Guest guest Posted May 15, 2001 Report Share Posted May 15, 2001 Harley, I'm a little confused. Are you saying that the original order was from a judge who then removed the order and then worded the new order as to place the burden on the probation officer? Tommy > I finally had my day in court today to try and have the order to > attend the well known religous cult better known as AA. > the judge had no problem with removing the order and rescendid the > order pending approval from my probation officer who has allready > told me that he had no problem with me asking to have it removed. > the thing that got me a bit heated was the fact that when I asked to > have my case back in court I expressed my concern with AA's views and > religous behavior as being > my main reason for seeking an alternative. > the state so kindly re wrote the order as follows. > (it is hearby ordered that the defendant's sentance is modified so > that he now attends any and all AA meetings that his probation > officer deems appropriate) > Allough he's told me he has no problem with it being reversed it sure > appears to me that the state is really still trying to force this on > me. > any one have any feed back on this? > or does this sound like the proper way the state usually re writes an > order such as this. > > thanx again. > I'd probably be real lost if you people wernt here. > lost in Illinois > Harley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2001 Report Share Posted May 15, 2001 Harley, I'm a little confused. Are you saying that the original order was from a judge who then removed the order and then worded the new order as to place the burden on the probation officer? Tommy > I finally had my day in court today to try and have the order to > attend the well known religous cult better known as AA. > the judge had no problem with removing the order and rescendid the > order pending approval from my probation officer who has allready > told me that he had no problem with me asking to have it removed. > the thing that got me a bit heated was the fact that when I asked to > have my case back in court I expressed my concern with AA's views and > religous behavior as being > my main reason for seeking an alternative. > the state so kindly re wrote the order as follows. > (it is hearby ordered that the defendant's sentance is modified so > that he now attends any and all AA meetings that his probation > officer deems appropriate) > Allough he's told me he has no problem with it being reversed it sure > appears to me that the state is really still trying to force this on > me. > any one have any feed back on this? > or does this sound like the proper way the state usually re writes an > order such as this. > > thanx again. > I'd probably be real lost if you people wernt here. > lost in Illinois > Harley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.