Guest guest Posted July 25, 2004 Report Share Posted July 25, 2004 Do you think that stem cell therapy could also be used for PLS since it, too, is a degenerative motor neuron disease? edith > 1: Lancet. 2004 Jul 10;364(9429):200-2. Related Articles, Links > > > Stem-cell therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. > > Silani V, Cova L, Corbo M, Ciammola A, Polli E. > > Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Dino Ferrari > Centre, University of Milan Medical School-IRCCS Istituto Auxologico > Italiano, Milano, Italy. Silanivincenzo@s... > > CONTEXT: With the lack of effective drug treatments for amyotrophic > lateral sclerosis (ALS), and compelling preclinical data, stem- cell > research has highlighted this disease as a candidate for stem-cell > treatment. Stem-cell transplantation is an attractive strategy for > neurological diseases and early successes in animal models of > neurodegnerative disease generated optimism about restoring function > or delaying degeneration in human beings. The restricted potential of > adult stem cells has been challenged over the past 5 years by reports > on their ability to acquire new unexpected fates beyond their > embryonic lineage (transdifferentiation). Therefore, autologous or > allogeneic stem cells, undifferentiated or transdifferentiated and > manipulated epigenetically or genetically, could be a candidate > source for local or systemic cell-therapies in ALS. STARTING POINT: > Albert Clement and colleagues (Science 2003; 302: 113-17) showed that > in SOD1G93A chimeric mice, motorneuron degeneration requires damage > from mutant SOD1 acting in non-neuronal cells. Wild-type non- neuronal > (glial) cells could delay degeneration and extend survival of mutant- > expressing motorneurons. Letizia Mazzini and colleagues (Amyotroph > Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2003; 4: 158-61) injected > autologous bone-marrow-derived stem cells into the spinal cord of > seven ALS patients. These investigators reported that the procedure > had a reasonable margin of clinical safety. WHERE NEXT? The success > of cell-replacement therapy in ALS will depend a lot on preclinical > evidence, because of the complexity and precision of the pattern of > connectivity that needs to be restored in degenerating motoneurons. > Stem-cell therapy will need to be used with other drugs or > treatments, such as antioxidants and/or infusion of trophic molecules. > > PMID: 15246734 [PubMed - in process] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2004 Report Share Posted July 25, 2004 > Do you think that stem cell therapy could also be used for PLS since > it, too, is a degenerative motor neuron disease? > edith Edith, I believe it will be a long time before stem cell therapy will be used on PLS because of several reasons: 1. Our neurons that are in need of therapy are in an area of the brain that is very hard to reach. Any method know as of this time is risky at best. 2. The chance of getting a study done on us is very difficult due to the rarity of our disease and the inability to definitively diagnose PLS. 3. Due to the invasive nature and risks involved, the first trials will be on those that have very little to lose. We have a lot to lose! If you are at a late stage of disease you might chose to try it, but most are not in that category, so it would be really hard to find enough PLSers that didn't have much to lose. I tried a drug therapy for my liver back in 2000 and I had rapid (within 2 weeks) loss of my speech and strength. I was bedridden and unable to communicate for several months. I would not take the risk of doing that again. Period. 4. The stem cell therapy that is offered by some of the companies now does not have a delivery method that is effective. It is really a hit and miss. They inject a ton of cells into you and hope (and pray) that some of them will get to the right area and do some good. But it has been proven that while the new cells might work for a short period of time, they eventually (and very quickly) stop working and die. There isn't a case out there that has been successful for any period of time. The ALS-TDF even injected the new cells directly into the spinal cord of several ALS patients and they saw no long term improvement. It wasn't worth it so they didn't opt for doing it again. If it did work, there would be so many ALSers getting the treatment it would make your head spin. These folks are desperate for anything. It just doesn't work yet. It will one day, but not today. Thomson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2004 Report Share Posted July 25, 2004 > Do you think that stem cell therapy could also be used for PLS since > it, too, is a degenerative motor neuron disease? > edith Edith, I believe it will be a long time before stem cell therapy will be used on PLS because of several reasons: 1. Our neurons that are in need of therapy are in an area of the brain that is very hard to reach. Any method know as of this time is risky at best. 2. The chance of getting a study done on us is very difficult due to the rarity of our disease and the inability to definitively diagnose PLS. 3. Due to the invasive nature and risks involved, the first trials will be on those that have very little to lose. We have a lot to lose! If you are at a late stage of disease you might chose to try it, but most are not in that category, so it would be really hard to find enough PLSers that didn't have much to lose. I tried a drug therapy for my liver back in 2000 and I had rapid (within 2 weeks) loss of my speech and strength. I was bedridden and unable to communicate for several months. I would not take the risk of doing that again. Period. 4. The stem cell therapy that is offered by some of the companies now does not have a delivery method that is effective. It is really a hit and miss. They inject a ton of cells into you and hope (and pray) that some of them will get to the right area and do some good. But it has been proven that while the new cells might work for a short period of time, they eventually (and very quickly) stop working and die. There isn't a case out there that has been successful for any period of time. The ALS-TDF even injected the new cells directly into the spinal cord of several ALS patients and they saw no long term improvement. It wasn't worth it so they didn't opt for doing it again. If it did work, there would be so many ALSers getting the treatment it would make your head spin. These folks are desperate for anything. It just doesn't work yet. It will one day, but not today. Thomson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 2004 Report Share Posted July 26, 2004 > HI, > > AS THINGS STAND RIGHT NOW JENNIFER IS RIGHT. > BUT WE STILL NEED THE RESEARCH TO CONTINUE SO THAT ALS PATIENTS DOWN THE > LINE HAVE A FIGHTING CHANCE. Bonnie, You are absolutely right! I really encourage everyone that is able to help support ALS research as well as PLS research. Not only will we benefit from ALS research, we'll also help (hopefully) some very dear friends like Don and Bonnie. I also support the local ALSA as they are very inclusive of PLSers in their support. Let's face it, our chances of having a local PLS support chapter are slim to none, so we need ALSA. And they need us. Thomson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.