Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Dear Carla and Edith, I've read through the other postings in re to DIM-Plus. As I have been taking it for nearly six weeks now, I think it is fair to add my personal experience for whatever it is worth. I was skeptical of DIM supplements when I began reading about methods of treating fibroids over the summer. Briefly, I experienced my first two bouts of flooding in May, 2003. The first time, went to the ER after a week of flooding and an afternoon of vomiting and intense cramping that was attributed to a possible rupture of an ovarian cyst. To say it reminded me of how mother's describe childbirth is not an understatement by any means. I also had a UTI and was severely anemic. I was placed on 10 mg of progestin, 2x a day for 10 days, to stop the bleeding, was told to start oral iron therapy and was told I might need a hysterectomy in a manner that was so strong, I felt I was being propagandized. So...though the flooding continued for three more weeks and was worse after stopping the progestin, I dared not return to the ER. Instead, I was already seeking alternative treatments that I could do to see if that would stop the bleeding. The not having any health insurance syndrome is a real bitch, btw. So why skeptical of DIM? Lack of research and contradictions to it, for one. Reading about it on the Life Extension website, there are concerns expressed over there that isolating DIM from its precursor, I3C, may not be a good thing. I3C is being touted as a possible preventative for breast cancer and estrogen dominant conditions. DIM is touted by the supplement market as a powerful estrogen metabolizer that might prevent breast cancer. The article on Life Extension's website is concerned that we actually need ALL of the chemical constituents that I3C breaks down to and not just DIM and that DIM might actually promote breast cancer. A similar though is also behind the thinking of those who encourage consuming a variety of whole foods rather than relying on supplements....because foods contain into the thousands of chemicals most of which have not been isolated by research. It is possible that they work synergestically to promote good health. So what happens when we isolate one particular compound to the exclusion of others in foods? Harmful or helpful? In regards to indole compounds, we don't know. The indole compounds are found in cruciferous veggies btw and it's now a trend in the supplement market to promote pills made from dehydrated veggies that are rich in indoles. To give an example, one concerned friend of mine sent me a generous supply of Juice Plus over the summer when she found out about my fibroids. She swears they help her with her IBS symptoms and she genuinely wanted to help. Since they likely contain bioflavanoids, I take them thinking I'm getting something out of them. One problem with these kinds of supplements is that there is no standardized amount of compounds like bioflavanoids or vitamins. You don't know how much you are getting of any one nutrient. And since I3C is heat sensitive, I doubt these supplements can provide me with that compound to yield any DIM, if that interests anyone. I am going to post this link for the curious. These researchers who study bone density found two people who had serious bone density loss and Vit D deficiency, which also means poor calcium absorption, who were also long term users of I3C/DIM. I don't have follow-up information about this pilot study related to the use of I3C/DIM and the effect it might have on bone health. It does bring up a legitimate concern, however, about the impact of self dosing with properties that are said to be anti-carcinogenic on other important functions/systems in the body. http://207.158.255.80/Vitamin%20D% 20Question.htm Gloria > > DIM has been on an uphill incline in the research world since 1995. > There has been some efficacy shown in prostate cancer research -- but > much more needs to be studied before I would recommend anyone just > " try " this potential solution on their own. For instance, it does > disturb me that fish treated with DIM in studies have acquired liver > cancer. Success with prostate cancer only to possibly promote liver > cancer? Granted, a supplement showing success with prostate cancer > would definitely be of interest to those looking into treatments for a > wide variety of other hormonally-associated tumors. But, the passage > you've quoted above doesn't mention DIM's role as an anti-androgenic > -- which is part and parcel to " metabolize estrogens > effectively " ...check PubMed to learn much, much more.... > > Admittedly, I don't understand all of the research underway -- but > have read enough confusing details regarding findings that I just > would be extremely cautious with this one. Besides, doesn't it make > more sense to simply up your fruit/vegetable intake that fits this > category? > > Self treating may have many pros and cons. Be certain you're not > blinded by the pros in the form of prose found online that doesn't > cover its bases with the cons also found in research..... > > As a matter of blatant curiosity...have any of the women who are > trying DIM experienced any differences in their sexual experiences? > Less desire, vaginal dryness, etc.? Anything at all of note? > > Carla Dionne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.