Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

tetanus

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I found this in some old archives I have from e-mails. I found it

interesting. It was written by a doctor keep in mind.

><<Subject: Re: Tetanus immune globulin

>

><<< What I'm asking is if you could compare what you know about both

and some

>of the reasoning behind your personal decision that the vaccine is much

>safer.>>>

>

><<<But what types of things do you think the alcohol fractionation

process

>misses in the plasma donated by what you consider less-than-desirable

donors?

>>>>

>

>The risk of serious reactions to tetanus vaccine is exceedingly rare

(although

>I have personally witnessed/treated an anaphylactic response to tetanus

toxoid

>-- see my previous post on this). The risk of adverse reaction

increases with

>each additional vaccination/booster given. It is quite common to have

local

>discomfort, and perhaps even swelling and some redness, after a

vaccination.

>It is possible, but much less common, to have

>general " creepy " symptoms for a day or two, even up to a week in rare

cases.

>But serious reactions with or without long-term sequelae are far lower

for

>tetanus toxoid than for any other vaccine. The effectiveness of the

vaccine

>is also the highest of all commercially-available vaccines.

>

>The organism that causes tetanus (Clostridium tetani) is widely

distributed in

>soil almost everywhere, especially in climates with abundant rain.

Although

>the common myth is that " stepping on a rusty nail " is the source of

infection,

>actually any puncture wound, however minor, can carry the offending

organism

>into the body. The organism can only grow in the absence of oxygen, so

some

>type of puncture wound or other relatively deep, narrow

>wound is typical. Many ordinary wounds fall into this category,

however, the

>most common being in people who encounter an unexpected thorn while

>gardening..... although the wound itself may seem quite trivial, the

>possibility of C. tetani infection is very real.

>

>Most physicians have never seen a case of tetanus, and are unlikely to

even

>include it in an initial differential diagnosis when evaluating a

patient with

>appropriate symptoms. The offending wound may have been so minor that

the

>patient will not recall it, even in the most detailed of medical

histories.

>So it is not reasonable to assume that the need for TIG in an

unvaccinated

>person will be recognized at an appropriate time, because the illness

>may not be diagnosed at all. The question of availability of

non-expired TIG

>is another valid issue.

>

>The alcohol-fractionation method is highly effective against HIV (which

is

>actually a fairly fragile virus), but the research that I have read has

left

>me with many doubts regarding its effectiveness against Hepatitis B and

>Hepatitis C. Hep B, especially, is an incredibly durable virus.... it

can

>survive and remain infectious at room temperatue on a hard surface for

at

>least a week, even after the surface being washed down with

>alcohol!! (This is why my children are all immunized against Hep B)

It can

>also survive extremes in temperature.

>

>The solvent-detergent method is better, but still not 100%.

Solvent-detergent

>plus heat-treating, followed by alcohol-fractionation appears to be

very, very

>safe, but this sequence of treatments is quite expensive, and not FDA

>required. Alpha Therapeutic Corporation does both solvent-detergent

and heat-

>treatment procedures -- I don't know for sure about other

manufacturers. But

>God forbid you should be in need of TIG and be at a small community

>hospital and their TIG is from a company that you don't know anything

about!

>

>Food for thought.....

>

>Dr. Mari

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I have a question for Lana. You said you would consider getting Cody

vaccinated against tetanus when he is older (5-6). Do you live in a

high-risk area, such as a farm? Or do you believe the tetanus vaccine

would be beneficial regardless? We don't live on a farm, but perhaps I

should be considering this shot for our daughters. What's everyone's

opinion on this?

Kate

At 06:02 AM 9/6/98 -0400, you wrote:

>From: Mark & Lana Clifton <mclifton@...>

>

>Janet wrote:

>Anyway, we haven't continued vaccinating except against tetanus. I'm

>not sure that's even a good idea any more, but we live on a farm and we

>thought there might be a big risk of tetanus.

>

>Although I am not pro-vaccine, I agree that the tetanus may be the safer in

>the long run, in your situation. The tetanus vaccine is (supposedly) the

>less-riskier of them all. Although it STILL contains formaldahyde with a

>number of other toxins, it has proven to have far less reactions than the

>others.

>

>Tetanus lives in the manuer of cows, which deposits into the soil, that can

>live in the soil for many, many years. If it comes into contact with an

>open wound on the leg or foot, it is possible to be infected with

>tetanus...which does not have a high recovery rate.

>

>I have read that proper hygeine and cleaning of the wounds can prevent

>infection, but you can't always expect children to come running home

>whenever they get a boo-boo.

>

>

>I have also considered getting tetanus for our son. Not now, or for the

>next few years...but prolly when our son gets to be around 5-6--about the

>time when he starts to play on his own.

>

>Janet wrote:

>They say a serious reaction is rare. I have rare children. And I'd

>like to KEEP them. :o)

>

>me too :-)

>

>Lana

>mama of Cody Ukiah

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi again,

Well tetanus is the only one we really considered. though I'm still very

unsure about it. I had this is an old e-mail:

From 1990 through 1995 there have been an average of 49.6 cases of

tetanus per year in the United States. Compared to total population,

that means approximately 1 in 5,198,200 people contract tetnaus.

There is a 20% mortality rate for tetanus if properly treated. That

means that approx 1 in 25,000,000 people will die of tetanus in any

given year. About 1800 people per year are struck by lightning and

there is a 25% morality rate for this event. 1 in 143,240 are struck

by lightning and 1 in 573,000 die. This is a lot of numbers BUT:

You are 44 times more likely to die from lightning than from tetanus.

I have also read what Lana had to say about it living in the manuer of cows

but I also read conflicting reports to that so this one is hard, who do

you believe?. There are only an average of 2 people here a year that get

tetanus(2 million people live in my province) and most doctor will NEVER

see a case. We also live in a big city.

I'm still unsure and would love to hear other views!

I have a question for Lana. You said you would consider getting Cody

vaccinated against tetanus when he is older (5-6). Do you live in a

high-risk area, such as a farm? Or do you believe the tetanus vaccine

would be beneficial regardless? We don't live on a farm, but perhaps I

should be considering this shot for our daughters. What's everyone's

opinion on this?

Kate

At 06:02 AM 9/6/98 -0400, you wrote:

>From: Mark & Lana Clifton <mclifton@...>

>

>Janet wrote:

>Anyway, we haven't continued vaccinating except against tetanus. I'm

>not sure that's even a good idea any more, but we live on a farm and we

>thought there might be a big risk of tetanus.

>

>Although I am not pro-vaccine, I agree that the tetanus may be the safer

in

>the long run, in your situation. The tetanus vaccine is (supposedly) the

>less-riskier of them all. Although it STILL contains formaldahyde with a

>number of other toxins, it has proven to have far less reactions than the

>others.

>

>Tetanus lives in the manuer of cows, which deposits into the soil, that

can

>live in the soil for many, many years. If it comes into contact with an

>open wound on the leg or foot, it is possible to be infected with

>tetanus...which does not have a high recovery rate.

>

>I have read that proper hygeine and cleaning of the wounds can prevent

>infection, but you can't always expect children to come running home

>whenever they get a boo-boo.

>

>

>I have also considered getting tetanus for our son. Not now, or for the

>next few years...but prolly when our son gets to be around 5-6--about the

>time when he starts to play on his own.

>

>Janet wrote:

>They say a serious reaction is rare. I have rare children. And I'd

>like to KEEP them. :o)

>

>me too :-)

>

>Lana

>mama of Cody Ukiah

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi . From reading that, it would seem silly to vaccinate against

tetanus. But I guess you have to consider the author's words: " proper

treatment " . How long does it take for the tetanus to really take hold? Do

you need immediate attention? Cuz that would be hard to do if your child

was cut while out playing away from home. And also, in the last article

you sent re tetanus, that doctor claimed that people get infected without

even realizing they sustained a wound. AAARRGH!!!!! Why can't anything be

simple and worry-free?

To go back to an earlier question, is anyone else worried about a polio

threat due to " post polio syndrome " ?

At 08:59 PM 9/5/98 -0600, you wrote:

>From: Mom2Q <Mom2Q@...>

>

>

>Hi again,

>

>

>Well tetanus is the only one we really considered. though I'm still very

>unsure about it. I had this is an old e-mail:

>

>>From 1990 through 1995 there have been an average of 49.6 cases of

>tetanus per year in the United States. Compared to total population,

>that means approximately 1 in 5,198,200 people contract tetnaus.

>There is a 20% mortality rate for tetanus if properly treated. That

>means that approx 1 in 25,000,000 people will die of tetanus in any

>given year. About 1800 people per year are struck by lightning and

>there is a 25% morality rate for this event. 1 in 143,240 are struck

>by lightning and 1 in 573,000 die. This is a lot of numbers BUT:

>

>You are 44 times more likely to die from lightning than from tetanus.

>

>I have also read what Lana had to say about it living in the manuer of cows

> but I also read conflicting reports to that so this one is hard, who do

>you believe?. There are only an average of 2 people here a year that get

>tetanus(2 million people live in my province) and most doctor will NEVER

>see a case. We also live in a big city.

>

>I'm still unsure and would love to hear other views!

>

>

>

>

>I have a question for Lana. You said you would consider getting Cody

>vaccinated against tetanus when he is older (5-6). Do you live in a

>high-risk area, such as a farm? Or do you believe the tetanus vaccine

>would be beneficial regardless? We don't live on a farm, but perhaps I

>should be considering this shot for our daughters. What's everyone's

>opinion on this?

>

>Kate

>

>

>At 06:02 AM 9/6/98 -0400, you wrote:

>>From: Mark & Lana Clifton <mclifton@...>

>>

>>Janet wrote:

>>Anyway, we haven't continued vaccinating except against tetanus. I'm

>>not sure that's even a good idea any more, but we live on a farm and we

>>thought there might be a big risk of tetanus.

>>

>>Although I am not pro-vaccine, I agree that the tetanus may be the safer

>in

>>the long run, in your situation. The tetanus vaccine is (supposedly) the

>>less-riskier of them all. Although it STILL contains formaldahyde with a

>>number of other toxins, it has proven to have far less reactions than the

>>others.

>>

>>Tetanus lives in the manuer of cows, which deposits into the soil, that

>can

>>live in the soil for many, many years. If it comes into contact with an

>>open wound on the leg or foot, it is possible to be infected with

>>tetanus...which does not have a high recovery rate.

>>

>>I have read that proper hygeine and cleaning of the wounds can prevent

>>infection, but you can't always expect children to come running home

>>whenever they get a boo-boo.

>>

>>

>>I have also considered getting tetanus for our son. Not now, or for the

>>next few years...but prolly when our son gets to be around 5-6--about the

>>time when he starts to play on his own.

>>

>>Janet wrote:

>>They say a serious reaction is rare. I have rare children. And I'd

>>like to KEEP them. :o)

>>

>>me too :-)

>>

>>Lana

>>mama of Cody Ukiah

>>

>>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Well, I don't have to worry about cow manure on our little farm. :o)

But there is manure from everything else, though how likely it is we'll

be getting it into cuts is another question. Goat manure is

considerably different from cows', and nobody goes into the fields

without their shoes. Then again, it is a most excellent fertilizer in

the garden.

The one and only case of tetanus I've ever heard of was a couple three

years back up in Pennsylvania. One of the Mennonite families had a

child who fell into a rose bush while playing or something, and got a

thorn in his little nose. He got tetanus, and if I remember right, did

not live through it.

When my daughter was two, she was bitten severely by a dog. The damage

was pretty extensive, and on one side of her head, her ear was torn

away, and barely attached. The doctors were very negative about it.

Since she was completely unvaccinated, they would not stitch the ear

back to her head. They said to do so would practically guarantee

tetanus. They also said that the ear healing was doubtful..that it was

one of the hardest areas to heal up. They gave her some kind of tetanus

globulin (?) and they gave her major penicilin to take (after a big shot

of it), and taped her ear to her head. After two days I took her back,

as the tape prevented air getting to the wound, and the flesh began to

literally rot. (Even though I cleaned every reachable area of it several

times a day.) They removed the tapes - infection had set in. They

doubted she would keep her ear.

I had to take her to the doctor every two days for several weeks. All

that they did was continue to check her ear for infection.

She healed beautifully. Once the tapes were gone, I was able to keep it

clean. Air was able to get to it and it improved immediately. Her

ear looks like anyone else's just about now, even though there were

large chunks torn out and gaps. They were sure plastic surgery would

have to be done, but that hasn't had to happen. There is no way it

would have healed this nicely, perfectly , if they had sewn it up.

I give the credit to God. The whole church was praying for her. :o)

Janet W.

--

The beginnings of our homestead, homeschool, and home business resource

page! What else would you like to see placed on it?

http://spitfire.cwv.net/~clover

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

All the statistics just seem to confuse me further....from the mothering

vaccination book, it quoted a death rate of 4-10 out of the 42 cases

reported in 1992---thats almost 50%...which gives reason to be of concern.

I live outside of a large city, Atlanta; in hopes of moving out towards

greener pastures....although it seems to me that tetanus is very, very,

rare (at least in the past 20 years) why isn't it more common if it can

live in the soil for a long time??..you would think many, many people would

contract tetanus

.......food for thought.

Lana

mama of Cody

At 08:59 PM 9/5/98 -0600, you wrote:

>From: Mom2Q <Mom2Q@...>

>

>

>Hi again,

>

>

>Well tetanus is the only one we really considered. though I'm still very

>unsure about it. I had this is an old e-mail:

>

>>From 1990 through 1995 there have been an average of 49.6 cases of

>tetanus per year in the United States. Compared to total population,

>that means approximately 1 in 5,198,200 people contract tetnaus.

>There is a 20% mortality rate for tetanus if properly treated. That

>means that approx 1 in 25,000,000 people will die of tetanus in any

>given year. About 1800 people per year are struck by lightning and

>there is a 25% morality rate for this event. 1 in 143,240 are struck

>by lightning and 1 in 573,000 die. This is a lot of numbers BUT:

>

>You are 44 times more likely to die from lightning than from tetanus.

>

>I have also read what Lana had to say about it living in the manuer of cows

> but I also read conflicting reports to that so this one is hard, who do

>you believe?. There are only an average of 2 people here a year that get

>tetanus(2 million people live in my province) and most doctor will NEVER

>see a case. We also live in a big city.

>

>I'm still unsure and would love to hear other views!

>

>

>

>

>I have a question for Lana. You said you would consider getting Cody

>vaccinated against tetanus when he is older (5-6). Do you live in a

>high-risk area, such as a farm? Or do you believe the tetanus vaccine

>would be beneficial regardless? We don't live on a farm, but perhaps I

>should be considering this shot for our daughters. What's everyone's

>opinion on this?

>

>Kate

>

>

>At 06:02 AM 9/6/98 -0400, you wrote:

>>From: Mark & Lana Clifton <mclifton@...>

>>

>>Janet wrote:

>>Anyway, we haven't continued vaccinating except against tetanus. I'm

>>not sure that's even a good idea any more, but we live on a farm and we

>>thought there might be a big risk of tetanus.

>>

>>Although I am not pro-vaccine, I agree that the tetanus may be the safer

>in

>>the long run, in your situation. The tetanus vaccine is (supposedly) the

>>less-riskier of them all. Although it STILL contains formaldahyde with a

>>number of other toxins, it has proven to have far less reactions than the

>>others.

>>

>>Tetanus lives in the manuer of cows, which deposits into the soil, that

>can

>>live in the soil for many, many years. If it comes into contact with an

>>open wound on the leg or foot, it is possible to be infected with

>>tetanus...which does not have a high recovery rate.

>>

>>I have read that proper hygeine and cleaning of the wounds can prevent

>>infection, but you can't always expect children to come running home

>>whenever they get a boo-boo.

>>

>>

>>I have also considered getting tetanus for our son. Not now, or for the

>>next few years...but prolly when our son gets to be around 5-6--about the

>>time when he starts to play on his own.

>>

>>Janet wrote:

>>They say a serious reaction is rare. I have rare children. And I'd

>>like to KEEP them. :o)

>>

>>me too :-)

>>

>>Lana

>>mama of Cody Ukiah

>>

>>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

At 08:55 AM 9/8/98 -0600, you wrote:

>From: ssollinger@...

>

>Regarding tetanus: according to Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, the Amish, who clearly

>should be at the greatest risk of contracting tetanus, as they actually

>manually work in their fields, almost never get tetanus, even though they

are

>not vaccinated. I have no problem at all stating that getting vaccinated for

>tetanus is not necessary.

>

>You must have just read my mind!! I have been wondering how many of the

few reported cases of tetanus were actually unvaccinated. A part of my mind

can't help but question if the vaccine efficacy may have anything to do

with the rareity of this disease; considering majority is vaccinated. My dh

(darling husband) is really concerned about getting this for our son in the

next few years. Most of the research we have found states that tetanus can

be deposited in the soil from cow manuer and can live there for many, many

years. Our only concern with tetanus is for when our son gets old enough

to play on his own; and proper hygeine is the least of his worries.

Lana

mama of Cody Ukiah

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Great question!!

It looks like the tetanus shot for babies and for adults contain the same

amount(5Lf). Now to answer your question why?...I don't know. I'll do

some more research on this and let you know.

The Td is given to adults(reduced diphtheria):

Each dose (0.5 mL) contains: tetanus toxoid (5 Lf.), diphtheria toxoid (2

Lf.) and aluminum phosphate

1.5 mg. Thimerosal 0.01% is added as a preservative.

The DT is given to children:

Each 0.5 mL dose contains: diphtheria toxoid (25 Lf.) tetanus toxoid (5

Lf.) and aluminum phosphate 1.5 mg.

Thimerosal 0.01% is added as a preservative

P.S. The amounts of tetanus are the same in the DPT, DaPT and the DPTHib

shots too.

TETANUS

From: s <mkpeters@...>

A question: If a tetanus vaccine gives 10 years of protection, why do

babies have 4 shots before their 2nd birthday? Are they given only 1/4

doses?

Kate

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Ok this is the info I had but wanted to double check it:

You need to get the 3 shots (then the 4th a year

later) as a series in order to develop adequate antibodies/immunity. Then

every 10 years, beginning around age 11, you need a booster as your

immunity

starts to wane.

For inactive vaccines, like tetanus, the first dose usually does not

provide protection. This protection does not usually happen until the

second or third dosage. The fourth is basically for " insurance " . The

antibody titers will(decrease) " wane " after a few years and that is why a

booster is needed.

Hope that answers your question!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Thanks for the info !

Kate

At 07:06 PM 10/2/98 -0600, Mom2Q wrote:

>From: Mom2Q <mom2q@...>

>

>

>Ok this is the info I had but wanted to double check it:

>

>You need to get the 3 shots (then the 4th a year

>later) as a series in order to develop adequate antibodies/immunity. Then

>every 10 years, beginning around age 11, you need a booster as your

>immunity

>starts to wane.

>For inactive vaccines, like tetanus, the first dose usually does not

>provide protection. This protection does not usually happen until the

>second or third dosage. The fourth is basically for " insurance " . The

>antibody titers will(decrease) " wane " after a few years and that is why a

>booster is needed.

>

>Hope that answers your question!

>

>

>

>

>

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

In a message dated 1/28/99 10:55:28 PM Pacific Standard Time, mom2q@...

writes:

<< Personally the only vaccine we even considered was tetanus for our

daughter,

even now we are still not going to do it. >>

Me too! And the good thing about this one is you can wait till you actually

need it. So, if steps on an old rusty nail ... we will give him a

tetanus shot ... but we are not gonna do it until we have to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

In a message dated 1/29/99 1:03:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, pdmej@...

writes:

<< We were giving him (unknowns to the Drs) a remedy for

tetanus, since they were so concerned that they may pass it on to him. The

National Vaccine Information Center and PROVE here in Texas were a great

source of information and comfort. I would suggest everyone subscribes the

NVIC, >>

What did you give him?

Do you have subscription info for NVIC?

PS. Thanks for the great info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Just to make things more confusing!!!! If your child steps on a rusty nail,

etc. and you take him in to get a tetanus shot, you would have to have

already received the recommended dosage for it to be effective. Otherwise,

you would want the tetanus immune globulin which is made from humans who

have been given the tetanus inoculations and the antibodies have been

separated. Therefore, I would make sure it has been screened very well

before accepting. I only know this because our 3yo has recently been in the

hospital for a staff infection and they wanted us to give him the tetanus

inoculation and immune globulin. Blah,blah,blah. We refused the tetanus

inoculation immediately because we have never had him immunized for tetanus.

After reading the manufacture's insert for the immune globulin that clearly

states that the immune globulin has never been tested for safety or efficacy

on pediatrics, (among other things that it stated that we didn't like) we

refused that one to. To say that the DR's were unhappy was an

understatement. We were giving him (unknowns to the Drs) a remedy for

tetanus, since they were so concerned that they may pass it on to him. The

National Vaccine Information Center and PROVE here in Texas were a great

source of information and comfort. I would suggest everyone subscribes the

NVIC, you never know when you will need information immediately or help to

stick to your guns. They responded within hours of our request. If anyone

wants any more info on Tetanus, let me know.

Re: tetanus

>From: CynNDirk@...

>

>In a message dated 1/28/99 10:55:28 PM Pacific Standard Time,

mom2q@...

>writes:

>

><< Personally the only vaccine we even considered was tetanus for our

>daughter,

> even now we are still not going to do it. >>

>

>Me too! And the good thing about this one is you can wait till you

actually

>need it. So, if steps on an old rusty nail ... we will give him

a

>tetanus shot ... but we are not gonna do it until we have to.

>

>

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

i would like more info on tetanus. That is one vaccine I havw been

considering. Any info you have on the seriousness of the disease and instances

of those not vaccinated getting it. Thanks- Gretchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi, Janet.

My gosh, what a horrible thing for you all to have gone through. I am so

glad that your daughter has recovered so well and plastic surgery is not

necessary.

As to your question why they don't just treat serious wounds (in those

unvaccinated against tetanus) with penicillin, and eliminating the TIG - I

think that penicillin alone would not do it. The TIG is providing

unvaccinated individuals with passive immunity (antibodies) to tetanus, and

the penicillin is added protection for fighting infection. If someone came

down with tetanus, it would require (based on my literature) drastic

treatment, including muscle relaxants, sedatives, antibiotics, immune

globulin and antitoxens, a low-stimulus environment and often feeding through

a stomach tube, possibly an artificial airway being required. It is

obviously not something anyone wants.

<< Since that time, I've read a little about the immunoglobin, and I find it

unsettling that it's a substance that could give a person various diseases,

like a blood transfusion could give someone hepatitis, etc..or at least that

is my understanding.

>>

Here's what " The Vaccine Guide " says about TIG (tetanus immune globulin,

human). " Tetanus immune globulin (human) has not been associated with

reactions. Since it is a product made from human serum, it may contain

infectious material, though this possibility is highly unlikely. All

globulin products are tested for contamination by known pathogens such as

hepatitis and HIV viruses. The alcohol fractionation process used in the

production of TIG is a further safeguard, since this processing destroys such

contaiminating microorganisms. "

It further says, under Vaccine Efficacy:

" The effectiveness of Tetanus Immune Globulin (TIG) in protecting previously

unvaccinated individuals at the time of injury is more difficult to document.

It is not possible to conduct controlled studies in humans. Judging the

efficacy of tetanus immune globulin in the prevention of tetanus must be

accomplished by measuring antibody responses after injection and by clinical

experience. TIG raises antibodies in previously non-immune individuals to

levels that indicate adequate protection from tetanus for at least 28 days

(McComb & Dwyer, 1963). In addition, the record of tetanus immune globulin

in the prevention of fatalities from tetanus is also extremely good.

Clinical experience with TIG has led to a high level of confidence in the

immune globulin's ability to prevent tetanus and death from tetanus when used

in adequate doses within the prescribed interval following injury. There

have been rare cases of fatalities in individuals who received tetanus immune

globulin soon after injury (, 1969), but it is generally assumed that

one dose of TIG will provide protection from tetanus when administered soon

after an injury. " (Please note that, while these references go back to the

60s, " The Vaccine Guide " was published in 1996 - it is current.)

To give the other side of the coin here, this is one vaccine on which this

author seems to be " middle of the road " . He says " I cannot recommend the

tetanus toxoid vaccine for most children because of the unknown risks from

long-term effects of the vaccine. However, if a child has a high likelihood

of exposure or is traveling to a foreign country where sanitation is poor and

the incidence of tetanus is higher than the US, then tetanus vaccine

administration should be seriously considered. " He goes on to say that a

child under the age of 2 is likely not at risk for tetanus.

Hope this helps.

Cathi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Marsha,

Would you like the manufacturers package inserts on tetanus and measles

vaccines? If so, I can forward them to you privately. Just let me know.

If you're new to researching vaccines, I would really suggests getting some

books suggested by others on this list. They are the best beginning as they are

more in depth.

Sebastiana

At 08:12 AM 7/28/99 -0700, you wrote:

>I would like to know what people think about vaccinating or not a

>preschool-aged child for Tetanus. I understand that the vaccine probably

>does not have life-long protection. What are the potential recorded

>side-effects of the vaccine and what are the risks and rate of the disease?

>

>As I said before, my son starts preschool this fall and I am becoming more

>concerned about the illnesses that he is likely to be exposed to -- I know

>Tetanus is not one but it is something he is potentially exposed to every

>day he walks barefoot or falls or whatever. I am also still considering the

>measles vaccine. What are the risks of the disease vs the risks of the

>vaccine? Are there balanced websites that can help answer my questions?

<snip>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I have done some research but none recently. I tend to forget much of what

I read soon after I read it! I would appreciate it if you would forward

those inserts to me. Marsha

> Re: Tetanus

>

>

> From: Sebastiana <pienaar@...>

>

> Marsha,

>

> Would you like the manufacturers package inserts on tetanus

> and measles vaccines? If so, I can forward them to you

> privately. Just let me know.

>

> If you're new to researching vaccines, I would really

> suggests getting some books suggested by others on this list.

> They are the best beginning as they are more in depth.

>

> Sebastiana

>

>

> At 08:12 AM 7/28/99 -0700, you wrote:

> >I would like to know what people think about vaccinating or not a

> >preschool-aged child for Tetanus. I understand that the

> vaccine probably

> >does not have life-long protection. What are the potential recorded

> >side-effects of the vaccine and what are the risks and rate

> of the disease?

> >

> >As I said before, my son starts preschool this fall and I am

> becoming more

> >concerned about the illnesses that he is likely to be

> exposed to -- I know

> >Tetanus is not one but it is something he is potentially

> exposed to every

> >day he walks barefoot or falls or whatever. I am also still

> considering the

> >measles vaccine. What are the risks of the disease vs the

> risks of the

> >vaccine? Are there balanced websites that can help answer

> my questions?

> <snip>

>

> ---------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

TETANUS AND POLIO VACCINES -SOME FACTS FOR PARENTS WHO ARE WORRIED ABOUT THESE

DISEASES by Viera Scheibner (Jan 1998)

Mrs J Woods letter in the Summer 1997 edition of The Informed Parent inspired me

to write this letter to the Editor of TIP. J Wood stopped any further

vaccinations when she realised that her fully vaccinated child developed a most

frightening episode of whooping cough and suffered chronic ill health for years

because of all those vaccines injected into his system.

Interestingly, the specialist confirmed to her that the child’s immune system

was not very strong, but the GP called her irresponsible when she decided not to

continue with any further vaccine injections (I would not worry very much about

a GP's advise since GP's in the UK labour under a major monetary conflict of

interest in vaccinating). She stood her ground, however, but is still worried

about diseases like tetanus and polio.

1. Tetanus is a very rare disease in developed countries: there are only about

12 cases of tetanus per year in Australia, and half of those who got it were

vaccinated. Perhaps the most interesting thing about tetanus is that those who

get it do not develop immunity to it. How does one get tetanus? Well, from deep

puncture wounds. In other words the pathogen (Clostridium tetani) is literally

injected into the body via the deep puncture wounds. Vaccine injection does the

same thing: it bypasses the normal portals of entry (the mouth and nose) and

delivers the pathogen and toxins straight into the blood stream which triggers

an unnatural, abnormal, deranged immune response called sensitisation.

Far from immunising, tetanus (and other) vaccine injections make the recipients

more susceptible to diseases. J. Wood clearly saw it in her child: chronic ill

health, recurrent coughs and colds for years. It is very likely, that the

obvious improvements of her child's health was achieved by him finally

developing whooping cough in its acute form. --any parents report either a

marked improvement or disappearance of 'asthma' after their vaccinated children

developed acute whooping cough. Medical research demonstrated that having

whooping cough prevents asthma. One must wonder how much of that 'asthma' is

just a chronic whooping cough as a result of the vaccinated child's immune

system being deranged by vaccination and not being able to mount a proper,

acute, immune response.

If this does not make sense, then perhaps something else will: the New England

Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus booster injections result in

the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells as seen in AIDS patients. A 'mysterious'

new syndrome emerged in the US: thousands of children are developing AIDS

symptoms (with deranged T4 and T8 cells) without being HIV positive My

well-considered opinion is that it comes from that T (standing for tetanus) in

the DPT vaccine.

2. Polio has been painted as some natural scourge of humanity. Yet, epidemics

and outbreaks of polio in Europe go back to only less than 100 years. The

1949-50 and later outbreaks of polio were demonstrably caused by intensified

diphtheria and whooping cough vaccination, tonsillectomies, other injections

(painkillers) and a variety of traumas. They invented a name for it: provocation

poliomyelitis. Even though this has not been discussed in literature, the

earliest outbreaks were no doubt triggered by intensified smallpox vaccination.

The evidence for this connection comes from Egyptian excavations: some mummies

had withered limbs; but of course, variolation (a crude form of smallpox

inoculation) has been practised thousands of years ago, and most particularly,

in Egypt.

When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on 1.8 million American

children, within a few days they had a huge epidemic of paralytic polio: in the

vaccinated, their parents and other contacts. They called it the Cutter incident

and claimed that some of the vaccines (produced by the Cutter Laboratories)

contained live polio virus. So, the company withdrew their vaccines despite

polio vaccines produced by other manufacturers also causing paralysis in this

outbreak.

The OP vaccines are officially causing paralysis, allegedly only 10-12 reported

cases per year in the USA. The word 'reported' is the key word here. With the

mass use of the polio vaccines and continuing occurence of polio in the

vaccinated, the necessity arose to redefine the disease polio. The classical

definition of polio is a disease with residual paralysis which resolves within 2

months (usually within days). The new definition of polio now is 'a disease with

residual paralysis persisting for more than 60 days.' This is the secret formula

of 'eradication' of polio. Children are still getting polio, but those cases

which resolve within 60 days (which represent some 90% of cases) are not

diagnosed as polio. A new disease emerged: viral meningitis and as the incidence

of polio plummeted, so did the incidence of viral meningitis sky rocketed.

The best (and perhaps most frightening) example of these " elegant administrative

moves " is how they allegedly eliminated polio in the Americas (meaning South

America). The Journal of Infectious Diseases published in 1991 the results of a

major vaccination drive between 1985 and 1989 to eliminate polio. Within 4

months they had a huge outbreak of paralytic polio (350 cases). They decided to

reformulate the vaccine. Now if this outbreak had occurred in the unvaccinated

they would not have had to reformulate the vaccine. The outbreak occured in the

vaccinated.

However, the outbreaks with ever increasing number of reported cases of 'flaccid

paralysis' in the vaccinated continued. So what did they do? They started

discarding most of the reported cases of flaccid paralysis. Out of 2094 reported

cases they only 'confirmed' 130, the rest (1964) were discarded. They published

a graph which shows ever increasing number of reported cases as shadowy columns

in the background and the ever decreasing numbers of confirmed cases as black

columns in the forefront. I praise them for publishing it this way: any

discerning and unbrainwashed reader can see very clearly what happened in the

Americas between 1985 - 1989: mass vaccination caused sustained outbreaks of

paralytic polio and they tried to camouflage it by discarding the vast majority

of cases. When they finally stopped the program in 1989, even the number of

reported cases (shown as those shadowy columns in the background) went down.

The same happened in other countries: huge epidemics of paralysis followed

mass-vaccination drives.

How many vaccines does the child need to be protected? Children are given ever

increasing numbers of 'boosters'. Why? This trend makes sense only when you

consider that all those outbreaks and epidemics of any 'vaccine preventable'

diseases occur in the vaccinated. The vaccines are ineffective.

A shortage of space does not allow me to elaborate more on this interesting

subject'

There is only one immunity: the natural immunity which is achieved by children

going through infectious diseases of childhood. They are here to prime and

mature the immune system of children and they represent developmental

milestones. Perhaps more on this subject in some of the next issues of TIP. Some

problems with infectious diseases are results of mismanagement: if a child with

severe measles is given antibiotics instead of vitamin A and C and its fever is

suppressed you are asking for trouble.

And last but not least: no matter how worried anybody is about diseases, one

should remember one important thing, namely that vaccines do not prevent

diseases, they make you sick.

www.whale.to/vaccines

Tetanus

I would like to know what people think about vaccinating or not a

preschool-aged child for Tetanus. I understand that the vaccine probably does

not have life-long protection. What are the potential recorded side-effects of

the vaccine and what are the risks and rate of the disease?

As I said before, my son starts preschool this fall and I am becoming more

concerned about the illnesses that he is likely to be exposed to -- I know

Tetanus is not one but it is something he is potentially exposed to every day he

walks barefoot or falls or whatever. I am also still considering the measles

vaccine. What are the risks of the disease vs the risks of the vaccine? Are

there balanced websites that can help answer my questions?

Also, are there requirements for travel to Europe?

I am not anti-vaccine, although my son has only had two Hib and none other.

I am pro-choice. Although I believe is pro-vaccine, I think his questions

make us think more about our decisions and the reasons for our decisions.

Hearing both sides is what informed choice is about.

Marsha, always searching, always questioning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I wrote up a " brief " , of sorts, on the diseases and their risks. This

is what I have on tetanus. Someone correct me if any of the info is

wrong.

Tetanus - the big one that most non-vacc parents consider the most.

Tetanus spores (a bacteria) are around us constantly, even in cities.

They're just found in large concentrations in the manure of farm

animals, thus is why country kids are more at risk of getting it. They

also cannot survive in an aerobic environment (ie scratch) so that's why

puncture wounds are the big thing about it, because they can't get any

air.

Well, improper wound cleaning has alot to do with it. And there are lots

of homeopathics to prevent tetanus - and there are only about 50 cases

reported a year (yet the vaccine wears off every 10 years and most

adults DON'T go in to get boosters) so it, too, must not be that

prevalent. If you are faced with the situation, you can always get the

immunoglobin while in the hospital being treated, though I personally

wouldn't risk this because it's made from human blood products, and who

knows what could be in them (like before we discovered HIV) (The actual

shot cannot be given at this time as a preventative, because you need a

series of them to build up immunity)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Tetanus

> Somebody asked about tetanus, it may have been on another list. I have a

question as well. I grew up beleiving that if you stepped on a nail or cut

yourself with something you had to go and get a tetanus shot. Why is this

shot necessary for puncture wounds, especially if you do not live on a farm.

Also, if my three year old were to cut himself on a piece of glass and he

needed a few stitches would it be necessary to have a tetanus shot, or is it

just something that relates to metal objects? Thanks for clarifying, Ali

May be something here http://www.whale.to/Vaccines/tetanus.html

> ---------------------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

http://www.whaleto.freeserve.co.uk/Vaccines/tetanus.html

tetanus

> Hello, I would like to know about Tetanus vaccine side effects. I know

that MMR

> is related to autism for example and I was wondering about Tetanus. My

son is 1

> year old and unvaccinated but I am considering this vaccine. I appreciate

any

> and all information. Thank you

> and

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.

> Remember the good 'ol days

> 1/4053/7/_/489317/_/958962579/

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

,

Thank God you did not, because I as a Mom I know the Dtap shot to well

Brittany had a severe reaction to it.and is a special needs child now.

Way to stand up to those doctors, good for you.

I have a two month year old named na and had to tell the doc no way, no

hep B.

Poor Brittany reacted to that one to. I learned real quick with her.

Sincerely,

a mother of Brittany

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

....I just wanted to say that your pediatrician seems really awesome!

That's great that she was willing to call around for you about a ped tetnus!

I wish more doctors were accomodating to parental belief and

authority....unlike the ER doctor you encountered!!!!

Debi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

How frustrating. I don't agree with you homeopath, even about Tetanus and

neither do all the homeopaths I know. And to routinely give Vaccinosis,

eeks. But anyway.

You wouldn't have been helped at that point by a tetanus shot anyway as you

have to have had it way before the injury. Plus that type of injury is not

typically where tetanus would do harm - basically deep puncture wounds

where there is no oxygen (although sometimes severe burns with lots of dead

tissue). By cleaning and letting it bleed, you are doing the best.

Tetanus Immune Globulin is what they use in a non-vaccinated person at the

time of injury which is a blood product. It is not a vaccine so the remedy

that was given doesn't relate at all. It sounds like its some sort of

remedy for vaccine damage.

But, I applaud you on doing the best that you could and you did VERY well

in that situation. Everyone needs to be prepared for the what ifs like

this. Prepare, rehearse, have it thought out so you aren't taken off guard.

I'll repost some of the tetanus articles I have for the newcomers.

Thanks for sharing that,

Sheri

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS

MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO

VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin

Bookstore - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/bookstor.htm

International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers

Education, Homeopathic Education

KVMR Broadcaster/Programmer/Investigative Reporter, Nevada City CA

CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

In a message dated 6/26/00 11:52:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

snakken@... writes:

<< Tetanus Immune Globulin is what they use in a non-vaccinated person at the

time of injury which is a blood product >>

RIght, I knew that. but the ER doc tried to tell me that it " helps " and he

should have the regular vaccine along with the BayTet. I really didn't feel

it was a risk, but it was a hard decision and the baytet seemed fairly safe,

so I went ahead and did it. It was a very hard decision.

I kno tet is more in puncture wounds...but it's hard to decide in that sort

of situation. Also, some people say that tet never happens and so forth, and

others act like you ill surely end up with it...it's hard to be a parent. :)

Sigh...

I feel it worked out fairly well.

I think part of the reason she gave me vaccinosis was because it had tet in

it?

Gotta go. Kids being wild!!!

www.diapers.bizland.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...