Guest guest Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 Thought some of you might be interested in this abstract of a new report. If diagnosis isn't already complicated enough, this report suggests that different methods of measuring mito enzyme activity may produce different results. Even in a patient with a known mtDNA mutation, one method found normal activity of complexes I-IV while another found deficiencies. The researchers suggest that it may be necessary to test both ways to be sure.... Barbara Med Sci Monit. 2004 Aug 20;10(9):CS49-CS53. Enzymatic diagnosis of oxidative phosphorylation defects on muscle biopsy: Better on tissue homogenate or on a mitochondria-enriched suspension? Casademont J, Perea M, S, Beato A, Miro O, Cardellach F. Muscle Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clinic. " August Pi i Sunyer " Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS). School of Medicine, University of Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain. Background: The enzymatic analysis of mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) complexes of skeletal muscle is an important step in the diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders. Because of its lesser turbidity and increased sensitivity, mitochondrial fractionation has been increasingly considered the diagnostic method of choice compared with the more classical analysis of muscle homogenate. In circumstances in which mitochondria become abnormal in number, size or shape, the process of mitochondrial enrichment made by sequential centrifugation and washing may favor the selection of the most normal mitochondria, eliminating the most abnormal ones. In this situation, the study of muscle homogenate, paradoxically, may better reflect what happens in vivo. Case Report: To exemplify this situation we present a 60-year-old woman with a complete mitochondrial phenotype and a 70% heteroplasmic presence of the mtDNA A3243G mutation in muscle tissue. The respiratory and enzymatic activities from mitochondria-enriched muscle suspension were within normal control limits. In contrast, when muscle homogenate was studied, enzyme activities of complexes I, III, and V were found to be decreased. Conclusions: Although mitochondria- enriched muscle suspensions are usually more informative than muscle homogenates for studies of MRC, in some situations it may be necessary to study both to uncover the biochemical defect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.