Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Posted April 22, 2006 If you as a parent request a re-evaluation after a 3 year period and the school district refuses...get it in writing and take them to mediation. I would be willing to be that re-evaluation would be done real quick. Pam Quote
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Posted April 22, 2006 ; I have to admit that up here the schools have been extremely supportive of everything we have asked, and have really worked hard with us to continually re-evalute our son. I can, however, draw on the experience of how we've handled problems with our other children. Sometimes getting your facts together and requesting arbitration of their decision works - sometimes, however it does not and it wastes a lot of time. In the past, I have always used money to get my way. Remember, the schools get a certain amount of money for each child in attendance - to that end, I've threatened before to pull my child out and go to a different school that will meet my needs. I've shown them how much money they would lose out on, and then also presented how much what I am asking them for will cost. 9 times out of 10, this usually gets my way - or at least forces them to explain to me in terms that I can accept, why a certain decision was made. Honestly, it's a bluff tactic, but if you speak with the superintendant and are serious enough about it, you will get your way. Anyway - good luck with that! --- Reid <hskrgrl0605@...> wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I don't post too often however I am at a despirate > hour. I've got an > IEP meeting coming real soon and have not been given > any indication > that the school district is going to re-evaluate my > son. Last time he > was tested was when he was three years old. He is > now six. We've > asked for a re-evaluation in the past and they've > asked us " why, when > the IEP is based on cirriculum and what tests should > we use? " . I am > well versed on the federal law, however I am looking > for solid advice > on how to deal with the school district. > > Thank you! > Reid > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2006 Report Posted April 23, 2006 In a message dated 4/22/2006 9:13:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, grep_boy@... writes: Sometimes getting your facts together and requesting arbitration of their decision works - sometimes, however it does not and it wastes a lot of time. Re-evaluations every three years per parental or teacher request is the law. Getting the refusal in writing and then filing for mediation has just as good a chance of getting the re-evaluation followed through on as does threatening to pull a child out of a school and assumming that the school department will pay for a different school. There is no guarantee in that either. Pam Quote
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2006 Report Posted April 23, 2006 Subject: Re: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to re-evlauate ; I have to admit that up here the schools have been extremely supportive of everything we have asked, and have really worked hard with us to continually re-evalute our son. I can, however, draw on the experience of how we've handled problems with our other children. Sometimes getting your facts together and requesting arbitration of their decision works - sometimes, however it does not and it wastes a lot of time. In the past, I have always used money to get my way. Remember, the schools get a certain amount of money for each child in attendance - to that end, I've threatened before to pull my child out and go to a different school that will meet my needs. I've shown them how much money they would lose out on, and then also presented how much what I am asking them for will cost. 9 times out of 10, this usually gets my way - or at least forces them to explain to me in terms that I can accept, why a certain decision was made. Honestly, it's a bluff tactic, but if you speak with the superintendant and are serious enough about it, you will get your way. Anyway - good luck with that! Please do not bluff to get your way. Unless you also have money to buy your way in to another school, you shouldn't threaten to do that. If the school balks, you are in deep and will no longer be taken seriously at all about anything. Be able to back up what you say and this will give you the confidence to prove your points. Roxanna Quote
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2006 Report Posted April 23, 2006 Subject: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to re-evlauate Hello everyone! I don't post too often however I am at a despirate hour. I've got an IEP meeting coming real soon and have not been given any indication that the school district is going to re-evaluate my son. Last time he was tested was when he was three years old. He is now six. We've asked for a re-evaluation in the past and they've asked us " why, when the IEP is based on cirriculum and what tests should we use? " . I am well versed on the federal law, however I am looking for solid advice on how to deal with the school district. Thank you! Reid The school has to re-evaluate every three years if you request it. So request that they do so in writing. If they have no clue what testing to do, then say " fine, refer me to an independent outside resource who CAN do a proper multi-factored evaluation. " What kinds of tests you want are a variety of evaluations depending upon the needs of your child. You probably would consider IQ testing as well as achievement testing. Not state standardized testing or curriculum testing but rather something like woodcock . You would probably ask for speech evaluation, including pragmatics as well as OT eval that covers fine motor, handwriting and sensory. If you child has any other specific areas of concern you would request that they test in that area with a good test for that sort of issue. You can always find names on the net if you do a search. Definitely write a letter with your request. CC copies to everyone up the food chain. Give them a date to respond by and expect to hear results. I would be nice at first but definitely get a paper trail to document everything that is being said and refused. Roxanna Quote
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Posted April 24, 2006 Aren't they *required* to test every three years? In our district, they test every three years, like clockwork, whether you request it or not. You have to sign off on it (give permission). I don't know if this is a California thing or a San Diego thing. Liz On Apr 23, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Roxanna wrote: > Subject: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to > re-evlauate > > Hello everyone! > > I don't post too often however I am at a despirate hour. I've got an > IEP meeting coming real soon and have not been given any indication > that the school district is going to re-evaluate my son. Last time he > was tested was when he was three years old. He is now six. We've > asked for a re-evaluation in the past and they've asked us " why, when > the IEP is based on cirriculum and what tests should we use? " . I am > well versed on the federal law, however I am looking for solid advice > on how to deal with the school district. > > Thank you! > Reid > > > The school has to re-evaluate every three years if you request it. So > request that they do so in writing. If they have no clue what > testing to > do, then say " fine, refer me to an independent outside resource who > CAN do a > proper multi-factored evaluation. " > > What kinds of tests you want are a variety of evaluations depending > upon the > needs of your child. You probably would consider IQ testing as well as > achievement testing. Not state standardized testing or curriculum > testing > but rather something like woodcock . You would probably ask for > speech evaluation, including pragmatics as well as OT eval that covers > fine > motor, handwriting and sensory. If you child has any other specific > areas > of concern you would request that they test in that area with a good > test > for that sort of issue. You can always find names on the net if you > do a > search. > > Definitely write a letter with your request. CC copies to everyone up > the > food chain. Give them a date to respond by and expect to hear > results. I > would be nice at first but definitely get a paper trail to document > everything that is being said and refused. > > Roxanna > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Posted April 24, 2006 The districts are no longer " required " to evaluate every three years...unless it is requested or " deemed " neccessary by the team or parent. Procedures for reevaluations. An LEA must ensure that a reevaluation for each child with a disability is conducted in accordance with Sections 614( and 614© if: * The LEA determines that the educational or related services needs, including improved academic achievement and functional performance, of the child warrant a reevaluation; or * The child’s parents or teacher requests a reevaluation. However, a reevaluation shall occur not more frequently than once a year, unless the parent and the LEA agree otherwise; and at least once every three years, unless the parent and the LEA agree that a reevaluation is unnecessary. [614(a)(2)] Quote
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Posted April 24, 2006 Our experience has been that we have to push for whatever we want, regardless...wish us luck! > > > Subject: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to > > re-evlauate > > > > Hello everyone! > > > > I don't post too often however I am at a despirate hour. I've got an > > IEP meeting coming real soon and have not been given any indication > > that the school district is going to re-evaluate my son. Last time he > > was tested was when he was three years old. He is now six. We've > > asked for a re-evaluation in the past and they've asked us " why, when > > the IEP is based on cirriculum and what tests should we use? " . I am > > well versed on the federal law, however I am looking for solid advice > > on how to deal with the school district. > > > > Thank you! > > Reid > > > > > > The school has to re-evaluate every three years if you request it. So > > request that they do so in writing. If they have no clue what > > testing to > > do, then say " fine, refer me to an independent outside resource who > > CAN do a > > proper multi-factored evaluation. " > > > > What kinds of tests you want are a variety of evaluations depending > > upon the > > needs of your child. You probably would consider IQ testing as well as > > achievement testing. Not state standardized testing or curriculum > > testing > > but rather something like woodcock . You would probably ask for > > speech evaluation, including pragmatics as well as OT eval that covers > > fine > > motor, handwriting and sensory. If you child has any other specific > > areas > > of concern you would request that they test in that area with a good > > test > > for that sort of issue. You can always find names on the net if you > > do a > > search. > > > > Definitely write a letter with your request. CC copies to everyone up > > the > > food chain. Give them a date to respond by and expect to hear > > results. I > > would be nice at first but definitely get a paper trail to document > > everything that is being said and refused. > > > > Roxanna > > > > > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Posted April 24, 2006 Roxanna - Thanks for your support - wish us luck! > > Subject: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to > re-evlauate > > Hello everyone! > > I don't post too often however I am at a despirate hour. I've got an > IEP meeting coming real soon and have not been given any indication > that the school district is going to re-evaluate my son. Last time he > was tested was when he was three years old. He is now six. We've > asked for a re-evaluation in the past and they've asked us " why, when > the IEP is based on cirriculum and what tests should we use? " . I am > well versed on the federal law, however I am looking for solid advice > on how to deal with the school district. > > Thank you! > Reid > > > The school has to re-evaluate every three years if you request it. So > request that they do so in writing. If they have no clue what testing to > do, then say " fine, refer me to an independent outside resource who CAN do a > proper multi-factored evaluation. " > > What kinds of tests you want are a variety of evaluations depending upon the > needs of your child. You probably would consider IQ testing as well as > achievement testing. Not state standardized testing or curriculum testing > but rather something like woodcock . You would probably ask for > speech evaluation, including pragmatics as well as OT eval that covers fine > motor, handwriting and sensory. If you child has any other specific areas > of concern you would request that they test in that area with a good test > for that sort of issue. You can always find names on the net if you do a > search. > > Definitely write a letter with your request. CC copies to everyone up the > food chain. Give them a date to respond by and expect to hear results. I > would be nice at first but definitely get a paper trail to document > everything that is being said and refused. > > Roxanna > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Posted April 24, 2006 Thanks for your advise! Wish us luck!! > > > In a message dated 4/22/2006 9:13:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > grep_boy@... writes: > > > Sometimes getting your facts together and requesting > arbitration of their decision works - sometimes, > however it does not and it wastes a lot of time. > > > > Re-evaluations every three years per parental or teacher request is the law. > Getting the refusal in writing and then filing for mediation has just as > good a chance of getting the re-evaluation followed through on as does > threatening to pull a child out of a school and assumming that the school department > will pay for a different school. There is no guarantee in that either. Pam > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2006 Report Posted April 24, 2006 Thanks - one would think that, in the best interest of the child, a re-evaluation would be automatically conducted in order to " stay on target " with the childs current level. My child has gained more progress by attending a special needs " pre-school " rather than the public school. > > The districts are no longer " required " to evaluate every three > years...unless it is requested or " deemed " neccessary by the team or parent. > > > Procedures for reevaluations. > An LEA must ensure that a reevaluation for each child with a disability is > conducted in accordance with Sections 614( and 614© if: > * The LEA determines that the educational or related services needs, > including improved academic achievement and functional performance, of the > child warrant a reevaluation; or > * The child’s parents or teacher requests a reevaluation. > However, a reevaluation shall occur not more frequently than once a year, > unless the parent and the LEA agree otherwise; and at least once every three > years, unless the parent and the LEA agree that a reevaluation is unnecessary. > [614(a)(2)] > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Posted May 3, 2006 In the new IDEA 2004 regulations, school districts are no longer " REQUIRED " to test students with disabilities every three years. Parents and teachers (IEP team members) can still request the testing be done, but it is no longer mandatory. Pam Quote
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Posted May 3, 2006 Subject: Re: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to re-evlauate Aren't they *required* to test every three years? In our district, they test every three years, like clockwork, whether you request it or not. You have to sign off on it (give permission). I don't know if this is a California thing or a San Diego thing. Liz Liz, They don't have to, as Pam wrote earlier. I imagine most do it anyway, just to check current levels. But sometimes they don't want to do it. For example, when Royce was in 5th grade, he was due for his 3 year eval and they didn't want to do it. They said they agreed he needed to be in sped so there was no need to do this. I disagreed and they did one. But it isn't just a California thing. Roxanna Quote
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Posted May 3, 2006 It is a federal thing. In Texas, schools have the right to do what is called a triennial review. That means that everyone sits down and discusses the childs current levels in and out of school. They discuss any changes in the last 3 years and they discuss the childs needs. If everyone agrees that there is no need to do more testing, than the child simply stays in special ed and the ARD meeting is held. If there is something that seems out of the ordinary, then testing in just one area can be done instead of all the tests being done. It makes it easier on the schools but also, I think, on the kids because they don't spend days taking tests they don't need. I have never had any problems with it in the 7 years my kids have been in special ed. But like all special ed laws, they are only as good as the school that follows them. Have a great day, LaRae > > Subject: Re: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to > re-evlauate > > Aren't they *required* to test every three years? In our district, they > test every three years, like clockwork, whether you request it or not. > You have to sign off on it (give permission). I don't know if this is a > California thing or a San Diego thing. > > Liz > > > Liz, > They don't have to, as Pam wrote earlier. I imagine most do it anyway, just > to check current levels. But sometimes they don't want to do it. For > example, when Royce was in 5th grade, he was due for his 3 year eval and > they didn't want to do it. They said they agreed he needed to be in sped so > there was no need to do this. I disagreed and they did one. But it isn't > just a California thing. > > Roxanna > > Quote
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Posted May 4, 2006 Subject: RE: ( ) IEP mtg/school district not wanting to re-evlauate It is a federal thing. In Texas, schools have the right to do what is called a triennial review. That means that everyone sits down and discusses the childs current levels in and out of school. They discuss any changes in the last 3 years and they discuss the childs needs. If everyone agrees that there is no need to do more testing, than the child simply stays in special ed and the ARD meeting is held. If there is something that seems out of the ordinary, then testing in just one area can be done instead of all the tests being done. It makes it easier on the schools but also, I think, on the kids because they don't spend days taking tests they don't need. I have never had any problems with it in the 7 years my kids have been in special ed. But like all special ed laws, they are only as good as the school that follows them. Have a great day, LaRae *** Please all consider this: If your child has had " no changes " in 3 years time, then I would suggest the program he/she is in is a total failure! Get the evaluation and compare to the last evaluation. What has changed? What subtest scores have improved? If nothing has improved, then they need a serious revamping of the program they are in. Roxanna Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.