Guest guest Posted April 12, 2004 Report Share Posted April 12, 2004 Other than a hyst. for a cancer diagnosis, there seem to be other, less dramatic and wiser choices available. Also, for me, there is a feminist component. throwing the baby's bed out with the bath water. hahaha. maybe it is not analoguous to a guy having prostrate cancer.... but, they don't lop off their peni...in fact they take great pains...up to the point of having some sort of hand pump to preserve their dignity...and then there's viagara.... let's also talk about heart disease and women.... and dvt....we are just a little in need of self advocacy in the woman's health arena. just my O-pinion. gigi Dawn Dennings wrote: >Hello Ladies- > I would like to know why this group seems to not >see a hysterectomy as one of the wiser choices for >dealing with large, painful fibroids? >Dawn > > > > >MEETUP! with other local women who have Uterine Fibroids. http://uterinefibroids.meetup.com > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 Hello Ladies Well I chose hysterectomy, but not because I had fibroids but because I had alot of other problems as well as fibroids. Pain that would still be there even if I had a myomectomy or UAE, made my decision a little easier. But that being said it was not an easy decision by any means. I dont think anyone on this list has actually said dont have a hyst, just make sure you research all of your options first before chosing a hyst, which is just plain common sense. And most importantly it should be a personal choice by you, not your doctor or anyone else. If a man has penis cancer, they do in fact remove the penis if there is no other way to stop the progression, much the same as uterine or ovarian cancer. As for hand pumps and viagra, well that just goes to show that mens sexual disfunction is obviously more of an issue than womens sexual disfunction. That has more to do with the womens health issues all over and needs to be addressed very seriously. I feel very strongly about the womens sexual health issues, being one that has been complaining about my all over health issues for as long as I can remember and not getting any help at all. Just wanted to add that during my long painfull search for something that worked for me, my hysterectomy was the least painfull and least traumatic surgery or treatment I have experienced in the last 10 years. That is my experience and my opinion anyway. Bree > > >Hello Ladies- > > I would like to know why this group seems to not > >see a hysterectomy as one of the wiser choices for > >dealing with large, painful fibroids? > >Dawn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 Obviously a great many posters aren't doctors, and responsibility lies with the reader not to take everything as guaranteed gospel truth, but rather as ideas to weigh up and question further. Every case is different and there's more to be learnt about fibroids by the medical profession. With so many posters you should expect some to get their facts completely wrong and to have very strong biasses, although we seem to be fine here. As I understand it the group wants women to know there are different options out there, so they can make an informed choice themselves. There'll never be a definitive answer because we all have different priorities and different experiences of the same treatments. There may be times when hysterectomy makes a lot of sense as a choice. But if the forum saves just one 20 year old with some small fibroids who wanted kids from an unecessary hysterectomy it would have all been worth it. How wise is it not to have a hysterectomy for particularly large fibroids?... you'd have to consult the gynaecologists. I've seen posts and book references to large fibroids being treated by treatments other than hysterectomy, and it seems UAE can be used in even more cases than they previously thought. If someone is in that situation, I guess I'd say ask your specialist what the risks are in your particular case, get a second opinion if the recommendation is a hysterectomy and you're not happy about that, and look into the suitability of other treatment options in discussion with someone who knows what they're talking about, such as an up to date gynaecologist/radiologist...rather than a doctor that you're doubtful about. Make sure they're recommending what they believe is best as opposed to just giving you what you want and therefore giving you the mistaken impression they agre with you that it's the best choice. Fibroids can grow very large. How do the large fibroids compare with other posters here and what were their treatment experiences? What were they told? Bleeding heavily is a risk to take seriously. " You might one day get cancer if you have a uterus " is a claim to be more cautious of. The patient needs to know the treatment choice was made with your best interests at heart by a capable surgeon open to sensible alternatives to hysterectomy, where appropriate. Patients being scared with talk of cancer risks should ask about current evidence and current test results in THEIR case. Ask the gyn if they would spot that during a myomectomy. Fibroids are common and cancerous tumours are much rarer. If the evidence really is pointing to cancer however, and you've got a second or even 4th opinion who all agree, then be wise. I for one would be happy to pass on recommended hysterectomy group web site addresses such as Hyster-Sisters. Aztek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 Dawn: The removal of your uterus is drastic and permanent. You are removing a MAJOR organ - an organ which has been linked by some in the medical profession to heart health for women. If your uterus is otherwise healthy without the fibroids, then I feel the first course of action is to get rid of the fibroids. Don't throw the dishes out with the dish water. I believe that the only reason you should remove a major organ is to save your life or when no other options exist to correct a permanently painful and irreversible condition. Fight to keep your uterus. As you may know, heart disease is the number 1 killer of women in the United States. Any help we can get in promoting heart health is well worth it - and, it appears that the uterus may in fact, be a partner in this battle. Regards, Joyce reasons for your choices? I would like to know why this group seems to not see a hysterectomy as one of the wiser choices for dealing with large, painful fibroids? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.