Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Increased Carotid Wall Stress in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Pierre Boutouyrie MD, PhD, Dominique P. Germain MD, PhD, Jean-Noël Fiessinger MD, Brigitte Laloux PhD, Jérôme Perdu MD, and Stéphane t MD, PhD* From the Departments of Pharmacology and INSERM EMI 0107 (P.B., B.L., S.L.), Clinical Genetics (D.P.G.), and Vascular Medicine (J.-N.F., J.P.), Hôpital Européen s Pompidou, Paris, France. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephane.laurent@.... Background--Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS), also known as EDS type IV, an inherited disorder of connective tissue, results from mutations in the gene encoding type III procollagen (COL3A1). Affected patients are at risk for arterial dissection or rupture, the main cause of death. To understand the pathogenesis of the vascular lesions, we used a biomechanical approach and determined steady and pulsatile wall stress. Methods and Results--Sixteen patients with vEDS and 16 age-, gender-, and blood pressure-matched control subjects were included in this cross-sectional noninvasive study. Circumferential wall stress was determined under steady and pulsatile conditions at the site of an elastic (common carotid) and a muscular (radial) artery from the measurements of intima-media thickness and internal diameter with high-resolution echo-tracking systems and either mean blood pressure or pulse pressure, respectively. At the site of the carotid artery, steady circumferential wall stress was 43% higher in vEDS patients than in control subjects (68.9±14.3 versus 48.2±12.1 kPa, P<0.001), and pulsatile circumferential wall stress was 22% higher (28.2±7.7 versus 23.1±5.7 kPa, P<0.001). Carotid intima-media thickness was 32% lower (408±56 versus 598±171 µm, P<0.001) in vEDS patients, and internal diameter was not different between groups. Radial artery parameters were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions--In vEDS patients, an abnormally low intima-media thickness generates a higher wall stress than in control subjects at the site of an elastic artery, which may increase the risk of arterial dissection and rupture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.