Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 The same way the IAFF deals with them. It’s my answer to those and the next ten, the IAFF works for FF’s, and it’s successful because it is powerful and represents FF’s as a whole. The same as any EMS union/organization needs to do, it needs to fight for the rights of the individual EMS technician. It needs to be able to ignore those who choose to incite the crap between different types of providers. The IAFF doesn’t care if you belong to a small FD with 6 members in your local or a huge union with 1000 members in your local, they represent you. If you pay your dues, you are a member, if you are a member, you are represented by the union/organization. Period end of story. What we have at this moment does not work, we see organizations that do, the IAFF, Texas BNE and the likes. If what they have works, why not fashion our structure after theirs? Because we are so different in what we do? That has nothing to do with a representative organizations structure It’s like we don’t want to try anything different because to do so, would be admitting that someone else figured it out and we want to tag along……. In so much as apathy, this conversation came up once before, and I will reiterate what I said before. I have spent countless hours working with small rural and volunteer organizations to make sure that they had CE opportunities for free, I have dined with State representatives detailing the plight of Texas EMS, I have fought Medicare tooth and nail to change the ratings of services to increase their reimbursement rate. I still work daily to insure that EMS is never brushed to the side, I will continue to fight for EMS, specifically Texas EMS, and more specifically, rural Texas EMS with every breath I have. I can assure you that I am far from apathetic, and until you are clear and concise on my personal reasons for not joining EMSAT, I would urge you to rethink your blanket statement that those who are not members are ‘apathetic’. Re: EMS Fatgue In a message dated 8/19/2007 7:49:40 A.M. Central Daylight Time, HYPERLINK " mailto:lverrett%40swbell.net " lverrett (AT) swbell (DOT) -net writes: As far as a Union goes, yes I am all for it. As far as EMSAt goes, yes I am all for it. Will either be able to change the current labor laws, no. Because congress does not care. Please explain to me who you " unionize " " EMS " , 1) how do you deal with volunteers in a union? 2) what is your " local " structure? 3) how do you have collective bargaining on the level of the " whole of EMS " ? 4)answer those and there are 10 more behind them. Also, we in Texas do not need CONGRESS to change any labor laws when if we could must there right lobby in Austin we might be able to get the Legislature here to impact the regulatory process so that regulations would be promulgated to affect the fatigue issue and some other issues that have been discussed here. As the Vice-President of EMSAT it's hard for me to say to some Legislator in Austin that I think EMS Providers want XYZ and then I get to tell him I have 250 members. Really hard since he or she has not even got the time to see me since my voice is so small. Apathy is our first issue to overcome and we need to look in the mirror. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/-EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/-Author/Journalis-t/Fire Protection Consultant HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino%40aol.com " LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) -com (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************-*********-*********-******** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at HYPERLINK " http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour " http://discover.-aol.com/memed/- aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Bingo! I think you said a lot with that statement. It seems like most providers work another job no matter what the hours are. The bottom line is EMS companies need to put more units in service. It seems the IAFF is interested in firefighters and job security and not EMS as a profession. There interest is keeping in the fire departments and not in the hands of municipalities or private owners. How many fire departments are ran by Paramedics? Medics who have done there time in the field? L. ________________________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Comments in line. LNM In a message dated 8/19/2007 10:56:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, hatfield@... writes: Not until EMS is mandated in Texas, until then the volunteers are an integral part of the system. Even if it was I think that as large and as rural as parts of Texas are you can't ever have a true working system without some level of volunteers but your point about the mandate is a valid one. The IAFF takes a particularly nasty look at volunteers, anyone associated with the IAFF knows this, the sad thing about that (in my opinion) is that the vast majority of us in both Fire and EMS, all got our start via the volunteer system. I just can't see how a Union in the same vein as any true union could do that? As for the IAFF stance on volunteers I've known literally dozens of IAFF Members that were also very much active in the VFD world in the same county as they were a career FF in, the IAFF stance is one that seems to have its roots only on the level of the International and in those areas where the Locals choose to attack it. In NYC they actually had to ask some of the IAFF Members from FDNY NOT t bring the Command cars that they were issued from their VFD's to their duty shifts at FDNY! In NJ there are guys that have been in VFD's longer then they have been in the union etc. Its at best segmented. In my not so humble opinion, so long as the volunteers are paying their dues, and EMS is not mandated, then any Union/Organization should represent them as they represent anyone else. I am not even sure that would be legal but then again I did not sleep at a Holiday Inn, and I sure as hell am not a lawyer. Once we (hopefully) get a mandate, then the cities and counties will be forced to pay livable wages, the volunteers may take a less active role, but they will still be there Given how hard the lobby against any mandates let alone an EMS mandate I can't speculate when we see that mandate. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Tip O'Neill was supposed to have said, " All politics is local. " and that's certainly true in what we're talking about when it comes to change. Over and over on here I have urged people to talk to their state representatives and senators about EMS between sessions. Get one-on-one with them, take them to lunch (they never turn down a free lunch) and explain the issues to them. Many of them simply don't know. If they're too " high powered " for you to get to, make friends with one of their staff members who handles public safety and health issues for them. That's where we drop the ball. There are 50,000+ certified and licensed EMS folks in Texas, and if every one of them simply made a phone call it would have an effect. Yes, apathy is our enemy. GG > > > In a message dated 8/19/2007 7:49:40 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > lverrett@... writes: > > As far as a Union goes, yes I am all for it. As far as EMSAt goes, yes I am > all for it. Will either be able to change the current labor laws, no. > Because > congress does not care. > > Please explain to me who you " unionize " " EMS " , > > 1) how do you deal with volunteers in a union? > > 2) what is your " local " structure? > > 3) how do you have collective bargaining on the level of the " whole of EMS " ? > > > 4)answer those and there are 10 more behind them. > > Also, we in Texas do not need CONGRESS to change any labor laws when if we > could must there right lobby in Austin we might be able to get the > Legislature > here to impact the regulatory process so that regulations would be > promulgated to affect the fatigue issue and some other issues that have been > discussed > here. > > As the Vice-President of EMSAT it's hard for me to say to some Legislator in > Austin that I think EMS Providers want XYZ and then I get to tell him I have > 250 members. Really hard since he or she has not even got the time to see me > since my voice is so small. > > Apathy is our first issue to overcome and we need to look in the mirror. > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ FF/ > Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Freelance Cons Freelance Consultant/Traine > > LNMolino@... > > (Cell Phone) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) > (Home Phone) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > original author. > > ************ ******** ******** ************<wbr>*********<wbr>*********<wbr> > ** > http://discover.http://discovehttp://disco > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 In a message dated 8/19/2007 11:21:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time, wegandy1938@... writes: Yes, apathy is our enemy. Thank you! Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Not until EMS is mandated in Texas, until then the volunteers are an integral part of the system. The IAFF takes a particularly nasty look at volunteers, anyone associated with the IAFF knows this, the sad thing about that (in my opinion) is that the vast majority of us in both Fire and EMS, all got our start via the volunteer system. In my not so humble opinion, so long as the volunteers are paying their dues, and EMS is not mandated, then any Union/Organization should represent them as they represent anyone else. Once we (hopefully) get a mandate, then the cities and counties will be forced to pay livable wages, the volunteers may take a less active role, but they will still be there. Re: EMS Fatgue In a message dated 8/19/2007 4:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, HYPERLINK " mailto:hatfield%40neopolis.net " hatfield (AT) neopolis (DOT) -net writes: The same way the IAFF deals with them. As a way to deal with volunteers is what you're saying? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/-EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/-Author/Journalis-t/Fire Protection Consultant HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino%40aol.com " LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) -com (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************-*********-*********-******** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at HYPERLINK " http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour " http://discover.-aol.com/memed/- aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Barry, I am in complete agreement. The reason that most people in EMS resist a change to 8 or 12 hour shifts is that they have second or third jobs on their days off to make a decent living. EMS should pay a decent living without having to work 144 hours a week to do it. Gene G. > > A few years ago, I posed the idea of getting away from the 24-hour shifts to > more of a PD type of 8- or 12-hour shifts and was torched by more than one > response. > > I've watched a number of my colleagues who's bodies are trashed out by the > time they start getting to a point where retirement is a reality. In a 20-year > and out system, that means retirement that could start as early as someone's > mid-40s and their back and knees are to the point that the quality of life > for the next 30 years is pretty well shot. > > If we are working our medics to the point of being physically wasted at the > end of each shift, imagine what we are doing over the course of their career. > Unfortunately, we view medics like nursing homes view nurse aids...as > disposable products that can be replaced easily and quickly. We need to rethink our > staffing and shifting patterns and adjust our salaries so that we don't kill > the ability of our staff to be able to take care of their families in a way > that doesn't suggest poverty wages or that our profession doesn't have a > future. If our people are our biggest assets, then we need to find solutions that > show where the priorites are. > > Barry > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Not until EMS is mandated in Texas, until then the volunteers are an integral part of the system. The IAFF takes a particularly nasty look at volunteers, anyone associated with the IAFF knows this, the sad thing about that (in my opinion) is that the vast majority of us in both Fire and EMS, all got our start via the volunteer system. In my not so humble opinion, so long as the volunteers are paying their dues, and EMS is not mandated, then any Union/Organization should represent them as they represent anyone else. Once we (hopefully) get a mandate, then the cities and counties will be forced to pay livable wages, the volunteers may take a less active role, but they will still be there Re: EMS Fatgue In a message dated 8/19/2007 4:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, HYPERLINK " mailto:hatfield%40neopolis.net " hatfield (AT) neopolis (DOT) -net writes: The same way the IAFF deals with them. As a way to deal with volunteers is what you're saying? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/-EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/-Author/Journalis-t/Fire Protection Consultant HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino%40aol.com " LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) -com (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************-*********-*********-******** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at HYPERLINK " http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour " http://discover.-aol.com/memed/- aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 A few years ago, I posed the idea of getting away from the 24-hour shifts to more of a PD type of 8- or 12-hour shifts and was torched by more than one response. I've watched a number of my colleagues who's bodies are trashed out by the time they start getting to a point where retirement is a reality. In a 20-year and out system, that means retirement that could start as early as someone's mid-40s and their back and knees are to the point that the quality of life for the next 30 years is pretty well shot. If we are working our medics to the point of being physically wasted at the end of each shift, imagine what we are doing over the course of their career. Unfortunately, we view medics like nursing homes view nurse aids...as disposable products that can be replaced easily and quickly. We need to rethink our staffing and shifting patterns and adjust our salaries so that we don't kill the ability of our staff to be able to take care of their families in a way that doesn't suggest poverty wages or that our profession doesn't have a future. If our people are our biggest assets, then we need to find solutions that show where the priorites are. Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Getting rid of 24 hr shifts is not the answer. The only answer is placing more medic units in service. ________________________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 At one time the IAFF had it in their bylaws that a union member was not allowed to volunteer. ________________________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 > > > > In a message dated 8/19/2007 11:34:59 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > hatfield@... writes: > > Unfortunately, EMSAT hasn’t been able to come up with an answer. > > > Having been on the BoD for 2 years I agree but I blame those that would > rather tear whatever it (EMSAT) does down as oppose to try to work in any > structure, that and the apparent apathy on the PROVIDER level since after all only > 250 or so out of some 50,000 Providers are members and of that only about 25 > are ACTIVE in stating their opinions and beliefs and the like. > > The same can be said at the national (NAEMT) level given the number of > Providers in the us versus the numbers of Members of NAEMT and their Active > Members level as well. > > I too have not got answers per se but I have opinions and I do try to work > the system even though at times it appears fruitless. > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI > Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) > > I agree that Shifts are too long and there are way to many calls in some shifts. And I agree that most management and the congress or even DSHS dont really care about it. No company or EMS provider to my knowledge has been suied due to mistakes made by fatigued employees. I would not disagree with EMS becoming organinized with a union. But I think you have to fix the real problem at hand before there will be any real relief. And I believe that the real problem is simply there is just not enought paramedics. How can we work shorter shifts and run fewer calls if there is nobody else to do the job? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 It’s still there, for that matter, a union member is not supposed to work a part time job either RE: EMS Fatgue At one time the IAFF had it in their bylaws that a union member was not allowed to volunteer. ____________-_________-_________-_________-_________-_________-_ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! HYPERLINK " http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 " h ttp://track.-juno.com/-s/lc?u=http:-//ads.addynamix.-com/click/-2-2130421--1 77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 I am authorized to man 7 ambulances and I can man six on a real good day and that is if my staff volunteers to work an extra shift. (See the pattern here)? I do not mandate six trucks but I do have to mandate 5.? I could have 14 trucks but I still need someone to work on them.? I know each and everyone of you are short medics, so here we go loopty-loop, here we go loopty-lye.? Andy Bingo! I think you said a lot with that statement. It seems like most providers work another job no matter what the hours are. The bottom line is EMS companies need to put more units in service. It seems the IAFF is interested in firefighters and job security and not EMS as a profession. There interest is keeping in the fire departments and not in the hands of municipalities or private owners. How many fire departments are ran by Paramedics? Medics who have done there time in the field? L. Re: EMS Fatgue Bingo! I think you said a lot with that statement. It seems like most providers work another job no matter what the hours are. The bottom line is EMS companies need to put more units in service. It seems the IAFF is interested in firefighters and job security and not EMS as a profession. There interest is keeping in the fire departments and not in the hands of municipalities or private owners. How many fire departments are ran by Paramedics? Medics who have done there time in the field? L. ________________________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 In a message dated 8/20/2007 8:31:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time, hatfield@... writes: It’s still there, for that matter, a union member is not supposed to work a part time job either Its selectively enforced in different parts of the US as far as I can tell and as for no part time jobs have you ever met a FF that did not have at least one? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 LMAO, I can't think of many that don't have TWO spare jobs to fill the time up. It's like Andy said though, even if they were making enough money at 1 job, chances are they would still continue working a second one, just for the extra income. I thihk we have done so much with so little for so long, we ofteb try and build a ridiculous cushion to fall back on..... Hatfield FF/EMT-P www.canyonlakefire-ems.org Re: EMS Fatgue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 , I can remember in 1989, before I retired from Mobil, I was making $80k a year, I was working OT like it was never coming back.? I could buy the biggest TV/Stereo system from one payday's OT.? There are just too many type? " A " personalities that just don't know when to quit.? I really do not see how they do it.? I asked some of my ex-employees that went on to RN school if it was worth it, and they said they made a great big mistake but got used to the money and can't come back. Andy Foote Re: EMS Fatgue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 Personaly I believe that there was a time when Unions were a good and practical thing. Today, they are crooked, misleading, and are far more trouble than they are damned worth. The IAFF instead of shunning or looking down their noses at Volunteer firefighters or EMT's, should take them under their wing and fight for better equipment, training, structure etc, etc, etc. Do they? Hell no. Because of that, they themselves are worthless just because they have the plain audacity to thumb their noses at us! I cry FOUL! " don't feed the trolls " A.Dempsey EMT-I/FF kdempseyjr@... --------------------------------- Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 It's all about job security and how much pay they can get. How about that thing they are supporting for president. Did any Local members on this list get the opportunity to have a say in that decision?? Or is it just the big Locals such as FDNY that make the decisions for the little guy?? ________________________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2007 Report Share Posted August 21, 2007 You can always vote for whoever you feel like, contribute to whomever you wish (although donations by the organization might annoy you) and speak your mind wherever you wish - being in the union doesn't block your Constitutional Rights. " lwd7734@... " wrote: It's all about job security and how much pay they can get. How about that thing they are supporting for president. Did any Local members on this list get the opportunity to have a say in that decision?? Or is it just the big Locals such as FDNY that make the decisions for the little guy?? __________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2007 Report Share Posted August 22, 2007 Best shift I ever worked (for 3+ years) was 1800 to 0500 on Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat....I too thought 24's were the way to go....until about 2 weeks into it when I realized I no longer got my sleep interrupted to run a call.....really nice BTW. Unfortunately, my agency still uses 24/48's...why???? It is the cheapest and most efficient way to provide round the clock coverage...although moving away from this is in our strategic plan for the future.... Dudley RE: Re: EMS Fatgue Getting rid of 24 hr shifts is not the answer. The only answer is placing more medic units in service. __________________________________________________________ Send your friends personalized video messages! Sign up for a FREE Juno account and start sending Video Mail today! http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-177 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2007 Report Share Posted August 27, 2007 A few year back Acadian implemented a down time policy in which a crew working a 24 hour unit can request down time. Once requested dispatch is to give them a min. of 4 hours of uninterupted rest. The crews are not permitted to leave the station, and they should be utilizing the time to sleep and nothing else. The crew is paid for this. One would think that crews would use this all the time, but we have noticed that this does not happen as often as one would think. The reason being is because the 24 hour crew knows that if they call for down time, the call load increases on the other units. Once a crew does call for down time, the supervisor reviews the unit hour utilization to determine if it was warrented. Most of the time it is. Hamilton Acadian Ambulance Hatfield wrote: Not until EMS is mandated in Texas, until then the volunteers are an integral part of the system. The IAFF takes a particularly nasty look at volunteers, anyone associated with the IAFF knows this, the sad thing about that (in my opinion) is that the vast majority of us in both Fire and EMS, all got our start via the volunteer system. In my not so humble opinion, so long as the volunteers are paying their dues, and EMS is not mandated, then any Union/Organization should represent them as they represent anyone else. Once we (hopefully) get a mandate, then the cities and counties will be forced to pay livable wages, the volunteers may take a less active role, but they will still be there. Re: EMS Fatgue In a message dated 8/19/2007 4:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, HYPERLINK " mailto:hatfield%40neopolis.net " hatfield (AT) neopolis (DOT) -net writes: The same way the IAFF deals with them. As a way to deal with volunteers is what you're saying? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/-EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/-Author/Journalis-t/Fire Protection Consultant HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino%40aol.com " LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) -com (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************-*********-*********-******** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at HYPERLINK " http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour " http://discover.-aol.com/memed/- aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2007 Report Share Posted August 27, 2007 , What's the UHU cutoff for this? What if, for example, a crew had done fewer calls but they were higher density calls such as cardiac arrests, critical traumas, and other stressful calls. How does Acadian assess those situations? How do you even out the stress on a crew that has done two cardiac arrests back to back, and then an MCI with multiple critical patients, and the crew that has made twice as many calls but they were all either no transports or minor emergencies? Is there a way to do this? Gene Gandy > > A few year back Acadian implemented a down time policy in which a crew > working a 24 hour unit can request down time. Once requested dispatch is to give > them a min. of 4 hours of uninterupted rest. The crews are not permitted to > leave the station, and they should be utilizing the time to sleep and nothing > else. The crew is paid for this. One would think that crews would use this all > the time, but we have noticed that this does not happen as often as one > would think. The reason being is because the 24 hour crew knows that if they call > for down time, the call load increases on the other units. Once a crew does > call for down time, the supervisor reviews the unit hour utilization to > determine if it was warranted. Most of the time it is. > > Hamilton > Acadian Ambulance > > Hatfield wrote: > > > Not until EMS is mandated in Texas, until then the volunteers are an > integral part of the system. > > The IAFF takes a particularly nasty look at volunteers, anyone associated > with the IAFF knows this, the sad thing about that (in my opinion) is that > the vast majority of us in both Fire and EMS, all got our start via the > volunteer system. > > In my not so humble opinion, so long as the volunteers are paying their > dues, and EMS is not mandated, then any Union/Organization should represent > them as they represent anyone else. > > Once we (hopefully) get a mandate, then the cities and counties will be > forced to pay livable wages, the volunteers may take a less active role, but > they will still be there. > > Re: EMS Fatgue > > In a message dated 8/19/2007 4:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > HYPERLINK " mailto:hatfield% HYPERLINK HYPERLINK " m HYPERLIN HYPERLINK " > > The same way the IAFF deals with them. > > As a way to deal with volunteers is what you're saying? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ FF/N > Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Freelance Consu Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ > > HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino% HYPERLINK HYPERLIN HYPERLI > > (Cell Phone) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) > (Home Phone) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > original author. > > ************ ******** ******** ******** ************<wbr>-********<wbr>*- > AOL at > HYPERLINK > " http://discover.http://discovehttp://disco " http://discover.http://dihttp:// > aolcom30tour > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2007 Report Share Posted August 28, 2007 What do they do with ED Docs???? After working two codes and 8 patients coming in from an MVA around the corner....how does the ED Doc request down-time to rest and recuperate?? What about the nurses?? What about lab, RT or radiology who not only have to run to the ED but have other duties throughout the hospital...how do they request down time??? Dudley Re: EMS Fatgue > > In a message dated 8/19/2007 4:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > HYPERLINK " mailto:hatfield% HYPERLINK HYPERLINK " m HYPERLIN HYPERLINK " > > The same way the IAFF deals with them. > > As a way to deal with volunteers is what you're saying? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ FF/N > Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Freelance Consu Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ > > HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino% HYPERLINK HYPERLIN HYPERLI > > (Cell Phone) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) > (Home Phone) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > original author. > > ************ ******** ******** ******** ************<wbr>-********<wbr>*- > AOL at > HYPERLINK > " http://discover.http://discovehttp://disco " http://discover.http://dihttp:// > aolcom30tour > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2007 Report Share Posted August 28, 2007 The ER docs go to their room and take a nap. GG > > What do they do with ED Docs???? After working two codes and 8 patients > coming in from an MVA around the corner....how does the ED Doc request down-time > to rest and recuperate?? What about the nurses?? What about lab, RT or > radiology who not only have to run to the ED but have other duties throughout the > hospital...how do they request down time??? > > Dudley > > Re: EMS Fatgue > > > > In a message dated 8/19/2007 4:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > HYPERLINK " mailto:hatfield% HYPERLINK HYPERLINK " m HYPERLIN HYPERLINK " > > > > The same way the IAFF deals with them. > > > > As a way to deal with volunteers is what you're saying? > > > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ FF/N > > Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Freelance Consu Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ > > > > > HYPERLINK " mailto:LNMolino% HYPERLINK HYPERLIN HYPERLI > > > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) > > (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) > > (Home Phone) > > > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and > the > > > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > > unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended > only > > for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain > by > > the > > original author. > > > > ************ ******** ******** ******** ************<wbr>-***-***<<wbr><w > > AOL at > > HYPERLINK > > " http://discover.http://discover.http://dis " > http://discover.http://discoveht > > aolcom30tour > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.