Re: Hulda does not have cure for cancer.

[Guest guest]

Proof that Hulda does not have a cure for cancer? Sorry, but this

reader, who knows nothing about Hulda , would not take this piece as

'proof'.

As for the suppressing of cancer treatments, haven't most of us come to

believe this is done all the time? There are many thousands of people that

have 'overcome'(better word than cure), cancer here around the world in

Europe, Mexico, and the United States. Yet, one rarely hears about it and

certainly not in main-stream media.

I personally do not like the work 'Cure' because there are no protocols, no

products, no foods, that Cure................these are only instruments the

body may use to 'overcome' cancer. It's like surgery, the most it can

do is buy the body time and 'suppress' the cancer cells (sometimes)so that

our own immune system can take over as those pesky cells are there,

somewhere, waiting to again take root.

I suppose many people just use the word cure for convenience sake, however,

it would be better to use the work 'help' so to better understand that the

curing is the function of the body not the product.

Joe C.......................non-expert layman

[Guest guest]

I read the scenario. The " Goldrushers " did not have to make a decision of going

by horseback at their own expense, or taking a luxurious train ride to the

goldfields and staying at the best hotels, all paid for by the government, with

the promise of a map to the gold. In both cases the " gold " was and unknown

factor. The " gold " in the scenario is the " cancer cure " in reality. The " rush "

is controlled by available money. Where is the available money?

Cancer victims only go to alternatives after their bodies have been destroyed by

" conventional " treatments so any that do survive have really survived against

all odds. They expect the alternative treatments to not only take care of the

original cancer problem, but to also correct all the colateral damages and

problems caused by conventional therapies.

A huge percentage of cancer victims being treated at alternative clinics are

" medical professionals " which, given any amount of common sense, leads one to

reason that there is something drastically wrong with the present system.

Why isn't there a " rush " to alternatives? One thing is medical insurance will

not cover it so it is limited to only those who have the means. When one goes to

a Doctor who practices both in the United States and Mexico, it may be necessary

to pay $5000 a week in cash to receive US diagnostic help and then treatment in

Mexico. Secondly, there hasn't been any testing of the various alternatives to

better direct their use. As you know, you oviously settled for one type of

treatment when there are many others which have a better history of stopping and

or controlling cancer. When there is federal money used to adequately test

alternatives rather than for prosecuting those professionals who have had

success using them, it will be a great day for cancer victims.

Sometimes it takes a combination of therapies. I chose cesium therapy to start

with because of the science behind it and the fact that it works very quickly.

Since cancer may be the result of genetic mutations throughout a lifetime,

repair may be a long process.

When a cancer victim dies after months of chemotherapy, the relatives say what a

great job the oncologist did keeping their favorite person " alive " for " X "

number of months. Was the quality of life actually better than if there had been

no treatment at all?

When a cancer victim dies after months of alternative treatment, the relatives

exclaim, " Ha, I knew it was a waste of money and obviously it didn't work " !

If you have used alternatives, consider that you have probably done a better job

of preserving a better quality of life for a longer period of time for yourself

or your loved one than could have been expected by using the only approved

treatments administered by the most experienced doctors, at the very best

hospitals and cancer clinics that this country offers: expensive and insurance

covered.

Look at the statistics.

Dottie

[Guest guest]

Common sense is not all that common!

Loyd http://www.royalrife.com

[ ] Hulda does not have cure for cancer.

A common sense proof that Hulda does not have a cure for cancer.

http://no-cancer-cure.tripod.com/

[Guest guest]

i agree with you about the use of the word cure....i never use it...I like

" managed " instead.

[Guest guest]

Tommy,

The " proof " you offer on your site is not proof, it's opinion. You

don't have a clue. Where are the studies proving your statements? I

have living proof, and it's my wife! It sounds like you lost your

wife, or someone you love, and are lashing out at the world like

quackbusters, which will be shut down shortly, for making invalid

claims, biased testimony, and slandering alternative therapies. I'm

sorry about Cheryl and understand your grief, having lost ALL my

relatives to cancer except my brother, but that was no reason to

stop and declare it all to be quackery. I kept going, searching for

the truth for them! Is that what Cheryl would want you to do? Give

up?

The truth is, no single treatment works on everybody, just like one

drug will not work on everybody all the time. The key is finding the

right combination of treatments for each person, just like with

drugs. There are several treatments that have cured thousands of

people from all kinds of " incurable " diseases. For you to come in

here and give your opinion like that is pure ignorance. Like an

atheist saying there is no God, when for them to know that to be

true, they would have to know everything, and to have been

everywhere before time started, and through out all time.

Dr. 's treatment doesn't work for everyone, I'm the first to

admit, but it has worked for some. Research it. Dr. Budwig's

treatment has worked for some, but again not for everyone. Research

it. Ozone has cured people from many diseases, again not for

everything. Research it. Apricot seeds have cured quite a few people

also. Research it. There are many protocols that have cured many

thousands of people (www.hacres.com is another) and the reason you

don't hear about it in the news is because the medical system is set

up wrong.

For a news agency to put something on the air there has to

be " scientific evidence " behind it or they can get sued. For there

to be scientific evidence you need at least $250,000,000 to get it

approved by the FDA. (Federal Disaster Agency) Money is what gets it

approved, not effectiveness. I wrote a letter to the FDA asking why

they approve a WMD (chemo) for curing cancer when it's only

effective about 10% of the time. (Most chemo is made from mustard

gas.) They said it's the " intended result " that makes it a treatment

instead of a WMD. They didn't deny any of what I said. Saying it's

the intention is a lie also though. If I let mustard gas out in a

subway to cure peoples cancer, I'm sure I'd be locked up forever.

The FDA lies so much they can't even cover up their lies anymore, if

you really look into it. The truth is cancer is big money. If they

find a cure, no more money! They're just like Bush and will cover up

the truth to make money for themselves & big business, even if it

kills millions, which it has. Read the message I posted on the flu

scare game to see the real truth on how many people are actually

killed by the flu. Go to the CDC website and see the real number of

people that have died from the flu since 1979 are only 30,200.

That's less than they say die EACH YEAR from the flu. Anyway,

understand the medical system is corrupt and not there to cure

anything! It's all business. I could go on and on proving this.

Like you said on your web site, if there's any truth in alternative

therapies, the truth will get out. Well it's going to get out, only

it takes a lot more time without the 1/4 billion dollars it takes to

get in on headline news. Plus the medical system is going to fight

it all the way to keep their money coming in. If you listen to the

news, you will hear about part of this treatment getting evidence

backing it up, and another part of another therapy getting backed

up. In a few years it will all get backed up. 80% of all people in

the U.S. are doing other things besides what the doctors tell them

to treat disease. It's snow balling and eventually the medical

system as we know it will be looked on as witchcraft. You can be a

part of it, or get run over by it. It's up to you, but you can't

stop it. The truth will always prevail.

The truth is you should be slamming the FDA, EPA, FTC, CDC, AMA,

ACS, and just about any other three letter agency set up to cure

disease, because they are killing FAR more EACH YEAR than

alternative treatments have EVER " killed " .

Have you heard they are going to be trying to take away vitamins in

Europe next year and then move on to America soon after that? They

are going to declare vitamins to be drugs. The FDA says in order for

something to be a drug, it has to cure something. Interesting huh?

Anyway look into something before you open your mouth, or you sound

that chicken little, or a quackbuster. Quack Quack.

You're probably mad after this, but think of what you've done to

others in here fighting for their lives, and if anyone takes you

seriously and dies without hope because of your ignorant " opinions " ,

I wouldn't want to be you! I ask you, who is really at fault here?

Take Care,

Gaylen

>

>

>

> A common sense proof that Hulda does not have a cure for

cancer.

>

> http://no-cancer-cure.tripod.com/