EMS Under DHS

[Guest guest]

I had the opportunity to participate in the development of this proposal as a

member of the HSPI Taskforce, so I thought I would add a few thoughts for

everyone to consider. This is what I believe to be a significant policy

document that speaks to the fundamental issues regarding the state of EMS in

this country. This has begun a national debate on the issue of where a Federal

Office of EMS should be located and how it should be funded.

There is an immediate need for us to act as an EMS community to at least discuss

the issue, and in my humble opinion, support the recommendations in the HSPI

report.

No matter how you feel about the issue, I urge you to call Washington and have

EMS? voice heard from the providers, so that no one agency or interest speaks

for the masses.

Can we agree that what is not needed for EMS (look at it for the country and

profession as a whole, not just here in TX) is the status quo!

Since 9/11/01, millions of grant dollars have flowed into states for

preparedness. What I have witnessed is a vast majority of the money going to

police and fire, with little attention or money going to local EMS.

EMS is an important but forgotten first responder in our national preparedness

plan. Whether public, private, paid or volunteer, EMS answers the call. Sadly,

our fragmented, disorganized approach to EMS at a national level, has failed to

give EMS personnel the training and equipment needed to respond to every day

emergencies, let alone a CBRNE incident. The evidence is on the television news

routinely. Firefighters are seen in complete protective equipment while EMS

providers are being protected only by their uniform shirts at the same scene.

The current system is fragmented, decentralized, marginalized and ignored. DHS

is the lead agency in the federal government to coordinate first responders

across the nation. This is a chance to sit at the table as we plan for the

future threats. It is an opportunity to help EMS gain equality in focus,

funding and leadership.

It seems that the politics will really be heating up soon............and the

question of who really represents EMS will be one of the greatest questions. Who

leads it now and who should lead it in the future?

EMS Providers need to take this opportunity to speak up and speak out. We now

have a chance to be heard, and to let the policy makers and leaders know how we

feel.

It isn't about who provides it.......it is about who recognizes it as an

important public emergency service with the ability to grow and meet the needs

of Americans.

Graham

(The comments in this correspondence are mine, and mine alone. They do

represent any other person or entity with whom I am or am perceived to be

associated)