Guest guest Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 Based on my own experience, I wholeheartedly second the eloquent and truthful picture has painted of Loren's contributions. Thanks to both of you! :-) Elena > Loren, > I want to publicly thank you for the work and the support that you > have provided for alternative medicine especially alternative cancer > therapy. So many people have thrown money at a problem and not understood > why the problem didn't fade. You are different in that you are taking a > hands-on approach to understanding the issues, trying to learn the science, > and bringing your own research and life experiences into the think tank. > You are a person of opinions (usually proven correct), but you have > always been able to listen objectively and you have always been willing to > modify or reverse your opinions as seemed appropriate. I appreciate the > way you have funded research into areas that I think are extremely > important such as multiple drug resistance and cell signalling. You have > kept an open mind as we have surveyed opportunities in pleuripotent stem > cells. > You were the main supporter of Oregon's Right-to-Die law. In this > you (along with the Dutch) have led the world in the sovereign rights of > the individual. Now you are doing the same thing in seeing to patient's > Right-to-Life. No government agency nor standard-of-mediocrity > conventional physician should have the legal right to force conventional > therapies or (deprive unapproved therapies) on/from any mentally competent > adult. > I admire your independence. I delight that your own favored > political party considers you a source of consternation in that you think > for yourself and don't march in lockstep to anyone's orders. I like it > that you are a what-you-see-is-what-you-get kind of guy. You put on no > airs or pretensions. You are right enough of the time that you never > hesitate to say that you were mistaken or that you don't understand some > areas of science. > I like it that you recognize how our whole conventional medical system > has subverted all efforts to actually cure any chronic disease. I like it > that you have tried to awaken followers of natural medicine to that fact > that greedy marketers and unwarranted mysticism can undermine their efforts > at finding the most useful treatments. > List, over the past four decades Loren has developed a way of > disentangling a cancer patient from the subconscious emotional baggage that > so often thwarts recovery. His techniques often take as little as two > minutes to achieve, but I have seen him spend an hour helping individual > patients " disconnect " from any " mind-forged manacles " that hinder > recovery. This is not a cancer cure. It is a way of allowing other > treatments to work. Loren never charges for this work. > List, Loren is now in his mid-seventies and is in great health > because he practices what he preaches. He studied conventional science in > graduate school and has watched as virtually all of his classmates have > died. He has watched as a couple of generations of his personal physicians > have prematurely died. He has watched as those who have bucked the system > have survived -- even if their choices may not have been Loren's choices. > Loren Parks is not just another name that shows up on the list from > time to time. Read his posts if you want intelligent and independent > outside opinions and interactions that are never mystical, never maudlin. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 > Based on my own experience, I wholeheartedly second the eloquent and > truthful picture has painted of Loren's contributions. > Thanks to both of you! :-) > > Elena So how is it possible to encounter a topic that Loren knows apparently little about, has not read anything of note about, but decides to label as baloney? That appears to be right out of character. Something is amiss here? Is it because I brought it up, a lowly huckster who decided to prey upon the uneducated cancerous fools who soon are to part with their money? This really seems incongruent to the max. And being accused of having no education bugs me. My personal CV is posted on my website, and lists all the years I spent stuffing my head with misdirected factoids I needed to unlearn later. who spent a lot of hours putting together validated research information at www.life-enthusiast.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 Hi , I think you misaddressed your grievances in your message to me. I said only what I said, and any additional implications you many have inferred can't possibly be corroborated by the actual words that were uttered by my keyboard. Do you mind addressing my actual words rather than the messages of your own imagination the next time around? I would be happy to answer any actual questions about what I know, what I said, and why I said it -- while refraining from any comments on the subjects I am not familiar with -- e.g., on the subject of how much someone's words have offended someone else and how fair or unfair they feel it was. I honestly have no time to become an expert on this specific issue, sorry. I believe my responsibility is limited to being accountable for my own words, not for someone else's interpretations of my words about the third party with whom the offended party has had a disagreement. Please be reasonable. Best wishes, Elena > > > > Based on my own experience, I wholeheartedly second the eloquent and > > truthful picture has painted of Loren's contributions. > > Thanks to both of you! :-) > > > > Elena > > So how is it possible to encounter a topic that Loren knows apparently > little about, has not read anything of note about, but decides to label as > baloney? That appears to be right out of character. Something is amiss here? > > Is it because I brought it up, a lowly huckster who decided to prey upon the > uneducated cancerous fools who soon are to part with their money? > > This really seems incongruent to the max. And being accused of having no > education bugs me. My personal CV is posted on my website, and lists all the > years I spent stuffing my head with misdirected factoids I needed to unlearn > later. > > > who spent a lot of hours putting together validated research information at > www.life-enthusiast.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.