Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 Will do. This sounds like a very scientific study. Maybe we should do a survey of our own that expands to issues such as stress and types of food intake. In my case, no genetic link: I don't think my grand-mother had fibroid. I have one sister, and either she nor my mother has fibroid. Jackie genetic link for fibroid formation > I was wondering if there is any " known cause " that is scientific and > documented for these invaders??? I came across a study that is being conducted at Brigham and Womens hospital in Boston looking for genetic explanations of fibroid formation. If you have a sister who also has fibroids they would be very interested in having your family participate. check out : http://www.fibroids.net/html/study1.htm contact phone for this study is 1- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 Another resource http://www.niehs.nih.gov/fibroids/home.htm > > I was wondering if there is any " known cause " that is > > scientific and documented for these invaders????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 Hi, Jackie, Since the majority of women with fibroids do not have symptoms and may never be told they have them, I'm not sure we can state with accuracy that we don't have a genetic connection for our fibroids just because no other woman in our family has been diagnosed with them. Regarding your idea about a poll to find out a connetion between stress and food, and fibroids, we do have a polling feature on our Yahoo! Groups website and anyone is free to use it. I'm not sure if Carla Dionne, as the owner/moderator of the group, has to approve your poll or not before it goes online. If she does, there'll be a slight delay as she's away right now until the 31st. And just a comment on the validity of any poll done here. Setting up a valid scientific study is more than just asking questions about someone's perceived level of stress or food intake. For a start, we're too small a group for our results to have validity. We would need to define " stress " very precisely and need to be sure that every woman who responded understood the definition and was using the same criteria to measure her stress. Food questions, to be valid, really need to involve a food diary kept by the subjects for a period of time. Researchers have found out that self-reported memories of what people ate over a period of time differ markedly from diaries showing actual food consumption day-by- day. There's a research truism that states that just because two things occur simultaneously, this does not prove that the one caused the other. For instance, I bought a puppy and then broke my leg. Conclusion: Puppies cause broken legs. It's pretty obvious here that we'd need to know a lot more about the circumstances before we could say that that conclusion is true. For one, we'd need to know just what the connection between the puppy and the broken leg was. The same principle holds even when the connection, or maybe I should say " disconnection " isn't so obvious. So you can see that setting up a valid research study is fairly complicated. To conduct a poll here can be interesting and even give us something to speculate on, but it's unlikely that we could design a poll that could really tell us something scientific about our fibroids. Leonie > Will do. This sounds like a very scientific study. Maybe we should do a > survey of our own that expands to issues such as stress and types of > food intake. In my case, no genetic link: I don't think my grand- mother > had fibroid. I have one sister, and either she nor my mother has > fibroid. > > Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.