Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Dave- This is a contorversial topic and can be explored in the archives. The BHR is cast. Midland Medical feels that a cast in porosity which is then coated with hydroxyapatite creates a unified stronger surface which promotes bone integration. They feel the heat treated sintering process could possibly weaken, break, and the beads could create abrasion between the 2 surfaces. Check out Midlands site for the explanation. I AM NOT trying to open a can of worms- you asked. All of the manufacturers have minor differences and of course feel that their method is the best. How many angels can you place on the head of a pin? If in fact there are angels. And would they be willing to stand on the head of a pin? Jude Re: Why American Doctors Cringe - Setting The Record > Straight > > Hi, Rog! > > Happy New Year to you! > > Technically, it is true that Charnley " experimented " with resurfacing > but he did not pursue it in any serious way which is why he is not > credited with the development of resurfacing. Technically, the first > who did was Dr. Trantieri in Italy in 1973. The other surgeons > developing resurfacing systems inn the early 70's included Amstutz > (US), Mueller (Switzerland), Wagner (Germany), Freeman (UK) and Eicher > (US). > > An interesting " aside " : Amstutz' " chamfered cylinder " design of the > femoral shell (THARIES) became the standard and all subsequent designs > have essentially copied this concept including McMinn's first CORIN > device as well as the BHR device. > > All the best! > > Chuck > JRI > > >>>>> I'm just trying to get the record straight here and am looking >>>>> for verification or disqualification of this statement. I > believe >>>>> that the reason why American Doctors are so conservative about >>>> what >>>>> they want their patients to do or not do is NOT because they >>> don't >>>>> trust the devices but because they want to see the devices get >>>>> approved so that insurance companies will cover all of us > looking >>>> to >>>>> get a hip resurface. >>>>> >>>>> At least that is the impression that I got with Dr. >>>> Kennedy >>>>> and his group down in Sarasota, Florida. They loved the > devices >>>> but >>>>> want to go easy until this thing is FINALLY approved by the FDA. >>>>> The P.A. Mark in his office liked to share stories of people >>>> pushing >>>>> it past the limit even though he told me to go easy. One > guy for >>>>> example worked on a fishing boat and invited Mark to come > see him >>>> at >>>>> work and go off-shore fishing for free basically. When Mark >>> first >>>>> got there he saw this patient who was 5 months after surgery >>> slide >>>>> down the mast of the boat and bounce off a cooler and jump > on the >>>>> deck, smiling all the time and saying " works pretty good, > doesn't >>>>> it? " . He told of another (a foot doctor) who went back to work >>>>> only 4 weeks after surgery and I went back to work after 4.5 >>> weeks. >>>>> >>>>> So once again I think the American doctors may be getting a bum >>>> rap >>>>> for trying to look out for our best long term interests > which are >>>> to >>>>> get these things out there for all patients. Also, we have to >>>> admit >>>>> that the lawsuit frenzy in this country has some down sides. >>>>> >>>>> Jeff (01-03-03 C2K) >>>>> >>>>> P.S. I walked and jogged last night as I tried to imitate > normal >>>>> Americans trying to get back in shape after making a New Years >>>>> resolution. >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.