Re: Cult Leaders

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 03/12/2000 10:49:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,

LynneMWallace@... writes:

<< From: " Lynne Wallace " <LynneMWallace@...>

Dear Bill,

Yes, conventional medicine has accomplished much, but is it not overdone?

Don't you think it's most effective, and at its best, in the treatment of

acute illnesses or trauma, rather than in chronic disease? Were I to be

diagnosed with cancer today, an M.D. would be the last health professional I

would contact, and a naturopath would be my first choice of a health

professional. MD's don't treat disease, they treat symptoms. According to

the AMA, 200,000 people die each year from the correct use of prescriptions,

and another 80,000 to 98,000 die from malpractice. Only 40,000 die each

year from car accidents. Thus, when an American walks into a doctor's

office, he/she is 7 times more likely to die from the doctor than from a car

accident.

The prospect of changing my diet to 85% raw vegees, eliminating all

dairy and flushing the toxins out with several quarts of water a day may

sound radical, but it's far more preferable to a radical mastectomy. The

stats I quoted above don't include deaths from chemo-

therapy and radiation. We don't know, and are not likely to ever know, how

many cancer patients die from these toxic treatments than from cancer. I'll

choose dying from the disease over dying from the poisons that a myopic

medical community would have me undergo.

Yes, praise God, we don't have to worry about our kids contracting

>smallpox or polio. But in addition to the vaccinations which pro-

tected millions of children, those viruses have also run their course in our

country, at least, and only exist in laboratories. To vaccin-

ate against those illnesses, and most others, is no longer necessary and has

proven time and again to be harmful and even lethal. We no longer vaccinate

our 5 kids, not even against TB and polio. (That's another health frontier

we've embarked upon, enduring pressure and ridicule from others). There is

big money and politics involved in the production and administration of

vaccines, as well. So it goes on.

Finally, our toxic environment and our traditional diets may also be

causing the awful increase in childhood cancers, and the epidemic of kids

diagnosed with ADHD, among all other diseases. Our kids are suf-

fering due to our complacency, laziness, reluctance to change, etc. It's a

very tough battle, but we have to advance for our kids' sakes.

Goliath was defeated by a boy who trusted in his God. The same God has told

us not to put unholy junk into our bodies, and He's also told us that He's

given us plants for the service of mankind. Dr. and her pioneering

kind may not all honor the same God, but He has honored their work if it is

in keeping with His design. Thanks for " listening " . L.

>>

Hello Lynne Wallace:

Bravo !! Bravo !! Bravo !! You deserve a standing ovation for what you

have written here.

Ira M. Fine

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 03/12/2000 11:10:34 AM Eastern Standard Time,

rossviva@... writes:

<< Counts wrote:

Dr. 's protocols of getting rid of all of your dental work, all

sources of pollution in your personal care products and your house

(replacing your copper pipes etc.), getting rid of parasites, boiling

all of your dairy products before you consume them etc., is very stilt

and very difficult follow.

,

You say it is " very strict and very difficult to follow. " I've heard

this before, usually when I ask about those who die of cancer who have

been to Dr. 's clinic for cancer help.

It troubles me that at the beginning of Dr. 's book on curing

cancer, this " very difficult " aspect of the cure is not mentioned as far

as I know. And at the " Dr. Research Association " website, they

suggest Dr. 's cancer cure is fast and " easy, " and no mention is

made of the " very difficult " nature of the alleged cure. You can read

what I'm talking about by going to:

http://www..ch/cancer/canc_frame.htm

Following are some quotes from that webpage, which illustrate what I'm

talking about:

" Read the case histories to see how easy it is to stop even terminal

cancer. " " Go directly to the cancer curing recipe and order your

supplies. Using the herbal recipe together with the zapper is best. It

only takes days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have.

It does not matter how far progressed the cancer is, you can still stop

it in 5 days. "

The above claims at Amrein's website, which encourage cancer

sufferers to " order supplies " and " stop it in 5 days " seems quite at

odds with the " very strict and difficult to follow " description you

yours. How do you explain this disparity?

Bill Ross

>>

It is my personal opinion that " very strict and difficult to follow " is a

subjective thing. I am 30 pounds over weight, and by exercising adequately,

I know I could manage to lose much of the excess weight. I am too lazy to

take the time and effort necessary. It is my own fault.

There are many people who exercise regularly as part of their lifestyle, and

for them, they enjoy it and have the self discipline. For them it is not

" very strict and difficult to follow. " People are creatures of habit, and

for many, new habits are difficult to form and stick to, and old habits are

difficult to break and refrain from going back to.

Ira M. Fine