Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 This is part two of my critique of Sylvia's ebook at: http://www.fixourfood.com/images/Print%20Layout%201.pdf On page 20 Sylvia writes, " Bacteria emit hydrogen in the process of digesting the lactose and other sugars in the intestines. The amount of hydrogen released from the lungs is high due to the lactose-consuming bacteria in the intestine. " But lactobacilli are known to digest lactose and produce carbon dioxide, not hydogen, and bifidobacteria use lactose and produce no gas; producing short chain fatty acids instead. Both can also use other sugars and the populations are sizeable, probably the majority. From Tungland's review posted on my website, " When the main types of generally recognized beneficial bacteria, bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, are at optimum levels they constitute approximately one-third of the bacterial population in the gastrointestinal tract. In some cases the numbers of beneficial bacteria may be so low they are undetectable. The numbers of bifidobacteria are regarded as a marker of the stability of the human intestinal microflora (Mutt & Tanaka, 1987). Populations of bifidobacteria can represent up to 95% of the total intestinal microflora in breast-fed infants, in comparison with about 25% in the adult (Gibson, 1995). " So when Sylvia quotes the researchers, " The same patients were given small amounts of milk, steadily increasing the amount for two weeks. At the end of the two weeks, that person could consume the same amount of milk as in the first test and the hydrogen breath test did not register as high as it did the first time. The conclusion was that lactose intolerance could be overcome by continued ingestion of milk " , I would tend to agree with them because the milk may have stimulated the lactic acid bacteria and the bifidobacteria, which should be and may already have been there in hugely dominant numbers. Modern research I posted yesterday in part 1 of my critique of the ebook showed that cultivating these bacteria in the bowel is a specific cure for lactose intolerance. It's immaterial whether some people may have lost genetics for lactose digestion as we evolved with these bacteria that perform the task for us. And, the studies I've seen used inulin in two-week to four-week periods, same as the milk/lactose study offered here by Sylvia. Given the data we have on the subject I doubt she's going to get anywhere with her postulate that an immune system reaction caused a reduced response to lactose; it's more likely just the bowel ecology correcting itself. On page 21 she refers to gastric reflux and burning as a sign of possible intestinal fermentation, but the stomach is not involved in intestinal fementation; insufficient stomach acid called hypochlorhydia is the main cause of GERD, while healthy intestinal fermentation causes no discomfort. This can be looked up in a keyword search on hypochlorhydria. Chronic hypochlorhydria results in poor digestion and often dysbiosis, and the progress towards dysbiosis can be accelerated by taking TUMS or antacids or of course antibiotics. Hope this helps; I'd be happy to discuss any of these points more thoroughly with anyone and I do hope you'll update your ebook for the second edition, Sylvia. Duncan Crow http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 A lot of people take TUMS for the calcium. Are you saying this is a bad thing? Sylvia's free ebook(2) On page 21 she refers to gastric reflux and burning as a sign of possible intestinal fermentation, but the stomach is not involved in intestinal fementation; insufficient stomach acid called hypochlorhydia is the main cause of GERD, while healthy intestinal fermentation causes no discomfort. This can be looked up in a keyword search on hypochlorhydria. Chronic hypochlorhydria results in poor digestion and often dysbiosis, and the progress towards dysbiosis can be accelerated by taking TUMS or antacids or of course antibiotics. Duncan Crow http://members. shaw.ca/duncancr ow/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 YES!!! Re: Sylvia's free ebook(2) A lot of people take TUMS for the calcium. Are you saying this is a bad thing? Sylvia's free ebook(2) On page 21 she refers to gastric reflux and burning as a sign of possible intestinal fermentation, but the stomach is not involved in intestinal fementation; insufficient stomach acid called hypochlorhydia is the main cause of GERD, while healthy intestinal fermentation causes no discomfort. This can be looked up in a keyword search on hypochlorhydria. Chronic hypochlorhydria results in poor digestion and often dysbiosis, and the progress towards dysbiosis can be accelerated by taking TUMS or antacids or of course antibiotics. Duncan Crow http://members. shaw.ca/duncancr ow/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Tums are bad, for everyone? or just people with the gastric reflux problem. I am trying to understand this. I don't use Tums, but, a lot of people do. Sylvia's free ebook(2) On page 21 she refers to gastric reflux and burning as a sign of possible intestinal fermentation, but the stomach is not involved in intestinal fementation; insufficient stomach acid called hypochlorhydia is the main cause of GERD, while healthy intestinal fermentation causes no discomfort. This can be looked up in a keyword search on hypochlorhydria. Chronic hypochlorhydria results in poor digestion and often dysbiosis, and the progress towards dysbiosis can be accelerated by taking TUMS or antacids or of course antibiotics. Duncan Crow http://members. shaw.ca/duncancr ow/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 maybe duncan can enlighten us with the scientifics. i forget the breakdown but they're bad for everyone. All antacids are no good! Re: Sylvia's free ebook(2) Tums are bad, for everyone? or just people with the gastric reflux problem. I am trying to understand this. I don't use Tums, but, a lot of people do. Sylvia's free ebook(2) On page 21 she refers to gastric reflux and burning as a sign of possible intestinal fermentation, but the stomach is not involved in intestinal fementation; insufficient stomach acid called hypochlorhydia is the main cause of GERD, while healthy intestinal fermentation causes no discomfort. This can be looked up in a keyword search on hypochlorhydria. Chronic hypochlorhydria results in poor digestion and often dysbiosis, and the progress towards dysbiosis can be accelerated by taking TUMS or antacids or of course antibiotics. Duncan Crow http://members. shaw.ca/duncancr ow/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Taking TUMS if you need the calcium amounts to one or two tablets daily. It will not appreciably neutralize stomach acid at that dose and it's only temporary. But neutralizing stomach acid with higher doses on a continuous basis or every time you eat a meal (the meal also dilutes stomach acid) will promote GERD and bowel dysbiosis. Duncan On 14 Sep 2006 at 11:05, candidiasis wrote: > > Posted by: " T " avec_tendresses@... avec_tendresses > Date: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:13 pm (PDT) > > > A lot of people take TUMS for the calcium. Are you saying this is a > bad thing? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.