Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 Two Articles in Todays Sun: And no, they are not meant to be humorus. ------------------ Article One: Op was on the wrong leg BUNGLING docs operated on a mum's wrong leg — even though there was a huge ARROW drawn on the other one. Mum-of-three Tracey , 30, woke to find both ankles bandaged. Her left was cut open before surgeons realised it was the right which needed the 20-minute tendon op at Lincoln County Hospital. Tracey said: " If this had been an amputation I could have come out of there missing some toes off the wrong foot. " Hairdresser Tracey fears any lasting damage could end her career and is set to sue the hospital. ------------------- Article Two: OAP killed by MRI scan By ROBIN PERRIE A GREAT GRANNY died when forgetful doctors gave her a brain scan which made her pacemaker pack up. Three doctors and a nurse failed to tell radiologists that ex-mayor Molly Brown, 83, had a pacemaker — even though they knew an MRI scan could be deadly for her. The MRI radio waves disrupted electrical impulses controlling Molly's heart beat. Her heart stopped within minutes. And at an inquest yesterday coroner Mitford blasted staff at North Tyneside General Hospital, North Shields. He said: " This situation arose in part because the presence of a pacemaker was overlooked and not appreciated by the medical and nursing staff. " Mrs Brown — a Labour councillor at Wallsend for 37 years — was sent for the scan at the Nuffield Hospital, Newcastle, in December 2001. Doctors at North Tyneside referred her after she suffered blackouts. References to her pacemaker on her medical notes " slipped the mind " of consultant Dr Moorcroft when he requested the magnetic resonance imaging scan, the inquest heard. Senior House Officer Dr Anisha Metha filled in a safety form from memory without checking the notes. And even though Mrs Brown had to wait three days for the scan, neither Pre-Registration House Officer Dr Gerald nor ward sister Sharon read her notes. The coroner said Dr Moorcroft overlooked the evidence of the pacemaker. And he dismissed claims that Dr Gerald and Sister were too busy to read the notes. Mr Mitford told them: " A file is useless if you don't open it. " He said Dr Metha made an elementary error and added: " If you don't look back at what's been written, what's the point of making notes? " Verdict: Misadventure -------------------- And a personal note of disgust. If my memory is correct, a verdict of " death by misadventure " attaches no criminal liability to it. There might (and should be) some civil liabilities involved with this last one, but all of the " offending " parties skate free on any criminal charges or penalties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.