Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 You cannot compare women who get pregnant with fibroids to this woman. No matter where you stand on the abortion issue, it would have been illegal in any state in the union to perform an abortion in the 9th month for any reason other than to save the mother's life. This woman refused the cesarean not to save her life, but because she " didn't want the scar " (take a look at this lady's photo and tell me how rational that is). Therefore, her refusal to have a C-section amounted to the same thing as an " unjustified " late-term abortion, and should never have been allowed. This woman was verifiably mentally ill, and was therefore incapable of making a rational decision. In my never to be humble opinion, they should have performed the C-section w/out her consent since she was not capable of giving it. The difference between this and the hypothetical situation you give, is that it is quite possible for a woman with fibroids to deliver a healthy baby. Many women on this list have. In some instances, having a myo might even hurt ones chances of delivering a healthy child. The woman in the article said that she *knew* the baby would die, and she did not care! NO sane woman (and I am sure that includes everyone here) would knowingly get pregnant w/a fibroid if she KNEW that her baby would die. I believe that all of the women on this list are acting in what they believe will be *the best interest* of their yet-to-be-conceived children. That is the difference, and it is a *huge* one. Elana te: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:03:12 -0000 Subject: Refusing medical treatment can get you charged with a crime? This really bothers me because the implications are so far reaching. Regardless of whether or not the mother had mental illness there are lots of women who don't want to have surgery. What next, will women who knowingly get pregnant with fibroids and miscarry, even thought their doctor told them to have a myo -- are they going to be charged with murder as well? Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus Utah Woman Who Refused a Caesarean Section Is Charged With Murdering Fetus http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20040312_740.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 I found this story a little unique myself when I first heard of it. But I guess considering that it was a healthy fetus/child/or what have u.... and the fetus was at a state that it could survive as long as the proper procedure had been undergone....then it would be considered murder, maybe they view it as a late-term abortion. i really don't know, i'm just throwing idea out there. i don't believe that if a woman w/fibroids that miscarry would be charged w/murder as well....but if that woman was pregnant w/fibroids and the baby was healthy and they were having complications allowing the child to be born vaginally, and the mother refused to have a C- section to remove the child, then I think they could charge one w/murder. still sorta strange though. What next, will women who knowingly get pregnant with fibroids and miscarry, even thought their doctor told them to have a myo -- are they going to be charged with murder as well? > http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20040312_740.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2004 Report Share Posted March 14, 2004 How can they be so positive the baby would have survived if she had had a c-section? Since when are the experts beyond human in accurate predictions of life and death? Maybe this could go the other way too.... When I was 18 (I'm now 53), I was admitted to the hospital, 26 weeks pregnant, and delivered a stillborn. The altopsy showed nothing was wrong with the fetus. Medical records show when I was admitted (I arrived by ambulance) they could hear a heartbeat. So who's to say the baby wouldn't have lived if they had done an emergency C-section? Should every woman have a C-section, just in case her baby can't survive a vaginal birth? Is this whole thing leading to more unecessary C-sections because it's quicker and easier, and safer for the baby? What about the mother? If things go that way, then you can also run into babys that survive but mothers that die during major abdominal surgery, leading to motherless children who grow up in a state of depression. Gee, and did they even bother to tell her she'd be charged with murder? How can they positively know she would have survived the surgery herself? How about this one....sorry miss but if you don't have a c-section and your baby dies, you'll be up against a murder charge. Seems to me that perhaps we should be taking it out of the hands of the surgeons and put it back into the hands of mother nature instead of telling women what they must or must not do with their pregnancys and their bodies. Sorry for the rant, but you hit a tender spot and I had to say ouch.... Gerri > What next, will women who knowingly get pregnant with fibroids and miscarry, even thought their doctor told them to have a myo -- are they going to be > charged with murder as well? > > http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20040312_740.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.