Guest guest Posted April 8, 2006 Report Posted April 8, 2006 Connie, If the report isn't a Doctor's Data one, we may not be able to help you as much as we'd like. However, there is a place in the files section for uploading these sorts of things. Or, you can type out the results as best you can. Best wishes, Anita > > Hi, I'm new and just got DS7's Trace Hair analysis back and I am quite > alarmed. The explanation says that he is under considerable physical > or emotional stress. If I can scan this and post it in the files or > upload it to a web site, is there someone who can help me understand > this? > > My son is 7 and has SID. > > Thanks! > > Connie > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2006 Report Posted April 8, 2006 It's from Trace elements. I was wondering if these were age adjusted reference ranges or not. The report though does refer to him as " this child. " It describes him as a slow metabolizer. For reference, he and I both have 2 celiac genes. He has been gluten and casein free except for our Mc's and other mistakes for 3 years. I do have full blown Celiac disease (autoimmune gluten intolerance) and Hashimoto's hypothyroidism (autoimmune hypothyroidism). Here are the problems: Sodium levels and Potassium levels go off the chart high. Sodium - 382, reference range - 4-36 Potassium - 121, reference range - 2-24 Ca - 37, reference range - 22-97 Mg - 4.1, reference range - 2.0-11.0 Toxic elements, All were in the normal range according to the lab Arsenic is 0.017, reference range - 0-0.020 (so hi normal) Mercury was 0.08, reference range - 0-0.18 Significant ratios Ca/K .31 (Says this is low) Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high) The explanation part says this: Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a stressor. In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or physical stress. Factors that may contribute to Na retention: high sodium intake toxic metal accumulation or elimination inflammatory conditions biological stress response Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with lithium. frequently found with elevated K. Low Ca/K ratio: high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to an acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype and is usually only temporary. High Na/Mg ratio: When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an increase in magnesium requirements. The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium profile is indicative of increased cortical function. All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one ratio that was not in correct proportion. Zinc/Mercury When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to produce and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions associated with mercury may occur. They recommend reducing sodium intake. eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really skinny). eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates. avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates. avoid high purine (no problem there) reduce milk due to high fat and calcium ( we eat none) reduce intake of fats and oils ( we have little fat except for cod liver oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef) Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either) Avoid cal and Vit D supplements Thanks for the help! Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2006 Report Posted April 9, 2006 I don't see where you mention what media this is...blood, hair, urine, stool??? S S <tt> It's from Trace elements. I was wondering if these were age adjusted<BR> reference ranges or not. The report though does refer to him as " this<BR> child. " It describes him as a slow metabolizer. <BR> <BR> For reference, he and I both have 2 celiac genes. He has been gluten<BR> and casein free except for our Mc's and other mistakes for 3<BR> years. I do have full blown Celiac disease (autoimmune gluten<BR> intolerance) and Hashimoto's hypothyroidism (autoimmune hypothyroidism).<BR> <BR> <BR> Here are the problems:<BR> Sodium levels and Potassium levels go off the chart high. <BR> Sodium - 382, reference range - 4-36<BR> Potassium - 121, reference range - 2-24<BR> Ca - 37, reference range - 22-97<BR> Mg - 4.1, reference range - 2.0-11.0<BR> <BR> Toxic elements, All were in the normal range according to the lab<BR> Arsenic is 0.017, reference range - 0-0.020 (so hi normal) <BR> Mercury was 0.08, reference range - 0-0.18<BR> <BR> Significant ratios<BR> Ca/K .31 (Says this is low)<BR> Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high)<BR> <BR> The explanation part says this:<BR> Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K<BR> are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are<BR> often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a stressor.<BR> In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the<BR> body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). <BR> <BR> Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or<BR> physical stress.<BR> <BR> Factors that may contribute to Na retention:<BR> high sodium intake<BR> toxic metal accumulation or elimination<BR> inflammatory conditions<BR> biological stress response<BR> <BR> Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with lithium.<BR> frequently found with elevated K. <BR> <BR> Low Ca/K ratio:<BR> high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid<BR> function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to an<BR> acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype and<BR> is usually only temporary.<BR> <BR> High Na/Mg ratio:<BR> When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an<BR> increase in magnesium requirements.<BR> <BR> The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium<BR> retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect<BR> cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity<BR> will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium<BR> profile is indicative of increased cortical function. <BR> <BR> All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one ratio<BR> that was not in correct proportion.<BR> <BR> Zinc/Mercury<BR> When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to produce<BR> and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of<BR> mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective<BR> action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the<BR> current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern<BR> becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions<BR> associated with mercury may occur. <BR> <BR> They recommend reducing sodium intake.<BR> eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase<BR> frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really<BR> skinny). <BR> <BR> eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates.<BR> <BR> avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates.<BR> <BR> avoid high purine (no problem there)<BR> <BR> reduce milk due to high fat and calcium ( we eat none)<BR> <BR> reduce intake of fats and oils ( we have little fat except for cod liver<BR> oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef)<BR> <BR> Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either)<BR> <BR> Avoid cal and Vit D supplements<BR> <BR> Thanks for the help!<BR> <BR> <BR> Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2006 Report Posted April 9, 2006 > > Hi, I'm new and just got DS7's Trace Hair analysis back and I am quite > alarmed. The explanation says that he is under considerable physical > or emotional stress. If I can scan this and post it in the files or > upload it to a web site, is there someone who can help me understand > this? > > My son is 7 and has SID. > > Thanks! > > Connie > If it is a DDI hair elements test, then there is a format you can use for posting the results. The format is at the end of this page: http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/HOW_TO_hair_test.html good wishes, Moria http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/ Mercury Detox: Information, Tools, and Resources Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2006 Report Posted April 9, 2006 It's hair. RE: [ ] Re: New and need help interpreting lab report I don't see where you mention what media this is...blood, hair, urine, stool??? S S <tt> It's from Trace elements. I was wondering if these were age adjusted<BR> reference ranges or not. The report though does refer to him as " this<BR> child. " It describes him as a slow metabolizer. <BR> <BR> For reference, he and I both have 2 celiac genes. He has been gluten<BR> and casein free except for our Mc's and other mistakes for 3<BR> years. I do have full blown Celiac disease (autoimmune gluten<BR> intolerance) and Hashimoto's hypothyroidism (autoimmune hypothyroidism).<BR> <BR> <BR> Here are the problems:<BR> Sodium levels and Potassium levels go off the chart high. <BR> Sodium - 382, reference range - 4-36<BR> Potassium - 121, reference range - 2-24<BR> Ca - 37, reference range - 22-97<BR> Mg - 4.1, reference range - 2.0-11.0<BR> <BR> Toxic elements, All were in the normal range according to the lab<BR> Arsenic is 0.017, reference range - 0-0.020 (so hi normal) <BR> Mercury was 0.08, reference range - 0-0.18<BR> <BR> Significant ratios<BR> Ca/K .31 (Says this is low)<BR> Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high)<BR> <BR> The explanation part says this:<BR> Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K<BR> are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are<BR> often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a stressor.<BR> In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the<BR> body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). <BR> <BR> Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or<BR> physical stress.<BR> <BR> Factors that may contribute to Na retention:<BR> high sodium intake<BR> toxic metal accumulation or elimination<BR> inflammatory conditions<BR> biological stress response<BR> <BR> Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with lithium.<BR> frequently found with elevated K. <BR> <BR> Low Ca/K ratio:<BR> high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid<BR> function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to an<BR> acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype and<BR> is usually only temporary.<BR> <BR> High Na/Mg ratio:<BR> When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an<BR> increase in magnesium requirements.<BR> <BR> The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium<BR> retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect<BR> cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity<BR> will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium<BR> profile is indicative of increased cortical function. <BR> <BR> All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one ratio<BR> that was not in correct proportion.<BR> <BR> Zinc/Mercury<BR> When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to produce<BR> and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of<BR> mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective<BR> action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the<BR> current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern<BR> becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions<BR> associated with mercury may occur. <BR> <BR> They recommend reducing sodium intake.<BR> eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase<BR> frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really<BR> skinny). <BR> <BR> eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates.<BR> <BR> avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates.<BR> <BR> avoid high purine (no problem there)<BR> <BR> reduce milk due to high fat and calcium ( we eat none)<BR> <BR> reduce intake of fats and oils ( we have little fat except for cod liver<BR> oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef)<BR> <BR> Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either)<BR> <BR> Avoid cal and Vit D supplements<BR> <BR> Thanks for the help!<BR> <BR> <BR> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]<BR> <BR> </tt> <!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| --> <br><br> <tt> =======================================================<BR> Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2006 Report Posted April 9, 2006 OK I have painstakingly transposed (hopefully correctly) the info below: > > Hi, I'm new and just got DS7's Trace Hair analysis back and I am quite > alarmed. The explanation says that he is under considerable physical > or emotional stress. If I can scan this and post it in the files or > upload it to a web site, is there someone who can help me understand > this? > > My son is 7 and has SID. > > Thanks! > > Connie > If it is a DDI hair elements test, then there is a format you can use for posting the results. The format is at the end of this page: http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/HOW_TO_hair_test.html good wishes, Moria http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/ Mercury Detox: Information, Tools, and Resources Trace Elements Inc. TEI Hair POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================= aluminum 0.4 0 - 1.8 antimony N/A 0 - .007 arsenic .017 0 - .020 beryllium .0010 0 - .0010 Footnote says below calibration limit bismuth .0020 .000 - .039 Footnote says below calibration limit cadmium .005 0 - .014 lead 0.10 0 - 0.30 mercury 0.08 0 - 0.18 platinum .001 .000 - .002 Footnote says below calibration limit thallium .0005 .0000 - .0060 Footnote says below calibration limit thorium not listed uranium .0005 0 - .0170 Footnote says below calibration limit nickel .02 .00 - .010 silver not listed tin 0.100 .000 - .030 titanium .09 .00 - .20 ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 37 22 - 97 Magnesium 4.1 2.0 - 11.0 Sodium 372 4 - 36 Potassium 121 2 - 24 Copper 0.9 3.9 Zinc 13 10 - 21 Manganese 0.051 .010 - .130 Chromium 0.07 0.02 - 0.08 Vanadium 0.14 .002 - 0.14 Molybdenum .002 .003 - .008 Boron 0.36 0.02 - 0.91 Iodine N/A not given (I have a question about this.) Lithium .001 .001 - .006 Phosphorus 12 11 - 20 Selenium 0.08 0.03 - 0.18 Strontium 0.07 0.03 - 0.50 Sulfur 3986 3546 - 5336 Barium 0.05 0.00 - 0.26 Cobalt .002 .001 - .003 Iron 0.6 0.5 - 1.6 Germanium .004 .006 - 0.11 Rubidium .1829 .0000 - 0.190 Zirconium 0.02 0.00 - 0.09 In addition their are important rations discussed in the test. Significant ratios Ca/K .31 (Says this is low) Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high) The explanation part says this: Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a stressor. In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or physical stress. Factors that may contribute to Na retention: high sodium intake toxic metal accumulation or elimination inflammatory conditions biological stress response Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with lithium. frequently found with elevated K. Low Ca/K ratio: high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to an acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype and is usually only temporary. High Na/Mg ratio: When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an increase in magnesium requirements. The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium profile is indicative of increased cortical function. All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one ratio that was not in correct proportion. Zinc/Mercury When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to produce and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions associated with mercury may occur. They recommend reducing sodium intake. eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really skinny). eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates. avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates. avoid high purine (no problem there) reduce milk due to high fat and calcium (we eat none, but take cal and mg supps) reduce intake of fats and oils (we have little fat except for cod liver oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef) Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either) Avoid cal and Vit D supplements So to me it looks like there are some hormone problems, or else he is kept in a cage and beaten regularly. He is 7 and has never been vaxxed. He has only had 2 injections in his life, vit K at birth and one time he had Im antibiotics because he was vomiting and she wanted to keep him out of the hosp. It also looks like he has an acid system to me. He does have celiac disease. This might account for the " inflammatory condition " under sodium retention. I will start by reducing his intake or sugar and subbing fruit (so far only eats bananas). We are working on fruits and veggies though. I will give him a protein snack between meals. Can anyone help me understand what any of this means? I would so appreciate it. Connie (mom to a very special little boy - IQ 150+) Celiac disease, casein intolerance, peanut and tree nut allergies. Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2006 Report Posted April 9, 2006 > > It's from Trace elements. I was wondering if these were age adjusted > reference ranges or not. The report though does refer to him as " this > child. " It describes him as a slow metabolizer. I am going by Andy's book and he says they don't use age adjusted ranges. Of course things can change, but without definitive info from your end (you could call them and ask), I will assume Andy's book is right. If they are age-adjusted ranges, post the full results and I will check it for mercury-related mineral derangement. > For reference, he and I both have 2 celiac genes. He has been gluten > and casein free except for our Mc's and other mistakes for 3 > years. I do have full blown Celiac disease (autoimmune gluten > intolerance) and Hashimoto's hypothyroidism (autoimmune hypothyroidism). Got it. > Here are the problems: > Sodium levels and Potassium levels go off the chart high. > Sodium - 382, reference range - 4-36 > Potassium - 121, reference range - 2-24 > Ca - 37, reference range - 22-97 > Mg - 4.1, reference range - 2.0-11.0 Yes, that looks like adrenal stress, of the type where too much adrenaline is produced, but not enough cortisol. > Toxic elements, All were in the normal range according to the lab > Arsenic is 0.017, reference range - 0-0.020 (so hi normal) > Mercury was 0.08, reference range - 0-0.18 Hm - if these are in microgram/gram units, then they don't look like adult ranges. If they are adult ranges, then those levels are of concern. If not, then it depends on the rest of the hair test. I'd encourage you to call them and verify whether they use age-adjusted ranges or not. > Significant ratios > Ca/K .31 (Says this is low) > Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high) I don't know what a low Ca/K means. Yes Na/Mg is whoppingly high - does he have symptoms consistent with this? Hyperactive, anxious, poor immune function? > The explanation part says this: > Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K > are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are > often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a stressor. > In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the > body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). > > Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or > physical stress. > > Factors that may contribute to Na retention: > high sodium intake > toxic metal accumulation or elimination > inflammatory conditions > biological stress response Andy says hair sodium does not say anything about dietary intake or body burden, so I would not worry about sodium retention. In fact, in adrenal stress, there can be a greater need for salt. Interestingly, he also says that in celiac disease, sodium is often lower than potassium - I would infer that he has not had too many infractions in the three months before the test. > Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with lithium. > frequently found with elevated K. Rubidium level tracks Na and K when adrenal stress is present. I wouldn't worry about this at all. > Low Ca/K ratio: > high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid > function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to an > acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype and > is usually only temporary. > > High Na/Mg ratio: > When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an > increase in magnesium requirements. > > The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium > retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect > cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity > will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium > profile is indicative of increased cortical function. > > All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one ratio > that was not in correct proportion. > > Zinc/Mercury > When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to produce > and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of > mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective > action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the > current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern > becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions > associated with mercury may occur. > > They recommend reducing sodium intake. Based on Andy's book, I think this is unnecessary. > eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase > frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really > skinny). Protein is good, as is frequency of meals. Certainly feed him what he will eat - he clearly needs calories. > eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates. > > avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates. Good idea with adrenal stress. > avoid high purine (no problem there) > > reduce milk due to high fat and calcium ( we eat none) I wouldn't worry about this. > reduce intake of fats and oils ( we have little fat except for cod liver > oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef) This is because of the slow metabolizer result, but I think you should ignore it. I don't see how he can be a slow metabolizer with the adrenal stress level, but I am not an expert and maybe Andy could make sense of this. > Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either) Again good idea because of the adrenal stress. Sugar carbs will cause problems. > Avoid cal and Vit D supplements Not sure why they think so. > Thanks for the help! > You're welcome! -- Quote
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Posted April 10, 2006 Oh, , I so much appreciate it. I was freaking out. It made no sense to me how his labs could be this bad. He does eat a fair amount of junk but far less than most kids. We can't do fast food at all, because of the celiac, so junk is a gf cookie or a gf cf pizza from whole foods. I am vigilante. He has sid and maybe ADHD though they say with gifted kids it sometimes looks like ADHD. Still, with our autoimmune issues and his low immunity, I do worry about ASD stuff all the time. I do think there is a possibility of hg though. Here's the reason. I had my amalgams removed when he was about 3 and nursing. I did oral chelation with chemet, and pumped and dumped while doing it and they were done in one visit, but I did get it done. I was sick or I wouldn't have done it. Dr Cave (I live in BR) interestingly enough missed the fact that I have celiac and hashimoto's. I do appreciate getting my amalgams out, but gosh celiac and hashimoto's. <shaking head> So I am going to start cilantro. I know, I know no studies, but it feels safer to me. Connie [ ] Re: New and need help interpreting lab report > > It's from Trace elements. I was wondering if these were age adjusted > reference ranges or not. The report though does refer to him as " this > child. " It describes him as a slow metabolizer. I am going by Andy's book and he says they don't use age adjusted ranges. Of course things can change, but without definitive info from your end (you could call them and ask), I will assume Andy's book is right. If they are age-adjusted ranges, post the full results and I will check it for mercury-related mineral derangement. > For reference, he and I both have 2 celiac genes. He has been gluten > and casein free except for our Mc's and other mistakes for 3 > years. I do have full blown Celiac disease (autoimmune gluten > intolerance) and Hashimoto's hypothyroidism (autoimmune hypothyroidism). Got it. > Here are the problems: > Sodium levels and Potassium levels go off the chart high. > Sodium - 382, reference range - 4-36 > Potassium - 121, reference range - 2-24 > Ca - 37, reference range - 22-97 > Mg - 4.1, reference range - 2.0-11.0 Yes, that looks like adrenal stress, of the type where too much adrenaline is produced, but not enough cortisol. > Toxic elements, All were in the normal range according to the lab > Arsenic is 0.017, reference range - 0-0.020 (so hi normal) > Mercury was 0.08, reference range - 0-0.18 Hm - if these are in microgram/gram units, then they don't look like adult ranges. If they are adult ranges, then those levels are of concern. If not, then it depends on the rest of the hair test. I'd encourage you to call them and verify whether they use age-adjusted ranges or not. > Significant ratios > Ca/K .31 (Says this is low) > Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high) I don't know what a low Ca/K means. Yes Na/Mg is whoppingly high - does he have symptoms consistent with this? Hyperactive, anxious, poor immune function? > The explanation part says this: > Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K > are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are > often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a stressor. > In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the > body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). > > Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or > physical stress. > > Factors that may contribute to Na retention: > high sodium intake > toxic metal accumulation or elimination > inflammatory conditions > biological stress response Andy says hair sodium does not say anything about dietary intake or body burden, so I would not worry about sodium retention. In fact, in adrenal stress, there can be a greater need for salt. Interestingly, he also says that in celiac disease, sodium is often lower than potassium - I would infer that he has not had too many infractions in the three months before the test. > Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with lithium. > frequently found with elevated K. Rubidium level tracks Na and K when adrenal stress is present. I wouldn't worry about this at all. > Low Ca/K ratio: > high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid > function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to an > acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype and > is usually only temporary. > > High Na/Mg ratio: > When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an > increase in magnesium requirements. > > The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium > retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect > cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity > will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium > profile is indicative of increased cortical function. > > All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one ratio > that was not in correct proportion. > > Zinc/Mercury > When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to produce > and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of > mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective > action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the > current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern > becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions > associated with mercury may occur. > > They recommend reducing sodium intake. Based on Andy's book, I think this is unnecessary. > eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase > frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really > skinny). Protein is good, as is frequency of meals. Certainly feed him what he will eat - he clearly needs calories. > eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates. > > avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates. Good idea with adrenal stress. > avoid high purine (no problem there) > > reduce milk due to high fat and calcium ( we eat none) I wouldn't worry about this. > reduce intake of fats and oils ( we have little fat except for cod liver > oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef) This is because of the slow metabolizer result, but I think you should ignore it. I don't see how he can be a slow metabolizer with the adrenal stress level, but I am not an expert and maybe Andy could make sense of this. > Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either) Again good idea because of the adrenal stress. Sugar carbs will cause problems. > Avoid cal and Vit D supplements Not sure why they think so. > Thanks for the help! > You're welcome! -- ======================================================= Quote
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Posted April 10, 2006 > > > > It's from Trace elements. I was wondering if these were age adjusted > > reference ranges or not. The report though does refer to him as " this > > child. " It describes him as a slow metabolizer. > > I am going by Andy's book and he says they don't use age adjusted > ranges. Of course things can change, but without definitive > info from your end (you could call them and ask), I will assume > Andy's book is right. > > If they are age-adjusted ranges, post the full results and I will > check it for mercury-related mineral derangement. > > > > For reference, he and I both have 2 celiac genes. He has been gluten > > and casein free except for our Mc's and other mistakes for 3 > > years. I do have full blown Celiac disease (autoimmune gluten > > intolerance) and Hashimoto's hypothyroidism (autoimmune > hypothyroidism). > > Got it. > > > Here are the problems: > > Sodium levels and Potassium levels go off the chart high. > > Sodium - 382, reference range - 4-36 > > Potassium - 121, reference range - 2-24 > > Ca - 37, reference range - 22-97 > > Mg - 4.1, reference range - 2.0-11.0 > > Yes, that looks like adrenal stress, of the type where too much > adrenaline is produced, but not enough cortisol. > > > > Toxic elements, All were in the normal range according to the lab > > Arsenic is 0.017, reference range - 0-0.020 (so hi normal) > > Mercury was 0.08, reference range - 0-0.18 > > Hm - if these are in microgram/gram units, then they don't look > like adult ranges. If they are adult ranges, then those > levels are of concern. If not, then it depends on the rest > of the hair test. > > I'd encourage you to call them and verify whether they use > age-adjusted ranges or not. > > > > Significant ratios > > Ca/K .31 (Says this is low) > > Na/Mg 11.82 (off the chart high) > > I don't know what a low Ca/K means. > > Yes Na/Mg is whoppingly high - does he have symptoms consistent > with this? Hyperactive, anxious, poor immune function? > > > > The explanation part says this: > > Both Sodium and Potassium are markedly elevated above normal. Na and K > > are affected by the adrenal glands. When elevated, these levels are > > often indicative of the body's adrenal cortical response to a > stressor. > > In the slow metabolizer (type #4), this profile is reflective of the > > body's response to a considerable stress (physical or emotional). > > > > Next Paragraphs says again Na retention can be from emotional or > > physical stress. > > > > Factors that may contribute to Na retention: > > high sodium intake > > toxic metal accumulation or elimination > > inflammatory conditions > > biological stress response > > Andy says hair sodium does not say anything about dietary intake > or body burden, so I would not worry about sodium retention. In > fact, in adrenal stress, there can be a greater need for salt. > Interestingly, he also says that in celiac disease, sodium is often > lower than potassium - I would infer that he has not had too many > infractions in the three months before the test. > > > > Rubidium levels were high. It's a non toxic element assoc with > lithium. > > frequently found with elevated K. > > Rubidium level tracks Na and K when adrenal stress is present. > I wouldn't worry about this at all. > > > > Low Ca/K ratio: > > high potassium relative to calcium in indicative of elevated thyroid > > function. This profile is often the result of the body's response to > an > > acute stress episode. This is not uncommon in this metabolic subtype > and > > is usually only temporary. > > > > High Na/Mg ratio: > > When sodium is high relative to Magnesium, there is frequently an > > increase in magnesium requirements. > > > > The adrenal glands may play an essential role in regulating sodium > > retention and excretion. Studies have also shown that mg will affect > > cortical activity and response, while an increase in adrenal activity > > will result in decreased magnesium retention. This sodium-magnesium > > profile is indicative of increased cortical function. > > > > All Toxic elements were within normal range however there was one > ratio > > that was not in correct proportion. > > > > Zinc/Mercury > > When Zinc levels within the body are sufficient, zinc is able to > produce > > and antagonistic or protective response to the adverse affects of > > mercury. However when zinc is low in relation to hg, the protective > > action of zinc upon mercury may become markedly reduced. Although the > > current mercury level is within the acceptable range, if this pattern > > becomes chronic or worsens, some minor symptoms or adverse reactions > > associated with mercury may occur. > > > > They recommend reducing sodium intake. > > Based on Andy's book, I think this is unnecessary. > > > > eat high protein 40% of calories at each meal. lean protein. Increase > > frequency of meals while decreasing calorie intake. (he is really > > skinny). > > Protein is good, as is frequency of meals. Certainly feed him > what he will eat - he clearly needs calories. > > > > eat a moderate amount of unrefined carbohydrates. > > > > avoid all sugars and refined carbohydrates. > > Good idea with adrenal stress. > > > > avoid high purine (no problem there) > > > > reduce milk due to high fat and calcium ( we eat none) > > I wouldn't worry about this. > > > > reduce intake of fats and oils ( we have little fat except for cod > liver > > oil, some coconut oil, some grass fed beef) > > This is because of the slow metabolizer result, but I think you > should ignore it. I don't see how he can be a slow metabolizer > with the adrenal stress level, but I am not an expert and maybe > Andy could make sense of this. > > > > Reduce fruit juice intake (we don't use much of this either) > > Again good idea because of the adrenal stress. Sugar carbs will > cause problems. > > > > Avoid cal and Vit D supplements > > Not sure why they think so. > > > > Thanks for the help! > > > > You're welcome! > > -- > > > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Posted April 11, 2006 > I haven't used cilantro, but it really can cause > problems. Noone knows what the component is that chelates, so it > can't be standardized so that you get a consistent dose. Some > batches may have a lot of the chelating component, and some batches > may have little. So you won't be able to predict what effects it > might produce. it seems that every time I respond to this point I am misunderstood, regardless of how carefully I explain. You'd think I would just stop responding, but I do not. It just irritates me, because I hate having to hash it out every time. what gets " misunderstood " is that when I explain that it IS very possible to get consistent doses, people decide to interpret that as meaning completely other things, such as that I'm encouraging people to use cilantro. Don't do that. It is very possible to get consistent doses of cilantro, and I've done it, and can repeat it. And I don't even know much about this, I'm a rank amatuer. All I did was make a largish batch of tincture and shake it before each use. If I wanted to do this for huge amounts, say enough for 500 people to take for several years, I would talk to a REAL herbalist or a product manufacturer about how to go about it. None the less, the DIY way I did it does work fine, and I made far more than I would be likely to use up. > And of course no one knows the half-life, which > is very important to know for determining dosage frequency. THAT is the part that I think is a problem. Please note that I ALREADY posted with personal examples of (both negative and positive) results using cilantro. (This can be found here: http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/Chelation_products.html Look for section on " cilantro " .) Reading this actually HAS been known to change people's plans about cilantro. good wishes, Moria http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/ Mercury Detox: Information, Tools, and Resources Quote
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Posted April 11, 2006 No, he's never been vaxxed. We eat Shrimp and Tilapia. We just started eating canned tuna becasue there is no convenient way to eat away from our house unless we do, so we take small cans of Tuna in the car to sub for the Mc's that we can no longer eat. Quote
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Posted April 11, 2006 > I haven't used cilantro, but it really can cause > problems. Noone knows what the component is that chelates, so it > can't be standardized so that you get a consistent dose. Some > batches may have a lot of the chelating component, and some batches > may have little. So you won't be able to predict what effects it > might produce. it seems that every time I respond to this point I am misunderstood, regardless of how carefully I explain. You'd think I would just stop responding, but I do not. It just irritates me, because I hate having to hash it out every time. what gets " misunderstood " is that when I explain that it IS very possible to get consistent doses, people decide to interpret that as meaning completely other things, such as that I'm encouraging people to use cilantro. Don't do that. It is very possible to get consistent doses of cilantro, and I've done it, and can repeat it. And I don't even know much about this, I'm a rank amatuer. All I did was make a largish batch of tincture and shake it before each use. If I wanted to do this for huge amounts, say enough for 500 people to take for several years, I would talk to a REAL herbalist or a product manufacturer about how to go about it. None the less, the DIY way I did it does work fine, and I made far more than I would be likely to use up. [CC Bernard] I was still thinking of using it. I have a pound of dried cilantro here. I make my own tinctures and in larger batches. I would start off very low and watch carefully. In fact I see no reason to increase the dose or potency. The fact is I am much more comfortable with herbs having worked with them much more than any other modality and for over 20 years. I'm not an herbalist as I don't have any certification in it, but I do know as much as some of the ones I have known over the years. I would also read and research before doing this. Most of all though I would play it safe and I would watch my child carefully. I would also probably consult with a close family MD friend who is Chief for the Section of Complementary and Alternative Medicine at a local medical school. [CC Bernard] Now the way to get a consistent batch is to steep for a particular period of time and then strain it. Store it in a dark place and use from that batch. If I keep notes, my next batch should also be very very close in potency. > And of course no one knows the half-life, which > is very important to know for determining dosage frequency. THAT is the part that I think is a problem. Please note that I ALREADY posted with personal examples of (both negative and positive) results using cilantro. (This can be found here: http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/Chelation_products.html Look for section on " cilantro " .) Reading this actually HAS been known to change people's plans about cilantro. [CC Bernard] When I was reading some of those stories, I kept thinking these people were using too much. I think an amount that you would eat in a meal should be reasonable. my son has eaten lemongrass soup a few times that had a good amount of fresh cilantro in it and I saw no adverse effects. I think the key with an herb (which is being used as a drug for a child) is moderation. I would be cautious. I personally don't think it is appropriate to give more than the amount that would be consumed in a meal. More than that seems dangerous to me. I would also continue with our homeopathic remedies that we are using. I think that helped when we took it in Nov. I think it's time to take it again, though. I saw noticeable improvements in expressive language and in social maturity. Thanks for the advice and suggestions. I'm not doing anything today. I just freaked out about the adrenal thing. I can't understand this. How can a 7 yr old be that stressed out? I feel responsible. I feel that something I have done or my husband has done has harmed him and caused this condition to develop. I feel so guilty. Connie Quote
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Posted April 11, 2006 I may be repeating here so please pardon me if this information has already been given but fish, especially tuna contains a lot of mercury. I am not sure how much the tilapia contains but I know the tuna is pretty high and best avoided in anyone suspecting metal toxicity. I would avoid fish in anyone who may be metal toxic. The amount in tuna can be the same as a vaccine. There are some website that can provide mercury in fish amounts. Go for organic protein bars! - In , " Connie " <ABRAH@...> wrote: > > No, he's never been vaxxed. We eat Shrimp and Tilapia. We just started > eating canned tuna becasue there is no convenient way to eat away from > our house unless we do, so we take small cans of Tuna in the car to sub > for the Mc's that we can no longer eat. > > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Posted April 11, 2006 > > > I haven't used cilantro, but it really can cause > > problems. Noone knows what the component is that chelates, so it > > can't be standardized so that you get a consistent dose. Some > > batches may have a lot of the chelating component, and some > batches > > may have little. So you won't be able to predict what effects it > > might produce. > > it seems that every time I respond to this point I am > misunderstood, regardless of how carefully I explain. > You'd think I would just stop responding, but I do not. > It just irritates me, because I hate having to hash it > out every time. I'm sorry to have triggered you to spend time on this, since you apparently have done so before. I am not able to keep up with every post on this board and I have missed your previous responses to this topic. When I raise concerns about cilantro, I am mostly talking to those people who would be inclined to ill-considered use, use of large quantities and/or use of low quality sources. If you know the potential risks due to it's ability to chelate metals, you recognize that there is some important information lacking about half-life and dosage, and you still decide to try it, then I respect your decision. I haven't chosen to do this with myself, but if I was unable to take ALA, I would consider it. > what gets " misunderstood " is that when I explain that > it IS very possible to get consistent doses, people decide > to interpret that as meaning completely other things, such > as that I'm encouraging people to use cilantro. Don't > do that. I won't do that. I don't see any evidence that you are encouraging anyone. Even if you were, I personally value hearing your opinion, as long as I can express my opinion as well. Some people consider cilantro safe, simply because it is a food/herb and not a drug. I think many foods and herbs need to be used judiciously, especially with people who are toxic. > It is very possible to get consistent doses of cilantro, > and I've done it, and can repeat it. And I don't even > know much about this, I'm a rank amatuer. All I did > was make a largish batch of tincture and shake it before > each use. If I wanted to do this for huge amounts, say > enough for 500 people to take for several years, I would > talk to a REAL herbalist or a product manufacturer about > how to go about it. None the less, the DIY way I did it > does work fine, and I made far more than I would be likely > to use up. This gives you consistency from dose to dose of that particular batch. I still think you could get variations in strength from batch to batch. I am far from being an expert on this, but I would need some convincing to believe this is not an issue. > [CC Bernard] > I was still thinking of using it. I have a pound of dried cilantro > here. I make my own tinctures and in larger batches. I would start off > very low and watch carefully. In fact I see no reason to increase the > dose or potency. The fact is I am much more comfortable with herbs > having worked with them much more than any other modality and for over I prefer to take natural substances, and I am especially fond of Chinese herbal medicine. However, in all honesty I have had as much trouble with side effects and discomfort from foods and herbs as from drugs. If I can achieve greater health/well-being with an energetic therapy or a behavioral choice, I prefer that to taking drugs/herbs/foods/supplements. > 20 years. I'm not an herbalist as I don't have any certification in it, > but I do know as much as some of the ones I have known over the years. > I would also read and research before doing this. Most of all though I > would play it safe and I would watch my child carefully. I would also > probably consult with a close family MD friend who is Chief for the > Section of Complementary and Alternative Medicine at a local medical > school. > > [CC Bernard] > Now the way to get a consistent batch is to steep for a particular > period of time and then strain it. Store it in a dark place and use from > that batch. If I keep notes, my next batch should also be very very > close in potency. How do you measure the potency of each batch and compare them? > > And of course no one knows the half-life, which > > is very important to know for determining dosage frequency. > > THAT is the part that I think is a problem. Yes, I agree this is harder to solve than the dosage. > Please note that I ALREADY posted with personal examples > of (both negative and positive) results using cilantro. > (This can be found here: > http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/Chelation_products.html > Look for section on " cilantro " .) > Reading this actually HAS been known to change people's > plans about cilantro. > > [CC Bernard] > When I was reading some of those stories, I kept thinking these people > were using too much. I think an amount that you would eat in a meal > should be reasonable. my son has eaten lemongrass soup a few times that > had a good amount of fresh cilantro in it and I saw no adverse effects. > I think the key with an herb (which is being used as a drug for a child) > is moderation. I would be cautious. I personally don't think it is > appropriate to give more than the amount that would be consumed in a > meal. More than that seems dangerous to me. I agree this is sensible. > I would also continue with our homeopathic remedies that we are using. > I think that helped when we took it in Nov. I think it's time to take > it again, though. I saw noticeable improvements in expressive language > and in social maturity. I get good benefits from the homeopathic drainage drops. I also took a plumbum remedy which stirred up an awful lot of lead and made me pretty miserable for a few months. I'm not sure I would use that type of remedy again, at least not until I'm able to use higher doses of chelators. There seems to be no effective way to know how toxic you are, or how much will be stirred up by the remedy until it's already flooding your system. I found it too scary. > Thanks for the advice and suggestions. I'm not doing anything today. I > just freaked out about the adrenal thing. I can't understand this. How > can a 7 yr old be that stressed out? It needn't be external stress. The stress of toxins in the body (heavy metals, yeast, whatever) or any other type of illness can be enough all by itself to stress his adrenals. Adrenal and thyroid problems are very common with heavy metal toxicity. > I feel responsible. I feel that something I have done or my husband has > done has harmed him and caused this condition to develop. I feel so > guilty. > > Connie It is natural to look to your own actions, because that is the one thing you have control over. Be realistic, though. You love your son and you are doing your very best for him. I'm sure you can improve your parenting skills - everyone can and the vast majority of parents do. But you have no control over the genetic component. The vaccine issue is complex - even if you did vaccinate, you were making the best decision you could with the information you had at the time. And you certainly don't have control over the toxic metals floating around in the environment. Guilt is a natural pitfall of parenting. I think it can get in your way. One of the best things you can do for your son is to keep processing the guilts that come up and come to terms with the fact that, even if you are not perfect, you can give your child something that no one else can, because you are his mother. The special love you have for him is precious beyond value. Sorry if that sounds a bit sappy. We can always learn more about how to use our love to its best purpose. If we do make mistakes (and I'm not saying you have, but just suggesting a way of moving beyond your fear or belief that you have) love is the best tool for moving forward and I think you should concentrate on that. -- Quote
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Posted April 11, 2006 The type of mercury in tuna fish and assorted marine life is a chemical compound called methylmercury. It differs from the ethylmercury compound, the kind in vaccines, in that it the methylmercury compound doesn't degrade, decompose, or whatever you want to call it as quickly as the vaccine mercury does. It also appears the re-assemble in the brain as inorganic mercury in the brains at a more rapid rate, also. See Burbacher 2005 Aside from exposures to mercury by eating fish contaminated with methylmercury and breathing air contaminated with mercury from coal-fired power plants there are old munitions sites that are still mercury-toxic years after ceasing production and old manufacturing sites with very high soil contents of mercury. Silver tooth filling material is also mercury-heavy. Is it possible to become mercury-toxic from these? You won't get an argument out of CDC on that. In fact if you listen to the IOM and CDC and AAP they do speak in wishful thinking terms of " our mercury wouldn't be a problem if there just wasn't so much " other " mercury floating around " . I think the lack of government working to establish a safe exposure for ethylmercury some seven years or so since they " officially " discovered that they didn't have one, and, in fact, had to " borrow " an EPA standard established for less toxic methylmercury it quite telling. I think it's impossible to suggest safety for thimerosal with no safe exposure level established for ethylmercury. I think they never intend to establish a safe level of ethylmercury exposure. [ ] Re: New and need help interpreting lab report I may be repeating here so please pardon me if this information has already been given but fish, especially tuna contains a lot of mercury. I am not sure how much the tilapia contains but I know the tuna is pretty high and best avoided in anyone suspecting metal toxicity. I would avoid fish in anyone who may be metal toxic. The amount in tuna can be the same as a vaccine. There are some website that can provide mercury in fish amounts. Go for organic protein bars! - In , " Connie " <ABRAH@...> wrote: > > No, he's never been vaxxed. We eat Shrimp and Tilapia. We just started > eating canned tuna becasue there is no convenient way to eat away from > our house unless we do, so we take small cans of Tuna in the car to sub > for the Mc's that we can no longer eat. > > > > > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.