Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

(No subject)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Oh nothing surprises me anymore but I have learned to drink heavily to

block out all the nasty feelings I have about the cult freaks.

kisses

Tom Boy

At 06:01 AM 16/12/01 +0000, you wrote:

Believe it or not there was this

guy who used to come to meetings

with a dictionary from the 30's. He claimed it was necessary in

order to interpret correctly the AA writings of that time.

Pat

> > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a

copy

> > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11

sheet.

> > > >

> > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford

groups.

> > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and

Eve,

> > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is

" proof " of

> > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > >

> > >[snip]

> > >

> > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA

members

> > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's

" spiritual, not

> > >religious " and that it's universal rather than

Christian. A

> > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about

the

> > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact

at

> > >all.

> > >

> > > H.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>====================================================================

> >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic

be

alcohol

> >or

> >morphine or idealism.

> >

> >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

psychology

> >

> >

>

>_________________________________________________________________

> >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

>

>http://www.hotmail.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Scientology perhaps?

kisses

Boy

At 06:16 AM 16/12/01 +0000, you wrote:

i wonder what word in that

dictionary would have best decribed a

" universal creative intelligence of whom we are all it's

children "

> > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it

to a

copy

> > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x

11 sheet.

> > > > >

> > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford

groups.

> > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam

and

Eve,

> > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is

" proof " of

> > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > >

> > > >[snip]

> > > >

> > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA

members

> > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's

" spiritual, not

> > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than

Christian. A

> > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain

about

the

> > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact

at

> > > >all.

> > > >

> > > > H.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >===============================================

=====================

> > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the

narcotic be

> alcohol

> > >or

> > >morphine or idealism.

> > >

> > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist,

founded

> psychology

> > >

> > >

> > >

__________________________________________________

_______________

> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN

Hotmail.

> >

>http://www.hotmail.com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Scientology perhaps?

kisses

Boy

At 06:16 AM 16/12/01 +0000, you wrote:

i wonder what word in that

dictionary would have best decribed a

" universal creative intelligence of whom we are all it's

children "

> > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it

to a

copy

> > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x

11 sheet.

> > > > >

> > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford

groups.

> > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam

and

Eve,

> > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is

" proof " of

> > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > >

> > > >[snip]

> > > >

> > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA

members

> > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's

" spiritual, not

> > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than

Christian. A

> > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain

about

the

> > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact

at

> > > >all.

> > > >

> > > > H.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >===============================================

=====================

> > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the

narcotic be

> alcohol

> > >or

> > >morphine or idealism.

> > >

> > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist,

founded

> psychology

> > >

> > >

> > >

__________________________________________________

_______________

> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN

Hotmail.

> >

>http://www.hotmail.com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

thats a good anwser, partial credit to you.

its a qoute from BB of wilson describing a higher power to which

we are to turn are wills over to. i suspect in a 1930's dictionary

the most appropriate entry to describe such a thing is " god " .

-- In 12-step-free@y..., Tomboy wrote:

> Scientology perhaps?

>

> kisses

> Boy

>

>

> At 06:16 AM 16/12/01 +0000, you wrote:

> >i wonder what word in that dictionary would have best

decribed a

> > " universal creative intelligence of whom we are all it's

children "

> >

> >

> >

> > > > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a

> >copy

> > > > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11

sheet.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam

and

> >Eve,

> > > > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >[snip]

> > > > > >

> > > > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA

> >members

> > > > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual,

not

> > > > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian.

A

> > > > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain

about

> >the

> > > > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact

at

> > > > > >all.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > H.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >=============================================

==

> >=====================

> > > > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the

> >narcotic be

> > > alcohol

> > > > >or

> > > > >morphine or idealism.

> > > > >

> > > > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist,

> >founded

> > > psychology

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> >

__________________________________________________

> >_______________

> > > > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN

Hotmail.

> > > > >http://www.hotmail.com

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

thats a good anwser, partial credit to you.

its a qoute from BB of wilson describing a higher power to which

we are to turn are wills over to. i suspect in a 1930's dictionary

the most appropriate entry to describe such a thing is " god " .

-- In 12-step-free@y..., Tomboy wrote:

> Scientology perhaps?

>

> kisses

> Boy

>

>

> At 06:16 AM 16/12/01 +0000, you wrote:

> >i wonder what word in that dictionary would have best

decribed a

> > " universal creative intelligence of whom we are all it's

children "

> >

> >

> >

> > > > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a

> >copy

> > > > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11

sheet.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam

and

> >Eve,

> > > > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >[snip]

> > > > > >

> > > > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA

> >members

> > > > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual,

not

> > > > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian.

A

> > > > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain

about

> >the

> > > > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact

at

> > > > > >all.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > H.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >=============================================

==

> >=====================

> > > > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the

> >narcotic be

> > > alcohol

> > > > >or

> > > > >morphine or idealism.

> > > > >

> > > > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist,

> >founded

> > > psychology

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> >

__________________________________________________

> >_______________

> > > > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN

Hotmail.

> > > > >http://www.hotmail.com

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Pat

LMAO!! Did he drive to meetings in a car with a rumble seat? Har har

har har!

Tom

> Believe it or not there was this guy who used to come to meetings

> with a dictionary from the 30's. He claimed it was necessary in

> order to interpret correctly the AA writings of that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Abbadun

I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

patsy.

Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

Take care, Abbadun.

Regards,

Tom

> > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > >

> > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > >

> > >[snip]

> > >

> > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > >all.

> > >

> > > H.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>====================================================================

> >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

alcohol

> >or

> >morphine or idealism.

> >

> >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

psychology

> >

> >

> >_________________________________________________________________

> >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> >http://www.hotmail.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Abbadun

I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

patsy.

Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

Take care, Abbadun.

Regards,

Tom

> > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > >

> > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > >

> > >[snip]

> > >

> > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > >all.

> > >

> > > H.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>====================================================================

> >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

alcohol

> >or

> >morphine or idealism.

> >

> >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

psychology

> >

> >

> >_________________________________________________________________

> >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> >http://www.hotmail.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Abbadun

I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

patsy.

Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

Take care, Abbadun.

Regards,

Tom

> > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > >

> > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > >

> > >[snip]

> > >

> > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > >all.

> > >

> > > H.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>====================================================================

> >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

alcohol

> >or

> >morphine or idealism.

> >

> >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

psychology

> >

> >

> >_________________________________________________________________

> >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> >http://www.hotmail.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Tom

I do not know, maybe it is the " bad boy " in me. While I am still using AA I

enjoy getting people to explain what they know is wrong. For the members I

think of as goners, I do not even bother.

abbadun

>

>Reply-To: 12-step-free

>To: 12-step-free

>Subject: Re: (no subject)

>Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:02:57 -0000

>

>Hi Abbadun

>

>I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

>debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

>

>Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

> had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

>others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

>differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

>program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

>twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

>

>It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

>who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

>only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

>and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

>his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

>constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

>for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

>

>Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

>message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

>if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

>all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

>some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

>fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

>patsy.

>

>Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

>anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

>

>Take care, Abbadun.

>

>Regards,

>

> Tom

>

>

>

> > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > > >

> > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > >

> > > >[snip]

> > > >

> > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > > >all.

> > > >

> > > > H.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >====================================================================

> > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

>alcohol

> > >or

> > >morphine or idealism.

> > >

> > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

>psychology

> > >

> > >

> > >_________________________________________________________________

> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> > >http://www.hotmail.com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Tom

I do not know, maybe it is the " bad boy " in me. While I am still using AA I

enjoy getting people to explain what they know is wrong. For the members I

think of as goners, I do not even bother.

abbadun

>

>Reply-To: 12-step-free

>To: 12-step-free

>Subject: Re: (no subject)

>Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:02:57 -0000

>

>Hi Abbadun

>

>I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

>debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

>

>Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

> had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

>others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

>differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

>program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

>twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

>

>It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

>who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

>only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

>and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

>his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

>constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

>for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

>

>Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

>message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

>if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

>all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

>some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

>fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

>patsy.

>

>Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

>anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

>

>Take care, Abbadun.

>

>Regards,

>

> Tom

>

>

>

> > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > > >

> > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > >

> > > >[snip]

> > > >

> > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > > >all.

> > > >

> > > > H.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >====================================================================

> > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

>alcohol

> > >or

> > >morphine or idealism.

> > >

> > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

>psychology

> > >

> > >

> > >_________________________________________________________________

> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> > >http://www.hotmail.com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi Tom

I do not know, maybe it is the " bad boy " in me. While I am still using AA I

enjoy getting people to explain what they know is wrong. For the members I

think of as goners, I do not even bother.

abbadun

>

>Reply-To: 12-step-free

>To: 12-step-free

>Subject: Re: (no subject)

>Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:02:57 -0000

>

>Hi Abbadun

>

>I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

>debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

>

>Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

> had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

>others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

>differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

>program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

>twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

>

>It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

>who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

>only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

>and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

>his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

>constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

>for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

>

>Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

>message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

>if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

>all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

>some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

>fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

>patsy.

>

>Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

>anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

>

>Take care, Abbadun.

>

>Regards,

>

> Tom

>

>

>

> > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > > >

> > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > >

> > > >[snip]

> > > >

> > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > > >all.

> > > >

> > > > H.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >====================================================================

> > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

>alcohol

> > >or

> > >morphine or idealism.

> > >

> > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

>psychology

> > >

> > >

> > >_________________________________________________________________

> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> > >http://www.hotmail.com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

" Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :) "

No, no. Do NOT apologize. I haven't laughed that hard in a while. After

reading your post, I feel better now too.

Re: (no subject)

> Hi Abbadun

>

> I have never understood why you persist in engaging 12 steppers in

> debate. If this makes or keeps you well, then I'm happy for you.

>

> Myself, I find such activity less than useless. It is clear that Bill

> had ZERO respect for the opinions or religious beliefs of

> others, and paid lip service to the " rights " of others to believe

> differently only because he was, at heart, a con man with a snake oil

> program to sell. And sell he did, becoming wealthy and, in his own

> twisted little mind, powerful in the process.

>

> It should be clear by now that his cultist followers, at least those

> who " get " the Program, believe as Bill did: that their way is the

> only way, that they are going to give it to us by hook or by crook,

> and if we don't " get it " , then we are going to be screwed over by

> his " Loving God " in a way that only the Almighty can screw over the

> constitutionally incapable wretches who refuse to accept what's good

> for them when it is shoved down their powerless undeserving throats.

>

> Oh, and as far as that lip service bullshit about carrying the

> message to others goes, they really don't give a rat's ass about us

> if we are not prepared to bend over and accept their superiority in

> all things moral. Like the chapter on " Working with Others " says, if

> some pathetic alcoholic slob just can't or won't take the bait,

> fuck 'em if they can't take a joke, just move on and find some other

> patsy.

>

> Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-up

> anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :)

>

> Take care, Abbadun.

>

> Regards,

>

> Tom

>

>

>

> > > > >Wanna drive AA's nuts?: Print this up and take it to a copy

> > > > >shop. You can fit this four times on one 8-1/2x 11 sheet.

> > > > >

> > > > > " AA is based on the bible from the oxford groups.

> > > > >There is no more evidence, no more proof of Adam and Eve,

> > > > >garden of Eden or original sin than there is " proof " of

> > > > >Superman, Batman or Spiderman.

> > > >

> > > >[snip]

> > > >

> > > >I don't think this would work. Most committed AA members

> > > >seem to have convinced themselves that it's " spiritual, not

> > > >religious " and that it's universal rather than Christian. A

> > > >pamphlet like this would probably have to explain about the

> > > >Oxford Group and so forth in order to have any impact at

> > > >all.

> > > >

> > > > H.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >====================================================================

> > >Every form of addiction is bad, no matter whether the narcotic be

> alcohol

> > >or

> > >morphine or idealism.

> > >

> > >--- Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), Swiss psychiatrist, founded

> psychology

> > >

> > >

> > >_________________________________________________________________

> > >Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

> > >http://www.hotmail.com

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I remember reading - hearing? - somewhere that Bill W. did his writing

with a dictionary close to hand, one reason being that he didn't want

the same word to appear tweice on any page (discounting 'the', 'and',

'but', and so on, etc, presumably )

I have no idea whether or not this is true (and could not face the

thought of actually trying to find out......and why on earth does saying

that make the guilty feeling start nipping at my heels?) but wondered if

anyone else knew....

Also once heard the 12x12 described as " Bill W.'s ego trip " ..........at

that time I was rather as I have heard Tomboy describe - an ardent

program person - and I was seething with anger and indignation, and

said so......how dare this person say that, etc etc

etc...............shit.......

***************

Message: 20

Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 01:13:14 -0000

Subject: Re: (no subject)

A 30s dictionary would explain words in terms of other 30s words,

which in themselves will have changed meetings, so he would also have

to look up those words to see what they meant then..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> I remember reading - hearing? - somewhere that Bill W. did

his writing

> with a dictionary close to hand, one reason being that he didn't

want

> the same word to appear tweice on any page (discounting 'the',

'and',

> 'but', and so on, etc, presumably )

>

> I have no idea whether or not this is true (and could not face

the

> thought of actually trying to find out......and why on earth does

saying

> that make the guilty feeling start nipping at my heels?) but

wondered if

> anyone else knew....

I have heard something about this, too. The example I was

shown was in the steps. Step 5 - " wrongs, " step 6 - " defects of

carachter, " step 7- " shortcomings. " They all mean the same

thing, Bill used the different words to avoid sounding repetitive,

repititious, redundant, and monotonous. God, god, god, god ,god

knows it didn't work.

Devin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hello, my name is Drew. I have never been a member of a 12 step group, but my

mother was. I am 33 years

old. When my mother was in the group, she was constantly trying to indoctrinate

me in.(recruit me without

my awareness that I was being recruited) I guess this sounds pretty strange, but

one time she was talking

to me, and out of the blue, she snaps " You can't relate to others! " After that,

it was as if I just heard

her voice ringing in my head, saying " You can't relate to others! " More to the

point, I had more dificulty

relating to other, than ever before. I would feel angry, out of control. I would

get so angry, that I would

scare people away from me. I never had this problem before this confrontation at

27 years of age. I was

wondering if this sounded like anyone elses experience here?

Thank you,

Drew.

dmarcoot wrote:

> what set off bells for me was i met a guy who introduced himself

> as " hi, im an alcoholic and my name is john " because being an

> alcoholic was more pertinent to his identity than his name.

> i thougth that was a pretty twisted self image to hold, whcih amde me start

questioning more and more.

>

>

> > > > he also used a technique of persuasion where instead

> of

> > saying

> > > > " I " , he used " we " , which made it sound more

> approachable

> > and

> > > > less self centered. But this is also a deception on his

> part.

> > >

> > > This is an incredibly effective brainwashing technique

> when

> > used in

> > > meetings. When read out, it gives the impression that

> > everybody in

> > > the entire room, and everybody in every AA meeting, thinks

> > exactly

> > > the same way, and the poor sap newcomer doesnt realize

> that

> > probably

> > > well over half the ppl in the room are recent arrivals as

> > skeptical

> > > as he is, and a fair number dont even want to be there at

> all! In

> > OA

> > > they pass the damn book around so that everybody reads

> a bit

> > and

> > > hence gets drawn into saying things for themself.

> Frequently I

> > > refuse to read things and just pass the book on.

> > >

> > > P.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

he also used a technique of persuasion where instead of saying

" I " , he used " we " , which made it sound more approachable and

less self centered. But this is also a deception on his part.

> > I remember reading - hearing? - somewhere that Bill W. did

> his writing

> > with a dictionary close to hand, one reason being that he

didn't

> want

> > the same word to appear tweice on any page (discounting

'the',

> 'and',

> > 'but', and so on, etc, presumably )

> >

> > I have no idea whether or not this is true (and could not face

> the

> > thought of actually trying to find out......and why on earth does

> saying

> > that make the guilty feeling start nipping at my heels?) but

> wondered if

> > anyone else knew....

>

> I have heard something about this, too. The example I was

> shown was in the steps. Step 5 - " wrongs, " step 6 - " defects of

> carachter, " step 7- " shortcomings. " They all mean the same

> thing, Bill used the different words to avoid sounding repetitive,

> repititious, redundant, and monotonous. God, god, god, god

,god

> knows it didn't work.

>

> Devin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> I have heard something about this, too. The example I was

> shown was in the steps. Step 5 - " wrongs, " step 6 - " defects of

> carachter, " step 7- " shortcomings. " They all mean the same

> thing, Bill used the different words to avoid sounding repetitive,

> repititious, redundant, and monotonous. God, god, god, god ,god

> knows it didn't work.

>

> Devin

Bill reminds me of that L. Ron Hubbard - the fellow who

started the Scientology cult and wrote the " Dianetics " book. It is

pitiful that people still want to follow these snake-oil salesmen.

If Bill W. had lived in this era, he would have been a good candidate

for TV evangelism along with this ego, treatment of his wife, and the

various mistresses he is supposed to have had.

http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/aaornatwelvestepcults

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> " Egad. Sorry about all the profanity. Methinks I had a bit of pent-

up

> anger to unleash there. But I do feel better now! :) "

>

> No, no. Do NOT apologize. I haven't laughed that hard in a while.

After

> reading your post, I feel better now too.

>

At one meeting I used to attend (Rebos - Casselberry, Florida), there

was a sign on the wall that said, " Profanity is not spiritual. " Oh,

brother. I also had to laugh when a chairperson would say how " bad

words " were not to be used if certain members brought their small

children. Bringing a little kid to a meeting is not the most prudent

thing for a parent to do.

http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/aaornatwelvestepcults

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Bringing small children to a meeting? Ugh. Not only exposing them to the

cult influence, but listening to peoples drunkalogs, too - can't be good for

them.

-----Original Message-----

From: camouflage32790

I also had to laugh when a chairperson would say how " bad

words " were not to be used if certain members brought their small

children. Bringing a little kid to a meeting is not the most prudent

thing for a parent to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Many AA's dont like the 12&12 - partly because its so damn depressing

and extreme I suspect, and also some because they feel wrote

it to make himself more money. There's even an AA oddball of nearly

40 yrs standing who tries to claim that it isnt an AA book, and goes

to desperate and ridiculous lengths to try to prove it. This guy is

a kind of self-appointed political correctness policemen of views on

AA on the net. Talk about a sad case. He showed up on Tommy's list

recently trying to police there too.

P.

> Also once heard the 12x12 described as " Bill W.'s ego

trip " ..........at

> that time I was rather as I have heard Tomboy describe - an ardent

> program person - and I was seething with anger and indignation,

and

> said so......how dare this person say that, etc etc

> etc...............shit.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> I have heard something about this, too. The example I was

> shown was in the steps. Step 5 - " wrongs, " step 6 - " defects of

> carachter, " step 7- " shortcomings. " They all mean the same

> thing, Bill used the different words to avoid sounding repetitive,

> repititious, redundant, and monotonous. God, god, god, god ,god

> knows it didn't work.

Shows what a crap writer he was - a good writer does this

spontaneously, and is not afraid to re-use pivotal words when

necessary. Note how careful he was not to use the word he was really

talking about, SIN.

P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> he also used a technique of persuasion where instead of saying

> " I " , he used " we " , which made it sound more approachable and

> less self centered. But this is also a deception on his part.

This is an incredibly effective brainwashing technique when used in

meetings. When read out, it gives the impression that everybody in

the entire room, and everybody in every AA meeting, thinks exactly

the same way, and the poor sap newcomer doesnt realize that probably

well over half the ppl in the room are recent arrivals as skeptical

as he is, and a fair number dont even want to be there at all! In OA

they pass the damn book around so that everybody reads a bit and

hence gets drawn into saying things for themself. Frequently I

refuse to read things and just pass the book on.

P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I have always been horrified when parents have brought their little kids

to meetings. No matter how indoctrinated I was into Satans clutch, I

always realised that exposing young children to AA set them up for a life

of " addiction " and " alcoholism " . Children learn what

they see.

It has always been a real sore spot with me.

kisses

Buoy

At 10:47 AM 17/12/01 +0000, you wrote:

Bringing a little kid to a

meeting is not the most prudent

thing for a parent to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> I have always been horrified when parents have brought their little

kids to

> meetings. No matter how indoctrinated I was into Satans clutch, I

always

> realised that exposing young children to AA set them up for a life

of

> " addiction " and " alcoholism " . Children learn what they see.

> It has always been a real sore spot with me.

And of course, more and more kids are being coerced into going to AA

or NA on progressively more and more ludicrous pretexts, such as

drinking or smoking pot on a handful of occasions. Apparently just

being President of a college Greek fraternity was enough at one

place. Good grief.

P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...