Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 THE OLD CANCER SCARE – Again – Here is part of an old post of mine. You can see the whole thing in the archives - it’s #42198 - just plug the # into the message number box. I don't remember the exact numbers – or sources – off the top of my head, but the things I learned include the following: · A fibroid is NEVER malignant & they DON'T " become " malignant either. · It is possible to mistake a malignant tumor for a fibroid, but that is EXTREMELY rare. · The risk of dying from surgery to remove the things is very rare, BUT · The risk of dying from surgery is still GREATER than the risk of it being cancer. In other words, taking them out just for the sake of finding out is slightly riskier than just leaving them in. · If they've been in there long enough to become a problem, it's probably not cancer – because if it was cancer and there that long, you'd probably be in really awful shape by now. _____________________ And by all means see Dr. Bill 's post #33624 – in the archives of this group – regarding differentiating sarcoma on MRI – ****** (end of old stuff – begin new) As for “fast growth” – the idea that it might be related to cancer seems to be what I call an “Old Doctor’s Tale” – it gets a lot of lip service, but it doesn’t pan out when they actually look at the facts and figures -- evidence. Fast growing fibroids seem to be just that – fibroids that are growing fast – nothing more. * * * * * HYST v. MYO: Docs who do a LOT of myos say it is no bloodier than hyst - or that the bloodiness can be easily managed – so if your doc says it is bloodier you might want to think about finding a more experienced/less-bloody doc. As for age & choices – the older you are the less likely you are to have time to grow more fibroids to the point where they could be a problem - seems like being older might give more weight to the myo rather than the hyst. ---- And - regrowth is only a problem for a small percentage of the women who have myos. * * * * * And, here’s an interesting little thing I came across. I have no idea who this society is & obviously only 3 candidates seem to have answered their questionnaire (at least so far) – there’s not a lot of info, but still you might want to take a look at it: The Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR) has launched a new website - http://www.votewomenshealth.org - that provides voters with the candidates' positions on medical research and women's health issues. Pat _________________________________________________________________ Scope out the new MSN Plus Internet Software — optimizes dial-up to the max! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/plus&ST=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.