Rhogam

[Guest guest]

There's a blurb in EoH where it talks of a study done where there

was no association found between Rhogam and autism. The study done

by Judith Miles was presented at the American College of Medical

Genetics. It found no association. Of course, Kirby points

out that the study was funded by & (the maker of

Rhogam which used to contain thimerosal). Come on, now. Can we say

conflict of interest? Maybe the study is accurate but can we please

get another one done which isn't funded by the freakin' company

which is getting it's butt sued over the issue. What the hell!

I had 6 Rhogam shots in 6 years. I just pinched myself, I'm still

here... barely...

Sue M.

- In EOHarm , Fund <susan_fund@...> wrote:

>

> The Autism Research Institute may have some info on

> how many ASD kids have Rhogam Moms. There was a DAN

> conference about 2 or 3 years ago and one of the DAN

> presenters asked all of the Rhogam moms to stand up. I

> think 2/3 of the room stood. Soooooooo if only 10 of

> all motheres get Rhogam shots but 70% of ASD kids have

> rhogam moms. I guess rhogam in utero is not a good

> thing.

> susan

>

> --- Marty Landman <marty@...> wrote:

>

> > At 10:41 PM 5/12/2006, " Herman Fudenberg "

> > nitrf@... wrote:

> >

> > >is this her first pregnsancy? If so, she does not

> > need it.

> > >Is her husband Rh neG? (13% of population).IF SO,

> > SHE DOES NOT NEED IT.

> >

> > Speaking of rhogam and blood type, I remember one of

> > the questions my wife

> > and I were asked when our son began getting services

> > was whether my wife

> > was Rh negative. So this data has been collected but

> > has anyone out there

> > been able to get statistics on whether autism and

> > perhaps other disorders

> > are more common among Rh neg mothers??

> >

> > Marty

> >

> >

> > --

> > Mainstreaming Experiences & Strategies

> >

> MainstreamingDisabledKids/

> > Asperger's/High Functioning Autism Homeschooler's

> > discussion list

> >

> as-hfa-homeschool/

> >

> >

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

[Guest guest]

Generation Rescue has a blurb about this (Don't quote my numbers

exactly I don't have enough time right now to look it up) I do not

know the source. But it states that (roughly)10-15% of the

population has a negative blood type but that (roughly) 50% of

autistic kids have Rh- moms. Again, don't know source or exact

numbers. remeber this shot contained 62.5 micrograms of Hg until

2001 and is given at 28 weeks gestationally and right after

birth..goes into breastmilk. This is a HUGE Hg insult!

>

> >is this her first pregnsancy? If so, she does not need it.

> >Is her husband Rh neG? (13% of population).IF SO, SHE DOES NOT

NEED IT.

>

> Speaking of rhogam and blood type, I remember one of the questions

my wife

> and I were asked when our son began getting services was whether my

wife

> was Rh negative. So this data has been collected but has anyone out

there

> been able to get statistics on whether autism and perhaps other

disorders

> are more common among Rh neg mothers??

>

> Marty

>

>

> --

> Mainstreaming Experiences & Strategies

> MainstreamingDisabledKids/

> Asperger's/High Functioning Autism Homeschooler's discussion list

> as-hfa-homeschool/

>

[Guest guest]

for djberle

The Rhogam given in 2002 usually contained thimerol, because the pharmacies and docs wanted to use it up; throwing it away was like

throwing away money.

my data suggest that the incidence of autism in infants of Rh neg mothers

who received Rhogam was 8-9 fold the incidence of infants of Rh neg mothers

who did not receive Rhogam.

H. H.Fudenberg, M.D.,DDG.IOM

Inman, SC 29349

(864) 592 8076

Website nitrf.org

From: "djberle" <dberle@...>Reply-EOHarm To: EOHarm Subject: Re: RhoGamDate: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:50:21 -0000Generation Rescue has a blurb about this (Don't quote my numbers exactly I don't have enough time right now to look it up) I do not know the source. But it states that (roughly)10-15% of the population has a negative blood type but that (roughly) 50% of autistic kids have Rh- moms. Again, don't know source or exact numbers. remeber this shot contained 62.5 micrograms of Hg until 2001 and is given at 28 weeks gestationally and right after birth..goes into breastmilk. This is a HUGE Hg insult!> > >is this her first pregnsancy? If so, she does not need it.> >Is her husband Rh neG? (13% of population).IF SO, SHE DOES NOT NEED IT.> > Speaking of rhogam and blood type, I remember one of the questions my wife > and I were asked when our son began getting services was whether my wife > was Rh negative. So this data has been collected but has anyone out there > been able to get statistics on whether autism and perhaps other disorders > are more common among Rh neg mothers??> > Marty> > > -- > Mainstreaming Experiences & Strategies> MainstreamingDisabledKids/> Asperger's/High Functioning Autism Homeschooler's discussion list> as-hfa-homeschool/>

[Guest guest]

,

RhoGAM Facts:

1. When RhoGAM was Thimerosal-preserved

(possibly in date and used up to late

2003 in the US), RhoGam had a nominal

0.003 % (30 ppm) level of Thimerosal

(30 micrograms of Thimerosal per mL)

and NOT a 0.01% level of Thimerosal

(100 micrograms per mL).

2. The average volume of serum in each

RhoGAM syringe was 0.7 mL (0.6-0.9 mL).

3. Based on Point 2, the maximum nominal dose

of Thimerosal (max syringe volume and max

overage of preservative) from a Thimerosal-

preserved RhoGAM shot was " 33+ micrograms "

of Thimerosal or about 16.5 micrograms of

mercury and, on average, the Thimerosal

dose was 21 micrograms or 10.5 microgram

of mercury.

SEE: http://www.fda.gov/cber/blood/mercplasma.htm

It does not serve anyone's interests to INFLATE

the amount of mercury in a RhoGAM shot by a factor

of about 2 or more!

Hopefully, the preceding, which has been posted

before, will set the record straight regarding

RhoGAM exposure from a single dose.

BayRho Facts:

1. When BayRho was Thimerosal-preserved

(possibly in date and available for use

up to late 1998 in the US), BayRho had

a 0.01 % (100 ppm) level of Thimerosal

(100 micrograms of Thimerosal per mL).

2. The average volume of serum in each RhoGAM

syringe was also 0.7 mL (0.6 - 0.9 mL).

3. Based on Point 2, the maximum nominal dose

of Thimerosal (max syringe volume and max

overage of preservative) from a Thimerosal-

preserved BayRho shot was " 112+ micrograms "

of Thimerosal or 56 micrograms of mercury

and, on average, the Thimerosal dose was 70

micrograms or 35 microgram of mercury.

In addition, there is another product, licensed

in 1996, WinRho SD, that is freeze-dried and

contained " NO " Thimerosal.

Most women in the US received RhoGam, a few

BayRho, and a smaller number, WinRho SD.

Rh-Negativity Prevalence & Approximate %

of Autism Cases In Rh-Negative Mothers:

Boyd Haley's estimate is 9 to 10 % of the

pregnant women are Rh negative and these

were the mothers of about 42% of the

" autism " cases he tracked.

According to another physician who is in

the process of auditing the records of

his practice over the last two+ decades,

about 8.6 % of his patients were Rh negative

and these accounted for about 26 % of the

" autism " patients that he saw.

These numbers should be considered as single-

point estimates because:

1. There are no published national up-to-date

US numbers,

2. The numbers depend on the racial backgrounds

of the populations studied, and

3. The government has not tracked either the

number of autism cases or the RH status,

vaccination history, amalgam-filling load,

blood mercury level, breastfeeding duration,

weight, and diet of those mothers whose

children are subsequently diagnosed with

" autism " (or, for that matter, any other

neurodevelopmental disorder or disease

(e.g., asthma, allergy, type 2 diabetes, MS,

or, in the elderly, dementias including

Alzheimer's disease), which has had a sharp

incidence increase since the late 1980s.

Fetal and Post-Partum Mercury Exposures

From RhoGam Injected Mothers

Factually:

1. Based on studies of nursing Iraqi

mothers who were exposed to mercury-

based fungicides in the bread they

first ate AFTER giving birth, the

level of mercury in their breast

milk was 1/100-th the level in their

blood.

2. Animal studies indicate that the

placenta absorbs and concentrates

the mercury in the blood leading

to the reality that the dose absorbed

from the dose administered in RhoGAM

is transferred to the fetus before

birth. [The absorbed mercury from

amalgam fillings, dietary sources, and

post-natal vaccines administered to

the mother are the principal sources

of mercury in the breast milk.]

Hopefully, this information is will help all

understand the current state of the " facts "

about Rh, Rho products, and the form of

mercury-based or mercury-triggered neuro-

developmental disorders diagnosed as

DSM " REGRESSIVE autism " .

Respectfully,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

PS: FOOD FOR THOUGHT:

For those who are skeptics of the role of

mercury from Thimerosal and other sources,

please consider that in those mercury-

poisoned with Calomel-laced teething powders

and worming preparations (claimed to be safe

but, like Thimerosal-containing drugs, with

NO PROOF of Safety) in the 1900s, not only

did " Pink Disease " disappear after the

withdrawal of these products from the market

(in late 1930s and 1940s), but " stomach

cancer " also went from being a major percent

of the cancers diagnosed in the 1950s, 1960s

and 1970s to being a RARE cancer today --

Calomel is practically insoluble in water

(2 micrograms per mL [1.7 ppm mercury] at 25

degrees C) but it is more soluble in stomach

acid where it disproportionates into mercuric

chloride (which is much more soluble in

stomach acid [>1 g per 10 mL of stomach acid]

driving the decomposition reaction towards

completion) and metallic mercury.

Also, in the mercury poisoning CAUSED by

administering Calomel-laced medicines was

commonly called " Pink Disease " because those

affected had pink cheeks, and the palms of

their hands and soles of their were dusty

pink feet.

In the mercury poisoning CAUSED by injecting

babies with Thimerosal-preserved vaccines,

the kids often have bright pink ears,

precocious puberty caused by the elevation

of their testosterone levels, elevated

metalloporphrins in their urine, and digestive

system upsets traceable to mercury-poisoned

methylation pathways.

When the total maximun dose of Thimerosal

that children could receive decreased, the

rate of neurodevelopmental disorders just

" happened " to decrease and those who have

never been vaccinated RARELY (< 1 in

15,000) have been diagnosed with " autism "

and, in many cases, mercury poisoning from

other sources has been established in those

children who were not vaccinated but have

been diagnosed with autism (e.g., Amish

kids living downwind of a coal-fired power

plant and eating food produced on the farms

whose fields and water sources receive

mercury from the power plant's emissions).

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

At 20:50 5/13/06 -0000, djberle wrote:

>

>Generation Rescue has a blurb about this

>(Don't quote my numbers exactly I don't

>have enough time right now to look it up)

>I do not know the source. But it states

>that (roughly) 10-15% of the population

>has a negative blood type but that (roughly)

>50% of autistic kids have Rh- moms. Again,

>don't know source or exact numbers. remeber

>this shot contained 62.5 micrograms of Hg

>until 2001 and is given at 28 weeks

>estationally and right after birth..goes

>into breastmilk. This is a HUGE Hg insult!

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dr. King,

I repsectfully thank you for your input. This is new info to me.

this is the quote from GR's site regarding RhoGAM

a. Any Vaccines Received During Pregnancy. The most likely

vaccines mothers receive during pregnancy include the RhoGAM shot

(for women who are Rh-negative) and the flu shot. " RhoGAM Moms " are

approximately 15% of the general population but 49% of the population

of mothers of autistic children.

It is not named where those numbers came from. I will try to find

out where I got the 62.5 micrograms of Hg info. If I can find

that...you should contact " them " with your knowledge.

Gratefully,

> >

> >Generation Rescue has a blurb about this

> >(Don't quote my numbers exactly I don't

> >have enough time right now to look it up)

> >I do not know the source. But it states

> >that (roughly) 10-15% of the population

> >has a negative blood type but that (roughly)

> >50% of autistic kids have Rh- moms. Again,

> >don't know source or exact numbers. remeber

> >this shot contained 62.5 micrograms of Hg

> >until 2001 and is given at 28 weeks

> >estationally and right after birth..goes

> >into breastmilk. This is a HUGE Hg insult!

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

http://tinyurl.com/2hb3o Because mercury crosses the placental barrier, the study also examined maternal exposure to mercury via food, dental fillings, and the thimerosal-containing Rho D immunoglobulin injections typically given to Rh-negative women—16 percent of the population—during pregnancy. Prior to the mid-1980s, an Rh-negative woman was given this injection only after delivery to prevent complications that can occur if the baby is Rh-positive. But Rh-negative women now receive Rho D injections at 28 or 34 weeks, and any time there is a chance of a mother's blood mixing with the baby's—after undergoing amniocentesis, for instance. The study found that nearly half of the autistic children's mothers had received Rho D injections, compared with only 9 percent in the control group. In addition, 37 percent of mothers in the autistic group also had 10 or more fillings containing mercury, compared with only 18 percent in the control group. The authors suggest that the near absence of mercury in hair samples of autistic infants despite higher exposure indicates that TCVs could be the last straw for children whose ability to excrete mercury is impaired or who are near a dangerous threshold due to maternal exposure.

-----Original Message-----From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ]On Behalf Of djberleSent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 4:50 PMEOHarm Subject: Re: RhoGamGeneration Rescue has a blurb about this (Don't quote my numbers exactly I don't have enough time right now to look it up) I do not know the source. But it states that (roughly)10-15% of the population has a negative blood type but that (roughly) 50% of autistic kids have Rh- moms. Again, don't know source or exact numbers. remeber this shot contained 62.5 micrograms of Hg until 2001 and is given at 28 weeks gestationally and right after birth..goes into breastmilk. This is a HUGE Hg insult!> > >is this her first pregnsancy? If so, she does not need it.> >Is her husband Rh neG? (13% of population).IF SO, SHE DOES NOT NEED IT.> > Speaking of rhogam and blood type, I remember one of the questions my wife > and I were asked when our son began getting services was whether my wife > was Rh negative. So this data has been collected but has anyone out there > been able to get statistics on whether autism and perhaps other disorders > are more common among Rh neg mothers??> > Marty> > > -- > Mainstreaming Experiences & Strategies> MainstreamingDisabledKids/> Asperger's/High Functioning Autism Homeschooler's discussion list> as-hfa-homeschool/>

[Guest guest]

Hi

I was told that it actually varies. I had Louis in ham and best I can find out I had four jabs in the month pre delivery and that they have the highest dose in that area.( It was 13 years ago and of course no one can find my records) I then had Charlie in Sidcup where the dose was much lower and only given once. I was told that each Doctors/health authority apparently decides how many times you have this jab and at what dose.

I consequently refused this for Madeleine. The jab protects your next baby - not the one you are carrying- and although the Midwifes were supportive the health authority freaked out as apparently " women often say they don't want more children but then fall pregnant again when they change their minds" What a silly giddy forty-something I obviously seemed to be ! Offered to give them the 'no more kids' declaration in writing and they left me alone.

I have always thought that anti-D assault by ham hospital was one of Charlie biggest triggers - I must have been swimming in metal by the time I got pregnant with poor Char.

So I guess I am saying that from what I have been told you would have to find out specifically what dose you were given to owrk it out. I don't know if that is right - just what my Health Auth told me when I was questioning when pregnant with moo...

Regards

Deborah

[Guest guest]

Deborah,

For what

it is worth I went through much the same thing – as a rh- mum I was given 4

anti – d shots with my daughter because I kept having a bleed with her (no idea

how much mercury because the other factor is whether you get from the top of

the bottle or near the bottom, if they don’t shake between each take (as they

are supposed too but don’t from what I have been told) then the closer to the

bottom of the bottle the more mercury!) – had alex 22 mths later – and like you

in hindsight have wondered how much of this was still in my system when I fell

with him but another factor was he was the only child I was induced with over 2

days of contact with the gel – so not looking good there either! I seem to

recall in the mists of time that there was a question mark over the anti –d shots.

Regards

Nikki

Re:

Rhogam

Hi

I was told that it actually varies.

I had Louis in ham and best I can find out I had four jabs in the month

pre delivery and that they have the highest dose in that area.( It was 13 years

ago and of course no one can find my records) I then had Charlie in

Sidcup where the dose was much lower and only given once. I was told that each

Doctors/health authority apparently decides how many times you have this

jab and at what dose.

I consequently refused this for

Madeleine. The jab protects your next baby - not the one you are

carrying- and although the Midwifes were supportive the health authority

freaked out as apparently " women often say they don't want more children

but then fall pregnant again when they change their minds " What a

silly giddy forty-something I obviously seemed to be ! Offered to

give them the 'no more kids' declaration in writing and they left me alone.

I have always thought that anti-D assault

by ham hospital was one of Charlie biggest triggers - I must have been swimming

in metal by the time I got pregnant with poor Char.

So I guess I am saying that from what I

have been told you would have to find out specifically what dose you were given

to owrk it out. I don't know if that is right - just what my Health Auth told

me when I was questioning when pregnant with moo...

Regards

Deborah

--

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.1/344 - Release Date: 19/05/2006

--

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.1/344 - Release Date: 19/05/2006

[Guest guest]

At 06:38 PM 9/2/2006 -0000, you wrote:

> Hi, I am new to this list and I have a question about the Rhogam

>shot that is given to pregnant women who have a negative blood type

>(do not have the Rh factor) when it is possible their baby may be a

>positive blood type. This shot is given in order to prevent the

>mother's body from attacking the baby's if their blood was to mix in

>utero. Is there an alternative?

> I guess this isn't really a vaccination question, but it is an

>injection that probably contains similiar ingredients and I was

>wondering about the possible effects to the unborn baby as well as the

>mother. Thanks.

>

Rhogam during pregnancy is a BAD idea

I have a rhogam page

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/rhogam.htm

read carefully

Sheri

>

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

earthmysteriestours@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Reality of the Diseases & Treatment -

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

[Guest guest]

1990 - added to the protocol in 1983 but not officially adopted as a standard until 1990 - they wanted to make sure that word got to all doctors so that no one would commit malpractice by not administering.

On 9/11/06 7:33 PM, " McDonough " <kevntimmcd@...> wrote:

Does anyone know what year the ACOG added the 28 week gestation dose

of RhoGam to the protocol for Rh Negative women?

[Guest guest]

THanks...so what you're saying is that they didn't make

it " official " until '90 to protect the docs from civil action, right?

I find that ironic. Protect the doctors from med mal for NOT

administering something that was harmful to the fetus....I am

guessing that the odds of harm to the baby are the same or higher

from Thimerosal containing RhoGam than Rh incompatibility. But that

is just a guess.

With my second child, I had an amniocentesis and I reminded the

doctor to give me a RhoGam after the procedure. He had the wrong

blood type in my file. Fortunately, he is not ASD.

My first son was born with autism. My RhoGam was fully loaded, 80-

120 mcg. given at 26 weeks gestation. Got a second one after

delivery. WEnt home from the hospital and couldn't feel my hands.

Couldn't sleep, couldn't think straight, couldn't speak right. I

think I had Hg poisoning myself.

>

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Does anyone know what year the ACOG added the 28 week gestation

dose

> > of RhoGam to the protocol for Rh Negative women?

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Thimerosal is supposed to have been removed from RhoGam in 2001-2002,

but always double-check.

On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:45 PM, christine heeren wrote:

This question is forwarded from another group.  I thought if anyone

knows they would be on THIS list

Thanks,

 

Hi all,

My girlfriend is having an amnio next week and has to have a rhogam

shot.  She is worried about the mercury.  Does anyone know if there are

mercury free rhogam shots available or an alternative that does the

same thing?   

 

[Guest guest]

I am currently pregnant tell me what is wrong with Rhogam and Hep C is there

some contraindication? Just curious. I did not have to have it the last baby but

I am Hep C positive and pregnant. So you have my curiousity up.

Thanks,

RHOGAM

Are there any female members that were given RHOGAM when pregnant?

[Guest guest]

I am currently pregnant tell me what is wrong with Rhogam and Hep C is there

some contraindication? Just curious. I did not have to have it the last baby but

I am Hep C positive and pregnant. So you have my curiousity up.

Thanks,

RHOGAM

Are there any female members that were given RHOGAM when pregnant?

[Guest guest]

Rhogam is a blood product. I'm RH negative and had to have several

rhogam shots. I have four children. The blood products were not

tested for Hep C until after 1992. My last child was born in 1988. I

cannot find any other reason for my Hep C besides these Rhogam shots.

I would just make sure that the Rhogam used today is regulated better

if I were you.

>

> I am currently pregnant tell me what is wrong with Rhogam and Hep C

is there some contraindication? Just curious. I did not have to have

it the last baby but I am Hep C positive and pregnant. So you have my

curiousity up.

> Thanks,

>

> RHOGAM

>

>

> Are there any female members that were given RHOGAM when pregnant?

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Rhogam is a blood product. I'm RH negative and had to have several

rhogam shots. I have four children. The blood products were not

tested for Hep C until after 1992. My last child was born in 1988. I

cannot find any other reason for my Hep C besides these Rhogam shots.

I would just make sure that the Rhogam used today is regulated better

if I were you.

>

> I am currently pregnant tell me what is wrong with Rhogam and Hep C

is there some contraindication? Just curious. I did not have to have

it the last baby but I am Hep C positive and pregnant. So you have my

curiousity up.

> Thanks,

>

> RHOGAM

>

>

> Are there any female members that were given RHOGAM when pregnant?

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for sharing this

An article on this by Sara Wickham

http://www.withwoman.co.uk/contents/info/antid.html

For those who have just joined us, more at my webpages too

http://www.wellwithin1.com/rhogram.htm

Sheri

At 02:01 PM 4/12/2008, you wrote:

>Hi,

>

>I got a book from my midwife called " anti-D in Midwifery " by Sara

>Wickham. get it.

>

>Its all about Rh-

>

>I am also pregnant with my second, rh-, and my first was rh-. I have

>a 50/50 chance of having another rh- baby, because my husband is rh+.

>

>I am refusing rhogam during pregnancy (and probally after birth,

>even if the baby is positive) because rhogam cannot stop antibodies

>if i have them, it IS antibodies, it is the very thing I'm trying to

>avoid. if i got into a car accident and there was bleeding, then i

>would consider the shot, maybe.

>

>I am not finished reading the book, but the jist is this....

>Rho gam is not needed in an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery,

>blood mixing was a problem in the 70s and perhaps before because

>they were not letting the placenta detatch first and were yanking it out.

>

>Some countries don't even offer rhogam during pregnancy.

>

>90% of women who are rh- and have a rh+ baby do not need

>rhogam. This is from the only testing trials done in the 60s.

>

>I don't believe doctors understand how rhogam works, i asked sooooo

>many questions the first time, and didn't get any thing resembling

>the truth i have dig out of the internet, sheri's site and now this

>great book.....

>

>

>Diane

[Guest guest]

Ok, I am sorry if this is a dumb question but I have noticed and read alot of

the post and I do not even know what Rhogam is. As far as I know, I was never

tested nor was my hubby. I did have blood work in the beginning of my pregnancy

but that was it....

What is this, how do they determine if you or your baby has the + or - and what

are the risk of getting the shot verses not getting it.

Apparently, this book seems to have the information in it......

Thanks,

Beth

Rhogam

Hi,

I got a book from my midwife called " anti-D in Midwifery " by Sara Wickham. get

it.

Its all about Rh-

I am also pregnant with my second, rh-, and my first was rh-. I have a 50/50

chance of having another rh- baby, because my husband is rh+.

I am refusing rhogam during pregnancy (and probally after birth, even if the

baby is positive) because rhogam cannot stop antibodies if i have them, it IS

antibodies, it is the very thing I'm trying to avoid. if i got into a car

accident and there was bleeding, then i would consider the shot, maybe.

I am not finished reading the book, but the jist is this....

Rho gam is not needed in an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery, blood mixing

was a problem in the 70s and perhaps before because they were not letting the

placenta detatch first and were yanking it out.

Some countries don't even offer rhogam during pregnancy.

90% of women who are rh- and have a rh+ baby do not need rhogam. This is from

the only testing trials done in the 60s.

I don't believe doctors understand how rhogam works, i asked sooooo many

questions the first time, and didn't get any thing resembling the truth i have

dig out of the internet, sheri's site and now this great book.....

Diane

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __

[Guest guest]

If your doctors have never said anything to you about it then you must

have Rh+ blood. If you are + then it doesn't matter what your babies

are. If the mom is - though, then her body could potentially attack the

baby if it's +.

)0(~~~)0(~~~)0(

Mom to Brittany, born 08/31/93, dx'd IDDM 05/28/01; , born

06/28/97; Shayna, born 06/01/00; and Thalea, born 06/24/07.

Read my birth story here: http://www.jessicas-haven.com/baby.htm

Expecting a new little one before Yule :-)

Vaccine free since 1999.

[Guest guest]

Does anyone know anything about what is in Rhogam besidews the blood product? I

am concerned that there may be an adjuvant.

[Guest guest]

Does anyone know anything about what is in Rhogam besidews the blood product? I

am concerned that there may be an adjuvant.

[Guest guest]

At 07:18 PM 9/22/2009, you wrote:

>

>

>Does anyone know anything about what is in Rhogam besidews the blood

>product? I am concerned that there may be an adjuvant.

No adjuvant

There used to be mercury but I think most are mercury-free now

YOu may want to read my webpages on it

Most countries in the world DO NOT give during pregnancy

See http://www.wellwithin1.com/rhogam.htm

It is pooled blood

Sheri

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email

courses - next classes start September 30 & October 1

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm

[Guest guest]

At 07:18 PM 9/22/2009, you wrote:

>

>

>Does anyone know anything about what is in Rhogam besidews the blood

>product? I am concerned that there may be an adjuvant.

No adjuvant

There used to be mercury but I think most are mercury-free now

YOu may want to read my webpages on it

Most countries in the world DO NOT give during pregnancy

See http://www.wellwithin1.com/rhogam.htm

It is pooled blood

Sheri

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email

courses - next classes start September 30 & October 1

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm

[Guest guest]

I am astounded that in your country Rhogam is given during pregnancy.

According to the 1998 Rhogam data sheet, it contained gamma globulin,sodium

chloride, polysorbate 80, thimerosal and glycine.

The 2006 Mercury free data sheet lists sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 and

glycine as adjuvants.

Polysorbate 80 has been linked to infertility and other disorders - see

http://www.whale.to/v/tween_80.html

also see http://www.whale.to/vaccines/bayer.html

and in particular the response to Bayer's petition for clarification of the

proposition 65 listing of " Mercury and Mercury Compounds " as chemicals known

to cause reproductive toxicity.

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hgbayer1.pdf

This report could and should also be used as evidence against the insanity

of poisoning pregnant women with thimerosal-laced flu shots.

Ingrid

Does anyone know anything about what is in Rhogam besidews the blood

product? I am concerned that there may be an adjuvant.

------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

I am astounded that in your country Rhogam is given during pregnancy.

According to the 1998 Rhogam data sheet, it contained gamma globulin,sodium

chloride, polysorbate 80, thimerosal and glycine.

The 2006 Mercury free data sheet lists sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 and

glycine as adjuvants.

Polysorbate 80 has been linked to infertility and other disorders - see

http://www.whale.to/v/tween_80.html

also see http://www.whale.to/vaccines/bayer.html

and in particular the response to Bayer's petition for clarification of the

proposition 65 listing of " Mercury and Mercury Compounds " as chemicals known

to cause reproductive toxicity.

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hgbayer1.pdf

This report could and should also be used as evidence against the insanity

of poisoning pregnant women with thimerosal-laced flu shots.

Ingrid

Does anyone know anything about what is in Rhogam besidews the blood

product? I am concerned that there may be an adjuvant.

------------------------------------