Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 Char, You wrote: > > > (((((((((((((((((((((((((Chuck)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) > I thought you could use that! > Thanks, much. How is the new job going? Chuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 Sherry, Thanks much. How is that for concise? Chuck > > > Hey Chuck please keep posting at your same rate. When I log on I > first look for threads of interest, and then look for posts from > you. Your posts are usually not off topic, concise and to the > point, and learn have some interesting scientific fact (such as the > chlorine statement). So, please know that others of us on the list > enjoy learning from your experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 Could be you're right. We really hate to face the fact that with health care, as with everything else, all too often we're rolling the dice. . > > Re: Question for Chuck > <hypothyroidism/message/31297;_ylc=X3oDMTJxdGlvcWZ\ nBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEwODIEbXNnSWQDMzEyOTcEc2V\ jA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MDA3MDMzNQ--> > > > > Posted by: " Crystal " sweetnwright@... > <mailto:sweetnwright@...?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Question%20for%20Chuck> > sweetenloe1 <sweetenloe1> > > > Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:05 pm (PST) > > > I think its their " education " that gets some of us in trouble > > -- Re: Question for Chuck > > The doctors who are so often slandered on this list as being ignorant > and stupid [or worse] are in fact on average much more intelligent and > well educated than the average of those doing the slandering. > > That does not negate the fact that some percentage of patients do in > fact receive utterly horrible, even fatal, health care. > > > > > > > Re: Question for Chuck > > <hypothyroidism/message/31266 > <hypothyroidism/message/31266> > _ylc=X3oDMTJxNDBwZzkxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE0NTY2NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDkyNTEw > DIEbXNnSWQDMzEyNjYEc2VjA2Rtc2cEc2xrA3Ztc2cEc3RpbWUDMTE5MDAyMDg5NQ--> > > > > > > > > Posted by: " Gracia " circe@... <mailto:circe%40gwi.net> > > <mailto:circe@... > <mailto:circe%40gwi.net>?Subject=%20Re%3A%20Question%20for%20Chuck> > > graciabee <graciabee > <graciabee>> > > > > > > Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:26 pm (PST) > > > > > > LOL > > we have all been to docs who sounded just like Chuck and were dead > > wrong, and we were almost dead b/c of it. > > not meaning to bash Chuck. > > Gracia > > > > Hi, . You're right that everyone has a right to their opinion. > > But I certainly have never seen ANY statement by Chuck that could > > reasonably be considered aggressive, passive or otherwise. > > > > Chuck is, however, a scientist. He therefore speaks as a scientist. > > The factual and unemotional way of reacting to inaccurate statements > may > > well be off-putting to someone not familiar with the approach of > > scientists to facts and fallacies. > > > > That being said, if you think Chuck is passive/aggressive then you > > probably think my statements re: Hulda [and similar quack nut > > cases] far beyond passive-aggressive. So be it. But saying a pig will > > fly isn't going to gain it a lot of air miles; and I kind of tend to > > call a spade a spade. > > > > Regards, > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 the new job is going...dealing with some CNA's isn't always easy..but soon I shall be in the ranks of a Nurse! WOO HOOO. Chemistry is hardddddd waaaaaaaa especially when a touch of the ole brain fog decides to hit. Thank God for Bacopa! It does help. Peace and thanks for caring! Char ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 I love to read what types. He so reminds me of an English gent that might well be sipping his afternoon tea as he types. And that is meant with the utmost respect. I'm going back to the corner with now. Hey ...let's pop some pop-corn and watch! :-) ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 I totally agree with you Sherry. I also do have to admit that I do like the differences of opinion. It is good to hear all sides. I enjoy Gracia, Sam and anyone else some might consider controversial. It makes me think. Venizia -- In hypothyroidism , " hary722001 " <hary722001@...> wrote: > > Hey Chuck please keep posting at your same rate. When I log on I > first look for threads of interest, and then look for posts from > you. Your posts are usually not off topic, concise and to the > point, and learn have some interesting scientific fact (such as the > chlorine statement). So, please know that others of us on the list > enjoy learning from your experience. > Sherry > > > > > , > > > > You wrote about me: > > > > > ... He is wrong in his approach to others on > > > this list who have a right to their opinions on their own > health. Plus > > > their right to post these opinions.... > > > > I guess I am not entitled to my own opinion let alone the right to > > express it. I have never opposed anyone's right to post here. > > > > > > > >...He negates that right being passive aggressive. And all of us > feel it but > > > we either don't reply or are agitated by it .....whether or not > it is his > > > intention to keep all of us out of the mix, have the site to > himself... > > > hmmm? > > > > I find it curious that you would slander me in a post addressed to > > someone else, by calling me passive aggressive. As for my > dominating the > > list, the last full month, August, had 664 posts. Of those I had > 80, > > including the FAQ. That indicates active participation, but by no > means > > dominance. > > > > Chuck > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 Absolutely. That's why this is my favorite group on this subject. > > > > > > , > > > > > > You wrote about me: > > > > > > > ... He is wrong in his approach to others on > > > > this list who have a right to their opinions on their own > > health. Plus > > > > their right to post these opinions.... > > > > > > I guess I am not entitled to my own opinion let alone the right to > > > express it. I have never opposed anyone's right to post here. > > > > > > > > > > >...He negates that right being passive aggressive. And all of us > > feel it but > > > > we either don't reply or are agitated by it .....whether or not > > it is his > > > > intention to keep all of us out of the mix, have the site to > > himself... > > > > hmmm? > > > > > > I find it curious that you would slander me in a post addressed to > > > someone else, by calling me passive aggressive. As for my > > dominating the > > > list, the last full month, August, had 664 posts. Of those I had > > 80, > > > including the FAQ. That indicates active participation, but by no > > means > > > dominance. > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.