Guest guest Posted September 9, 2004 Report Share Posted September 9, 2004 Thanks Alice! It is nice to know that she doesn't have Mito anymore. I wish I knew how they diagnosed her the first time and what tests that Dr. Haas did this time to rule it out. Kind of makes you wonder if all the testing that we are going through is as accurate as we take it to be, and that would be for both Positive and Negative results. I wonder how many have been diagnosed with Mito but really don't have it. Sure wish we knew more. Ann-Marie Jack Black Sister Question Answered Hi Alice Jack's sister was diagnosed with Mito and had worn this diagnosis for a few years. The family sought out a " second opinion " and further testing and wound up at UCSD in the hands of Dr Haas. After extensive testing and a muscle biopsy the conclusion was that it WAS NOT MITO - Her symptoms had been getting better and to get the news that she was officially " un-diagnosed " from Mito I'm sure also helped her mentally. Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2004 Report Share Posted September 10, 2004 Hi, Just wanted to share our experience with this. (Our oldest son, Seth, was diagnosed by muscle biopsy in 1997 by Dr. DiMauro. This testing showed a deficiency in Complex III and he was diagnosed with mito. We then took Seth to see Dr. Haas in 1999. He did another muscle biopsy which he said proved Seth didn’t have mito since there was no deficiency in Complex III. We were very confused. Our neuro wrote both docs asking that they address the differences and try to explain them. After two requests and a year later, Dr. DiMauro requested some of Seth’s remaining muscle tissue from San Diego. Dr. DiMauro retested some of the original muscle and also found a CoEnzyme 10 deficiency in the muscle. He then ran the same tests on the second biopsied muscle. It showed no deficiency in CoQ10. They discussed it and decided that the difference was due to the fact that after the original muscle biopsy, we had begun supplementation with COQ10. Once the muscle levels of COQ10 were normalized, their theory is that the Complex III (which they decided was secondary) also normalized. If we hadn’t pressed the issue, we would think Seth didn’t have mito and would still be without a diagnosis for his brother who presented also. They just don’t know enough about the diagnosis yet. Now they’re starting to require that people be off of supplementation during muscle biopsies, I guess to prevent these kinds of false negatives. Unfortunately, normalizing the muscle COQ10 hasn’t fixed Seth’s brain or really fixed his use of his muscles either. Just wanted to share. Cindy Cruz (mom to Seth and Ben, both mito) Re: Jack Black Sister Question Answered Thanks Alice! It is nice to know that she doesn't have Mito anymore. I wish I knew how they diagnosed her the first time and what tests that Dr. Haas did this time to rule it out. Kind of makes you wonder if all the testing that we are going through is as accurate as we take it to be, and that would be for both Positive and Negative results. I wonder how many have been diagnosed with Mito but really don't have it. Sure wish we knew more. Ann-Marie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2004 Report Share Posted September 10, 2004 Hi, Just wanted to share our experience with this. (Our oldest son, Seth, was diagnosed by muscle biopsy in 1997 by Dr. DiMauro. This testing showed a deficiency in Complex III and he was diagnosed with mito. We then took Seth to see Dr. Haas in 1999. He did another muscle biopsy which he said proved Seth didn’t have mito since there was no deficiency in Complex III. We were very confused. Our neuro wrote both docs asking that they address the differences and try to explain them. After two requests and a year later, Dr. DiMauro requested some of Seth’s remaining muscle tissue from San Diego. Dr. DiMauro retested some of the original muscle and also found a CoEnzyme 10 deficiency in the muscle. He then ran the same tests on the second biopsied muscle. It showed no deficiency in CoQ10. They discussed it and decided that the difference was due to the fact that after the original muscle biopsy, we had begun supplementation with COQ10. Once the muscle levels of COQ10 were normalized, their theory is that the Complex III (which they decided was secondary) also normalized. If we hadn’t pressed the issue, we would think Seth didn’t have mito and would still be without a diagnosis for his brother who presented also. They just don’t know enough about the diagnosis yet. Now they’re starting to require that people be off of supplementation during muscle biopsies, I guess to prevent these kinds of false negatives. Unfortunately, normalizing the muscle COQ10 hasn’t fixed Seth’s brain or really fixed his use of his muscles either. Just wanted to share. Cindy Cruz (mom to Seth and Ben, both mito) Re: Jack Black Sister Question Answered Thanks Alice! It is nice to know that she doesn't have Mito anymore. I wish I knew how they diagnosed her the first time and what tests that Dr. Haas did this time to rule it out. Kind of makes you wonder if all the testing that we are going through is as accurate as we take it to be, and that would be for both Positive and Negative results. I wonder how many have been diagnosed with Mito but really don't have it. Sure wish we knew more. Ann-Marie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.