Guest guest Posted October 8, 2006 Report Share Posted October 8, 2006 Hi -- I'm not an adoptive mom, and I did breast feed (for 18 mos) but I've often wondered the same thing about the possibility that my diet was deficient when I was pregnant and nursing. I did know something about EFAs then (though certainly not like I do now), and I took prescription prenatal vits that included an EFA pill and a multi-vitamin pill. I also bought the eggs that have extra omega 3s and ate about one a day. I thought I was doing great, but now I suspect it might not have been enough. Still, I guess it's possible that my child's problems might be worse if I hadn't supplemented at all. At the time, I drove myself a little nuts because I knew the types of fish I could eat was limited (more limited than I realized actually, but that's another story) and I mistakenly thought fish oils might have mercury in them, so I was at a loss for how I would get enough omega 3s into my diet. I even wondered if I should drink formula because it had DHA added! My OB thought I was crazy and told me to stop worrying. Adding the prenatals with the omegas put my mind at ease, though I also tried to work flax oil and lots of walnuts and so forth into my diet (I didn't know at the time you can't rely on the precursors). Now, like said, I just basically take everything I give my son: 2 Omega 3 6 9s, 1 EPA and 400 IU Vit E. I do think the mom's diet, lifestyle and exposures to various contaminants affects her baby, but it isn't the whole story. Plenty of moms who do everything " right " have babies with issues, while moms who break all the rules still have healthy babies somehow. > > hi all, > > Any other adoptive moms here? > > I was thinking about my own child's circumstances and wondering if > this may apply to some others here. (My little girl seems to be doing > better with ProEfa in the rather conservative dose I'm currently using.) > > In addition to the possibilities of fatty acid metabolic > abnormalities, I wonder whether deficiencies may be dietary - prenatal > " diet " , formula, perhaps in breast milk if the mom's diet wasn't rich > in some of these nutrients. > > My child is adopted from economically disadvantaged circumstances in > an undeveloped area (also with possible prenatal and first year of > life toxic exposures) - it is easy for me to believe that her birth > mother's diet was not adequate in any number of ways, and I don't know > details of the formula she was given during her year in an orphanage. > > Maybe for some kids this is an explanation? And if so - maybe it > implies that some kids will need supplementation for a period of time > but not lifelong, whereas those with a metabolic issue may be more > likely to need long term supplementation. Just another thought to add > to the mix. > > And - one more voice here thanking so much for everything. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 Hi -- I'm not an adoptive mom, and I did breast feed (for 18 mos) but I've often wondered the same thing about the possibility that my diet was deficient when I was pregnant and nursing. I did know something about EFAs then (though certainly not like I do now), and I took prescription prenatal vits that included an EFA pill and a multi-vitamin pill. I also bought the eggs that have extra omega 3s and ate about one a day. I thought I was doing great, but now I suspect it might not have been enough. Still, I guess it's possible that my child's problems might be worse if I hadn't supplemented at all. At the time, I drove myself a little nuts because I knew the types of fish I could eat was limited (more limited than I realized actually, but that's another story) and I mistakenly thought fish oils might have mercury in them, so I was at a loss for how I would get enough omega 3s into my diet. I even wondered if I should drink formula because it had DHA added! My OB thought I was crazy and told me to stop worrying. Adding the prenatals with the omegas put my mind at ease, though I also tried to work flax oil and lots of walnuts and so forth into my diet (I didn't know at the time you can't rely on the precursors). Now, like said, I just basically take everything I give my son: 2 Omega 3 6 9s, 1 EPA and 400 IU Vit E. I do think the mom's diet, lifestyle and exposures to various contaminants affects her baby, but it isn't the whole story. Plenty of moms who do everything " right " have babies with issues, while moms who break all the rules still have healthy babies somehow. > > hi all, > > Any other adoptive moms here? > > I was thinking about my own child's circumstances and wondering if > this may apply to some others here. (My little girl seems to be doing > better with ProEfa in the rather conservative dose I'm currently using.) > > In addition to the possibilities of fatty acid metabolic > abnormalities, I wonder whether deficiencies may be dietary - prenatal > " diet " , formula, perhaps in breast milk if the mom's diet wasn't rich > in some of these nutrients. > > My child is adopted from economically disadvantaged circumstances in > an undeveloped area (also with possible prenatal and first year of > life toxic exposures) - it is easy for me to believe that her birth > mother's diet was not adequate in any number of ways, and I don't know > details of the formula she was given during her year in an orphanage. > > Maybe for some kids this is an explanation? And if so - maybe it > implies that some kids will need supplementation for a period of time > but not lifelong, whereas those with a metabolic issue may be more > likely to need long term supplementation. Just another thought to add > to the mix. > > And - one more voice here thanking so much for everything. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 hi, I'm an adoptive mom...my son was adopted @ 3 days old from Texas. His birthmom was only 17 and she hid the pregnancy from her parents. At around 6 months when she finally started to show, she told her parents she was getting a job with Americorp in Dallas. They assisted in finding an adoption organization, Gladney where she began getting prenatal care. So, I too believe that my son who is apraxic is so because she was under extreme duress for the first six months and so the proper hormones and prenatal nutrition were not emitted or obtained. He's responded pretty well to Pro-EFA, Carnaware and now Vitamin E. " sarchina2003 " <sar2005@...> Sent by: cc: @yaho Subject: [ ] on formula-feeding, adoption etc ogroups.com 10/08/2006 10:55 AM Please respond to hi all, Any other adoptive moms here? I was thinking about my own child's circumstances and wondering if this may apply to some others here. (My little girl seems to be doing better with ProEfa in the rather conservative dose I'm currently using.) In addition to the possibilities of fatty acid metabolic abnormalities, I wonder whether deficiencies may be dietary - prenatal " diet " , formula, perhaps in breast milk if the mom's diet wasn't rich in some of these nutrients. My child is adopted from economically disadvantaged circumstances in an undeveloped area (also with possible prenatal and first year of life toxic exposures) - it is easy for me to believe that her birth mother's diet was not adequate in any number of ways, and I don't know details of the formula she was given during her year in an orphanage. Maybe for some kids this is an explanation? And if so - maybe it implies that some kids will need supplementation for a period of time but not lifelong, whereas those with a metabolic issue may be more likely to need long term supplementation. Just another thought to add to the mix. And - one more voice here thanking so much for everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 hi, I'm an adoptive mom...my son was adopted @ 3 days old from Texas. His birthmom was only 17 and she hid the pregnancy from her parents. At around 6 months when she finally started to show, she told her parents she was getting a job with Americorp in Dallas. They assisted in finding an adoption organization, Gladney where she began getting prenatal care. So, I too believe that my son who is apraxic is so because she was under extreme duress for the first six months and so the proper hormones and prenatal nutrition were not emitted or obtained. He's responded pretty well to Pro-EFA, Carnaware and now Vitamin E. " sarchina2003 " <sar2005@...> Sent by: cc: @yaho Subject: [ ] on formula-feeding, adoption etc ogroups.com 10/08/2006 10:55 AM Please respond to hi all, Any other adoptive moms here? I was thinking about my own child's circumstances and wondering if this may apply to some others here. (My little girl seems to be doing better with ProEfa in the rather conservative dose I'm currently using.) In addition to the possibilities of fatty acid metabolic abnormalities, I wonder whether deficiencies may be dietary - prenatal " diet " , formula, perhaps in breast milk if the mom's diet wasn't rich in some of these nutrients. My child is adopted from economically disadvantaged circumstances in an undeveloped area (also with possible prenatal and first year of life toxic exposures) - it is easy for me to believe that her birth mother's diet was not adequate in any number of ways, and I don't know details of the formula she was given during her year in an orphanage. Maybe for some kids this is an explanation? And if so - maybe it implies that some kids will need supplementation for a period of time but not lifelong, whereas those with a metabolic issue may be more likely to need long term supplementation. Just another thought to add to the mix. And - one more voice here thanking so much for everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.