Guest guest Posted September 18, 2000 Report Share Posted September 18, 2000 Dear Avi, Your English is great! Don't worry. I wish I knew Hebrew. Just wanted to tell you that I also had hydrocephalus and Pseudo Tumor Cerebrai along with ACM. I have 3 shunts now so I understand what you might have gone through. The shunts are great though. I have learned to appreciate what they're all about. I hope things continue to go well for you. Hang in there. Sending you a big hug from very HOT California. Leanda avi wrote: > > Hi everybody, > long time past since i have been hear, maybe a year. It's like > comming back home with all the fillings .... > I had a 3rd ventriculostomy surgery for hydrocephallus and after a > few unpleasant weeks, It seemed i got better due to the surgery, the > prosac or may be i learned to live with all the symptoms. i abundond > my search for clear diagnosys and ideal nsg and just live my life. > i have 1 year old daughter that gives a good taste to life, and i > started working as a school psychologist, so life looks better and > better. > Take care, hope my english is understandable (i am better in hebrew) > avi from israel > > Help section: /help/ > > NOTE: NCC refers to posts with No Chiari Content > > Unsubscribe Yourself: chiari-unsubscribeegroups > > WACMA Home: www.pressenter.com/~wacma > > WACMA List: www.eGroups.com/group/chiari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2001 Report Share Posted October 24, 2001 You can turn off the grammar check while you are typing, assuming your green lines are in Word. You go to tools, options, & then the spelling & grammar tab. Uncheck the box near the bottom for " Check grammar as you type. " This way, it will check the grammar with the spellcheck at the end. That gets rid of all those green lines while you are working. I like mine that way so that only red lines show typos/misspellings, which I fix as I go. Chris Re: (unknown) > Thank you all. I couldn't help but wonder if maybe she is considering the > contractures a syndrome or symptom or group but I think you guys are all > right so it will become " are " . > My reports light up like a Christmas tree with green lines as she does > everything in fragmented sentences. It drove me crazy in the beginning. > Now I tend to just scan the green lines and only respond to the red's. > Thank God there are few of those. > Aliceanne > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:57:22 -0400 " Margaret Grant " > writes: > > Aliceanne, I believe your doctor is using is because it is right next > > to severe, rather than realizing it goes with contractures. You are > > correct to question her, as that would be there are severe digital > > contractures... Margaret > > > > >>> Alice A Sawyer 10/24/01 08:35PM >>> > > Should the following be is or are? Doctor dictates is but spell > > check > > tells me it is are. I figure she is looking at the one foot as a > > whole so > > she dictates is?? > > I can't wait to hit the pillow::: > > there is severe digital contractures with distal lesions noted. > > There is > > also a severe HAV deformity, B/L. > > > > Aliceanne > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2001 Report Share Posted November 28, 2001 I don't really know for sure, but I guess it makes sense. If you have a bandage covering more than one digit (fingers or toes???...anyway) and the " distal " end of the bandage, or that part of it that is toward the tip of the digits, moves or migrates somewhat, I suppose it could pull one digit with it a bit and cause it to overlap another one. You think? ----Original Message Follows---- To: nmtc Subject: (unknown) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:35:44 -0500 Every hear of distal migration of a bandage? It is 'distal' I am not sure I am hearing correctly. Upon dressing removal, the right 5th digit is overlapping the 4th digit; most likely secondary to the distal migration of the bandage Any help appreciated. Aliceanne _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2001 Report Share Posted December 3, 2001 Hi! I found xerostomia meaning dry mouth. Hope this helps! (unknown) " Spells characterized by a kind of visual blurring and a general feeling of heaviness along with some s/l zero stomia. " This is waht the doc says, but I cannot document this word. It might also be one word like s/l zerostoma. Any help would be appreciated. Jan in COGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2001 Report Share Posted December 10, 2001 Hi, I'm not sure about the drug, but I have been told several times that Type II diabetes should be transcribed as " Type 2 Diabetes " . Just my $.02 worth. tjk81664 wrote: > This patient is diagnosed with (1) Status-post cerebrovascular > accident. (2) Seizure disorder. (3) Hypertension. (4) Type II > diabetes. > > She is prescribed...(1) Accupril, (2) Actos, (3)Trileptal, (4) s/l > Pryvid or plyvid 75 mg #30, 1 q.d. (5)Protonix, and (6)DiaBeta > > I did find Plavix 75 mg. Would this be correct? > > Thanks....Tracey > > > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to nmtc-unsubscribe > > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2001 Report Share Posted December 14, 2001 ....started approximately 1-1/2 weeks ago. Rennie (unknown) Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I can't figure out where it is wrong. help. Thanks: Aliceanne ....started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2001 Report Share Posted December 14, 2001 Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half week ago? " Wouldn't it make more sense if it read " approximately 1.5 weeks ago " or " 1 to 1.5 weeks ago? " If you have a half a fraction indicating a time measurement, it would be placed before the whole measurement of time, as in " approximately one-half to one week ago. " Also, if it were to be correct as one to one-half week, there wouldn't be an 's' on week because it isn't a plural week. However, if it were one AND a half weeks ago or one to one and a half, it would be plural. Diane MT forum administrator http://mtgripe.proboards.com/ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (unknown) > > > > Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I > can't figure out where it is wrong. help. > Thanks: > Aliceanne > ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar > aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and > also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any > > > > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to nmtc-unsubscribe > > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2001 Report Share Posted December 15, 2001 I think it's just dictated as " one and a half " , and they're following the guidelines in the AAMT BOS that for mixed fractions if you cannot create reduced-size fractions that can be placed directly following whole numbers, then use the " numeral-virgule-numeral " style, placing a hyphen between the whole number and the fraction (Page 146). ) ----Original Message Follows---- To: " Rennie " , " nmtc " <nmtc > Subject: Re: (unknown) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:11:26 -0500 Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half week ago? " Wouldn't it make more sense if it read " approximately 1.5 weeks ago " or " 1 to 1.5 weeks ago? " If you have a half a fraction indicating a time measurement, it would be placed before the whole measurement of time, as in " approximately one-half to one week ago. " Also, if it were to be correct as one to one-half week, there wouldn't be an 's' on week because it isn't a plural week. However, if it were one AND a half weeks ago or one to one and a half, it would be plural. Diane MT forum administrator http://mtgripe.proboards.com/ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (unknown) > > > > Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I > can't figure out where it is wrong. help. > Thanks: > Aliceanne > ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar > aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and > also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any > > > > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to nmtc-unsubscribe > > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2001 Report Share Posted December 15, 2001 Yes, if the " to " was dictated. She didn't include it in her statement so I took it literally. ----- Original Message ----- Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half week ago? " ----- Original Message ----- > ...started approximately 1-1/2 weeks ago. > ----- Original Message ----- > > Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but I > can't figure out where it is wrong. help. > Thanks: > Aliceanne > ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the plantar > aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect and > also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2001 Report Share Posted December 17, 2001 Well the way I read the new guidelines which made its way around the email NMTC we are too use numerals now. I agree that I was stumped with the weeks vs week. But I ended up using weeks. Thanks for sharing. Aliceanne On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:11:26 -0500 " Diane " writes: > Wouldn't this read literally " started approximately one to one-half > week > ago? " Wouldn't it make more sense if it read " approximately 1.5 > weeks ago " > or " 1 to 1.5 weeks ago? " If you have a half a fraction indicating a > time > measurement, it would be placed before the whole measurement of > time, as in > " approximately one-half to one week ago. " > > Also, if it were to be correct as one to one-half week, there > wouldn't be an > 's' on week because it isn't a plural week. However, if it were one > AND a > half weeks ago or one to one and a half, it would be plural. > > Diane > MT forum administrator > http://mtgripe.proboards.com/ > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > (unknown) > > > > > > > > Too late for my brain to work. The 1 1/2 weeks is not correct but > I > > can't figure out where it is wrong. help. > > Thanks: > > Aliceanne > > ...started approximately 1 1/2-weeks ago. Pt. points to the > plantar > > aspect of her left foot and states that the entire plantar aspect > and > > also her heel is involved. Pt. denies any > > > > > > > > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to > nmtc-unsubscribe > > > > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2002 Report Share Posted January 7, 2002 That is what I will do. Thanks. Aliceanne On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:28:25 -0500 " Margaret Grant " writes: > Aliceanne, I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat x-ray. > Margaret > > >>> Alice A Sawyer 01/07/02 06:10PM >>> > Help please... > > Overlying the second metatarsal, right foot. *Re-x-ray* > in the form of 3 views, right was performed. > > I am not sure how to do the * * Any help would be appreciated. > Aliceanne > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2002 Report Share Posted January 7, 2002 Aliceanne, I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat x-ray. Margaret >>> Alice A Sawyer 01/07/02 06:10PM >>> Help please... Overlying the second metatarsal, right foot. *Re-x-ray* in the form of 3 views, right was performed. I am not sure how to do the * * Any help would be appreciated. Aliceanne TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to nmtc-unsubscribe PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2002 Report Share Posted January 7, 2002 That's what my instructor at Career Step taught me too. Repeat x-ray. ----- Original Message ----- > Aliceanne, I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat x-ray. Margaret > > >>> Alice A Sawyer 01/07/02 06:10PM >>> > Help please... > > Overlying the second metatarsal, right foot. *Re-x-ray* > in the form of 3 views, right was performed. > > I am not sure how to do the * * Any help would be appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), In reference to your comment: è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat è x-ray I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall under either one of those eh? Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), In reference to your comment: è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat è x-ray I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall under either one of those eh? Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 In a message dated 1/8/2002 8:17:26 AM Central Standard Time, swatt8@... writes: > I'm with ya' Chris. When my husband hears yet > another ref book hitting the wall, he jumps in with " now, you keep saying > you LOVE your job. What the heck would you throw if you hated it? " Hmmm > ......... good point. I really do love it and wouldn't trade it for > anything (most days!!!). > They just don't understand! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 In a message dated 1/8/2002 8:17:26 AM Central Standard Time, swatt8@... writes: > I'm with ya' Chris. When my husband hears yet > another ref book hitting the wall, he jumps in with " now, you keep saying > you LOVE your job. What the heck would you throw if you hated it? " Hmmm > ......... good point. I really do love it and wouldn't trade it for > anything (most days!!!). > They just don't understand! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 Just to add a bit on this: When I worked for a group of radiologists (before relocating), they often dictated " re-x-ray " and made it clear on more than one occasion that when they said " re-x-ray " they meant " re-x-ray " ... not " repeat x-ray. " Think it's another " not right, not wrong " issue, but if it is a verbatim account, I would transcribe as dictated. I certainly, as do others I'm sure, don't care for " re-x-ray " , but hey ... they dictated it, they know what they want, and they certainly (and SHOULD) know a bit more than I (although my recent course does indicate a preference for " repeat x-ray " ). With that said, " re-x-ray " used as a verb would necessitate recasting the sentence. Who has time for all that when re-x-ray is just fine. If I sound a tad snippy, I do apologize. With all the account changes/software + hardware expenditures, etc. this past month, and equipment breakdowns/replacements, my expenses for 2001 pretty much meets, if not exceeds, my income for 2001. Just a bad year all around I guess. Let's all hope/pray for a better 2002 (profitability-wise too!). I'm with ya' Chris. When my husband hears yet another ref book hitting the wall, he jumps in with " now, you keep saying you LOVE your job. What the heck would you throw if you hated it? " Hmmm .......... good point. I really do love it and wouldn't trade it for anything (most days!!!). Shel Re: (unknown) Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), In reference to your comment: è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat è x-ray I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall under either one of those eh? Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to nmtc-unsubscribe PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 Good question. I recast the sentence as my client is pretty good. There are some things she picks up as changed immediately and will tell me but she never tells me to re do it. Aliceanne On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:44:07 EST JanTranscribes@... writes: > Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), > > In reference to your comment: > > è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat > è x-ray > > I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? > We are > allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would > fall > under either one of those eh? > > > > Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) > Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, > whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 Good question. I recast the sentence as my client is pretty good. There are some things she picks up as changed immediately and will tell me but she never tells me to re do it. Aliceanne On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:44:07 EST JanTranscribes@... writes: > Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), > > In reference to your comment: > > è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat > è x-ray > > I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? > We are > allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would > fall > under either one of those eh? > > > > Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) > Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, > whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 I'd have to say that it is a love-hate relationship right now (the business, not the marriage). I know that it would make things easier to just say " enough is enough " and go get a real job working 8 hours, but then what the heck would I do with the other 16 hours in a day? (eat normally, sleep, be human...) Chris Re: (unknown) > > > Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), > > In reference to your comment: > > è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat > è x-ray > > I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are > allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall > under either one of those eh? > > > > Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) > Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, > whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). > > > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to > nmtc-unsubscribe > > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2002 Report Share Posted January 8, 2002 I'd have to say that it is a love-hate relationship right now (the business, not the marriage). I know that it would make things easier to just say " enough is enough " and go get a real job working 8 hours, but then what the heck would I do with the other 16 hours in a day? (eat normally, sleep, be human...) Chris Re: (unknown) > > > Hello MGrant@... (Margaret Grant), > > In reference to your comment: > > è I always recast the sentence, something like Repeat > è x-ray > > I agree, but what does one do if one is on a " verbatim " account??? We are > allowed to fix glaring errors and grammar... Guess " re-x-ray " would fall > under either one of those eh? > > > > Jan " Typing is my life " (said sarcastically) > Remember... WSTPMTR (which means, > whoever signs the paycheck makes the rules). > > > TO REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THIS MAILING LIST send a blank email to > nmtc-unsubscribe > > PLEASE VISIT THE NMTC WEB SITE - http://go.to/nmtc > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2003 Report Share Posted February 20, 2003 Aww Susie....Christmas did me in this time around...I nudged up a bit also..... But those are great lipid results!! Another interesting bit of news....right at diagnosis my c-reactive protein was 7!! The highest it could go and this time they repeated that and it was 1.9...slightly elevated I hope you feel well enough soon to exercise. Hate that Syndrome X thing...exercise is so crucial to us. Ressy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2003 Report Share Posted February 20, 2003 Good news, Susie...now let's work on that A1C! (Y'know, you can get UL without a prescription...might be just the thing to help you out...) Vicki In a message dated 02/20/2003 10:40:11 AM US Mountain Standard Time, ottercritter@... writes: The lab says a number below 3.5 is Ideal for Cardiac Risk. My number is 2.5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2003 Report Share Posted February 20, 2003 Okay, Dave...what does GD & RLH mean? In a message dated 02/20/2003 12:37:52 PM US Mountain Standard Time, fencible@... writes: > I've heard that low carbing helps.. (GD & RLH) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.