Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 what I heard was the Paramedic that was arrested basically refused to sign the ticket till the Supervisor should up, becuase he was performing pt care at the time, the other two medics on scene signed the citation. The PD garbed his arm and he jerked away, then PD preceeded to take him down to the ground for resisting arrest ... after that I didn't hear the rest of the story becuase I was dispatched to another call. roumors or not this is what said... drake --- Jack Pitcock wrote: > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > By > <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b6d35 > fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn > Baytown Sun > > > > Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago > > A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested > for disorderly conduct > after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. > > La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and > resisted arrest when > Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the > city without a permit, > but the owner of Baystar claims police used > excessive force in unnecessarily > arresting the medic. > > Baystar owner said the medic, > iel Jung, refused to sign > the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has > officially been charged > with resisting arrest. > > " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by > his side and the officer > came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and > took him down. " > > Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte > city ordinance passed last > year that requires private ambulance operators to > attain a city permit. > > La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are > required to ensure private > ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper > equipment and understand > emergency policies in the city. > > Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. > > " It's my understanding they made a couple of > contacts with our inspectors to > start the process but they never followed through, " > Nolen said. > > Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed > until the city began a new > permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. > > said the ambulance was responding to a call > from a La Porte resident > who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified > La Porte EMS and was > cleared to respond to the call, said. > > " He was just there to help the patient and that's > all, " said. " There > was nothing for them to take him down. " > > But La Porte police say Jung became combative and > used abusive language and > stood in the road after Baystar was issued the > citation. > > " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " > said La Porte police > Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling > him to settle down. He > wasn't interested in arresting him but all the > cussing and screaming in > front of all those people is not necessary. " > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 what I heard was the Paramedic that was arrested basically refused to sign the ticket till the Supervisor should up, becuase he was performing pt care at the time, the other two medics on scene signed the citation. The PD garbed his arm and he jerked away, then PD preceeded to take him down to the ground for resisting arrest ... after that I didn't hear the rest of the story becuase I was dispatched to another call. roumors or not this is what said... drake --- Jack Pitcock wrote: > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > By > <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b6d35 > fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn > Baytown Sun > > > > Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago > > A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested > for disorderly conduct > after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. > > La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and > resisted arrest when > Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the > city without a permit, > but the owner of Baystar claims police used > excessive force in unnecessarily > arresting the medic. > > Baystar owner said the medic, > iel Jung, refused to sign > the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has > officially been charged > with resisting arrest. > > " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by > his side and the officer > came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and > took him down. " > > Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte > city ordinance passed last > year that requires private ambulance operators to > attain a city permit. > > La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are > required to ensure private > ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper > equipment and understand > emergency policies in the city. > > Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. > > " It's my understanding they made a couple of > contacts with our inspectors to > start the process but they never followed through, " > Nolen said. > > Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed > until the city began a new > permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. > > said the ambulance was responding to a call > from a La Porte resident > who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified > La Porte EMS and was > cleared to respond to the call, said. > > " He was just there to help the patient and that's > all, " said. " There > was nothing for them to take him down. " > > But La Porte police say Jung became combative and > used abusive language and > stood in the road after Baystar was issued the > citation. > > " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " > said La Porte police > Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling > him to settle down. He > wasn't interested in arresting him but all the > cussing and screaming in > front of all those people is not necessary. " > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 what I heard was the Paramedic that was arrested basically refused to sign the ticket till the Supervisor should up, becuase he was performing pt care at the time, the other two medics on scene signed the citation. The PD garbed his arm and he jerked away, then PD preceeded to take him down to the ground for resisting arrest ... after that I didn't hear the rest of the story becuase I was dispatched to another call. roumors or not this is what said... drake --- Jack Pitcock wrote: > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > By > <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b6d35 > fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn > Baytown Sun > > > > Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago > > A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested > for disorderly conduct > after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. > > La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and > resisted arrest when > Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the > city without a permit, > but the owner of Baystar claims police used > excessive force in unnecessarily > arresting the medic. > > Baystar owner said the medic, > iel Jung, refused to sign > the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has > officially been charged > with resisting arrest. > > " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by > his side and the officer > came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and > took him down. " > > Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte > city ordinance passed last > year that requires private ambulance operators to > attain a city permit. > > La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are > required to ensure private > ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper > equipment and understand > emergency policies in the city. > > Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. > > " It's my understanding they made a couple of > contacts with our inspectors to > start the process but they never followed through, " > Nolen said. > > Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed > until the city began a new > permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. > > said the ambulance was responding to a call > from a La Porte resident > who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified > La Porte EMS and was > cleared to respond to the call, said. > > " He was just there to help the patient and that's > all, " said. " There > was nothing for them to take him down. " > > But La Porte police say Jung became combative and > used abusive language and > stood in the road after Baystar was issued the > citation. > > " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " > said La Porte police > Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling > him to settle down. He > wasn't interested in arresting him but all the > cussing and screaming in > front of all those people is not necessary. " > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte By <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b6d35 fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn Baytown Sun Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly conduct after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest when Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a permit, but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in unnecessarily arresting the medic. Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to sign the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been charged with resisting arrest. " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the officer came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed last year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our inspectors to start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a new permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte resident who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was cleared to respond to the call, said. " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. " There was nothing for them to take him down. " But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language and stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in front of all those people is not necessary. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte By <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b6d35 fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn Baytown Sun Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly conduct after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest when Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a permit, but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in unnecessarily arresting the medic. Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to sign the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been charged with resisting arrest. " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the officer came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed last year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our inspectors to start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a new permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte resident who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was cleared to respond to the call, said. " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. " There was nothing for them to take him down. " But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language and stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in front of all those people is not necessary. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 You mean a medic being arrested for responding to a call for help from a citizen and being hassled while providing treatment. At least that's how the story reads to me. I would remember that for a long time and ask why the cops were interfering with a medic doing what they are called to do. It seems the issue needed to be taken up with the management of the EMS outfit in question than with the street medics. That might be what is remembered by the folks of that neighborhood. I would not have signed that citation either. If I'm dispatched to a location, then I would assume that is someplace I'm supposed to be, and I too would refer the cops to my supervisor and continue to treat whomever called on us. Of course many of the cops I know would take offense at their orders being ignored. The medic in the story might have handled things better, but I thing the officers might have done the same. If I were a citizen there, I would be asking some hard questions of city officials. Crosby EMT-B ________________________________ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of THEDUDMAN@... Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:28 AM To: Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte By <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b 6d35 fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn Baytown Sun Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly conduct after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest when Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a permit, but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in unnecessarily arresting the medic. Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to sign the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been charged with resisting arrest. " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the officer came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed last year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our inspectors to start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a new permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte resident who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was cleared to respond to the call, said. " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. " There was nothing for them to take him down. " But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language and stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in front of all those people is not necessary. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 You mean a medic being arrested for responding to a call for help from a citizen and being hassled while providing treatment. At least that's how the story reads to me. I would remember that for a long time and ask why the cops were interfering with a medic doing what they are called to do. It seems the issue needed to be taken up with the management of the EMS outfit in question than with the street medics. That might be what is remembered by the folks of that neighborhood. I would not have signed that citation either. If I'm dispatched to a location, then I would assume that is someplace I'm supposed to be, and I too would refer the cops to my supervisor and continue to treat whomever called on us. Of course many of the cops I know would take offense at their orders being ignored. The medic in the story might have handled things better, but I thing the officers might have done the same. If I were a citizen there, I would be asking some hard questions of city officials. Crosby EMT-B ________________________________ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of THEDUDMAN@... Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:28 AM To: Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte By <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b 6d35 fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn Baytown Sun Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly conduct after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest when Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a permit, but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in unnecessarily arresting the medic. Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to sign the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been charged with resisting arrest. " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the officer came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed last year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our inspectors to start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a new permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte resident who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was cleared to respond to the call, said. " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. " There was nothing for them to take him down. " But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language and stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in front of all those people is not necessary. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 You mean a medic being arrested for responding to a call for help from a citizen and being hassled while providing treatment. At least that's how the story reads to me. I would remember that for a long time and ask why the cops were interfering with a medic doing what they are called to do. It seems the issue needed to be taken up with the management of the EMS outfit in question than with the street medics. That might be what is remembered by the folks of that neighborhood. I would not have signed that citation either. If I'm dispatched to a location, then I would assume that is someplace I'm supposed to be, and I too would refer the cops to my supervisor and continue to treat whomever called on us. Of course many of the cops I know would take offense at their orders being ignored. The medic in the story might have handled things better, but I thing the officers might have done the same. If I were a citizen there, I would be asking some hard questions of city officials. Crosby EMT-B ________________________________ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of THEDUDMAN@... Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:28 AM To: Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte By <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b 6d35 fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn Baytown Sun Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly conduct after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest when Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a permit, but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in unnecessarily arresting the medic. Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to sign the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been charged with resisting arrest. " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the officer came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed last year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our inspectors to start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a new permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte resident who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was cleared to respond to the call, said. " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. " There was nothing for them to take him down. " But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language and stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in front of all those people is not necessary. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/28/2005 10:21:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, jrpitcock@... writes: La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. My first question is for the legal beagle types. Can a City in Texas do this? I know that it was tried in NJ and DE for a time and was deemed illegal in those states as EMS services were state regulated but that in PA and MA they do it all the time (mostly in the large cities) but the difference being that NJ and DE are States and both PA and MA are Commonwealths so their laws are much different in structure. So in that vein can a city in Texas create such a " required permit " for an already state licensed EMS service? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/28/2005 10:21:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, jrpitcock@... writes: La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. My first question is for the legal beagle types. Can a City in Texas do this? I know that it was tried in NJ and DE for a time and was deemed illegal in those states as EMS services were state regulated but that in PA and MA they do it all the time (mostly in the large cities) but the difference being that NJ and DE are States and both PA and MA are Commonwealths so their laws are much different in structure. So in that vein can a city in Texas create such a " required permit " for an already state licensed EMS service? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/28/2005 10:21:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, jrpitcock@... writes: La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure private ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and understand emergency policies in the city. My first question is for the legal beagle types. Can a City in Texas do this? I know that it was tried in NJ and DE for a time and was deemed illegal in those states as EMS services were state regulated but that in PA and MA they do it all the time (mostly in the large cities) but the difference being that NJ and DE are States and both PA and MA are Commonwealths so their laws are much different in structure. So in that vein can a city in Texas create such a " required permit " for an already state licensed EMS service? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 12:32:04 A.M. Central Standard Time, THEDUDMAN@... writes: Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Dudley you make a good point there. You'd think we could resolve something like this a bit more privately as opposed to publicly. No good here not for the public the provider or even the LE agency or city. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 12:32:04 A.M. Central Standard Time, THEDUDMAN@... writes: Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Dudley you make a good point there. You'd think we could resolve something like this a bit more privately as opposed to publicly. No good here not for the public the provider or even the LE agency or city. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 12:32:04 A.M. Central Standard Time, THEDUDMAN@... writes: Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these neighborhoods. Ouch. Dudley Dudley you make a good point there. You'd think we could resolve something like this a bit more privately as opposed to publicly. No good here not for the public the provider or even the LE agency or city. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/28/2005 10:41:39 P.M. Central Standard Time, drakedunivan@... writes: what I heard was the Paramedic that was arrested basically refused to sign the ticket till the Supervisor should up, Next legal question. If I refuse to sign said ticket what would be the " normal " course of action for the LEO? Is refusing to sign what I'm seeing here is a ticket for an offence by definition " resisting " ? To me as both a street level EMS provider and as a Supervisor I can see the actions of the street medic as appropriate and not unreasonable (assuming the Supervisor is en route) but my view is shaded. That and by the end of the week we will hear 20 versions if not 50. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 10:26:56 A.M. Central Standard Time, rxmd911@... writes: I think that the family should be sueing the City, the police officer and the police department. This officer sounds like he just wanted to make a point. Someone should beat the hell out of that officer, because the officer handled the situation in the wrong way. Wayne you're placing a lot of faith on the media report aren't you? This incident has to have what something like 5 or more parties involved let alone witnesses, the LE officer, the medic, the partner, the patient and since the article said family was present at least one member of the family and that's the minimum. I doubt the media interviewed them all and if they did I would hope that the cop, medic and partner were smart enough not to comment to the media. Everyone is so fast to sue these days. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 10:26:56 A.M. Central Standard Time, rxmd911@... writes: I think that the family should be sueing the City, the police officer and the police department. This officer sounds like he just wanted to make a point. Someone should beat the hell out of that officer, because the officer handled the situation in the wrong way. Wayne you're placing a lot of faith on the media report aren't you? This incident has to have what something like 5 or more parties involved let alone witnesses, the LE officer, the medic, the partner, the patient and since the article said family was present at least one member of the family and that's the minimum. I doubt the media interviewed them all and if they did I would hope that the cop, medic and partner were smart enough not to comment to the media. Everyone is so fast to sue these days. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 10:26:56 A.M. Central Standard Time, rxmd911@... writes: I think that the family should be sueing the City, the police officer and the police department. This officer sounds like he just wanted to make a point. Someone should beat the hell out of that officer, because the officer handled the situation in the wrong way. Wayne you're placing a lot of faith on the media report aren't you? This incident has to have what something like 5 or more parties involved let alone witnesses, the LE officer, the medic, the partner, the patient and since the article said family was present at least one member of the family and that's the minimum. I doubt the media interviewed them all and if they did I would hope that the cop, medic and partner were smart enough not to comment to the media. Everyone is so fast to sue these days. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 11:02:53 A.M. Central Standard Time, manemtp@... writes: Lou, MANY Cities in Texas have what they call Certificates of Necessity, or permits...very common. So ANY city can do it or are the size limitations etc. In NJ and De we did away with them (same name BTW) both at the city and state level in the 1990's might have even been the 80's? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 In a message dated 12/29/2005 11:02:53 A.M. Central Standard Time, manemtp@... writes: Lou, MANY Cities in Texas have what they call Certificates of Necessity, or permits...very common. So ANY city can do it or are the size limitations etc. In NJ and De we did away with them (same name BTW) both at the city and state level in the 1990's might have even been the 80's? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI LNMolino@... (Office) (Office Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 Same in Beaumont. $25.00 a year. Andy In a message dated 12/29/2005 8:44:30 A.M. Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: Heck, here in Austin, transfer services have to apply to Austin EMS for permission to operate within the city limits. -Wes -----Original Message----- To: Sent: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:13:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte In her infinitely motherly wisdom, my mother always said there were three sides to every story, mine, yours, and what really happened. The media is not known for reporting ALL the facts, only the ones that make interesting reading. Curious how this one will turn out. How many cities actually require services to get permits to operate inside their limits still? I can think of a couple. Corpus Christi still, or at least did not long ago, make the medics themselves get a permit to operate inside the city limits. 10.00 per year. Hatfield FF/EMT-P > > > the citation. The PD garbed his arm and he jerked > > away, then PD preceeded to take him down to the ground > > for resisting arrest ... after that I didn't hear the > > rest of the story becuase I was dispatched to another > > call. > > Case law requires an actual & quot;act in furtherance of & quot; to get > resisting. > Maybe they actually charged him with interference with official > duties? > > Mike > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Article health wellness > Center for health and wellness > Health and wellness > Health and wellness program > Health wellness product > Health and wellness job > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > Visit your group " " on the web. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 Same in Beaumont. $25.00 a year. Andy In a message dated 12/29/2005 8:44:30 A.M. Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: Heck, here in Austin, transfer services have to apply to Austin EMS for permission to operate within the city limits. -Wes -----Original Message----- To: Sent: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:13:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte In her infinitely motherly wisdom, my mother always said there were three sides to every story, mine, yours, and what really happened. The media is not known for reporting ALL the facts, only the ones that make interesting reading. Curious how this one will turn out. How many cities actually require services to get permits to operate inside their limits still? I can think of a couple. Corpus Christi still, or at least did not long ago, make the medics themselves get a permit to operate inside the city limits. 10.00 per year. Hatfield FF/EMT-P > > > the citation. The PD garbed his arm and he jerked > > away, then PD preceeded to take him down to the ground > > for resisting arrest ... after that I didn't hear the > > rest of the story becuase I was dispatched to another > > call. > > Case law requires an actual & quot;act in furtherance of & quot; to get > resisting. > Maybe they actually charged him with interference with official > duties? > > Mike > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Article health wellness > Center for health and wellness > Health and wellness > Health and wellness program > Health wellness product > Health and wellness job > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > Visit your group " " on the web. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 Same in Beaumont. $25.00 a year. Andy In a message dated 12/29/2005 8:44:30 A.M. Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: Heck, here in Austin, transfer services have to apply to Austin EMS for permission to operate within the city limits. -Wes -----Original Message----- To: Sent: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:13:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte In her infinitely motherly wisdom, my mother always said there were three sides to every story, mine, yours, and what really happened. The media is not known for reporting ALL the facts, only the ones that make interesting reading. Curious how this one will turn out. How many cities actually require services to get permits to operate inside their limits still? I can think of a couple. Corpus Christi still, or at least did not long ago, make the medics themselves get a permit to operate inside the city limits. 10.00 per year. Hatfield FF/EMT-P > > > the citation. The PD garbed his arm and he jerked > > away, then PD preceeded to take him down to the ground > > for resisting arrest ... after that I didn't hear the > > rest of the story becuase I was dispatched to another > > call. > > Case law requires an actual & quot;act in furtherance of & quot; to get > resisting. > Maybe they actually charged him with interference with official > duties? > > Mike > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Article health wellness > Center for health and wellness > Health and wellness > Health and wellness program > Health wellness product > Health and wellness job > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > Visit your group " " on the web. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 As one who plays both sides of the fence, I can understand what's going on in the provider's minds, and in the cops minds. Needless to say, enforcing permitting requirements against street medics seems pointless. Are the street medics the ones personally responsible for obtaining individual permits? If not, why not get their information and cite the company via mail? That's a legal option in Texas. OTOH, getting belligerent with a police officer who's probably been ordered to " make a point " with these " unpermitted medics " wasn't a happy choice, either. There's arguements around whether or not this involved patient care, but I have to wonder how out-of-town EMS organizations are supposed to know whether every city they possibly respond to requires a separate permit. Mike > You mean a medic being arrested for responding to a call for help from a > citizen and being hassled while providing treatment. At least that's > how the story reads to me. I would remember that for a long time and > ask why the cops were interfering with a medic doing what they are > called to do. It seems the issue needed to be taken up with the > management of the EMS outfit in question than with the street medics. > That might be what is remembered by the folks of that neighborhood. I > would not have signed that citation either. If I'm dispatched to a > location, then I would assume that is someplace I'm supposed to be, and > I too would refer the cops to my supervisor and continue to treat > whomever called on us. Of course many of the cops I know would take > offense at their orders being ignored. The medic in the story might > have handled things better, but I thing the officers might have done the > same. If I were a citizen there, I would be asking some hard questions > of city officials. > > > > Crosby > > EMT-B > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of THEDUDMAN@... > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:28 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > > Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what > is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the > wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these > neighborhoods. Ouch. > > Dudley > > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > By > <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b > 6d35 > fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn > Baytown Sun > > > > Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago > > A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly > conduct > after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. > > La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest > when > Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a > permit, > but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in > unnecessarily > arresting the medic. > > Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to > sign > the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been > charged > with resisting arrest. > > " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the > officer > came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " > > Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed > last > year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. > > La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure > private > ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and > understand > emergency policies in the city. > > Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. > > " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our > inspectors to > start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. > > Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a > new > permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. > > said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte > resident > who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was > cleared to respond to the call, said. > > " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. > " There > was nothing for them to take him down. " > > But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language > and > stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. > > " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police > Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He > wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in > front of all those people is not necessary. " > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2005 Report Share Posted December 29, 2005 As one who plays both sides of the fence, I can understand what's going on in the provider's minds, and in the cops minds. Needless to say, enforcing permitting requirements against street medics seems pointless. Are the street medics the ones personally responsible for obtaining individual permits? If not, why not get their information and cite the company via mail? That's a legal option in Texas. OTOH, getting belligerent with a police officer who's probably been ordered to " make a point " with these " unpermitted medics " wasn't a happy choice, either. There's arguements around whether or not this involved patient care, but I have to wonder how out-of-town EMS organizations are supposed to know whether every city they possibly respond to requires a separate permit. Mike > You mean a medic being arrested for responding to a call for help from a > citizen and being hassled while providing treatment. At least that's > how the story reads to me. I would remember that for a long time and > ask why the cops were interfering with a medic doing what they are > called to do. It seems the issue needed to be taken up with the > management of the EMS outfit in question than with the street medics. > That might be what is remembered by the folks of that neighborhood. I > would not have signed that citation either. If I'm dispatched to a > location, then I would assume that is someplace I'm supposed to be, and > I too would refer the cops to my supervisor and continue to treat > whomever called on us. Of course many of the cops I know would take > offense at their orders being ignored. The medic in the story might > have handled things better, but I thing the officers might have done the > same. If I were a citizen there, I would be asking some hard questions > of city officials. > > > > Crosby > > EMT-B > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of THEDUDMAN@... > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:28 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > > Lovely. One step forward, three steps back. Doesn't really matter what > is truth and what isn't...it will take a lot of time to heal from the > wounds this one article inflicts on our profession...in these > neighborhoods. Ouch. > > Dudley > > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > Baystar medic arrested at scene in La Porte > > > By > <http://www.baytownsun.com/contact.lasso?ewcd=e1294085d816e50d038c7ada0b > 6d35 > fbf41ee6bc07dda007d0b813fdd15363e1> Austin Kinghorn > Baytown Sun > > > > Published December 29, 2005 - Updated 25 minutes ago > > A medic with Baytown-based Baystar EMS was arrested for disorderly > conduct > after responding to a call in La Porte on Wednesday. > > La Porte police say the medic became belligerent and resisted arrest > when > Baystar was issued a citation for operating in the city without a > permit, > but the owner of Baystar claims police used excessive force in > unnecessarily > arresting the medic. > > Baystar owner said the medic, iel Jung, refused to > sign > the citation until his supervisor arrived. Jung has officially been > charged > with resisting arrest. > > " He never resisted, " said. " He had hands by his side and the > officer > came up and grabbed him in the back of the neck and took him down. " > > Baystar was receiving a citation under a La Porte city ordinance passed > last > year that requires private ambulance operators to attain a city permit. > > La Porte EMS chief Ray Nolen said the permits are required to ensure > private > ambulance medics are properly trained, have proper equipment and > understand > emergency policies in the city. > > Nolen said Baystar has never received a permit. > > " It's my understanding they made a couple of contacts with our > inspectors to > start the process but they never followed through, " Nolen said. > > Enforcement of the new ordinance had been relaxed until the city began a > new > permit cycle on Oct. 1, Nolen said. > > said the ambulance was responding to a call from a La Porte > resident > who was having trouble breathing. Baystar notified La Porte EMS and was > cleared to respond to the call, said. > > " He was just there to help the patient and that's all, " said. > " There > was nothing for them to take him down. " > > But La Porte police say Jung became combative and used abusive language > and > stood in the road after Baystar was issued the citation. > > " On the radio traffic you could hear him swearing, " said La Porte police > Chief Reff. " The officer was just telling him to settle down. He > wasn't interested in arresting him but all the cussing and screaming in > front of all those people is not necessary. " > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.