Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 I am getting my new Echo today and have 10 years of added financial hardship to look forward to trying to pay for it... They have a mobility program and silly me I thought they would cover cruise control for the following problem, caused by my EDS. because of my problem with my back hips and legs seizing up when I drive any distance (like a half hour) with my right leg out on the gas pedal, sometimes I can't move it enough to get it on the brake so I have to do it left footed, which to me isn't the safest thing at highway speed. SO I thought it perfectly reasonable to consider cruise control, in my case, adaptive equipment. I make about 150 trips, 75% highway driving, tot he city for medical appts a year. To me it is no different than someone with hip arthritis deciding they want a hand control for their brake for the same reason. IF i can move that right leg around while driving with the cruise on, there is very low risk of me not being able to move it on to the brake or gas as opposed to it getting completley seized up. Yet, apparently because something like a handbrake is a more tradional piece of adaptive equipment, that is covered. They couldnt' seem to wrap their minds around the concept. Since they pay for the installation not the item, it is maybe $100 to $200 to install. This is a pittance in Toyota's very deep pockets. The definition of what they cover communicated to the customer is vague and refers to lifts and something else then " other adaptive equipment " and need for a letter from a physician, which for me would be no problem. To me if someone if offering a so-called mobility program they should be looking at the individual needs and any potential broader safety issues. It is virtually impossible to come up with a definition that covers all potential disabilities and limitations and even of adaptive equipment. I don't want cruise control for pleasure driving since I hardly do any! The " lady " I spoke with was like a broken record. Completely out of touch with the reality of the problem I have. I have been a good customer for 14 years and have given them customers. GIVEN them! They have taken in tens of thousands of dollars because of me. I felt discriminated against because they are picking and choosing disabilities and slapped in the face for being dumb enough to actually think this was a half decent company that might actualyl appreciate a good customer. The more I deal with the more I realize these big companies have too much power against the average consumer andknow only the very deep pocketed can take legal action against them so they get away with it. Give me a small business anyday. I certainly plan on pursuing this further but htink it is wholly pathetic. What do you guys think? Joyce Joyce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Joyce, Would it not be easier to pursue the hand controls then to risk the cruise control issue? My concern is that if you are seated for a length of time and do spasm, the cruise control isn't going to help you stop. The hand controls would. With the SI issues you describe, it would be a safer thing to pursue hand controls. Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.