Guest guest Posted March 24, 2004 Report Share Posted March 24, 2004 http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/471690?mpid=26198 Spurned Researcher Sounds off About Mixing Politics With Biomedical Science NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Mar 12 - A researcher who was recently replaced on President Bush's Council on Bioethics is now having her say about the political distortion of biomedical science. In an online issue of The New England Journal of Medicine released Friday, Dr. Blackburn, a biomedical scientist at the University of California, San Francisco, describes her experience serving on the Council, and subsequent termination. Her " Perspective " article will be published in the April 1st issue of the journal. Given the administration's well-known stance on stem cells and cloning, Blackburn says she was initially reluctant to join the Council when offered a position in late September 2001. But after receiving assurance from Council chairman Leon Kass that a range of expert opinions was needed, she accepted the offer. One particular area of concern, during her time with the Council, was the group's reports on stem cell research, Blackburn states. Not being a specialist in stem-cell research, she said she educated herself by reading published science, attending conferences, and consulting with specialists. Blackburn says Kass repeatedly assured her that the available science about stem cell research would be clearly represented in the Council's reports. Yet, when the final " Report on Monitoring Stem Cell Research " came out, Blackburn says " the best possible scientific information was not incorporated and communicated clearly...suggesting that the presentation was biased. " Last month, Blackburn says she received a call from the White House and was told that her services were no longer needed. She notes that the call came on a Friday afternoon, perhaps to take advantage of the " weekend void " in news coverage. In addition to Blackburn's departure, another member, May, a medical ethicist, left the council. According to Blackburn, both she and May voted against a ban and a moratorium on therapeutic cloning. Their positions were filled by three new members whose views were more in line with those of Kass, an opponent of embryonic stem cell research, she added. " There is a growing sense that scientific research -- which, after all, is defined by the quest for truth -- is being manipulated for political ends, " Blackburn writes. " There is evidence that such manipulation is being achieved through the stacking of the membership of advisory bodies and through the delay and misrepresentation of their reports. " " Scientific advice should and must be protected from the influence of politics, " Blackburn concludes. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1379-1380. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.