Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

May 20, 2005

Harry,

I just did a nine p m b s and it was three point two

I will do the two soda crackers with cheese like I said

then the lantus eight.

Re: Regulating 's blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading, let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

3.2 is way too low. Iwould recommend eating four or six of those crackers

with cheese and dosing Lantus as you are directed by your physician. . You

are telling me you only wish to consume only 4 grams of carbs, which raises

your bs almost 2 mole points, and you are already in the danger zone with an

extreme low bs. It makes no sense to me for you to do what you say you are

going to do, but I am sure this will make 's doctor thrilled. If

you do what you say you are going to do, I predict a rebound effect, and

's doctor will say you probably need to increase your Lantus dose.

I urge you to take my advice and not that doctor's advice. Fortunately, the

chkoice is yours. Do as you please. Let us know how it turns out.

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

Just a suggestion for , maybe you will need to, either consume more

carbohydrates at your meal or look at decreasing your Humalog.

At the meal your main source of carbohydrate was from the slice of French

Toast, the carbohydrate in the spinach and meat pattie were probably

minimal.

If you had added some vegetables such as carrot, peas, corn or whatever is

your preferred vegetable it would sustain you more and maybe also accompany

it with a 1/2 cup of potato or pasta or rice to help sustain your level.

If the bread was a slice of white bread it would rise your level more

rapidly and then drop off so it would not be giving a more slower increase

in your level and sustain your blood sugar. Also try having some fruit or

yoghurt.

However I don't know what your food likes and dislikes are so I could be

suggesting foods that you don't enjoy eating.

from down under

Re: Regulating 's

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

taking

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

would

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

curious

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

Harry

this mornings b s was four point four

humalog three

carbs the two slice low carb bread toasted with peanut

total eighteen carbsbutter.

I was wondering if this would work out o k but it did and I was pleased.

today's activity is going to be different in that I have a computer session

at ten this morning and after lunch I will have the pleasure of going to

hear my husband sing at a concert. but it means just sitting.

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

harry, remember i had the watermelon glucogon when i did this reading. karen

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

Congratulations on an excellent bs this morning! Last night with a bs of

3.2, how many grams of carbs did you consume and how many units of Lantus

did you dose?

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

I remember you took the glucose tablet, but you were also talking about

eating a soda cracker. So I still wonder just how many grams of carbs you

did consume. A watermelon tablet is 4 grams of carbs. Did you add to that

figure with a soda cracker or two or three?

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

Humalog 3 to 18 carb grams is a 1:6 ratio. This sounds pretty close to

being the correct ratio for you. Now let's see how that bs of 4.4 is

affected. Will it go up or will it go down next time it is taken. If it

varies a small amount one way or another, then you are in the right range

with this ratio. Only blood sugar testing will tell.

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

harry

Pre lunch b s eight point zero

Humalog four

Carbs two slice eight carb bread with ham and lettuce total eighteen carbs

karen

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

harry, today at lunch time i was eight and the ideal is five so i was three

too high. when doing the insulin i would do three for the lunch and what for

the three that i am high? karen

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

So you are going to use your deoctor's static scale recommendations? Do you

know what your U factor is?

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 20, 2005

Evidently, a 1:6 causes your bs to rise. Maybe you should try a 1:5 ratio.

Humalog 4 to 18 carb grams is a 1:4.5 ratio. Now let's see if that

decreases that mole reading of 8.0.

Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

> harry

> Pre lunch b s eight point zero

>

> Humalog four

>

> Carbs two slice eight carb bread with ham and lettuce total eighteen carbs

>

> karen

>

May 21, 2005

harry

Presupper b s nine point two

Humalog six

Carbs, supper cooked vegetables and chicken fifteen

Pretzels ten, total twenty five to thirty carbs

karen

Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

>

>> harry

>> Pre lunch b s eight point zero

>>

>> Humalog four

>>

>> Carbs two slice eight carb bread with ham and lettuce total eighteen

>> carbs

>>

>> karen

>>

>

May 21, 2005

there were only two soda crackers with cheese between them. karen

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition, your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business, so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

harry, i have no idea what a u factor is. all i kno is five is what i want

to be and i will do anything to get there. when i am high i dont like it

and i do not want to get higher so i am trying to prevent it from getting

higher. this is nothing to the highs i was getting before. i have made

improvement. karen

Re: Regulating 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

Let's see here: one 4 gram watermelon tablet plus two soda crackers at 2

grams each for a total of 4 grams of carbs. So, you are telling me that you

took a total of 8 grams of carbs at bedtime when you dosed that Lantus 8

units. This would raise that bs 3.2 reading to approximately 7.0 moles,

since four grams of carbs raises your bs around 1.9 moles. So 8 grams of

carbs is twice that which would be 3.8 moles. Add this figure to 3.2 moles

and you get a grand total of 7.0 moles, which is where you wish to be when

you dose lantus at night. As you may recall this is the reason you did not

have a rebound effect the next day and your morning fasting bs was 4.4,

which is an excellent reading. I would strongly suggest you continue dosing

Lantus at this bedtime level. It appears that dosing Lantus 8 units at

bedtime reduces your bs level around 2.6 points during the night. I believe

it will prevent you from having that rebound effect and you will also wake

up with your bs in the normal range.

Congratulations and keep up the good effort.

Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

> there were only two soda crackers with cheese between them. karen

>

May 21, 2005

I pretty much split the difference in total carb grams consumed at 28. With

Humalog 6 this would be a ratio of 1:4.7.

Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

> harry

>

> Presupper b s nine point two

>

> Humalog six

>

> Carbs, supper cooked vegetables and chicken fifteen

>

> Pretzels ten, total twenty five to thirty carbs

>

> karen

May 21, 2005

You are making excellent improvements, and I commend you on the effort you

are making and the results you are achieving. Once you know your U factor,

you will have greater control regarding your bs measurements. Simply put

the U factor is the average number of points drop in your bs caused by one

unit of Humalog. Suppose you have a bs of 9.0 and you wish to be a 5.5.

If you know your U factor, you would know exactly how many units of Humalog

to bring down that 9.0 reading to a 5.5 reading. It is not magic. It is

simple mathematics.

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore, you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

harry

tonight at nine p m b s two point three

took one watermelon glucogon

carbs four soda cracker with cheese , total eleven carbs

eight lantus

karen

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

harry, should we not try to be as close to five as possible? karen

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

Being close to 5.0 moles for a target bs is an excellent goal. While I aim

for 90USA, which is a mole of 5.0, my overall average is 5.3, which is 95

USA.

I predict a fasting bs for you in the morning of 4.9-5.4, and you will have

no rebound effect. This is based on your last reported bs level 2.3 and the

watermelon tablet you took plus those 4 crackers for a total of 12 carb

grams and dose of Lantus 8u.

Good night. I will see what you report in the morning.

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

Saturday pre breakfast two point nine

Carbs, one bowl all bran cereal with milk and yogurt thirty carbs I think?

Humalog three

Prelunch did at eleven a m b s twelve point one

Had to go to johns restaurant for a breakfast meeting

Humalog seven

Carbs, seventeen, one slice bread with turkey and lettuce

karen

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

That pre-breakfast of 2.9 is in the low range. I would recommend decreasing

your Lantus at night by 1 unit. So decrease the dose from 8 units to 7

units. At least you did not have that dreaded rebound effect. I think you

got pretty close to triggering it. Humalog 3 to 30 carb grams is a 1:10

ratio and it raised your bs from 2.9 to 12.1, which is a 9.2 raise in your

bs. Humalog 7 and 17 carb grams is a 1:2.5 ratio. Your bs is sure to rise,

but how much?

Now if that nurse comes to draw up your Lantus dose, show her this message

and tell her to call the doctor and get a verbal order to decrease the

Lantus dose from 8 units to 7 units. Tell her you are requesting that this

be done on the advice of an authority expert and your private wishes. If

you were responsible for drawing up your own Lantus, then you could just do

it on your own authority. The dose can always be increased at a later date,

but presently you are running extremely low fasting glucose levels near the

danger point. You are the boss. It is your body, so you decide.

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 21, 2005

Pre supper b s eighteen point one wow, this afternoon I was at a health

products meeting and they had snacks for children made from vegetables which

is good but they were sugar coated and I ate four of these little innocent

things. They were good but not for a diabetic. So it is pay back time.

Humalog ten

Carbs, italian sausage one link, cooked collieflower

Twelve carbs

Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

May 22, 2005

harry

i only see the nurse once a week, on wednesday mornings. so i will ask her

to reduce the dose of lantus then.

Nine p m b s three point seven

Carbs eleven, four soda cracker with two pieces cheese

Lantus eight

-

karen

---- Original Message -----

To: <blind-diabetics >

Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:53 PM

Subject: Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

> That pre-breakfast of 2.9 is in the low range. I would recommend

> decreasing your Lantus at night by 1 unit. So decrease the dose from 8

> units to 7 units. At least you did not have that dreaded rebound effect.

> I think you got pretty close to triggering it. Humalog 3 to 30 carb grams

> is a 1:10 ratio and it raised your bs from 2.9 to 12.1, which is a 9.2

> raise in your bs. Humalog 7 and 17 carb grams is a 1:2.5 ratio. Your bs

> is sure to rise, but how much?

> Now if that nurse comes to draw up your Lantus dose, show her this message

> and tell her to call the doctor and get a verbal order to decrease the

> Lantus dose from 8 units to 7 units. Tell her you are requesting that

> this be done on the advice of an authority expert and your private wishes.

> If you were responsible for drawing up your own Lantus, then you could

> just do it on your own authority. The dose can always be increased at a

> later date, but presently you are running extremely low fasting glucose

> levels near the danger point. You are the boss. It is your body, so you

> decide.

> Re: Regulating

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 's

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is none of my business, but I am very

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currently

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculating the amount of humalog that you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that you have a target blood sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 -

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be 5.5 under your system. Therefore,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cover your current meal carbs. In addition,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humalog

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjusted

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a beginning reading higher or lower than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blood

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sugar

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goal.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the way I try to do it, sometimes

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not see a pattern like this and I am just

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approaching

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the issue. Again, this is none of my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intrusion. I look forward to continuing to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marvin

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Sign In

Re: Regulating 's blood sugar

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest