swine flu

October 20, 2009

>

> I am supposed to begin a volunteer job next week working with children in a

hospital setting. I was asked if I would get a swine flu shot and said no, but

I'm still confused as to why hundreds of people are dying of this flu (if the

germ theory is false).

+++Hi . That's good you refuse to get the swine flu shot! The only reason

anyone gets the flu is because their bodies need to detoxify and they lack

" proper nutrients. " This World is loaded with toxins, damaging foods, etc. and

because the food and medical industry, government, etc. recommend the wrong

foods for us humans to be healthy.

So " they " attribute deaths to causes that " they " decide, and not to the true

causes. Here's Four Reasons Health Fails:

1. Lack of proper nutrition and oxygen.

2. Accumulation of toxins, poisons, and waste.

3. Lowered vitality due to stress, shock, injury, emotional upsets, relationship

or financial worries and concerns, etc.

4. Nutritional status inherited from your parents upon conception.

At this time of year, a lot of people get the flu due to a lack of vitamin D,

which they get from the sun.

There aren't as many deaths from the swine flu as there are to regular flu

anyway, but every year the " powers that be " broadcast the upcoming flu epidemic

in order to sell vaccines - which is all about the money and not about our

health. See these articles to understand more:

http://www.whale.to/vaccines.html

All the best, Bee

October 21, 2009

Best way I now to treat swine flu (or any flu!) is to avoid getting it

in the first place. Taking 5,000 IU of D3 should do the trick for

most people. Flue, like most everything else, is easier to prevent

than cure.

Alobar

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:45 PM, grogreenfrank <grogreenfrank@...> wrote:

> I imagine there's not much data but I surmise monolaurin could,should affect

this virus the same as others. I've heard people take as little as 2 tbsp.'s per

day and as high as 14. Does coconut milk have as much monolaurin as the oil or

monolaurin supplements? If someone were already contracted with swine flu esp.

in the lungs I wonder how much could be taken without a severe healing reaction.

If coconut oil were applied topcally on chest and back around lungs would it

migrate into lungs and slow-down the touted rapid lung-attack of the flu into

lower lung? If one never used coconut oil before and wanted to do swine flu

prevention how would one approach it. Too bad one could not make a vapor that

could be inhaled into the lungs?

> Any other ideas on swine flu.

> Dr. (Premier Research) appears to have a great monolaurin product

that appears to be much more highly concentrated than straight oil?

> Thanks Bruce for your great service to the world. Mattison

>

October 27, 2009

Do you take this much forever? Or just during the season? Sylvia

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Alobar <Alobar@...> wrote:

> Best way I now to treat swine flu (or any flu!) is to avoid getting it

> in the first place. Taking 5,000 IU of D3 should do the trick for

> most people. Flue, like most everything else, is easier to prevent

> than cure.

>

> Alobar

>

> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:45 PM, grogreenfrank <grogreenfrank@...>

> wrote:

> > I imagine there's not much data but I surmise monolaurin could,should

> affect this virus the same as others. I've heard people take as little as 2

> tbsp.'s per day and as high as 14. Does coconut milk have as much monolaurin

> as the oil or monolaurin supplements? If someone were already contracted

> with swine flu esp. in the lungs I wonder how much could be taken without a

> severe healing reaction. If coconut oil were applied topcally on chest and

> back around lungs would it migrate into lungs and slow-down the touted rapid

> lung-attack of the flu into lower lung? If one never used coconut oil before

> and wanted to do swine flu prevention how would one approach it. Too bad

> one could not make a vapor that could be inhaled into the lungs?

> > Any other ideas on swine flu.

> > Dr. (Premier Research) appears to have a great monolaurin

> product that appears to be much more highly concentrated than straight oil?

> > Thanks Bruce for your great service to the world. Mattison

> >

>

> ------------------------------------

>

January 20, 2010

Interesting article. Not new if you read all that Carlene sent.

Articles Related to This Article:â€¢ Ten Swine Flu Lies Told by the Mainstream Mediaâ€¢ Florida Hospital Caught in Swine Flu Cover-Up?â€¢ Ten Things You're Not Supposed to Know about the Swine Flu Vaccine

(NaturalNews) The great swine flu hoax of 2009 is now falling apart at the seams as one country after another unloads hundreds of millions of doses of unused swine flu vaccines. No informed person wants the injection anymore, and the entire fear-based campaign to promote the vaccines has now been exposed as outright quackery and propaganda.Even doctors are now calling the pandemic a complete hoax. As reported on FoxNews, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a leading health authority in Europe, says that drug companies "organized a 'campaign of panic' to put pressure on the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic. He believes it is 'one of the greatest medicine scandals of

the century,' and he has called for an inquiry." (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933...)H1N1 swine flu was never dangerous, and it never should have been escalated to a level-six pandemic in the first place. It was all a big marketing scam whose purpose was to simply sell vaccines. (And the CDC and WHO were in on it...)And it worked! Big Pharma made out with billions of dollars in profits for a useless vaccine that's now being dumped by the truck load. These vaccines were, of course, paid

for with taxpayer dollars, making the Great Swine Flu Hoax of 2009 nothing more than an elaborate financial scam whose goal was to transfer wealth from the People to the shareholders of Big Pharma.In just the fourth quarter of 2009, GlaxoKline shipped $1.4 billion worth of vaccines. (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...)That's $1.4 billion worth of taxpayer dollars, by the way. Dollars that could have been spent on nutrition or real health education. $1.4 billion worth of free vitamin D supplements would have done far more to protect public health than vaccines could ever hope to accomplish.

A bailout for Big Pharma

Wall Street hucksters have nothing on Big Pharma, the CDC and the WHO, all of which conspired to mislead the public and generate irrational fear in order to make money selling people vaccine shots they never needed in the first place.The drug companies raked in billions of dollars in revenues while providing a product that offered absolutely no net reduction in mortality. In fact, as the long-term side effects of the vaccines remain unknown, it could turn out that the vaccines actually result in a net increase in mortality.Meanwhile, countless people were harmed by the swine flu vaccine frenzy (it's "countless" because nobody's counting). In addition to those who were nearly paralyzed after receiving the vaccine shots, grade school students in Massachusetts who lined

up to receive swine flu vaccine shots were instead injected with insulin. (Insulin injections can put you into a coma.) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...)The school sent a letter home to students blaming the mishap on the school nurse. But if they weren't injecting these kids with a useless vaccine for a non-pandemic, none of this would have happened in the first place. Total swine flu deaths for 2009 were far lower than the number of deaths from regular seasonal flu. And yet it turns out that thousands of Americans who died from the swine flu had been previously injected with the vaccines (http://www.naturalnews.com/027956_H...). In fact, according to calculations derived from

official CDC estimates, thousands of vaccinated Americans died from swine flu anyway. The vaccines, it seems, don't really work after all. You're just as safe doing nothing.Actually, getting the vaccine may harm your health. Outspoken Dr. Wodarg even says that the full extent of the damage from the insufficiently-tested vaccines may not be known for years. "The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique that had never been used until now," he says.Just what we need, huh? Cancer cells being injected into the population as part of a vaccine campaign.

Cancelling vaccine orders

The Swine Flu hoax has fizzled out, and countries like Greece, France and the UK have cancelled orders for vaccines that they now realize won't be needed (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...) (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8...). But even the fizzling of this hoax doesn't mean it was a failure from the point of view of Big Pharma.The swine flu hoax was a huge success not only for drug company profits, but also for certain influential individuals including Dr Gerberding, former head of the CDC who has now accepted a high-paying job as the president of Merck's global vaccine operations. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027789_D...)One minute you're running the CDC, warning the country about a pandemic while urging everybody to get vaccinated, and the next minute you're running the for-profit vaccine division of the world's largest drug company. Amazing how that works, huh?

We called it right

I called much of this months ago in my popular hip-hop song, "Don't Inject Me" which you can listen to here:http://www.naturalnews.com/Dont_Inj...Or watch on YouTube here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXm...As I stated in the song lyrics, which were written in early August, 2009:The truth is outrageousDon't you know the drug companies made this fluDon't you know the swine flu is made by manPharmaceutical scamIt's all part of the Big Brother population planThey don't want you to see the remediesyou can stop influenza with vitamin D for freeHerbal medicine is all that you needBut they can't charge a fifty dollar feeUnlessThey inject youThe big drug

companies are makin' a killingCollectin' the billions and gettin' away like a Bond villainCuz' they're willin' to do almost anythingJust to make money with the flu vaccineMany clueless critics thought this song was some sort of outrageous conspiracy rant at the time. Turns out it was a spot-on prediction of the truth behind The Great Swine Flu hoax of 2009.Sources for this story include:Fox Newshttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933...Washington Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...Reutershttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...

Share419

Buzz up!17 votes

May 9, 2010

OKD

just curious, you still are glad you didn't get the swine flue shot even though

you were sick for a month with the swine flu? Why is that? I did get the swine

flu shot and didn't get the flu, although of course there is no way to know if

the flu shot made any difference at all. Did you not trust the swine flu

vaccine for some reason, or is there a reason why you couldn't take it? If I

could avoid being sick for a month by getting a vaccine I would do so.

Not judging, just wondering if there is information out there I don't know

about.

Joan in Fair Oaks

May 10, 2010

My understanding is that the risk with killed vaccines like the injected flu

shot (vs live inhaled version) is that the risk of being on biologics is more

that we'd have less of an immune response to the vaccine and have less

protection from the disease than the average person, rather than it would harm

us in some way. There is also a theory regarding the 1918 epidemic that it was

so deadly bc of a cytokine storm wherein people drown in their fluids bc of an

overly aggressive immune response. Those of us on biologic drugs might actually

have some protection from this kind of response bc we are suppressed. Kate F

And FWIW I had a tetanus booster last yr while on Enbrel and did fine with it.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 10, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Sheryl <Arrow31298@...> wrote:

Hi OKD,

Your post raised a question for me. I thought that the biologics, such as

Enbrel, worked by suppressing the immune system. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

Since RA is an auto-immune disease and our bodies are working overtime attacking

our own joints, this makes sense to me why they work so well.

Getting a flu shot of any kind would seem to me to be playing w/fire if you're

on a drug such as Enbrel. Because vaccines bypass the normal exposure routes

such as the mouth, nose and digestive tract and are placed directly into the

blood stream, that alone is a huge issue for a healthy body. But to do so in a

body who's immune system is suppressed by a drug seems really risky to me.

Vaccine suppress our immunes systems anyway. Here's an article that explains

how that works; http://www.mercola.com/article/vaccines/immune_suppression.htm

So I guess my question is, why do doctors even suggest flu shots to RA patients

on biologics? Just curious as to what the groups experience has been.

I'm not judging anyone's choice to get a flu shot. That's a personal decision.

Hope no one takes this post the wrong way because I'm a person who likes to know

these kinds of things, that's all.

Sheryl

From: OKD <Cofade_2000@...>

Subject: [ ] Re: swine flu

Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 8:38 AM

hi joan:

Yes, I am stil l glad I didnt get it. First, I dont trust it. I have had several

friends get bad reactions, many like guillen barre syndrome like responses, plus

at the time, my rheumy didnt trust how the enbreal an mtx would react with it

and we still dont know. I fought my job on this too ( i work in a hospital).

I still contend these " vaccines " were invented to make money for the drug

companies for the big pandemic that wasnt.

I did get the regulr flu shot and still you can get the flu because it doesnt

encompass every strain of it...

Personal decisions, but I put enuf poisons into my system with all the drugs I

take.

OKD

May 10, 2010

Hi Kate,

Thanks, good to know. I imagine everyone's body is different. Glad to hear

that you had no issues w/the tetanus booster. The immune suppression from the

biologics still concerns me. Guess you're at risk of getting the swine flu

either way, with or without the shot.

Sheryl

From: Kate Fair <kalfoley@...>

Subject: Re: [ ] Re: swine flu

" " < >

Date: Monday, May 10, 2010, 10:54 AM