Re: Reference ranges - dean

[Guest guest]

>

> The references ranges for toxic metals at DDI are taken from

thousands of samples of 'normal people' in the USA, right?

> Well if almost everyone of those 'normal' people probably had

mercury in their mouth whether they had symptoms or not (and were

also exposed to mercury in vaccinations) how can we consider the

mercury limit to be safe?

TK--- [i think] you would need to ask them exactly how they did the

testing to make sure of what you may be pondering.

TK--- no amount of Hg is really safe. The test is used to help

determine how toxic we are.

>

> I don't quite get it. Surely it should be zero, as with all the

other completely useless metals for our bodies.

TK--- optimally this would be good

>

> Are you only mercury poisoned when you overshoot the green line

into yellow with mercury, or when you go into the red?

TK--- you can be toxic even if you are in range for the Hg on the

hair test. frank Hg showing on the test out of reference range

shows obvious toxicity.

> Dean

>

>

>