Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 http://www.intense-workout.com/cravings.html about food cravings... This was something I read early this morning. It is worded a bit strong, but to the point...Kallie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 Wow strong article, but you are right that it gets the point across. I will really take the 5 sec thing to heart. Jill link (food cravings) > http://www.intense-workout.com/cravings.html > > about food cravings... > > This was something I read early this morning. It is worded a bit > strong, but to the point...Kallie > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2004 Report Share Posted March 25, 2004 Wow strong article, but you are right that it gets the point across. I will really take the 5 sec thing to heart. Jill link (food cravings) > http://www.intense-workout.com/cravings.html > > about food cravings... > > This was something I read early this morning. It is worded a bit > strong, but to the point...Kallie > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2004 Report Share Posted March 30, 2004 I just read the article, and I'm not sure that I agree. I had these two bakery cookies at the wedding I went to Sunday. I'm 100% that if I didn't have the cookies, these bakery cookies would have been a craving I couldn't control. Monday, I would have been at the bakery getting a whole tray. LOL :-) On the other hand, indulging in the two cookies, put the craving behind me and didn't take me off-program. I think that the attitude in this article is too strident - I agree with others on this board that its' never OK to give yourself permission to go off program, but isn't what WW is about - allowing you to work anything into your program? Not denying yourself? This article seems contrary to that philosophy. Not to mention the writier seems to be way arrogant. Mitch mousikos@... wrote: >Kallie, >that IS a strong article, but it echoes my opinion too (although I'd have >used gentler language!). Thanks for the link. >I hope you have a good day today, after yesterday's learning experience. I'm >pulling for you! >Bette >(P.S. Don't skip breakfast, okay? Your body needs SOMEthing to break the >fast, especially after a restless night!) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2004 Report Share Posted March 30, 2004 I just read the article, and I'm not sure that I agree. I had these two bakery cookies at the wedding I went to Sunday. I'm 100% that if I didn't have the cookies, these bakery cookies would have been a craving I couldn't control. Monday, I would have been at the bakery getting a whole tray. LOL :-) On the other hand, indulging in the two cookies, put the craving behind me and didn't take me off-program. I think that the attitude in this article is too strident - I agree with others on this board that its' never OK to give yourself permission to go off program, but isn't what WW is about - allowing you to work anything into your program? Not denying yourself? This article seems contrary to that philosophy. Not to mention the writier seems to be way arrogant. Mitch mousikos@... wrote: >Kallie, >that IS a strong article, but it echoes my opinion too (although I'd have >used gentler language!). Thanks for the link. >I hope you have a good day today, after yesterday's learning experience. I'm >pulling for you! >Bette >(P.S. Don't skip breakfast, okay? Your body needs SOMEthing to break the >fast, especially after a restless night!) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.