Guest guest Posted June 18, 2008 Report Posted June 18, 2008 I can't, without some effort on onibasu.com... Or, it may have been in a discussion with Jay (who runs onibasu), perhaps you can check the onibasu wiki? Look for stuff on lead, there is a bit there. In any case, the point was that with lead present, there is a much longer and slower chelation process. I have wondered if that is the case with me, since I definitely have lead present. It's old lead, so I don't quite know how much is left in there, but I do see that it is coming down _very_ slowly. Only 25% decrease in hair values, in 2 1/2 years of lead chelation. Dave. ------------ Posted by: " beigetable " beigetable@... beigetable Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:35 am (PDT) > I have just read recently that the path for > people who are lead poisoned (in addition to mercury) is > substantially longer than for those with no lead. Can you cite the author, and exactly what he or she said? Thanks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.