Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Testimonial 2 years postop - smaller incision?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

On the latter, the claim is the smaller incision

leads to less postop pain (How many of you complain of the pain in

your 9 inch scar? I thought so!)

The smaller incision procedure leads to not cutting directly through those

big muscles - and thats why there is less pain and shorter recovery time -

the muscles are parted, not cut (same as BHR).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yellow Pages 118 24 7

'Whatever you want, wherever you are, 24 7'

Calls cost 40p per minute from most landlines

[information] -- PostMaster:

This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be

confidential. If you are not the named addressee, or if the message has been

addressed to you in error, you must not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute or

use this transmission.

Delivery of this message to any person other than the named addressee is not

intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If you have received this

transmission in error please contact the sender or delete the message.

Thank you.

Yell Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered

in England and Wales, registered number 4205228.

Yellow Pages Sales Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1

7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 1403041.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Isobel

I may have misunderstood (pardon me if I have) - but it looks as

though you mean that big muscles are normally cut, but are parted

with smaller incisions. I have an 8 inch scar and was told that my

muscles were parted. Incidentally, I can't lie directly on the scar

even after 18 months (not that it really bothers me). Anyone else

experienced that?

Kathy

> On the latter, the claim is the smaller incision

> leads to less postop pain (How many of you complain of the pain in

> your 9 inch scar? I thought so!)

>

>

> The smaller incision procedure leads to not cutting directly

through those

> big muscles - and thats why there is less pain and shorter recovery

time -

> the muscles are parted, not cut (same as BHR).

>

>

>

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

---

>

> Yellow Pages 118 24 7

> 'Whatever you want, wherever you are, 24 7'

> Calls cost 40p per minute from most landlines

>

>

> [information] -- PostMaster:

> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may

be confidential. If you are not the named addressee, or if the

message has been addressed to you in error, you must not read,

disclose, reproduce, distribute or use this transmission.

>

> Delivery of this message to any person other than the named

addressee is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If

you have received this transmission in error please contact the

sender or delete the message.

>

> Thank you.

>

> Yell Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1

7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 4205228.

>

> Yellow Pages Sales Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading,

Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered

number 1403041.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its normal with a THR and a long incision that the big muscles are cut.

Its normal with the THR - small incision , and with BHR / Resurfacing, that

the muscles are parted.

(thats what Ive always seen, anyway)

To:

surfacehippy

cc:

Subject: Re:

Testimonial 2 years postop - smaller incision?

" khodderwilliams "

khh@...>

19/01/2004 11:21

Hi Isobel

I may have misunderstood (pardon me if I have) - but it looks as

though you mean that big muscles are normally cut, but are parted

with smaller incisions. I have an 8 inch scar and was told that my

muscles were parted. Incidentally, I can't lie directly on the scar

even after 18 months (not that it really bothers me). Anyone else

experienced that?

Kathy

> On the latter, the claim is the smaller incision

> leads to less postop pain (How many of you complain of the pain in

> your 9 inch scar? I thought so!)

>

>

> The smaller incision procedure leads to not cutting directly

through those

> big muscles - and thats why there is less pain and shorter recovery

time -

> the muscles are parted, not cut (same as BHR).

>

>

>

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

---

>

> Yellow Pages 118 24 7

> 'Whatever you want, wherever you are, 24 7'

> Calls cost 40p per minute from most landlines

>

>

> [information] -- PostMaster:

> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may

be confidential. If you are not the named addressee, or if the

message has been addressed to you in error, you must not read,

disclose, reproduce, distribute or use this transmission.

>

> Delivery of this message to any person other than the named

addressee is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If

you have received this transmission in error please contact the

sender or delete the message.

>

> Thank you.

>

> Yell Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1

7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 4205228.

>

> Yellow Pages Sales Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading,

Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered

number 1403041.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Kathy,

I have a 22-cm incision (that's about 9 inches)and have been able

to lie on it from 43 weeks post-op. It hasn't been a problem. In

fact, I notice I'm lying on the operated side more than the other

side lately. That's not surprising as it was my preferred side in

the past. I think this is just another example that there is a wide

range of different experiences. I hope your incision eventually

settles down. I remember at age 14 having a knee that became

sensitive some months after a nasty laceration (after having been

numb up till then). So I guess I've been lucky not having this

happen with the surgical scars from my 4 major orthopaedic surgeries

of recent times.

By the way, after just carrying my cane when going out and not

using it, it became an encumbrance - something extra to carry - and

so I stopped taking it with me. It now lives in the wardrobe out of

sight. I actually feel more confident and have better balance

*without* the stick. I'm getting round with a huge grin on my face,

I'm so happy!

It is wonderful that we have this metal-on-metal, large head

technology available, and first-class, caring surgeons committed to

giving us the outcomes most of us are experiencing.

Virginia (left hip, 27/08/03, Mater Hospital, Brisbane)

> Hi Isobel

> I may have misunderstood (pardon me if I have) - but it looks as

> though you mean that big muscles are normally cut, but are parted

> with smaller incisions. I have an 8 inch scar and was told that my

> muscles were parted. Incidentally, I can't lie directly on the scar

> even after 18 months (not that it really bothers me). Anyone else

> experienced that?

> Kathy

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...