Guest guest Posted March 26, 2004 Report Share Posted March 26, 2004 Fluorescent lighting, whether it be the common fluorescent bulb or the "Natural Light" spectrum bulbs, are detrimental to patients with Lupus. Both lighting fixtures display with UVB rays. Exposure to these rays have been proven to trigger flares in Lupus patients. There have been numerous studies concerning the effect fluorescent lighting has on Lupus and all point to the same conclusion: Lupus patients should not use flurorescent lighting in their homes or work place. Exposure on a day to day basis causes symptoms to increase. Below is an excerpt on how fluorescent light can effect those with Lupus. This alert was sent to all hospital facility managers so they would be aware of this. Fluorescent light activates the immunomodulator cis-urocanic acid in vitro: implications for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. McGrath H Jr, Bell JM, Haycock JW. Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112. OBJECTIVE--Erythemagenic (295-305 nm) ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation is toxic to patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Cool white fluorescent lamp emissions produce a similar toxicity even though the UVB radiation emitted is primarily at the relatively non-erythemagenic wavelength of 313 nm. The purpose of this study was to determine if fluorescent light, presumably acting predominantly along the 313 nm wavelength, exhibits photochemical activity sufficient to account for toxicity. METHODS--The photochemical activity of fluorescent light was assessed by testing its capacity to activate urocanic acid, a plentiful and potent epidermal immunological mediator normally activated by polychromatic UVB radiation but activated maximally at 313 nm. Irradiation-induced isomerisation of trans-urocanic to cis-urocanic acid was quantitated by UV spectroscopy after separation of the isomers by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS--Fluorescent light irradiation of solutions containing the photoreceptor trans-urocanic acid produced a cumulative conversion of trans-to-cis-urocanic acid. This photochemical activity was compared with that of erythemagenic sunlamps, high in polychromatic UVB emissions. When normalised for UVB irradiance, the accumulation of cis-urocanic acid produced by both light sources was essentially equivalent. Conventional acrylic diffusers that absorb UVB emissions eliminated the fluorescent light-induced reaction. CONCLUSION--The results indicate that radiation from fluorescent lamps possesses substantial photoimmunological capability, sufficient to activate a potent, potentially dangerous, disease-modifying, immunomodulatory pathway and that poorly erythemagenic, primarily monochromatic UVB photons are responsible. PMID: 8037497 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.