Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 On the latter, the claim is the smaller incision leads to less postop pain (How many of you complain of the pain in your 9 inch scar? I thought so!) The smaller incision procedure leads to not cutting directly through those big muscles - and thats why there is less pain and shorter recovery time - the muscles are parted, not cut (same as BHR). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Yellow Pages 118 24 7 'Whatever you want, wherever you are, 24 7' Calls cost 40p per minute from most landlines [information] -- PostMaster: This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be confidential. If you are not the named addressee, or if the message has been addressed to you in error, you must not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute or use this transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the named addressee is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender or delete the message. Thank you. Yell Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 4205228. Yellow Pages Sales Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 1403041. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 Hi Isobel I may have misunderstood (pardon me if I have) - but it looks as though you mean that big muscles are normally cut, but are parted with smaller incisions. I have an 8 inch scar and was told that my muscles were parted. Incidentally, I can't lie directly on the scar even after 18 months (not that it really bothers me). Anyone else experienced that? Kathy > On the latter, the claim is the smaller incision > leads to less postop pain (How many of you complain of the pain in > your 9 inch scar? I thought so!) > > > The smaller incision procedure leads to not cutting directly through those > big muscles - and thats why there is less pain and shorter recovery time - > the muscles are parted, not cut (same as BHR). > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- --- > > Yellow Pages 118 24 7 > 'Whatever you want, wherever you are, 24 7' > Calls cost 40p per minute from most landlines > > > [information] -- PostMaster: > This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be confidential. If you are not the named addressee, or if the message has been addressed to you in error, you must not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute or use this transmission. > > Delivery of this message to any person other than the named addressee is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender or delete the message. > > Thank you. > > Yell Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 4205228. > > Yellow Pages Sales Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 1403041. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 its normal with a THR and a long incision that the big muscles are cut. Its normal with the THR - small incision , and with BHR / Resurfacing, that the muscles are parted. (thats what Ive always seen, anyway) To: surfacehippy cc: Subject: Re: Testimonial 2 years postop - smaller incision? " khodderwilliams " khh@...> 19/01/2004 11:21 Hi Isobel I may have misunderstood (pardon me if I have) - but it looks as though you mean that big muscles are normally cut, but are parted with smaller incisions. I have an 8 inch scar and was told that my muscles were parted. Incidentally, I can't lie directly on the scar even after 18 months (not that it really bothers me). Anyone else experienced that? Kathy > On the latter, the claim is the smaller incision > leads to less postop pain (How many of you complain of the pain in > your 9 inch scar? I thought so!) > > > The smaller incision procedure leads to not cutting directly through those > big muscles - and thats why there is less pain and shorter recovery time - > the muscles are parted, not cut (same as BHR). > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- --- > > Yellow Pages 118 24 7 > 'Whatever you want, wherever you are, 24 7' > Calls cost 40p per minute from most landlines > > > [information] -- PostMaster: > This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be confidential. If you are not the named addressee, or if the message has been addressed to you in error, you must not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute or use this transmission. > > Delivery of this message to any person other than the named addressee is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender or delete the message. > > Thank you. > > Yell Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 4205228. > > Yellow Pages Sales Limited, Queens Walk, Oxford Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 7PT. Registered in England and Wales, registered number 1403041. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 Hi Kathy, I have a 22-cm incision (that's about 9 inches)and have been able to lie on it from 43 weeks post-op. It hasn't been a problem. In fact, I notice I'm lying on the operated side more than the other side lately. That's not surprising as it was my preferred side in the past. I think this is just another example that there is a wide range of different experiences. I hope your incision eventually settles down. I remember at age 14 having a knee that became sensitive some months after a nasty laceration (after having been numb up till then). So I guess I've been lucky not having this happen with the surgical scars from my 4 major orthopaedic surgeries of recent times. By the way, after just carrying my cane when going out and not using it, it became an encumbrance - something extra to carry - and so I stopped taking it with me. It now lives in the wardrobe out of sight. I actually feel more confident and have better balance *without* the stick. I'm getting round with a huge grin on my face, I'm so happy! It is wonderful that we have this metal-on-metal, large head technology available, and first-class, caring surgeons committed to giving us the outcomes most of us are experiencing. Virginia (left hip, 27/08/03, Mater Hospital, Brisbane) > Hi Isobel > I may have misunderstood (pardon me if I have) - but it looks as > though you mean that big muscles are normally cut, but are parted > with smaller incisions. I have an 8 inch scar and was told that my > muscles were parted. Incidentally, I can't lie directly on the scar > even after 18 months (not that it really bothers me). Anyone else > experienced that? > Kathy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.