Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Posted December 10, 2008 > > , > > The diagrams for the natural hormones are in your source, Fig. 6-3. > > http://www.thyroidmanager.org/Chapter6/6-text.htm#top > > Chuck > Thank you Chuck! I take it you've found some interesting stuff there? Quote
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Posted December 10, 2008 Cool...I was able to magnify the chart and save it as a jpg! Thanks again Chuck! > > , > > The diagrams for the natural hormones are in your source, Fig. 6-3. > > http://www.thyroidmanager.org/Chapter6/6-text.htm#top > > Chuck > Quote
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Posted December 10, 2008 , You wrote: > > I take it you've found some interesting stuff there? Yes, but a bit dated. Chuck Quote
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Posted December 11, 2008 Chuck, Do you have any related information that would be more current? > > > > I take it you've found some interesting stuff there? > > Yes, but a bit dated. > > Chuck > Quote
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Posted December 11, 2008 Hi again, Chuck! So this 'would' be a good source for me to read in its entirety to get a good grasp of all the related aspects presented within this particular source? > > > > Do you have any related information that would be more current? > > > > The part I thought was dated was the discussion of diagnostic tests, which have advanced quite a bit since the uptake index was widely used. That tells me some of the other information has probably been superseded as well. There are plenty of web sites around that give the current tests and their capabilities. > > The date of the latest revision of that particular chapter was 2000. The Chapter on thyroid assays (6A) was more recent, 2006, and it included the more recent information about diagnostic tests. > > Chuck > Quote
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2008 Report Posted December 11, 2008 , You wrote: > So this 'would' be a good source for me to read in its entirety to get > a good grasp of all the related aspects presented within this > particular source? In the sense that it is technically correct and mostly pretty current, yes. However, it is technical writing, which might make it hard to follow. It might occasionally be misleading, if you can't interpret the details. Chuck Quote
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2008 Report Posted December 12, 2008 I can always come ask you, right Chuck? ;-) > > So this 'would' be a good source for me to read in its entirety to get > > a good grasp of all the related aspects presented within this > > particular source? > > In the sense that it is technically correct and mostly pretty current, > yes. However, it is technical writing, which might make it hard to > follow. It might occasionally be misleading, if you can't interpret the > details. > > Chuck > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.