Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Re-read Elaine's book and have your parents read the book so they can understand what is happening with their beloved grandson. In a message dated 8/14/2004 3:18:12 AM Eastern Daylight Time, acjjb@... writes: My son is 4.5yr old asd, and has been scd for only three days. I have explained the diet and the science behind it to my parents, but they seem unimpressed. Their point of view is that if we can cut out 90% of the bad sugar in his diet, that must be great compared to his old regular diet which was high in sugar.(fast food, etc). I have read BTVC, but it seems like they do have a point. Any suggestions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 The way I see it, we are dealing with the intestines trying to digest molecules of food. If your son is getting 90% of the bad sugar out of his diet as compared to his old diet, that is indeed nice. But real healing can only happen when there are NO undigested molecules of food which feed the unwanted bacterial fauna and yeast. It is this that leads to such a host of problems. 90% is not 100% and it is not just sugar - complex carbohydrates are also undigestable for many of our kids. There is a nice, simple explanation on pecanbread.com, complete with simple pictures for simpletons like myself, just find the link to the science behind the diet. I imagine it is like offering a single cracker to someone with celiac disease. It might not hurt as much as a whole pasta dinner, but it still damages the body. Only our kiddos can't always tell us when it hurts. Sometimes, they don't even know it hurts until the hurt goes away and you see the " fog " lifting from their little minds that you know what the alternative can be for them. There are lunchboxes and t-shirts and other things that have printed " I only eat food from home " as a gentle reminder for grandparents, teachers, babysitters and new parents. You can find them also on the pecanbread.com site. My suggestion is to try the diet with 100% compliance and wait and see what you find. It sure can't hurt! Helen, mom to (9, ASD, SCD 4/04) > My son is 4.5yr old asd, and has been scd for only three days. I > have explained the diet and the science behind it to my parents, but > they seem unimpressed. Their point of view is that if we can cut out > 90% of the bad sugar in his diet, that must be great compared to his > old regular diet which was high in sugar.(fast food, etc). I have > read BTVC, but it seems like they do have a point. Any suggestions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2004 Report Share Posted August 15, 2004 I see their point, cause my parents were the same way, but 100% is definitely best, otherwise you will continue to crave the carbs and sugary stuff. You will have just enough in there to keep feeding that craving bacteria, putting you in a cycle of withdrawal over and over. You won't feel well during it all either. I would just gently and lovingly say that this is what you have decided for your child, and stick to it come ---- or highwater, so to speak. This is what I have had to do. It's not easy at first, but what a difference it makes. All the pain is worth seeing your child feeling good and happy. Tina > > My son is 4.5yr old asd, and has been scd for only three days. I > > have explained the diet and the science behind it to my parents, > but > > they seem unimpressed. Their point of view is that if we can cut > out > > 90% of the bad sugar in his diet, that must be great compared to > his > > old regular diet which was high in sugar.(fast food, etc). I have > > read BTVC, but it seems like they do have a point. Any suggestions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.