Re: Fwd: Media Release - funding of the Chicken Pox Vac SCAP ce

[Guest guest]

What's saddingly amazing is that the vaccine bigwigs know about DE

's MV and vaxMV studies re: immune impairment, but that doesn't

matter. I can't help but accept the madding bottom line that much of

vaccine policy is intended to induce neurologic and other medical

problems -- the damaged kids are good for pharmco business and for

physicians who sell their souls to work within that system.

robbie v wrote:

>T. I feel so foolish that I was so uneducated to let

>this happen. I think it is proof that he had all tof

>them together, has brain herniated to ring of below

>c-1 and is an immuno. mess! Thans for ant and all

>info/ replies--- Binstock

><binstock@...> wrote:

>

>

>>VZV vax with MMR - very scary. Researchers at s

>>Hopkins have

>>documented that MV and vaccinal MV impair immunity.

>>Great! Let's inject

>>a neurotrophic virus (VZV) that will be present

>>while the child's

>>immunity is impaired by the MMR. The vaccine-policy

>>folks are criminals.

>>

>>$$$:

>>

>>2. Adults with VZV will generate billable income and

>>pharm sales.

>>

>>3. We need to be closer to other species. And think

>>of the benefits to

>>the economy as provided by HIV -- all the research

>>dollars, all the

>>medication sales, all the property turnover when a

>>non-poor person dies

>>of AIDS.

>>

>>4. Again, " more shingles " means more billable

>>sessions with physicians

>>and more pharm sales.

>>

>>5. SJS is a severe syndrome that may result in

>>susceptible individuals

>>injected with Neomycin. SJS generates major income

>>and equity transfer

>>from affected families unto pharmcos and pharmco

>>servants in the

>>medication busine$$.

>>

>>If I were an heir to a pharm fortune, had

>>controlling interest in the

>>company, and had lapdogs like Bill Frist and other

>>politicos as

>>housepets, I'd want the VZV vax to be mandated.

>>Administering it with

>>MMR is even better.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest guest]

> I can't help but accept the madding bottom line that much of

> vaccine policy is intended to induce neurologic and other medical

> problems

I don't see it this way.

good wishes,

Moria

[Guest guest]

Of course they do.....that's where most of us came from. I wanted to

believe this, as many have wanted the same. Public awareness is

growing, and we can further it, but beware of scare tactics and down

right cruelty to those who are ignorant to the information we hold.

Let's face it, learning the ugly side is neither comforting or

reassuring. We can educate, but scare tactis only prove to make us

look like weirdos, and drive those who we wish to educate farther

away....which totally defeats our purpose.

a

> There is a difference between seeing the (extremely negative)

> effects of something and concluding the REASONS for policies

> and the INTENT of other people.

>

> I personally am convinced that many or most people sincerely

> believe that vaccination is a wonderful helpful and sane public

> health policy. If you discuss this with a variety of people, I

> believe you will find that reasonable and caring people

> frequently have this opinion. I have discussed it with some,

> and I do not find it at all difficult to understand that

> reasonable sane and caring people in fact DO hold this idea,

> sometimes with passion.

>

> good wishes,

> Moria

[Guest guest]

I agree with Moira's summary about decent people who believe in

vaccinations sincerely, albeit too stringently - even while having come

to accept that in the highest circles of the CDC, AAP, FDA, AMA, EPA,

USDA, and pharmcos, at least some of the most influential bigwigs know

that neurologic and other damage is being caused by vaccinations and by

other environmental toxins. In fact, there's even a philosophic defence

known as " Risk Management " , which is enforced in the US and which is

very different from Risk Avoidance policies, a concept that is belittled

in the US. Follow the money and find the bottom line: Sell vaccinations

and generate widely distributed profits, while the induction of

neurologic damage increases chronic sales of OTC remedies and

prescription medications. Allow a so-called " safe " level of toxins,

profit from lower levels of pollution controls, and sell meds to mask

symptoms that the toxins induced. The causal relationships here are too

clear, as are the revenue streams and profit centers. For instance, CDC

and NCI " Scientists Report 80% of Cancer Cases Caused by Environmental &

FoodCarcinogens " (1). If you're a controlling stockholder in a major

pharmco, then you profit from the sequelae of Risk Management procedures

within " regulatory " agencies.

Scientists Report 80% of Cancer Cases Caused by Environmental & Food

Carcinogens

The Environment News Service June 28, 2004

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2004/2004-06-28-02.asp

Environmental Factors the Major Cause of Cancer

BETHESDA, land, June 28, 2004 (ENS) - Most cases of cancer are linked

to environmental causes, U.S. government scientists report, and

simultaneously, a second group of government researchers says the number

of cancer survivors is growing in the United States. Cancer is the second

leading cause of death for Americans after heart disease...

This is only a small portion of the actual article. Read the full story

at the ENS website <http://www.ens-newswire.com>

pjand3kids wrote:

>Of course they do.....that's where most of us came from. I wanted to

>believe this, as many have wanted the same. Public awareness is

>growing, and we can further it, but beware of scare tactics and down

>right cruelty to those who are ignorant to the information we hold.

>Let's face it, learning the ugly side is neither comforting or

>reassuring. We can educate, but scare tactis only prove to make us

>look like weirdos, and drive those who we wish to educate farther

>away....which totally defeats our purpose.

>

>a

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>>There is a difference between seeing the (extremely negative)

>>effects of something and concluding the REASONS for policies

>>and the INTENT of other people.

>>

>>I personally am convinced that many or most people sincerely

>>believe that vaccination is a wonderful helpful and sane public

>>health policy. If you discuss this with a variety of people, I

>>believe you will find that reasonable and caring people

>>frequently have this opinion. I have discussed it with some,

>>and I do not find it at all difficult to understand that

>>reasonable sane and caring people in fact DO hold this idea,

>>sometimes with passion.

>>

>>good wishes,

>>Moria

>>

>>

>

>

>