Guest guest Posted June 8, 2004 Report Share Posted June 8, 2004 > > The Fat Epidemic: He Says It's an Illusion > By GINA KOLATA > > > Ask anyone: Americans are getting fatter and fatter. Advertising > campaigns say they are. So do federal officials and the scientists they > rely on. > > But Dr. Friedman, an obesity researcher at Rockefeller > University, argues that contrary to popular opinion, national data do > not show Americans growing uniformly fatter. > > Instead, he says, the statistics demonstrate clearly that while the > very fat are getting fatter, thinner people have remained pretty much > the same. > > Let it be said that Dr. Friedman, a Medical Institute > investigator and the discoverer of the gene for leptin, a hormone > released by fat cells, is not fat. He is tall and gangly, with the > rumpled look of an academic scientist. > > As an obesity researcher, he might be expected to endorse the > prevailing view that obesity in this country is out of control. But Dr. > Friedman said he was outraged by the acceptance of what he sees as a > hurtful myth, one that encourages people to believe that if you are > fat, it is your fault. > > The obesity arena " is so political, so rife with misinformation and > disinformation, " he said. > > Dr. Friedman points to careful statistical analyses of the changes in > Americans' body weights from 1991 to today by Dr. Flegal of > the National Center for Health Statistics. At the lower end of the > weight distribution, nothing has changed, not even by a few pounds. As > you move up the scale, a few additional pounds start to show up, but > even at midrange, people today are just 6 or 7 pounds heavier than they > were in 1991. Only with the massively obese, the very top of the > distribution, is there a substantial increase in weight, about 25 to 30 > pounds, Dr. Flegal reported. > > As a result, the curve of body weight has been pulled slightly to the > right, with more people shifting up a few pounds to cross the line that > experts use to divide normal from obese. In 1991, 23 percent of > Americans fell into the obese category; now 31 percent do, a more than > 30 percent increase. But the average weight of the population has > increased by just 7 to 10 pounds since 1991. > > Dr. Friedman gave an analogy: " Imagine the average I.Q. was 100 and > that 5 percent of the population had an I.Q. of 140 or greater and were > considered to be geniuses. Now let's say that education improves and > the average I.Q. increases to 107 and 10 percent of the population has > an I.Q. of above 140. > > " You could present the data in two ways, " he said. " You could say that > the average I.Q. is up seven points or you could say that because of > improved education the number of geniuses has doubled. " > > He added, " The whole obesity debate is equivalent to drawing > conclusions about national education programs by saying that the number > of geniuses has doubled. " > > Not everyone agrees. > > " It' s one thing to talk about statistics and another to talk about > what's happening to individuals, " said Dr. n Nestle, a professor > of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University. > " Everyone notices that there are more overweight people now. " > > Dr. Friedman, however, begs to differ. The statistics let scientists > get beyond impressions and focus on the evidence. > > He is, in a way, an unexpected figure to insert himself into the > highly charged politics of obesity. He left clinical medicine in 1980 > after discovering that his true passion was the laboratory. By 1981, he > had begun his scientific career, and within a few years he was taking > on what seemed like an impossibly onerous task, finding a gene whose > absence made mice grow massively obese. > > He keeps mementos from those days. He still has the purchase order, > from December 1986, for the first batch of mice he used for the > experiment. Hanging on his office wall is a framed strip of white paper > with black blotches, the data that on Sunday morning, May 8, 1994, > revealed he had found the gene that he named leptin. > > " To me, those data are as beautiful as the Mona , " he said. > > Over the years, Dr. Friedman says, he has watched the scientific data > accumulate to show that body weight, in animals and humans, is not > under conscious control. Body weight, he says, is genetically > determined, as tightly regulated as height. Genes control not only how > much you eat but also the metabolic rate at which you burn food. When > it comes to eating, free will is an illusion. > > " People can exert a level of control over their weight within a 10-, > perhaps a 15-pound range, " Dr. Friedman said. But expecting an obese > person to decide to simply eat less and exercise more to get below the > obesity range, below the overweight range? It virtually never happens, > he said. Any weight that is lost almost invariably comes right back. > > The same goes for gaining weight in general, Dr. Friedman argued. A > person who has the genes to be thin is not going to get fat because > portion sizes increase. It makes no scientific sense, he said. > > But isn't it true that we can decide to eat or not, choosing to skip > dinner, say, or pass up dessert? Isn't that free will? Not really, Dr. > Friedman said. The control mechanisms for body weight operate over > months, even years, not day to day or meal to meal. > > " People live in the moment, " he said. " They lose weight over the short > term and say that they have exercised willpower, " but over the long > term, the body's intrinsic controls win out. And just as willpower > cannot make fat people thin, a lack of it does not make thin people > fat. > > No one, he says, can consciously calibrate their food intake as > precisely as the body does naturally. Most people's weights remain > steady, within about 10 pounds, year in and year out. But when people > count calories, they typically err by about 10 percent. For someone who > eats 750,000 calories in a year, that 10 percent error would add up to > 75,000 calories, or about 25 pounds. > > Obesity, Dr. Friedman says, is a problem; fat people are derided and > they have health risks like diabetes and heart disease. But it does no > one any good to exaggerate the extent of obesity or to blame the obese > for being fat. > > " Before calling it an epidemic, people really need to understand what > the numbers do and don't say, " he said. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.