Re: machine and how it works...? : Quality, not Quantity may be the key

March 22, 2006

Bruce is on target as regards those who argue that more power must translate

into more effectiveness.

Perhaps one of the most common reason for NO RESULTS with Rife sessions is bad

targeting. Regardless of the output power that some researchers may boast,

attempting to kill a fly with a sledge hammer is of little use if you miss the

target!

From time to time we send out programs that have convergences of

CONVERGENCE 1 .03125

Divisional Convergence Harmonics is at the core of our research and cannot be

duplicated by innefective systems simply because the oscillator rather it be an

audio sound card or an inexpensive 555 timer may be too primitive to accurately

target many pathogens.

These inexpensive oscillators are like using a sling shot to hit a bird,

verses using a gun with a scope.

Thus we may often hear of the clamor for more power from some researchers

which is revealing that they probably are not getting a high percentage of

kills, so they assume that the problem is not enough POWER when in reality it is

more than likely BAD TARGETING. This is like putting a bigger rubber band on a

sling shot, when what really is necessary to up the percentages is to upgrade

the targeting device to something that is far more advanced such as a precision

oscillator.

Such oscillators although very expensive, have the ability to precision target

and have at least two output channels or more, allowing for pulses and sweeps to

be generated at the same time (pulses get better kills, while sweeps or

convergences will pick up mutations).

Understanding convergence's and harmonics / Principles for accurate targeting.

Many Rife programs converge at 1 1 or 1 Hz up and down from the primary number

or even wider. (I have seen convergences as wide as 10 1)

Example: Target frequency is 100. The first frequency with the above

convergence command would be 99 then 101, then finishing with the target of 100.

The purpose of this is to pick up possible mutations and variants outside of the

target number.

It should be noted that in many cases we are relying on harmonics of the

primary number for targeting. The actual primary number for example could be

331251 (Epstein-Barr Virus). This number is too high for many Plasma systems to

drive. So if we divide by 32 we can come up with a useful harmonic frequency

within the audio range that we can drive. (Or you can divide by 2 repeatedly)

If we were to run a 1 Hz convergence around this primary frequency 331251, we

would run 331250 then 331252 and finish with are target frequency of 331251.

Note what happens however as we divide these 3 numbers by 32 to get a useful

harmonic within the audio range our system can drive:

331250 = 10351.5625

331251 = 10351.59375 (target frequency)

331252 = 10351.625

It can be seen that all 3 frequencies fall within the same frequency range of

10351 Hz. The difference between these 3 numbers must be measured by the smaller

numbers after the decimal point to get a true harmonic convergence of 1 Hz up

and down in the audio range. The difference is .03125. Or each change of 1 Hz in

the upper range frequencies are a .03125 difference when divided by 32 to give

us harmonics in the audio range.

Therefore a convergence of 1 Hz up and down of the primary frequency within

the audio range of our harmonic numbers should have a command of .03125 to gain

a true 1 Hz convergence of the true higher range frequencies that we divided by

32.

This new command line should get us the greatest true convergence as well as

spread of the primary number:

This is the new command line: converge 1 .03125 This actually will give you a

convergence of 32 Hz off the primary number to pick up any possible mutations,

even though in the audio range it appears to be only spreading out 1 Hz, the

second number .03125 in the command line is what gives you the spread of 32 Hz

up and down from the primary frequency, picking up all the true harmonics.

1 Hz divide by 32 = .03215

From this research it can also be seen that if we reverse the math that a

convergence in the audio range of 1 Hz off from the primary number in the audio

range of 10351 will produce harmonics of not 1 Hz but 32 Hz off the true target

number of 331251!

Or it would translate like this:

10350=331200

10351=331232 Target Frequency: 331251???

10352=331264

It should be noted that NONE of these frequencies produce a true harmonic of

our target number of 331251! The only way to generate a true harmonic of 331251

from the audio range is to have an oscillator accurate enough to generate

frequencies with differences of less than 1 Hz. In this case the frequency in

the audio range must be 10351.59375 to produce the true harmonic target

frequency of 331251! Thus we can demonstrate the need for a precision oscillator

to produce these frequencies with smaller differences then simple 1 Hz steps.

Mike Truerife

" Bruce K. Stenulson " wrote:

Luigi,

It's good to hear that you are doing so well; obviously the way you are using

the 6C EM+ is VERY effective.

There appear to be some common misconceptions around the concepts of 'power'

versus 'effectiveness' that another researcher brought to my attention, so it

may be time to try to shed some light upon this common myth: that " more power

equals more effectiveness " . In many cases, the opposite is actually being found

to be true.

The 6C EM+ actually may have quite a bit more 'power' than what needs to be

employed to produce optimum body response in many situations; for example, using

a modest percentage of it's output power capability at the " 300 " power level

setting is repeatedly being reported to produce the maximum positive response,

while also producing the minimum of adverse collateral reactions.

On the 6C EM+, you can take a TriField meter in hand and back away from a single

Resonant Plasma tube about 8 feet before the E-field reading drops from being

pegged off-scale, down to the 100,000 volts per meter E-field density reading

when the " Power Output Level " setting is set at the " 300 " level. With the output

power set up to the maximum " 1220 " setting, you need to back away about ten

feet (or more) from the Resonant Plasma tube before the Trifield meter's reading

drops to that same 100,000 volts per meter E-field density reading. That's a lot

of power in the E-field. Being within 8 feet of the tube, even at this modest

Output Power Level setting, continuously produces results for users of the EM+

systems.

But the E-field reading is only a simple 'energy field density' reading, and it

does not offer any 'qualitative' information about the characteristics of the

resonance being set up within, and radiated from, the plasma tube (/tubes). When

run at the higher 1220 setting, there is more of a secondary 'ringing' / damped

wave resonance present in the radiated waveforms from the plasma. While this may

be acceptable and usable in many situations for many research subjects, there

may also be many research subjects who will in fact respond more positively to

the 'cleaner' plasma resonance that results when the power level is controlled

and the plasma resonance characteristics are optimized at intermediate power

levels.

Research subjects using the EM+ systems at the 300 Power Output Level setting

report dramatic results with a minimum of collateral reaction that are otherwise

experienced when a higher power output level is selected. (Many times the

'collateral adverse reactions' experienced from exposure to a plasma system with

too much input power, resulting in variations and uncontrolled plasma resonance

characteristics, are being misinterpreted as 'healing reactions', and people

are even being told that they are a 'good sign'.... even though while they feel

like crap for days after an exposure, their condition remains relatively

unchanged for prolonged periods.... (What's wrong with this picture?)

So maybe this often-repeated misconception that " more power is better " needs to

be very closely examined once more.

The body may in fact respond optimally within certain 'power windows', or more

properly 'windows of receptivity'. While the body is known to be responsive to

extremely subtle resonance influences (as evidenced by the results repeatedly

produced by the ABPA devices in use by Dr. Jeff Sutherland and many others), it

is also known to go into a 'resistive' or self-protective made when exposed to

adverse fields or energy levels; EAV testing and various forms of body response

testing illustrates this beyond question.

So yes, in many cases, 'more is less'... more power is paridoxicly less

effective... an interesting delima for those who are marketing from the

standpoint that " More MUST be better!??). And the often repeated clamor of " MORE

POWER - MORE POWER - MORE POWER! " may have misled many well-meaning researchers,

or individuals fighting their health challenges, looking for help and hope...

Extensive reports on this subject, arising out of research done over the last

year, are being prepared, which should offer further insight. Until these

reports are completed, I'd suggest those who are interested to utilize whatever

body response testing systems they may have available to them to investigate

this subject further.

I wish each of you the best of progress and insights in your research!

Be Well!!

Bruce

http://www.stenulson.net/althealth

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Luigi Farina wrote:

> The only one I know that might have that info about my EM+ is Bruce

> Stenulson so perhaps I should ask him, but I am doing well enough that I

> figure it's not really worth wasting his time.

> Luigi

>

> luigi-- Frex machine and how it works...?

>>

>>>>how far will the freq. travel from the bulb, to be

>>>>effective on your body, on your plasma system?

>>>>roger

>>>>

>>>>Luigi Farina wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> I am not sure how familiar you are with Frex15

>>>>>software (you might want to

>>>>>download it and kick its tires-it's shareware), but

>>>>>it allows me to set up a

>>>>>group of conditions I'll be dealing with, day or

>>>>>night, with each involving

>>>>>even dozens of frequencies.

>>>>>

>>>>>This software makes a computer equipped with a

>>>>>decent sound subsystem into a

>>>>>workable frequency producing device.

>>>>>

>>>>>And because the frequency lists come from CAFL, Jim

>>>>>Bare, Bruce Stenulson

>>>>>and Hulda I am quite sure they are good.

>>>>>

>>>>>During a session that will include, say, " cancer,

>>>>>BX " , " parasites,

>>>>>schistosoma " , " bone regeneration " , " dna repair " and

>>>>>a few other goodies my

>>>>>laptop will cycle by itself through what frequencies

>>>>>are associated with the

>>>>>conditions I am dealing with for up to several hours

>>>>>without any

>>>>>intervention from me.

>>>>>

>>>>>For example " cancer, BX " includes 21725, 17034,

>>>>>46015.6, 23007.8, 11503.9,

>>>>>3713, 2876, 2790, 2128, 2008 and 1604, with each of

>>>>>these frequencies fired

>>>>>for 180 seconds, although the software can be

>>>>>customized for different time

>>>>>lengths or additional frequencies for each

>>>>>condition.

>>>>>

>>>>>Because my cancer is a carcinoma I use " cancer, BX "

>>>>>or " cancer, carcinoma "

>>>>>and find some additional good frequencies with

>>>>> " parasites, schistosoma " (the

>>>>>parasite associated with bladder cancer).

>>>>>

>>>>>I also use the arthritis, bone regeneration, " acute

>>>>>pain " and " pain of

>>>>>cancer " sets (good for bone and joint pain-they help

>>>>>when the bones start to

>>>>>complain they have to produce marrow); strep, staph

>>>>>and c-diff frequencies

>>>>>(cheap insurance-I go to the hospital and to clinics

>>>>>A LOT, and that's where

>>>>>you catch these bugs!); plus colon and hypothalamus

>>>>>normalization (both

>>>>>these glands had almost shut down on me), kidney

>>>>>insufficiency and

>>>>>maintenance (my lone kidney needed help BIG TIME),

>>>>>and " Dr. 's Zapper "

>>>>>(good stuff all around I am told).

>>>>>

>>>>>There have been other sets I have used as a matter

>>>>>of emergency, like white

>>>>>and red blood production and energy and wellness,

>>>>>and for those there was no

>>>>>herx effect whatsoever.

>>>>>

>>>>>The others might make one feel a bit down the day

>>>>>after.

>>>>>

>>>>>One set that is A MUST at the end of each session is

>>>>> " dental foci " : one's

>>>>>teeth house LOADS of nasties that need killing or

>>>>>the problem might not go

>>>>>away.

>>>>>

>>>>>The EM+ I have can be used as a contact device or as

>>>>>a plasma unit, so the

>>>>>only additional trick I count on is to reuse a set

>>>>>of frequencies only every

>>>>>48 hours.

>>>>>

>>>>>And once every couple of days I'll rest the neon

>>>>>tube on my lap, as close to

>>>>>the bladder as possible, for the duration of the

>>>>>session.

>>>>>

>>>>>Luigi

>>>>>

>

March 23, 2006

Perhaps if you were someone able to merge 's Wade machine with

Bruce's, you'd have a pretty lethal rife machine (I'm not too familiar

with the physics, however, to determine whether or not the

piezoelectric properties can be fully reblicated with a plasma tube)

It'd be dangerous to use around sick people of course. Some

frequencies are not easily obtainable by simply inputting frequencies

(fourier transforms)...

I have used both machines (EM+ and Wade's 10b) and each has its

limitations. Wade's only treats a certain small area, while

Bruce you have to find the needle in the haystack in order to kill

something.

>

> Bruce is on target as regards those who argue that more power must

translate into more effectiveness.

>

> Perhaps one of the most common reason for NO RESULTS with Rife

sessions is bad targeting. Regardless of the output power that some

researchers may boast, attempting to kill a fly with a sledge hammer

is of little use if you miss the target!

>

> From time to time we send out programs that have convergences of

> CONVERGENCE 1 .03125

>

> Divisional Convergence Harmonics is at the core of our research

and cannot be duplicated by innefective systems simply because the

oscillator rather it be an audio sound card or an inexpensive 555

timer may be too primitive to accurately target many pathogens.

>

> These inexpensive oscillators are like using a sling shot to hit a

bird, verses using a gun with a scope.

>

> Thus we may often hear of the clamor for more power from some

researchers which is revealing that they probably are not getting a

high percentage of kills, so they assume that the problem is not

enough POWER when in reality it is more than likely BAD TARGETING.

This is like putting a bigger rubber band on a sling shot, when what

really is necessary to up the percentages is to upgrade the targeting

device to something that is far more advanced such as a precision

oscillator.

>

> Such oscillators although very expensive, have the ability to

precision target and have at least two output channels or more,

allowing for pulses and sweeps to be generated at the same time

(pulses get better kills, while sweeps or convergences will pick up

mutations).

>

> Understanding convergence's and harmonics / Principles for accurate

targeting.

>

> Many Rife programs converge at 1 1 or 1 Hz up and down from the

primary number or even wider. (I have seen convergences as wide as 10 1)

>

> Example: Target frequency is 100. The first frequency with the

above convergence command would be 99 then 101, then finishing with

the target of 100. The purpose of this is to pick up possible

mutations and variants outside of the target number.

>

> It should be noted that in many cases we are relying on harmonics

of the primary number for targeting. The actual primary number for

example could be 331251 (Epstein-Barr Virus). This number is too high

for many Plasma systems to drive. So if we divide by 32 we can come up

with a useful harmonic frequency within the audio range that we can

drive. (Or you can divide by 2 repeatedly)

>

> If we were to run a 1 Hz convergence around this primary frequency

331251, we would run 331250 then 331252 and finish with are target

frequency of 331251.

>

> Note what happens however as we divide these 3 numbers by 32 to

get a useful harmonic within the audio range our system can drive:

>

> 331250 = 10351.5625

> 331251 = 10351.59375 (target frequency)

> 331252 = 10351.625

>

> It can be seen that all 3 frequencies fall within the same

frequency range of 10351 Hz. The difference between these 3 numbers

must be measured by the smaller numbers after the decimal point to get

a true harmonic convergence of 1 Hz up and down in the audio range.

The difference is .03125. Or each change of 1 Hz in the upper range

frequencies are a .03125 difference when divided by 32 to give us

harmonics in the audio range.

>

> Therefore a convergence of 1 Hz up and down of the primary

frequency within the audio range of our harmonic numbers should have a

command of .03125 to gain a true 1 Hz convergence of the true higher

range frequencies that we divided by 32.

>

> This new command line should get us the greatest true convergence

as well as spread of the primary number:

>

> This is the new command line: converge 1 .03125 This actually will

give you a convergence of 32 Hz off the primary number to pick up any

possible mutations, even though in the audio range it appears to be

only spreading out 1 Hz, the second number .03125 in the command line

is what gives you the spread of 32 Hz up and down from the primary

frequency, picking up all the true harmonics.

>

> 1 Hz divide by 32 = .03215

>

> From this research it can also be seen that if we reverse the math

that a convergence in the audio range of 1 Hz off from the primary

number in the audio range of 10351 will produce harmonics of not 1 Hz

but 32 Hz off the true target number of 331251!

>

> Or it would translate like this:

>

> 10350=331200

>

> 10351=331232 Target Frequency: 331251???

>

> 10352=331264

>

> It should be noted that NONE of these frequencies produce a true

harmonic of our target number of 331251! The only way to generate a

true harmonic of 331251 from the audio range is to have an oscillator

accurate enough to generate frequencies with differences of less than

1 Hz. In this case the frequency in the audio range must be

10351.59375 to produce the true harmonic target frequency of 331251!

Thus we can demonstrate the need for a precision oscillator to produce

these frequencies with smaller differences then simple 1 Hz steps.

>

March 23, 2006

Hi zenalpha,

You don't have to " find the needle in a haystack " to kill

something. You can run one of the many freq sets (such as in the

Rife program Frex). There are sets for almost any condition you

can think of.

You can run stepped sweeps to do the job (in at least some

cases). You can run sweeps with 2 second, 2 Hz steps and see if

you get a hit. Usually covering a particular range of freqs that

is likely to cover the freq needed (sweeping from a few Hz to

over 10kHz may take much too long, depending on the freq step

chosen).

Bil

PC 1000

M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

http://magpulser.com

Mammoth Lakes, CA

mailto:magpulser@...

z> Perhaps if you were someone able to merge 's Wade machine with

z> Bruce's, you'd have a pretty lethal rife machine (I'm not too familiar

z> with the physics, however, to determine whether or not the

z> piezoelectric properties can be fully reblicated with a plasma tube)

z> It'd be dangerous to use around sick people of course. Some

z> frequencies are not easily obtainable by simply inputting frequencies

z> (fourier transforms)...

z> I have used both machines (EM+ and Wade's 10b) and each has its

z> limitations. Wade's only treats a certain small area, while

z> Bruce you have to find the needle in the haystack in order to kill

z> something.

z>

>>

>> Bruce is on target as regards those who argue that more power must

z> translate into more effectiveness.

>>

>> Perhaps one of the most common reason for NO RESULTS with Rife

z> sessions is bad targeting. Regardless of the output power that some

z> researchers may boast, attempting to kill a fly with a sledge hammer

z> is of little use if you miss the target!

>>

>> From time to time we send out programs that have convergences of

>> CONVERGENCE 1 .03125

>>

>> Divisional Convergence Harmonics is at the core of our research

z> and cannot be duplicated by innefective systems simply because the

z> oscillator rather it be an audio sound card or an inexpensive 555

z> timer may be too primitive to accurately target many pathogens.

>>

>> These inexpensive oscillators are like using a sling shot to hit a

z> bird, verses using a gun with a scope.

>>

>> Thus we may often hear of the clamor for more power from some

z> researchers which is revealing that they probably are not getting a

z> high percentage of kills, so they assume that the problem is not

z> enough POWER when in reality it is more than likely BAD TARGETING.

z> This is like putting a bigger rubber band on a sling shot, when what

z> really is necessary to up the percentages is to upgrade the targeting

z> device to something that is far more advanced such as a precision

z> oscillator.

>>

>> Such oscillators although very expensive, have the ability to

z> precision target and have at least two output channels or more,

z> allowing for pulses and sweeps to be generated at the same time

z> (pulses get better kills, while sweeps or convergences will pick up

z> mutations).

>>

>> Understanding convergence's and harmonics / Principles for accurate

z> targeting.

>>

>> Many Rife programs converge at 1 1 or 1 Hz up and down from the

z> primary number or even wider. (I have seen convergences as wide as 10 1)

>>

>> Example: Target frequency is 100. The first frequency with the

z> above convergence command would be 99 then 101, then finishing with

z> the target of 100. The purpose of this is to pick up possible

z> mutations and variants outside of the target number.

>>

>> It should be noted that in many cases we are relying on harmonics

z> of the primary number for targeting. The actual primary number for

z> example could be 331251 (Epstein-Barr Virus). This number is too high

z> for many Plasma systems to drive. So if we divide by 32 we can come up

z> with a useful harmonic frequency within the audio range that we can

z> drive. (Or you can divide by 2 repeatedly)

>>

>> If we were to run a 1 Hz convergence around this primary frequency

z> 331251, we would run 331250 then 331252 and finish with are target

z> frequency of 331251.

>>

>> Note what happens however as we divide these 3 numbers by 32 to

z> get a useful harmonic within the audio range our system can drive:

>>

>> 331250 == 10351.5625

>> 331251 == 10351.59375 (target frequency)

>> 331252 == 10351.625

>>

>> It can be seen that all 3 frequencies fall within the same

z> frequency range of 10351 Hz. The difference between these 3 numbers

z> must be measured by the smaller numbers after the decimal point to get

z> a true harmonic convergence of 1 Hz up and down in the audio range.

z> The difference is .03125. Or each change of 1 Hz in the upper range

z> frequencies are a .03125 difference when divided by 32 to give us

z> harmonics in the audio range.

>>

>> Therefore a convergence of 1 Hz up and down of the primary

z> frequency within the audio range of our harmonic numbers should have a

z> command of .03125 to gain a true 1 Hz convergence of the true higher

z> range frequencies that we divided by 32.

>>

>> This new command line should get us the greatest true convergence

z> as well as spread of the primary number:

>>

>> This is the new command line: converge 1 .03125 This actually will

z> give you a convergence of 32 Hz off the primary number to pick up any

z> possible mutations, even though in the audio range it appears to be

z> only spreading out 1 Hz, the second number .03125 in the command line

z> is what gives you the spread of 32 Hz up and down from the primary

z> frequency, picking up all the true harmonics.

>>

>> 1 Hz divide by 32 == .03215

>>

>> From this research it can also be seen that if we reverse the math

z> that a convergence in the audio range of 1 Hz off from the primary

z> number in the audio range of 10351 will produce harmonics of not 1 Hz

z> but 32 Hz off the true target number of 331251!

>>

>> Or it would translate like this:

>>

>> 10350=31200

>>

>> 10351=31232 Target Frequency: 331251???

>>

>> 10352=31264

>>

>> It should be noted that NONE of these frequencies produce a true

z> harmonic of our target number of 331251! The only way to generate a

z> true harmonic of 331251 from the audio range is to have an oscillator

z> accurate enough to generate frequencies with differences of less than

z> 1 Hz. In this case the frequency in the audio range must be

z> 10351.59375 to produce the true harmonic target frequency of 331251!

z> Thus we can demonstrate the need for a precision oscillator to produce

z> these frequencies with smaller differences then simple 1 Hz steps.

>>

z>

March 23, 2006

True, you could use a sweep program - that would be the way to go. I

think it would have to be more refined than using increments however.

You need some sort of oscillator like what is used in 's machine.

I ran over a small range of frequencies several times before getting

a " hit " (the same one I thought). I guess getting the right frequency

can be finnicky - especially as the temperature of the machine messes

with your input device..

>

> Hi zenalpha,

>

> You don't have to " find the needle in a haystack " to kill

> something. You can run one of the many freq sets (such as in the

> Rife program Frex). There are sets for almost any condition you

> can think of.

>

> You can run stepped sweeps to do the job (in at least some

> cases). You can run sweeps with 2 second, 2 Hz steps and see if

> you get a hit. Usually covering a particular range of freqs that

> is likely to cover the freq needed (sweeping from a few Hz to

> over 10kHz may take much too long, depending on the freq step

> chosen).

>

> Bil

>

> PC 1000

> M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

> http://magpulser.com

> Mammoth Lakes, CA

>

March 23, 2006

I'm not so sure that I can agree completely with the " bad targeting "

idea. Of course, not being remotely close to the

frequency/frequencies needed for a specific purpose will prove

ineffective, but that is not my point. It had been demonstrated over

and over again by individual researchers that in most cases, you can

be off the " perfect " frequency slightly and still have the

effectiveness.

Divisional convergence harmonics is not the answer by my records in

working with numerous conditions. Subtle sweeps around the target

frequency have proven far more effective in my records - so much

that I do not even use converges of any type, period.

I think a large part of effectiveness & results is something that

almost NO manufacturer will speak of, but is a topic that speaks

volumes...Effective plasma resonance.

I'm in complete agreement that more power does not give better

results. But by that statement and agreement, why is the " TrueRife "

device touting the high energy output so strongly? That just seems

like a contradiction. Plasma Dynamics is a far more important issue -

one that Mr. Stenulson hit upon in December of '97 when he departed

profoundly from all of the " in the box " thinking. Nobody still has

been able to duplicate what that wonderful knob does.

In either case, if imitation is the highest form of flattery, Bruce

Stenulson has received more flattery than any other creator of

devices. Not only do I respect the man for his incredible knowledge

in electronics and engineering in regard to these devices, but also

to his integrity to abide by the wishes of the late R.R.R. and not

use the Rife name to gain a foothold in marketing. But he doesn't

need to, anyway. His record speaks volumes for itself and hundreds

of researchers and users have only added to the credibility.

But back to my point, I haven't spoken with anyone who has the

knowledge to intelligently speak of the importance of plasma

dynamics and how it interacts with the body other than Mr.

Stenulson. It is so much more than getting a tube to light up.

I really wish that the creators of the various plasma devices would

all get in on a discussion about this, but I feel that is something

that will just not come about.

>

> Bruce is on target as regards those who argue that more power must

translate into more effectiveness.

>

> Perhaps one of the most common reason for NO RESULTS with Rife

sessions is bad targeting. Regardless of the output power that some

researchers may boast, attempting to kill a fly with a sledge hammer

is of little use if you miss the target!

>

> From time to time we send out programs that have convergences of

> CONVERGENCE 1 .03125

>

> Divisional Convergence Harmonics is at the core of our research

and cannot be duplicated by innefective systems simply because the

oscillator rather it be an audio sound card or an inexpensive 555

timer may be too primitive to accurately target many pathogens.

>

> These inexpensive oscillators are like using a sling shot to hit

a bird, verses using a gun with a scope.

>

> Thus we may often hear of the clamor for more power from some

researchers which is revealing that they probably are not getting a

high percentage of kills, so they assume that the problem is not

enough POWER when in reality it is more than likely BAD TARGETING.

This is like putting a bigger rubber band on a sling shot, when what

really is necessary to up the percentages is to upgrade the

targeting device to something that is far more advanced such as a

precision oscillator.

>

> Such oscillators although very expensive, have the ability to

precision target and have at least two output channels or more,

allowing for pulses and sweeps to be generated at the same time

(pulses get better kills, while sweeps or convergences will pick up

mutations).

>

> Understanding convergence's and harmonics / Principles for

accurate targeting.

>

> Many Rife programs converge at 1 1 or 1 Hz up and down from the

primary number or even wider. (I have seen convergences as wide as

10 1)

>

> Example: Target frequency is 100. The first frequency with the

above convergence command would be 99 then 101, then finishing with

the target of 100. The purpose of this is to pick up possible

mutations and variants outside of the target number.

>

> It should be noted that in many cases we are relying on

harmonics of the primary number for targeting. The actual primary

number for example could be 331251 (Epstein-Barr Virus). This number

is too high for many Plasma systems to drive. So if we divide by 32

we can come up with a useful harmonic frequency within the audio

range that we can drive. (Or you can divide by 2 repeatedly)

>

> If we were to run a 1 Hz convergence around this primary

frequency 331251, we would run 331250 then 331252 and finish with

are target frequency of 331251.

>

> Note what happens however as we divide these 3 numbers by 32 to

get a useful harmonic within the audio range our system can drive:

>

> 331250 = 10351.5625

> 331251 = 10351.59375 (target frequency)

> 331252 = 10351.625

>

> It can be seen that all 3 frequencies fall within the same

frequency range of 10351 Hz. The difference between these 3 numbers

must be measured by the smaller numbers after the decimal point to

get a true harmonic convergence of 1 Hz up and down in the audio

range. The difference is .03125. Or each change of 1 Hz in the upper

range frequencies are a .03125 difference when divided by 32 to give

us harmonics in the audio range.

>

> Therefore a convergence of 1 Hz up and down of the primary

frequency within the audio range of our harmonic numbers should have

a command of .03125 to gain a true 1 Hz convergence of the true

higher range frequencies that we divided by 32.

>

> This new command line should get us the greatest true

convergence as well as spread of the primary number:

>

> This is the new command line: converge 1 .03125 This actually

will give you a convergence of 32 Hz off the primary number to pick

up any possible mutations, even though in the audio range it appears

to be only spreading out 1 Hz, the second number .03125 in the

command line is what gives you the spread of 32 Hz up and down from

the primary frequency, picking up all the true harmonics.

>

> 1 Hz divide by 32 = .03215

>

> From this research it can also be seen that if we reverse the

math that a convergence in the audio range of 1 Hz off from the

primary number in the audio range of 10351 will produce harmonics of

not 1 Hz but 32 Hz off the true target number of 331251!

>

> Or it would translate like this:

>

> 10350=331200

>

> 10351=331232 Target Frequency: 331251???

>

> 10352=331264

>

> It should be noted that NONE of these frequencies produce a true

harmonic of our target number of 331251! The only way to generate a

true harmonic of 331251 from the audio range is to have an

oscillator accurate enough to generate frequencies with differences

of less than 1 Hz. In this case the frequency in the audio range

must be 10351.59375 to produce the true harmonic target frequency of

331251! Thus we can demonstrate the need for a precision oscillator

to produce these frequencies with smaller differences then simple 1

Hz steps.

>

> Mike Truerife

March 23, 2006

Hi zenalpha,

Whatever freq generator you use is The oscillator. I think freq

and time steps are plenty (more than most people use). The trick

is knowing what range to cover (so you don't spend all day).

Bil

PC 1000

M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

http://magpulser.com

Mammoth Lakes, CA

mailto:magpulser@...

z> True, you could use a sweep program - that would be the way to go. I

z> think it would have to be more refined than using increments however.

z> You need some sort of oscillator like what is used in 's machine.

z> I ran over a small range of frequencies several times before getting

z> a " hit " (the same one I thought). I guess getting the right frequency

z> can be finnicky - especially as the temperature of the machine messes

z> with your input device..

z>

>>

>> Hi zenalpha,

>>

>> You don't have to " find the needle in a haystack " to kill

>> something. You can run one of the many freq sets (such as in the

>> Rife program Frex). There are sets for almost any condition you

>> can think of.

>>

>> You can run stepped sweeps to do the job (in at least some

>> cases). You can run sweeps with 2 second, 2 Hz steps and see if

>> you get a hit. Usually covering a particular range of freqs that

>> is likely to cover the freq needed (sweeping from a few Hz to

>> over 10kHz may take much too long, depending on the freq step

>> chosen).

>>

>> Bil

>>

>> PC 1000

>> M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

>> http://magpulser.com

>> Mammoth Lakes, CA

>>

z>

March 24, 2006

Read this:

http://educate-yourself.org/gw/gwultrafreq25sep99.shtml

Not all frequency generators are created equal, and not all rife

devices operate necessarily the same way. It would be difficult to

create the hidden fourier components, I suspect, using a traditional

plasma machine (possible, but I'm not technical enough to answer

that). Which is why I suspect that used the piezoelectric plate

instead of plasma (it also might be that treating the whole body is

just plain dangerous using that type of sweep).

I've used both 's and Bruce's rife machines (and a few other

people's rife machines as well). I have been most satisfied with

's machine, not because it is necessarily inherently superior, but

because it is convenient and because I've gotten better results from

it than any other rife machine that I've used. This is probably due

to the nature of the device (the production of powerful pressure

square waves in the body and the hidden fourier frequencies). I'd be

difficult, but I suspect not impossible to replicate what 's

machine using a frequency generator.

> >>

> >> Hi zenalpha,

> >>

> >> You don't have to " find the needle in a haystack " to kill

> >> something. You can run one of the many freq sets (such as in the

> >> Rife program Frex). There are sets for almost any condition you

> >> can think of.

> >>

> >> You can run stepped sweeps to do the job (in at least some

> >> cases). You can run sweeps with 2 second, 2 Hz steps and see if

> >> you get a hit. Usually covering a particular range of freqs that

> >> is likely to cover the freq needed (sweeping from a few Hz to

> >> over 10kHz may take much too long, depending on the freq step

> >> chosen).

> >>

> >> Bil

> >>

> >> PC 1000

> >> M-Pulse 5000 magnetic pulse generator

> >> http://magpulser.com

> >> Mammoth Lakes, CA

> >>

>

> z>

March 24, 2006

Hi Neuromancer,

I can say Bruce's frequencies for stimulating and normalizing body functions has

received a lot of use and the frequencies well appear to do what is claimed.

I believe Bruce uses one coil in his system, which is a great indication that we

don't have to blast away to achieve results. My favourite RIFE photo is on

Bruce's web site, looking at that couch (look's so comfortable) and six plasma

lights around it.

I've mimiked it with two plasma lamps either side of my table.

However, Mike does a great system too from feedback I received. I seen what

coils can do to very accurate frequencies, so I do not believe a 0.001 is

required in the oscillator, as the plasma and assocated firmware will mess this

up a little.

Probably accurate oscillators would be more beneficial to the B/R which Dr Bare

has displayed how well the signal is transmitted and preserved from the plasma

tube on the B/R system and contact pads where accurate frequencies can be

delivered.

At the end of the day, we make the frequencies noisy, to cover morphing and

broad range physiological effects. Also audio frequencies without a RF carrier

aren't going to produce harmonics of value much more than 300kHz, so it becomes

pointless in attempting to target a higher RF region with audio alone.

I heard the GB4000 has produced excellent results for a contact system, since

the RF carrier was added, although the GB4000 has a huge frequency range and

outputs all RF frequencies directly. Nice :-)

Regards,

Ken

Re: machine and how it works...? : Quality, not Quantity may

be the key