Guest guest Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 Patti No, IPF means you have UIP of undetermined cause. Now, many are using it to mean other things and to use before they know, but technically that is the definition. Biopsy can never confirm IPF. It can only confirm UIP or NSIP or Sarcoidosis or many of the other 200 forms of PF. But IPF is confirmed by the combination of biopsy and clinical information. Yes, there are cases where biopsy does not give a definitive answer. This is more common in the open biopsy where only one wedge is taken than it most VATS where three slices are taken from different sections. But there is still a roughly 4% error on determinations by biopsy as to the specific form. > > Bruce, > Being new to all this I am still trying to sort all this out. Does a diagnosis of IPF mean that you have either UIP or NSIP and can it only be confirmed which one it is from a biopsy sent to pathology? > Therefore is an IPF diagnosis just used when there is no definitive information, and are there cases when a biopsy is done and it will still not confirm UIP or NSIP? > > Patti Indianapolis IPF 2007 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 If you have UIP caused by something determinable then by treating the underlying cause, the progression of your UIP may be slowed or even stopped for a while. > > Beth, > Does that mean if you have UIP with something else it is then treatable? I guess that's where I'm confused. And how do they detirmine if you do have something else going on? When I go to Columbia Presp. Hosp. next month will they do more searching? > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Beth mbmurtha@... > To: Breathe-Support > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 9:06:49 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Re VATS > > > Patti, > I neglected to mention that you can have more than one type of fibrosis at the same time. We have members who have both UIP and NSIP and there can be other combinations. > > The thing to remember is that there is tremendous change going on in this field. The terminology shifts around and it can be difficult to keep a handle on the research and changes. By coming here and pooling our knowledge we help each other. > > Beth > Moderator > Fibrotic NSIP 06/06 Dermatomyositis 11/08 > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Beth mbmurtha (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 8:42:00 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Re VATS > > > Patti, > This is all very confusing isn't it? In general it is said that all IPF is UIP. That's why you see the designation IPF/UIP. However not all UIP is IPF. In other words If you've got UIP and they know the cause then you don't have IPF. > For example, it's possible to have hypersensitivity pneumonitis that was caused by say mold exposure that looks like UIP on the ct scan or the biopsy. In that case that individual has HP/UIP. In other words they have UIP but the cause is known so it's not IPF. > Or you could have UIP caused by a connective tissue disease so in that case you would have something like UIP/Lupus. > > The only time something is clinically designated as IPF is when the cause is unknown. That's what idiopathic means. IPF literally means lung scarring of unknown origin. Once a cause is known you move away from the IPF label. > > It may seem like this is all picky and insignificant but it does matter when it comes to treatment. Determining a cause for someone's fibrosis opens up the possibility of more and potentially more effective forms of treatment. > > I hope this helps a bit. > > Beth > Moderator > Fibrotic NSIP 06/06 Dermatomyositis 11/08 > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Patti napa73 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 7:59:41 AM > Subject: Re: Re VATS > > > Bruce, > Being new to all this I am still trying to sort all this out. Does a diagnosis of IPF mean that you have either UIP or NSIP and can it only be confirmed which one it is from a biopsy sent to pathology? > Therefore is an IPF diagnosis just used when there is no definitive information, and are there cases when a biopsy is done and it will still not confirm UIP or NSIP? > > Patti Indianapolis IPF 2007 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 If you have UIP caused by something determinable then by treating the underlying cause, the progression of your UIP may be slowed or even stopped for a while. > > Beth, > Does that mean if you have UIP with something else it is then treatable? I guess that's where I'm confused. And how do they detirmine if you do have something else going on? When I go to Columbia Presp. Hosp. next month will they do more searching? > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Beth mbmurtha@... > To: Breathe-Support > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 9:06:49 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Re VATS > > > Patti, > I neglected to mention that you can have more than one type of fibrosis at the same time. We have members who have both UIP and NSIP and there can be other combinations. > > The thing to remember is that there is tremendous change going on in this field. The terminology shifts around and it can be difficult to keep a handle on the research and changes. By coming here and pooling our knowledge we help each other. > > Beth > Moderator > Fibrotic NSIP 06/06 Dermatomyositis 11/08 > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Beth mbmurtha (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 8:42:00 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Re VATS > > > Patti, > This is all very confusing isn't it? In general it is said that all IPF is UIP. That's why you see the designation IPF/UIP. However not all UIP is IPF. In other words If you've got UIP and they know the cause then you don't have IPF. > For example, it's possible to have hypersensitivity pneumonitis that was caused by say mold exposure that looks like UIP on the ct scan or the biopsy. In that case that individual has HP/UIP. In other words they have UIP but the cause is known so it's not IPF. > Or you could have UIP caused by a connective tissue disease so in that case you would have something like UIP/Lupus. > > The only time something is clinically designated as IPF is when the cause is unknown. That's what idiopathic means. IPF literally means lung scarring of unknown origin. Once a cause is known you move away from the IPF label. > > It may seem like this is all picky and insignificant but it does matter when it comes to treatment. Determining a cause for someone's fibrosis opens up the possibility of more and potentially more effective forms of treatment. > > I hope this helps a bit. > > Beth > Moderator > Fibrotic NSIP 06/06 Dermatomyositis 11/08 > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Patti napa73 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 7:59:41 AM > Subject: Re: Re VATS > > > Bruce, > Being new to all this I am still trying to sort all this out. Does a diagnosis of IPF mean that you have either UIP or NSIP and can it only be confirmed which one it is from a biopsy sent to pathology? > Therefore is an IPF diagnosis just used when there is no definitive information, and are there cases when a biopsy is done and it will still not confirm UIP or NSIP? > > Patti Indianapolis IPF 2007 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2010 Report Share Posted January 9, 2010 Bruce, even though it may be only 4% chance on an error of biopsy I sometimes feel encouraged. I have been tested for connective diseases more than once and once my dr. (rheumotologist ? )said that even though the test came back negative he couldn't rule out Lupus. And here I am with UIP.I am going to NYC Columbia Presp. Hosp next month for transplant eval. so I'm hoping they will look at my biopsy again.From: Bruce To: Breathe-Support Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 10:22:57 AMSubject: Re: Re VATS If you have UIP caused by something determinable then by treating the underlying cause, the progression of your UIP may be slowed or even stopped for a while. > > Beth, > Does that mean if you have UIP with something else it is then treatable? I guess that's where I'm confused. And how do they detirmine if you do have something else going on? When I go to Columbia Presp. Hosp. next month will they do more searching? > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Beth mbmurtha@... > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 9:06:49 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Re VATS > > > Patti, > I neglected to mention that you can have more than one type of fibrosis at the same time. We have members who have both UIP and NSIP and there can be other combinations. > > The thing to remember is that there is tremendous change going on in this field. The terminology shifts around and it can be difficult to keep a handle on the research and changes. By coming here and pooling our knowledge we help each other. > > Beth > Moderator > Fibrotic NSIP 06/06 Dermatomyositis 11/08 > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Beth mbmurtha (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 8:42:00 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Re VATS > > > Patti, > This is all very confusing isn't it? In general it is said that all IPF is UIP. That's why you see the designation IPF/UIP. However not all UIP is IPF. In other words If you've got UIP and they know the cause then you don't have IPF. > For example, it's possible to have hypersensitivity pneumonitis that was caused by say mold exposure that looks like UIP on the ct scan or the biopsy. In that case that individual has HP/UIP. In other words they have UIP but the cause is known so it's not IPF. > Or you could have UIP caused by a connective tissue disease so in that case you would have something like UIP/Lupus. > > The only time something is clinically designated as IPF is when the cause is unknown. That's what idiopathic means. IPF literally means lung scarring of unknown origin. Once a cause is known you move away from the IPF label. > > It may seem like this is all picky and insignificant but it does matter when it comes to treatment. Determining a cause for someone's fibrosis opens up the possibility of more and potentially more effective forms of treatment. > > I hope this helps a bit. > > Beth > Moderator > Fibrotic NSIP 06/06 Dermatomyositis 11/08 > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Patti napa73 (AT) comcast (DOT) net> > To: Breathe-Support@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 7:59:41 AM > Subject: Re: Re VATS > > > Bruce, > Being new to all this I am still trying to sort all this out. Does a diagnosis of IPF mean that you have either UIP or NSIP and can it only be confirmed which one it is from a biopsy sent to pathology? > Therefore is an IPF diagnosis just used when there is no definitive information, and are there cases when a biopsy is done and it will still not confirm UIP or NSIP? > > Patti Indianapolis IPF 2007 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.