Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Dateline

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

BIASED. They 'act' like they were fair by giving both sides, but they were

not. The end showed 'there is no link' - that is the CONCLUSION of the

piece.

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:00 PM, <mensrea320@...> wrote:

>

>

> I only caught the last 15 min, but taped the rest...what did everyone

> think?

>

> Holly

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind those in the Mountain Time zone and on the West Coast

have not had a chance to see it yet. Of course, I live in Denver and

the Broncos are playing PRESEASON football, and that takes precedence

over anything else that may be scheduled to air. Grrr....

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:00 PM, <mensrea320@...> wrote:

>

>

> I only caught the last 15 min, but taped the rest...what did everyone

> think?

>

> Holly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was an ok piece, not the best but for NBC what more can we expect.

I am betting it made a few people wake up and realise that they know NOTHING

when it comes to the crap being injected into their kids, and those few people

will be looking for more info as we speak.

You can't win em all, and I think at the very least the piece didn't make those

of us who don't vaccinate look like complete idiots!

Chelly

Vaccinations

From: amy.rochelle.wilson@...

Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:13:10 -0500

Subject: Re: dateline

BIASED. They 'act' like they were fair by giving both sides, but they were

not. The end showed 'there is no link' - that is the CONCLUSION of the

piece.

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:00 PM, <mensrea320@...> wrote:

>

>

> I only caught the last 15 min, but taped the rest...what did everyone

> think?

>

> Holly

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't watch til 10 pm tonight West coast time because that Denver

football game a mentioned.

Will watch though probably not the best thing to watch before I go to bed ;(

Sheri

At 06:21 PM 8/30/2009, you wrote:

>I thought it was an ok piece, not the best but for NBC what more can

>we expect.

>

>

>

>I am betting it made a few people wake up and realise that they know

>NOTHING when it comes to the crap being injected into their kids,

>and those few people will be looking for more info as we speak.

>

>

>

>You can't win em all, and I think at the very least the piece didn't

>make those of us who don't vaccinate look like complete idiots!

>

>Chelly

>

>

>

>

>

>Vaccinations

>From: amy.rochelle.wilson@...

>Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:13:10 -0500

>Subject: Re: dateline

>

>

>

>

>

>BIASED. They 'act' like they were fair by giving both sides, but they were

>not. The end showed 'there is no link' - that is the CONCLUSION of the

>piece.

>

>On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:00 PM, <mensrea320@...> wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > I only caught the last 15 min, but taped the rest...what did everyone

> > think?

> >

> > Holly

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Matt Lauer was pretty good too. He wasn't picking sides, just asking

questions.

I think it's hilarious that Proffit and Deer got so worked up while Wakefield

sat calmly explaining himself.

>

> I think Matt Laur did a good job. He stayed neutral (which a journalist

> is supposed to do). Laur has often kept the vaccine/autism link

> in focus instead of just reporting it as a closed subject.

>

> Anyone else notice how angry Mr Deer and Mr Offit were? And how they

> declared they KNOW vaccines don't cause autism? I find it amusing

> Ms Healy who was the head of the NIH thinks it needs to be

> researched- but an investigative reporter claims he knows for a

> fact that there's no connection between vaccines and autism.

>

> M

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed the show. I will try to find it.

On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:49 AM, michellebondy wrote:

> I thought Matt Lauer was pretty good too. He wasn't picking sides,

> just asking questions.

>

> I think it's hilarious that Proffit and Deer got so worked up while

> Wakefield sat calmly explaining himself.

>

>

> >

> > I think Matt Laur did a good job. He stayed neutral (which a

> journalist

> > is supposed to do). Laur has often kept the vaccine/autism link

> > in focus instead of just reporting it as a closed subject.

> >

> > Anyone else notice how angry Mr Deer and Mr Offit were? And how they

> > declared they KNOW vaccines don't cause autism? I find it amusing

> > Ms Healy who was the head of the NIH thinks it needs to be

> > researched- but an investigative reporter claims he knows for a

> > fact that there's no connection between vaccines and autism.

> >

> > M

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biased, biased, biased! My mother and I were especially angered by the

last comment encouraging new parents to be sure to vaccinate their very

young babies as that is the time they would be most susceptible to these

" vaccine preventable " diseases.....AAARRG!!! NOT impressed.

-

>

> I only caught the last 15 min, but taped the rest...what did everyone

> think?

>

> Holly

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...