Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 At 06:35 AM 01/19/2004, thecelestialspirit wrote: just remember, that while the virus may be gone from the blood, it still remains in the tissues, and can once again raise its ugly head......it's a crap shoot.......and a personal gamble...... Satya, Where do you get this stuff from?? regards, BobK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 oh, Man.....are you asking for the study again, just because I made a comment? Jesus, maybe I should be in a hep c chat room instead, so I wouldn't have to verify scientifically every statement I make. Grow up, Bob! come on! Satya Re: [ ] Re: Infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 4 in the United States At 06:35 AM 01/19/2004, thecelestialspirit wrote:just remember, that while the virus may be gone from the blood, it still remains in the tissues, and can once again raise its ugly head......it's a crap shoot.......and a personal gamble......Satya,Where do you get this stuff from??regards,BobK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 Satya, Your commen: quote " just remember, that while the virus may be gone from the blood, it still remains in the tissues, and can once again raise its ugly head " endquote ....has serious ramifications associated with it. As such I was wondering where you got this information. Do you know if the patients followed for ten years (and longer) who have repeatedly tested negative (in blood) still have virus in their tissue? Do you know what percentage of patients testing negative, six months after tx has ended, have positive viral titers from tissue. Does it happen to some? ALL? This would help other readers put your statement into perspective. Or is this more loose language on your part? If you don't know just say so! Regards, BobK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2004 Report Share Posted January 20, 2004 It was just a comment. I read enough things on these newslists to pick up some general information from reading plenty of scientific articles which are posted. I'm not a doctor, just a regular person, and people know this. I don't expect people reading these posts to take my words as gospel........it was just a comment.....n-kay-y-y-y-y-y?? Satya Re: [ ] Re: Infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 4 in the United States Satya,Your commen: quote "just remember, that while the virus may be gone from the blood, it stillremains in the tissues, and can once again raise its ugly head" endquote ...has serious ramifications associated with it. As such I was wondering where you got this information. Do you know if the patients followed for ten years (and longer) who have repeatedly tested negative (in blood) still have virus in their tissue? Do you know what percentage of patients testing negative, six months after tx has ended, have positive viral titers from tissue. Does it happen to some? ALL? This would help other readers put your statement into perspective. Or is this more loose language on your part?If you don't know just say so!Regards,BobK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.