Guest guest Posted April 19, 2004 Report Share Posted April 19, 2004 I would take some articles in supporting retention in pre-K. There have been some great ones posted here which you could probably find in the archives if you put 'kindergarten " in the subject line. I would bring in documentation from your MD or whoever stating that your child is neurologically and developmentally a year or so behind so giving him an extra year in pre-K would be meeting his needs. I would try to get a note from any professionals that he works with (pediatrician, therapists of any sort, etc). I remember taking letters in from my son's Sunday school teacher one year when we were fighting placement in a self-contained class which we felt was inappropriate. I would also go into the IEP meeting with the notion that you won't back down. The school might expect to " smooth you over " at the IEP meeting. Often if you stand your ground they will realize that there is no use in trying to push you in the other direction. Maybe the school will surprise you and be receptive to the people who know the child best --- the parents! Isn't there a pre-K program in your district? What my son did was attend a preschool for children with speech difficulties for 2 years (he started at age 3) and for his 3rd year he went to the mainstream pre-K so we used the mainstream pre-K in the mornings as a stepping stone to kindergarten (next year) with therapies in the afternoon (both school therapies and private therapies). Is there *any* sort of pre-K program in your district? The best thing about having my son do an extra year in pre-K is that we do all his therapies in the afternoons so he can participate in extra-curriculars (soccer, etc) in the after school hours just like the other kids. Plus, he hasn't had as much time to just be a kid since he has spent so much time in therapy. These kids really need time to play and grow up. Hopefully his therapy schedule will be less intense next year when he is in full day plus he will have increased endurance so he is able to handle therapies after a full day of school. Does your son receive any sort of private therapy? If so you could use that as another reason that you want him in pre-K next year. You could say that he needs the other half of the day to do private therapy. When my son's school was pushing for placement in kindergarten, their angle was that my son could do kindergarten twice. Here is an interesting article on kindergarten retention. " Research Link / When Children Aren't Ready for Kindergarten H. Holloway How can schools promote the achievement of children who are old enough to enroll in kindergarten but who are not developmentally ready to succeed? Two approaches that parents and schools commonly use are delaying the child's entry into kindergarten and retaining the child in kindergarten for an extra year. Giving children an extra year, whether through delayed entry or kindergarten retention, makes sense in view of the ample research suggesting that the youngest children tend to lag behind their classmates. West, Denton, and Reaney (2000) found that in the spring of their kindergarten year, younger children had lower reading and mathematics knowledge and skills on average than did their older counterparts. These researchers also found that older kindergartners were more likely to persist at tasks, more eager to learn, and better able to pay attention. Delayed Entry Versus Kindergarten Retention To avoid the disadvantage suffered by younger students, some parents choose to delay the entry of their children into kindergarten. Zill, Loomis, and West (1997) found that children whose kindergarten entry was delayed so that they started kindergarten when they were older performed better than their younger classmates in grades 1 and 2. These researchers concluded that the extra year before starting kindergarten does not harm the children who are held out and may help most of them. In contrast, the researchers discovered that children who repeated kindergarten were doing worse than their younger classmates on most school performance indicators by 1st or 2nd grade. For instance, two- thirds of the retained students had received some negative feedback from teachers compared with less than half of the nonretained students. The retained students were also much more likely to have problems concentrating, to perform below their capabilities, and to act up and disrupt the class. Zill, Loomis, and West concluded that repeating kindergarten had not helped those children and may have actually made matters worse. Reasons for the Differences What explains the difference between the school performance of delayed-entry children and those who repeat kindergarten? Both groups of students are older than most of their classmates, so why don't the beneficial effects of being older apply to both groups? Some possible answers are that The underlying developmental problems of the two groups may differ. The two groups may have different socioeconomic backgrounds. Parents who choose to delay their children's school entry may have a higher level of awareness and involvement. The stigmatizing effect of being required to repeat a grade may harm children's academic progress. (read full article) http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/200304/holloway.html Tricia Morin North Carolina [ ] Starting Kindergarten - Help! I am reading the posts about starting Kindergarten and am in a similiar position. My son will be five in July. He has just gone thtough his evaluations (no diagnosis - Auditory possibly) and it was determined that he is ready for Kindergarten with special services in the afternoon. My view on Kindergarten was always to keep him back delayed or not. Now I am between a rock and a hard place. I feel what is best for him is to attend prek-4 again. I know though that my town will not agree to that because he is doing so well and he goes out of district and it will cost too much money. I just feel very strongly that another year in prek to mature and catch up will make a world of difference. My question is can I demand that he go to prek and still receive services because I do not want to lose services for a year. Then he may regress? Can I demand he go to the town mainstream prek and receive services. The problem with that is the prek is afternoon and that is when they do their special services. What are my rights? My iep is less than a month away and I do not know what to do. Thanks in advance for any adice/suggestions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2004 Report Share Posted April 19, 2004 Having just gone through my daughter's IEP where I managed to convince the school to keep her in first grade for another year, my experience was that I had to make the case that my daughter's developmental delays, both social and cognitive, equate to her actually being developmentally younger than her chronological age and therefore it is a more appropriate placement for her to be with younger classmates. (They would not agree to retain her due to academic difficulties, as these can be addressed by the IEP.) I had a report from a developmental pediatrician who backed me on this, as well as support from the school's speech and occupational therapists, the school psychologist, and the resource teacher. My daughter's teacher, the school principal and the district program manager were not really in agreement with my decision, mainly because our district has a " philosophy " of not retaining children, but they acquiesced to my decision. I don't know if you will have much luck asking for a repeat of pre-K if the evaluations show that your son is ready for kindergarten, although I wouldn't think they can force you to enroll him in kindergarten since he does have a late birthday and would probably be one of the youngest in class. Does your local school offer a summer program for kids transitioning from preschool to kindergarten? Maybe he could try that and you could get feedback from the kindergarten teacher as to how ready he seems. > I am reading the posts about starting Kindergarten and am in a > similiar position. My son will be five in July. He has just gone > thtough his evaluations (no diagnosis - Auditory possibly) and it > was determined that he is ready for Kindergarten with special > services in the afternoon. > > My view on Kindergarten was always to keep him back delayed or not. > Now I am between a rock and a hard place. I feel what is best for > him is to attend prek-4 again. I know though that my town will not > agree to that because he is doing so well and he goes out of > district and it will cost too much money. I just feel very strongly > that another year in prek to mature and catch up will make a world > of difference. > > My question is can I demand that he go to prek and still receive > services because I do not want to lose services for a year. Then he > may regress? Can I demand he go to the town mainstream prek and > receive services. The problem with that is the prek is afternoon > and that is when they do their special services. What are my > rights? My iep is less than a month away and I do not know what to > do. > > Thanks in advance for any adice/suggestions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2004 Report Share Posted April 22, 2004 This subject hit close to home for me. I am get ready for my DS 4yrs 6mos. IEP on April 27. Since he is 5 yrs. before Oct 1 (only by 9 days) his is not eligible for the pre School program, there for no funding to pay for him. What we are doing is keeping in pre school (which is where we all feel is the right place for him) with sending him to Kindergarten for 30 minutes a day of social activity such a music, are or centers. this way he is get exposed to social activity of his own age group. The activity is left to his preschool teach to chose each day. He will remain in the pre K part of preschool the rest of the school day {we has half day Kindergarten and preschool in or school system]. We are requesting his OT and ST to be schedule in the afternoon after preschool is over. This way he will not lose any more time in his program since he will be leaving for 30 minutes each day. Now on the record he is attend kindergarten for social development ( eligible for funding now}, and we he enter it next year at 6yrs old he will not be repeating it. I hope I explain this so you get the idea of how we beat the system and keep everyone happy. If you have any further question please feel free to email me privately if you like. Good Luck Mom to 15 with ADD, Zac 11 in gifted program, and apraxia and DSI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2004 Report Share Posted April 22, 2004 I want to thank everyone who responded to my post. I called my case manager and asked her if my son could go into the mainstream prek-4 and receive his speech therapy just as if he were in kindergarten. She sounds very accomodating but she needs to check with her boss. I know who her boss is and can guess it will be a problem. I am prepared to fight for what I want because I beleive that is what is best. In a way I am being discriminated against if they say no because if my child were not classified I could do the pre-k and put him in kindergarten at the age of six. My district does not like to sway from their normal routine so I think I will have a fight on my hands. The case manager offered to put him in a program for children that come back into district (they only offer out of district special ed pre-k) for an extra year before starting kindergarten. My problem with that is #1 - I would like my son to be with the children that he will be in kindergarten the next year so he has the opportunity to make friends with. and.......#2 - My district will lump him with children of all disabilities and I want him where he is challenged rather than held back. Please don't take that the wrong way. It is just that he is doing so well and I firmly beleive that it is because he not only is in speech impaired school this year but also a " typical " preschool where is not known to be different. Well thanks for the advice and I appreciate everyone taking the time to answer my questions. I will keep you up to date. > I would take some articles in supporting retention in pre-K. There have > been some great ones posted here which you could probably find in the > archives if you put 'kindergarten " in the subject line. > > I would bring in documentation from your MD or whoever stating that your > child is neurologically and developmentally a year or so behind so giving > him an extra year in pre-K would be meeting his needs. I would try to get > a note from any professionals that he works with (pediatrician, therapists > of any sort, etc). I remember taking letters in from my son's Sunday school > teacher one year when we were fighting placement in a self- contained class > which we felt was inappropriate. > > I would also go into the IEP meeting with the notion that you won't back > down. The school might expect to " smooth you over " at the IEP meeting. > Often if you stand your ground they will realize that there is no use in > trying to push you in the other direction. > > Maybe the school will surprise you and be receptive to the people who know > the child best --- the parents! > > Isn't there a pre-K program in your district? What my son did was attend a > preschool for children with speech difficulties for 2 years (he started at > age 3) and for his 3rd year he went to the mainstream pre-K so we used the > mainstream pre-K in the mornings as a stepping stone to kindergarten (next > year) with therapies in the afternoon (both school therapies and private > therapies). Is there *any* sort of pre-K program in your district? > > The best thing about having my son do an extra year in pre-K is that we do > all his therapies in the afternoons so he can participate in > extra-curriculars (soccer, etc) in the after school hours just like the > other kids. Plus, he hasn't had as much time to just be a kid since he has > spent so much time in therapy. These kids really need time to play and grow > up. > > Hopefully his therapy schedule will be less intense next year when he is in > full day plus he will have increased endurance so he is able to handle > therapies after a full day of school. > > Does your son receive any sort of private therapy? If so you could use that > as another reason that you want him in pre-K next year. You could say that > he needs the other half of the day to do private therapy. > > When my son's school was pushing for placement in kindergarten, their angle > was that my son could do kindergarten twice. Here is an interesting article > on kindergarten retention. > > > " Research Link / When Children Aren't Ready for Kindergarten > > H. Holloway > > How can schools promote the achievement of children who are old > enough to enroll in kindergarten but who are not developmentally > ready to succeed? Two approaches that parents and schools commonly > use are delaying the child's entry into kindergarten and retaining > the child in kindergarten for an extra year. > > Giving children an extra year, whether through delayed entry or > kindergarten retention, makes sense in view of the ample research > suggesting that the youngest children tend to lag behind their > classmates. West, Denton, and Reaney (2000) found that in the spring > of their kindergarten year, younger children had lower reading and > mathematics knowledge and skills on average than did their older > counterparts. These researchers also found that older kindergartners > were more likely to persist at tasks, more eager to learn, and > better able to pay attention. > > Delayed Entry Versus Kindergarten Retention > To avoid the disadvantage suffered by younger students, some parents > choose to delay the entry of their children into kindergarten. Zill, > Loomis, and West (1997) found that children whose kindergarten entry > was delayed so that they started kindergarten when they were older > performed better than their younger classmates in grades 1 and 2. > These researchers concluded that the extra year before starting > kindergarten does not harm the children who are held out and may > help most of them. > > In contrast, the researchers discovered that children who repeated > kindergarten were doing worse than their younger classmates on most > school performance indicators by 1st or 2nd grade. For instance, two- > thirds of the retained students had received some negative feedback > from teachers compared with less than half of the nonretained > students. The retained students were also much more likely to have > problems concentrating, to perform below their capabilities, and to > act up and disrupt the class. Zill, Loomis, and West concluded that > repeating kindergarten had not helped those children and may have > actually made matters worse. > > Reasons for the Differences > What explains the difference between the school performance of > delayed-entry children and those who repeat kindergarten? Both > groups of students are older than most of their classmates, so why > don't the beneficial effects of being older apply to both groups? > Some possible answers are that > > The underlying developmental problems of the two groups may differ. > > The two groups may have different socioeconomic backgrounds. > > Parents who choose to delay their children's school entry may have a > higher level of awareness and involvement. > > The stigmatizing effect of being required to repeat a grade may harm > children's academic progress. > > (read full article) > http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/200304/holloway.html > > > > Tricia Morin > North Carolina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2004 Report Share Posted April 22, 2004 I am glad you having some positive dialog with the school about this. It is a start! Upon reading this email, I had one more thought. If worst comes to worst and the school doesn't want to let your son be in pre-K, maybe you could find a private Pre-K and just bring him up to the school for his therapies. Regardless I would go see the program you mentioned below " for kids that come back into district before starting K " . You might want to make sure you can see your child functioning well in the class (based on the level of functioning of the other kids, the routine, etc) Tricia Morin North Carolina I want to thank everyone who responded to my post. I called my case manager and asked her if my son could go into the mainstream prek-4 and receive his speech therapy just as if he were in kindergarten. She sounds very accomodating but she needs to check with her boss. I know who her boss is and can guess it will be a problem. I am prepared to fight for what I want because I beleive that is what is best. In a way I am being discriminated against if they say no because if my child were not classified I could do the pre-k and put him in kindergarten at the age of six. My district does not like to sway from their normal routine so I think I will have a fight on my hands. The case manager offered to put him in a program for children that come back into district (they only offer out of district special ed pre-k) for an extra year before starting kindergarten. My problem with that is #1 - I would like my son to be with the children that he will be in kindergarten the next year so he has the opportunity to make friends with. and.......#2 - My district will lump him with children of all disabilities and I want him where he is challenged rather than held back. Please don't take that the wrong way. It is just that he is doing so well and I firmly beleive that it is because he not only is in speech impaired school this year but also a " typical " preschool where is not known to be different. Well thanks for the advice and I appreciate everyone taking the time to answer my questions. I will keep you up to date. > I would take some articles in supporting retention in pre-K. There have > been some great ones posted here which you could probably find in the > archives if you put 'kindergarten " in the subject line. > > I would bring in documentation from your MD or whoever stating that your > child is neurologically and developmentally a year or so behind so giving > him an extra year in pre-K would be meeting his needs. I would try to get > a note from any professionals that he works with (pediatrician, therapists > of any sort, etc). I remember taking letters in from my son's Sunday school > teacher one year when we were fighting placement in a self- contained class > which we felt was inappropriate. > > I would also go into the IEP meeting with the notion that you won't back > down. The school might expect to " smooth you over " at the IEP meeting. > Often if you stand your ground they will realize that there is no use in > trying to push you in the other direction. > > Maybe the school will surprise you and be receptive to the people who know > the child best --- the parents! > > Isn't there a pre-K program in your district? What my son did was attend a > preschool for children with speech difficulties for 2 years (he started at > age 3) and for his 3rd year he went to the mainstream pre-K so we used the > mainstream pre-K in the mornings as a stepping stone to kindergarten (next > year) with therapies in the afternoon (both school therapies and private > therapies). Is there *any* sort of pre-K program in your district? > > The best thing about having my son do an extra year in pre-K is that we do > all his therapies in the afternoons so he can participate in > extra-curriculars (soccer, etc) in the after school hours just like the > other kids. Plus, he hasn't had as much time to just be a kid since he has > spent so much time in therapy. These kids really need time to play and grow > up. > > Hopefully his therapy schedule will be less intense next year when he is in > full day plus he will have increased endurance so he is able to handle > therapies after a full day of school. > > Does your son receive any sort of private therapy? If so you could use that > as another reason that you want him in pre-K next year. You could say that > he needs the other half of the day to do private therapy. > > When my son's school was pushing for placement in kindergarten, their angle > was that my son could do kindergarten twice. Here is an interesting article > on kindergarten retention. > > > " Research Link / When Children Aren't Ready for Kindergarten > > H. Holloway > > How can schools promote the achievement of children who are old > enough to enroll in kindergarten but who are not developmentally > ready to succeed? Two approaches that parents and schools commonly > use are delaying the child's entry into kindergarten and retaining > the child in kindergarten for an extra year. > > Giving children an extra year, whether through delayed entry or > kindergarten retention, makes sense in view of the ample research > suggesting that the youngest children tend to lag behind their > classmates. West, Denton, and Reaney (2000) found that in the spring > of their kindergarten year, younger children had lower reading and > mathematics knowledge and skills on average than did their older > counterparts. These researchers also found that older kindergartners > were more likely to persist at tasks, more eager to learn, and > better able to pay attention. > > Delayed Entry Versus Kindergarten Retention > To avoid the disadvantage suffered by younger students, some parents > choose to delay the entry of their children into kindergarten. Zill, > Loomis, and West (1997) found that children whose kindergarten entry > was delayed so that they started kindergarten when they were older > performed better than their younger classmates in grades 1 and 2. > These researchers concluded that the extra year before starting > kindergarten does not harm the children who are held out and may > help most of them. > > In contrast, the researchers discovered that children who repeated > kindergarten were doing worse than their younger classmates on most > school performance indicators by 1st or 2nd grade. For instance, two- > thirds of the retained students had received some negative feedback > from teachers compared with less than half of the nonretained > students. The retained students were also much more likely to have > problems concentrating, to perform below their capabilities, and to > act up and disrupt the class. Zill, Loomis, and West concluded that > repeating kindergarten had not helped those children and may have > actually made matters worse. > > Reasons for the Differences > What explains the difference between the school performance of > delayed-entry children and those who repeat kindergarten? Both > groups of students are older than most of their classmates, so why > don't the beneficial effects of being older apply to both groups? > Some possible answers are that > > The underlying developmental problems of the two groups may differ. > > The two groups may have different socioeconomic backgrounds. > > Parents who choose to delay their children's school entry may have a > higher level of awareness and involvement. > > The stigmatizing effect of being required to repeat a grade may harm > children's academic progress. > > (read full article) > http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/200304/holloway.html > > > > Tricia Morin > North Carolina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.