Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Re: (unknown)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Avi,

Your English is great! Don't worry. I wish I knew Hebrew.

Just wanted to tell you that I also had hydrocephalus and Pseudo Tumor

Cerebrai along with ACM. I have 3 shunts now so I understand what you

might have gone through. The shunts are great though. I have learned

to appreciate what they're all about.

I hope things continue to go well for you. Hang in there.

Sending you a big hug from very HOT California.

Leanda

avi wrote:

>

> Hi everybody,

> long time past since i have been hear, maybe a year. It's like

> comming back home with all the fillings ....

> I had a 3rd ventriculostomy surgery for hydrocephallus and after a

> few unpleasant weeks, It seemed i got better due to the surgery, the

> prosac or may be i learned to live with all the symptoms. i abundond

> my search for clear diagnosys and ideal nsg and just live my life.

> i have 1 year old daughter that gives a good taste to life, and i

> started working as a school psychologist, so life looks better and

> better.

> Take care, hope my english is understandable (i am better in hebrew)

> avi from israel

>

> Help section: /help/

>

> NOTE: NCC refers to posts with No Chiari Content

>

> Unsubscribe Yourself: chiari-unsubscribeegroups

>

> WACMA Home: www.pressenter.com/~wacma

>

> WACMA List: www.eGroups.com/group/chiari

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

You can turn off the grammar check while you are typing, assuming your green

lines are in Word. You go to tools, options, & then the spelling & grammar

tab. Uncheck the box near the bottom for " Check grammar as you type. " This

way, it will check the grammar with the spellcheck at the end. That gets

rid of all those green lines while you are working. I like mine that way so

that only red lines show typos/misspellings, which I fix as I go.

Chris

Re: (unknown)

> Thank you all. I couldn't help but wonder if maybe she is considering the

> contractures a syndrome or symptom or group but I think you guys are all

> right so it will become " are " .

> My reports light up like a Christmas tree with green lines as she does

> everything in fragmented sentences. It drove me crazy in the beginning.

> Now I tend to just scan the green lines and only respond to the red's.

> Thank God there are few of those.

> Aliceanne

>

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:57:22 -0400 " Margaret Grant "

> writes:

> > Aliceanne, I believe your doctor is using is because it is right next

> > to severe, rather than realizing it goes with contractures. You are

> > correct to question her, as that would be there are severe digital

> > contractures... Margaret

> >

> > >>> Alice A Sawyer 10/24/01 08:35PM >>>

> > Should the following be is or are? Doctor dictates is but spell

> > check

> > tells me it is are. I figure she is looking at the one foot as a

> > whole so

> > she dictates is??

> > I can't wait to hit the pillow:::

> > there is severe digital contractures with distal lesions noted.

> > There is

> > also a severe HAV deformity, B/L.

> >

> > Aliceanne

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I don't really know for sure, but I guess it makes sense. If you have a

bandage covering more than one digit (fingers or toes???...anyway) and the

" distal " end of the bandage, or that part of it that is toward the tip of

the digits, moves or migrates somewhat, I suppose it could pull one digit

with it a bit and cause it to overlap another one. You think?

----Original Message Follows----

To: nmtc

Subject: (unknown)

Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:35:44 -0500

Every hear of distal migration of a bandage? It is 'distal' I am not

sure I am hearing correctly.

Upon dressing removal, the right 5th digit is overlapping the 4th digit;

most likely secondary to the distal migration of the bandage

Any help appreciated.

Aliceanne

_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi! I found xerostomia meaning dry mouth. Hope this helps! :)

(unknown)

" Spells characterized by a kind of visual blurring and a general feeling of

heaviness along with some s/l zero stomia. "

This is waht the doc says, but I cannot document this word. It might also

be one word like s/l zerostoma.

Any help would be appreciated.

Jan in COGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :

http://explorer.msn.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hi,

I'm not sure about the drug, but I have been told several times that Type II

diabetes should be

transcribed as " Type 2 Diabetes " . Just my $.02 worth.

tjk81664 wrote:

> This patient is diagnosed with (1) Status-post cerebrovascular

> accident. (2) Seizure disorder. (3) Hypertension. (4) Type II

> diabetes.

>

> She is prescribed...(1) Accupril, (2) Actos, (3)Trileptal, (4) s/l

> Pryvid or plyvid 75 mg #30, 1 q.d. (5)Protonix, and (6)DiaBeta

>

> I did find Plavix 75 mg. Would this be correct?

>

> Thanks....Tracey

>

>

> TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

nmtc-unsubscribe

>

> PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

....started approximately 1-1/2 weeks ago.

:)

Rennie

(unknown)

Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I

can't figure out where it is wrong. help.

Thanks:

Aliceanne

....started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar

aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and

also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half week

ago? " Wouldn't it make more sense if it read " approximately 1.5 weeks ago "

or " 1 to 1.5 weeks ago? " If you have a half a fraction indicating a time

measurement, it would be placed before the whole measurement of time, as in

" approximately one-half to one week ago. "

Also, if it were to be correct as one to one-half week, there wouldn't be an

's' on week because it isn't a plural week. However, if it were one AND a

half weeks ago or one to one and a half, it would be plural.

Diane

MT forum administrator

http://mtgripe.proboards.com/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

(unknown)

>

>

>

> Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I

> can't figure out where it is wrong. help.

> Thanks:

> Aliceanne

> ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar

> aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and

> also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any

>

>

>

> TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

nmtc-unsubscribe

>

> PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I think it's just dictated as " one and a half " , and they're following the

guidelines in the AAMT BOS that for mixed fractions if you cannot create

reduced-size fractions that can be placed directly following whole numbers,

then use the " numeral-virgule-numeral " style, placing a hyphen between the

whole number and the fraction (Page 146). :o)

----Original Message Follows----

To: " Rennie " , " nmtc " <nmtc >

Subject: Re: (unknown)

Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:11:26 -0500

Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half week

ago? " Wouldn't it make more sense if it read " approximately 1.5 weeks ago "

or " 1 to 1.5 weeks ago? " If you have a half a fraction indicating a time

measurement, it would be placed before the whole measurement of time, as in

" approximately one-half to one week ago. "

Also, if it were to be correct as one to one-half week, there wouldn't be an

's' on week because it isn't a plural week. However, if it were one AND a

half weeks ago or one to one and a half, it would be plural.

Diane

MT forum administrator

http://mtgripe.proboards.com/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

(unknown)

>

>

>

> Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I

> can't figure out where it is wrong. help.

> Thanks:

> Aliceanne

> ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar

> aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and

> also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any

>

>

>

> TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

nmtc-unsubscribe

>

> PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yes, if the " to " was dictated. She didn't include it in her statement so I took

it literally. :)

----- Original Message -----

Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half week

ago? "

----- Original Message -----

> ...started approximately 1-1/2 weeks ago.

> ----- Original Message -----

>

> Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I

> can't figure out where it is wrong. help.

> Thanks:

> Aliceanne

> ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar

> aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and

> also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Well the way I read the new guidelines which made its way around the

email NMTC we are too use numerals now. I agree that I was stumped with

the weeks vs week. But I ended up using weeks. Thanks for sharing.

Aliceanne

On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:11:26 -0500 " Diane "

writes:

> Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half

> week

> ago? " Wouldn't it make more sense if it read " approximately 1.5

> weeks ago "

> or " 1 to 1.5 weeks ago? " If you have a half a fraction indicating a

> time

> measurement, it would be placed before the whole measurement of

> time, as in

> " approximately one-half to one week ago. "

>

> Also, if it were to be correct as one to one-half week, there

> wouldn't be an

> 's' on week because it isn't a plural week. However, if it were one

> AND a

> half weeks ago or one to one and a half, it would be plural.

>

> Diane

> MT forum administrator

> http://mtgripe.proboards.com/

> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> (unknown)

> >

> >

> >

> > Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but

> I

> > can't figure out where it is wrong. help.

> > Thanks:

> > Aliceanne

> > ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the

> plantar

> > aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect

> and

> > also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any

> >

> >

> >

> > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

> nmtc-unsubscribe

> >

> > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

> >

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

That is what I will do. Thanks.

Aliceanne

On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:28:25 -0500 " Margaret Grant "

writes:

> Aliceanne, I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat x-ray.

> Margaret

>

> >>> Alice A Sawyer 01/07/02 06:10PM >>>

> Help please...

>

> Overlying the second metatarsal, right foot. *Re-x-ray*

> in the form of 3 views, right was performed.

>

> I am not sure how to do the * * Any help would be appreciated.

> Aliceanne

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Aliceanne, I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat x-ray. Margaret

>>> Alice A Sawyer 01/07/02 06:10PM >>>

Help please...

Overlying the second metatarsal, right foot. *Re-x-ray*

in the form of 3 views, right was performed.

I am not sure how to do the * * Any help would be appreciated.

Aliceanne

TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

nmtc-unsubscribe

PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

That's what my instructor at Career Step taught me too. Repeat x-ray. :)

----- Original Message -----

> Aliceanne, I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat x-ray.

Margaret

>

> >>> Alice A Sawyer 01/07/02 06:10PM >>>

> Help please...

>

> Overlying the second metatarsal, right foot. *Re-x-ray*

> in the form of 3 views, right was performed.

>

> I am not sure how to do the * * Any help would be appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

In reference to your comment:

è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

è x-ray

I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are

allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall

under either one of those eh?

Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

In reference to your comment:

è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

è x-ray

I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are

allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall

under either one of those eh?

Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

In a message dated 1/8/2002 8:17:26 AM Central Standard Time, swatt8@...

writes:

> I'm with ya' Chris. When my husband hears yet

> another ref book hitting the wall, he jumps in with " now, you keep saying

> you LOVE your job. What the heck would you throw if you hated it? " Hmmm

> ......... good point. I really do love it and wouldn't trade it for

> anything (most days!!!).

>

They just don't understand!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

In a message dated 1/8/2002 8:17:26 AM Central Standard Time, swatt8@...

writes:

> I'm with ya' Chris. When my husband hears yet

> another ref book hitting the wall, he jumps in with " now, you keep saying

> you LOVE your job. What the heck would you throw if you hated it? " Hmmm

> ......... good point. I really do love it and wouldn't trade it for

> anything (most days!!!).

>

They just don't understand!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Just to add a bit on this:

When I worked for a group of radiologists (before relocating), they often

dictated " re-x-ray " and made it clear on more than one occasion that when

they said " re-x-ray " they meant " re-x-ray " ... not " repeat x-ray. " Think

it's another " not right, not wrong " issue, but if it is a verbatim account,

I would transcribe as dictated. I certainly, as do others I'm sure, don't

care for " re-x-ray " , but hey ... they dictated it, they know what they want,

and they certainly (and SHOULD) know a bit more than I (although my recent

course does indicate a preference for " repeat x-ray " ). With that said,

" re-x-ray " used as a verb would necessitate recasting the sentence. Who has

time for all that when re-x-ray is just fine. If I sound a tad snippy, I do

apologize. With all the account changes/software + hardware expenditures,

etc. this past month, and equipment breakdowns/replacements, my expenses for

2001 pretty much meets, if not exceeds, my income for 2001. Just a bad year

all around I guess. Let's all hope/pray for a better 2002

(profitability-wise too!). I'm with ya' Chris. When my husband hears yet

another ref book hitting the wall, he jumps in with " now, you keep saying

you LOVE your job. What the heck would you throw if you hated it? " Hmmm

.......... good point. I really do love it and wouldn't trade it for

anything (most days!!!).

Shel

Re: (unknown)

Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

In reference to your comment:

è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

è x-ray

I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are

allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall

under either one of those eh?

Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

nmtc-unsubscribe

PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Good question. I recast the sentence as my client is pretty good. There

are some things she picks up as changed immediately and will tell me but

she never tells me to re do it.

Aliceanne

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:44:07 EST JanTranscribes@... writes:

> Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

>

> In reference to your comment:

>

> è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

> è x-ray

>

> I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account???

> We are

> allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would

> fall

> under either one of those eh?

>

>

>

> Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

> Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

> whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Good question. I recast the sentence as my client is pretty good. There

are some things she picks up as changed immediately and will tell me but

she never tells me to re do it.

Aliceanne

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:44:07 EST JanTranscribes@... writes:

> Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

>

> In reference to your comment:

>

> è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

> è x-ray

>

> I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account???

> We are

> allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would

> fall

> under either one of those eh?

>

>

>

> Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

> Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

> whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I'd have to say that it is a love-hate relationship right now (the business,

not the marriage). I know that it would make things easier to just say

" enough is enough " and go get a real job working 8 hours, but then what the

heck would I do with the other 16 hours in a day? (eat normally, sleep, be

human...)

Chris

Re: (unknown)

>

>

> Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

>

> In reference to your comment:

>

> è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

> è x-ray

>

> I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are

> allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall

> under either one of those eh?

>

>

>

> Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

> Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

> whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

>

>

> TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

> nmtc-unsubscribe

>

> PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I'd have to say that it is a love-hate relationship right now (the business,

not the marriage). I know that it would make things easier to just say

" enough is enough " and go get a real job working 8 hours, but then what the

heck would I do with the other 16 hours in a day? (eat normally, sleep, be

human...)

Chris

Re: (unknown)

>

>

> Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant),

>

> In reference to your comment:

>

> è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat

> è x-ray

>

> I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are

> allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall

> under either one of those eh?

>

>

>

> Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically)

> Remember... WSTPMTR (which means,

> whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules).

>

>

> TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to

> nmtc-unsubscribe

>

> PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Aww Susie....Christmas did me in this time around...I nudged up a bit

also.....

But those are great lipid results!!

Another interesting bit of news....right at diagnosis my c-reactive protein

was 7!! The highest it could go and this time they repeated that and it was

1.9...slightly elevated

I hope you feel well enough soon to exercise. Hate that Syndrome X

thing...exercise is so crucial to us.

Ressy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Good news, Susie...now let's work on that A1C! (Y'know, you can get UL

without a prescription...might be just the thing to help you out...)

Vicki

In a message dated 02/20/2003 10:40:11 AM US Mountain Standard Time,

ottercritter@... writes:

The lab says a number below 3.5 is Ideal for Cardiac Risk. My number

is 2.5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Okay, Dave...what does GD & RLH mean?

In a message dated 02/20/2003 12:37:52 PM US Mountain Standard Time,

fencible@... writes:

> I've heard that low carbing helps.. (GD & RLH)

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...