Guest guest Posted February 26, 2004 Report Share Posted February 26, 2004 This is my first post, although I have been lurking for several months. I am 47 years old, no children, and recently divorced, so none likely. I found out about 2 years ago that I have fibroids. I had been having extremely heavy periods with large clots as well as lesser bleeding throughout the month. Nevertheless, I ignored the problem until one day I went for a walk and about halfway through, I simply " ran out of gas " . At that point I tried to head home, but I would walk about 20 or 30 feet and have to stop again because I couldn't catch my breath. After about 50 such efforts, I managed to return the few blocks to my home. That FINALLY got my attention. I went to the doctor who did blood work and found out my hemoglobin was 8.4. Not good, although I've heard a lot worse on this list. He scheduled a pelvic sonogram, which show multiple fibroids. I think he said 3 submucosal fibroids at the time, the largest of which was slightly larger than 3 centimeters. Being an old fashioned doctor, he immediately said I need a hysterectomy. I asked about alternatives and he said my fibroids were too large for a hysteroscopic resection. (From what I have read since, that appears to be inaccurate, although the position of the fibroids could have precluded resection.) He mentioned myomectomy, but mentioned the risk of heavy bleeding and strongly pushed hysterectomy because " you don't need your uterus " . He also prescribed hormones (Necon), which seems to have lessened my bleeding problems. No more mid month bleeding, except for occasional spotting, and reduced periods, although still very heavy and with large clots. With the lessened bleeding problems and iron supplements, I eventually returned my hemoglobin and iron counts into the normal range. I still have a great deal of fatigue, frequent headaches, etc. I am also becoming aware of the mass of my fibroids. Although my uterus is not especially large, I have a uncomfortable, weighty, and crampy feeling most of the time. I recently decided to go to a female gyn with the hope that a female would be less likely to be dead set on hysterectomy. No such luck. She said the same sort of thing everyone on this list hears. She scheduled another pelvic sonogram to be done and reported that my fibroids had doubled in size (the largest now 6+ centimeters). She said I also had a mass on my right ovary. I was distraught at this time and wondering if I was being foolish to resist the inevitable. I agreed to let her schedule a hysterectomy. Her nurse called back the next day with a surgery date in one week. I was shocked. Every time I needed to schedule an appointment for exam, sonogram, or follow-up consult, I had to wait 3 or 4 weeks for the appointment. But agree to surgery and ….voila, 1 week! That wasn't even adequate time to arrange an extended absence from work. The wrench in my gut also solidified for me just how much I really didn't want a hysterectomy and why I had played the " wait and see " game for 2 years. I told the nurse to cancel the surgery and schedule another appointment to discuss alternatives. It was at this time I found the embo and uterinefibroids yahoo groups. (Hey! I'm not the only older woman to want to keep her uterus.) Based on some suggestions on the list, I requested a copy of my sonogram report to get a better picture of what I was dealing with. The content was: Uterus: 9.2 x 10.7 x 9.0 cm (multi-fibroids) Endometrium: Could not be visualized due to fibroids Rt Ovary: Solid mass 4.7 x 2.6 x 3.8 cm Lt Ovary: 2.3 x 2.7 2.6 cm Comments: Multi-fibroids the largest measuring 6.2 x 3.2 x 5.0 cm Not as detailed as I would like. Where are the fibroids and how many is multiple? When I went in for the consult, I asked my gyn about the position of the fibroids and she said submucosal and intramural. When asked, she told me that she had done 2 myomectomies in the past 6 months. She also said she would probably want to just remove my ovary, because you couldn't get tests at the time of surgery to tell you if a mass was cancerous. If I didn't want the ovary arbitrarily removed, she would have to take a biopsy, then close me up. If tests came back positive, she would have to go back in later to remove the ovary. I asked about possibly getting a referral to an RE, but she said they would likely refer me right back to her because of my age. She scheduled an endometrial biopsy (probably overdue). The nurse called me back a few weeks later, mentioning no uterine cancer cells, but the existence of a polyp, and that I needed to get my hysterectomy scheduled. By this time, I was stubbornly in the " only cancer will cause me to remove any of my organs " mode. When I last went in, my gyn seemed pretty fed up with me and simply asked me what I wanted to do. Because the polyp can be removed hysteroscopically, I suggested maybe it could be removed and the fibroids evaluated for resection at the time. From the yahoo groups I have found out that some doctors will resect fibroids larger that 3-4 centimeters so long as you are prepared to undergo more than once procedure. Then my gyn said she didn't think my fibroids were impinging on the uterine lining. OK. First they were submucusal, then submucosal and intramural, and now they aren't submucosal at all. Multiple fibroids (number unknown) migrating around my uterus (location unknown). Mmmm. I start to get the feeling that I am always told whatever will most likely urge me to hysterectomy. If I don't have submucosal fibroids, can all the bleeding be from one polyp? Because I just don't trust I can go into surgery for a myo and not wake up with a hyst with my current gyn, and because she proved right about the RE based on the one I spoke with (who wouldn't do a myo unless I also needed their egg donor program), I suggested that she refer my to an IR that was part of my Cigno North Texas HMO and who was listed as doing UFE. I wanted to schedule the polyp to be removed ASAP, but my gyn wanted to schedule the polyp removal and surgery to evaluate my ovary at the same time. I thought I saw a post on this list (or perhaps uterinefibroids) concerning the use of MRI to evaluate ovarian masses as being cancerous or not. My gyn also made it sound at times as though she really couldn't be sure from the sonograms whether there was actually an ovarian mass or if a fibroid was simply in the way. With those 2 factors in mind, I thought that perhaps I should check with the IR first and perhaps the MRI could tell me whether there actually is a mass on my ovary and whether I actually need to have my abdomen cut to evaluate the ovary. So I am desperately seeking advice and input: 1) Is the doctor correct in that an ovarian mass cannot be evaluated at the time of surgery? Do the tests take too long? 2) Does anyone remember posts concerning the use of MRI to identify cancerous masses? 3) Since I have multiple things going on, in different parts of my reproductive organs, should I forget about even investigating the UFE option and continue to look for a better surgeon for an abdominal myomectomy? 4) I spoke with the IR's office to find out if Cigna even covered UFE (they said yes) and they said they could refer me to other doctors with myomectomy experience if I was not a candidate for UFE. It may be that these would be excellent referrals, but can anyone recommend a doctor with a lot of myomectomy experience in the Dallas area? Most of you ladies seem to be from the west or east coasts. Any suggestions concerning how to best proceed would be appreciated. Every time I thought I knew my next step, something new just popped up to complicate the issue. I've made the same post on the embo group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.