Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 I'd just add that I test on the sides as Alan suggests, average 4 times a day " now " & experience little pain if any. But I'd add that I switch fingers, using one for all the pokes in a day, then switching to another finger the next day, ad. infinitum. I have to do this in an orderly fashion because there's so little trauma from my adjustable Softklix lancing device that I don't know which finger I used " yesterday " , at least when I'm in the fog of sleep after waking! For whatever trauma is done, there's seven days of healing before I get back to the same finger. I " never " test on the pads of my fingers as " that is painful " & gushes blood, far more than I need even on low-depth settings of the " lancer " . I've not used any alternate sites for serious testing, but those I've tried experimentally, I had poor luck getting any blood without poking very deeply. But then, that's just me. Although there's some debate about it, it seems that there is a delay in bg readings taken in the arm. This is not important for general testing, but could be crucial if you're talking testing for a low (for instance) and using readings to make corrections. Also, insulin users may have comments on that because it's more important that they accurately know actual #'s at the moment (as accurate as possible with our meters) to determine " bolus " injections. At least that's my impression as a non-insulin user & I'm sure some of the insulin users will comment. , T2, dx'ed 4/98, controlling with LC & Supplements Average fasting bg 100mg/dl, last HbA1c 5.6% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know you are looking for alternative site testing advice, but this may at least give you some ideas on easier ways for your fingers. If not, some of the logic applies whatever site you use. Painless Pricking. Wash your hands in warm water first, and shake them to get the circulation going. Check your lancet - it should be adjustable. Mine is Soft-clix, made by Roche and is usually painless. I get an occasional tiny sting, and it lets me know if it's getting blunt sometimes, but I've tested close to 4000 times in the past 3 years without any trauma. That's from a guy who was, and is, needle-phobic. Start with the second lowest setting (1 or 1.5), hold it firmly against your skin on the side of a finger near the tip. Don't flinch when you release the button. The button releases a spring-loaded tiny needle which makes a tiny hole in your skin and instantly retracts. Incidentally, using the sides has two advantages - there are less nerve-ends than on the pads, and it doubles the number of test-points so you can rotate through the positions. Massage gently until a drop of blood forms sufficient to put on the test strip. If this setting doesn't provide an adequate quantity, move the lancet setting up one notch for the next one. If you got a large sample and it hurt a little, go to the lower setting. And that's all there is to it. Sometimes it helps to shake your hands a little more, or warm them up if it's cold. The manufacturers advise changing the lancet needle every time; I change mine when I remember or if it gets a bit blunt - that's about once a month or every 150 tests :-) You do what you are comfortable with. Cheers Alan, T2, Australia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:49:52 EDT rogerhlmn@... writes: > > I'd just add that I test on the sides as Alan suggests, average 4 > times a day " now " & experience little pain if any. , it is not just Alan who suggests this. If you read the literature that comes with most meters, their instructions specifically say to use the sides of the fingers. This was not the case when meters first came out. We used the pads in the center of the finger and got calluses to prove we were testing. Then meter companies (at least Lifescan and Accuchek) told us to stop using the pads and start using the sides of fingers and the calluses will go away. It was sort of a selling point to get the new lancet devices that replaced little stabbing devices we initally used. We had to buy the lancet devices separately, unlike now where the lancet devise comes with the meter. If more people read the inserts that come with products, maybe there would be less problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:49:52 EDT rogerhlmn@... writes: > > I'd just add that I test on the sides as Alan suggests, average 4 > times a day " now " & experience little pain if any. , it is not just Alan who suggests this. If you read the literature that comes with most meters, their instructions specifically say to use the sides of the fingers. This was not the case when meters first came out. We used the pads in the center of the finger and got calluses to prove we were testing. Then meter companies (at least Lifescan and Accuchek) told us to stop using the pads and start using the sides of fingers and the calluses will go away. It was sort of a selling point to get the new lancet devices that replaced little stabbing devices we initally used. We had to buy the lancet devices separately, unlike now where the lancet devise comes with the meter. If more people read the inserts that come with products, maybe there would be less problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 Absolutely, . I need to know what my BG is CURRENTLY to know how much Humalog to dose for meals, therefore I always test on my fingertips (as opposed to alternate site testing). Alternate site testing isn't as accurate as fingertip testing because there's sort of a " delayed " reading - from what I understand the results are about 20 minutes slower than fingertip testing. (Is this clear?) Vicki, who tests a lot, with no pain using the lightest setting on adjustable poker... My Finger Tests: was-Re: How to use my meter w/o sticking fingers? > > I'd just add that I test on the sides as Alan suggests, average 4 > times a > day " now " & experience little pain if any. > But I'd add that I switch fingers, using one for all the pokes in a > day, > then switching to another finger the next day, ad. infinitum. > I have to do this in an orderly fashion because there's so little > trauma > from my adjustable Softklix lancing device that I don't know which > finger I used > " yesterday " , at least when I'm in the fog of sleep after waking! > For whatever trauma is done, there's seven days of healing before I > get back > to the same finger. > I " never " test on the pads of my fingers as " that is painful " & gushes > blood, far more than I need even on low-depth settings of the > " lancer " . > > I've not used any alternate sites for serious testing, but those I've > tried > experimentally, I had poor luck getting any blood without poking very > deeply. > But then, that's just me. > Although there's some debate about it, it seems that there is a delay > in bg > readings taken in the arm. This is not important for general testing, > but > could be crucial if you're talking testing for a low (for instance) > and using > readings to make corrections. Also, insulin users may have comments > on that > because it's more important that they accurately know actual #'s at > the moment > (as accurate as possible with our meters) to determine " bolus " > injections. At > least that's my impression as a non-insulin user & I'm sure some of > the > insulin users will comment. > , T2, dx'ed 4/98, controlling with LC & Supplements > Average fasting bg 100mg/dl, last HbA1c 5.6% > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > I know you are looking for alternative site testing advice, but this > may at least give you some ideas on easier ways for your fingers. If > not, some of the logic applies whatever site you use. > > Painless Pricking. > > Wash your hands in warm water first, and shake them to get the > circulation going. Check your lancet - it should be adjustable. Mine > is Soft-clix, made by Roche and is usually painless. I get an > occasional tiny sting, and it lets me know if it's getting blunt > sometimes, but I've tested close to 4000 times in the past 3 years > without any trauma. That's from a guy who was, and is, needle-phobic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.