Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Okay, you all know I really struggle with this issue and the incessant confusion that I have but what happens if you just have the intrahepatic damage? Is that advanced? Or does that just mean that is where the disease started with that patient? Or will it go back out and catch the extrahepatic ducts? (which would not be all bad in my mind.) Does having intrahepatic damage cause more symptoms in the way of fatigue or what? Can any one speak to this? Labs? Just curious what this does to the disease course in general. Thank you in advance. Would all 4 portal tracts being involved mean intra- or extra- or does that alone not indicate either? Can you tell that I still don’t quite get it? www.caringbridge.org/pa/nwmartens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Well, I cannot remember either to be honest and my doctor has confused the matter by doing some flip-flopping. She seems to answer my question with what I seem to her that day as wanting to hear. <grrrr> So, we are getting records for an eyes-on look. This conversation came up after Clint (relaytech1960) got his ERCP results and started asking me and asked me to ask the group because he was too tired…hmmm wonder why. (I hate this disease.) So my questions are really for two of us and I really have his newbie thoughts in mind as well as my own. He only had intrahepatic damage. So that is a GOOD thing right!!! That would be small duct PSC? The supposed slow-moving train. It will not go back out and cause damage to the extrahepatic ducts will it? Is fatigue worse with intrahepatic or does it just depend on how far you are into the disease? Clint is historically a very active fellow (biker, runner) and is really suffering from the fatigue end of things. And it seems to have slammed him all of a sudden…like in the last 3-6 months which is VERT frustrating to someone who WANTS to be out there doing things. Does anyone have any words of wisdom for him. I KNOW he won’t ask, but he should if there is anything to help. God Bless you all, this is a wonderful group, Mom of Zoe (13) My very normal (teenager normal) soccer player; Noah (8 1/2) Indeterminate colitis, PSC, Osteopenia (1-4 lumbar vertebrae), Enthesopathy; Aidan (4 1/2) Moderately-severe SNHL bilaterally Recycle Yourself Become an Organ Donor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Well, I cannot remember either to be honest and my doctor has confused the matter by doing some flip-flopping. She seems to answer my question with what I seem to her that day as wanting to hear. <grrrr> So, we are getting records for an eyes-on look. This conversation came up after Clint (relaytech1960) got his ERCP results and started asking me and asked me to ask the group because he was too tired…hmmm wonder why. (I hate this disease.) So my questions are really for two of us and I really have his newbie thoughts in mind as well as my own. He only had intrahepatic damage. So that is a GOOD thing right!!! That would be small duct PSC? The supposed slow-moving train. It will not go back out and cause damage to the extrahepatic ducts will it? Is fatigue worse with intrahepatic or does it just depend on how far you are into the disease? Clint is historically a very active fellow (biker, runner) and is really suffering from the fatigue end of things. And it seems to have slammed him all of a sudden…like in the last 3-6 months which is VERT frustrating to someone who WANTS to be out there doing things. Does anyone have any words of wisdom for him. I KNOW he won’t ask, but he should if there is anything to help. God Bless you all, this is a wonderful group, Mom of Zoe (13) My very normal (teenager normal) soccer player; Noah (8 1/2) Indeterminate colitis, PSC, Osteopenia (1-4 lumbar vertebrae), Enthesopathy; Aidan (4 1/2) Moderately-severe SNHL bilaterally Recycle Yourself Become an Organ Donor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hi ; I'd tend to agree with Arne that PSC with only small-duct (intrahepatic) involvement seems to have a better prognosis than PSC with large-duct involvement. According to Adolf Stiehl, when the large-ducts get strictured (he calls these large-duct structures 'dominant stenoses') there seeems to be a higher risk of bacterial infections of the bile. This can lead to deterioration of liver function. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jan;18(1):69-74. The role of dominant stenoses in bacterial infections of bile ducts in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Pohl J, Ring A, Stremmel W, Stiehl A. Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ruprechts Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany. OBJECTIVE: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and strictures of the biliary system. We studied the role of dominant stenoses in bacterial biliary infections and the effect of routine antibiotic administration with cholangiography. DESIGN: A prospective clinical trial without blinding or randomization. SETTING: The endoscopy unit in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients with PSC entered and finished the study. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 103 endoscopic retrograde cholangiographies (ERC) was performed in 37 PSC patients with dominant stenosis and 13 controls with PSC but no dominant stenosis. After selective cannulation of the bile duct, bile samples were obtained during each procedure. All patients received systemic antibiotic treatment with ciprofloxacin for one week after ERC. RESULTS: Enteric bacteria were detected in the bile specimens of 15 out of 37 PSC patients (40.5%) with dominant stenosis but never in the absence of dominant stenosis (P=0.004). Positive cultures for enteric bacteria were associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein, high leukocyte counts in bile (P<0.05) and the deterioration of liver function assessed by increasing bilirubin levels during the follow-up period lasting a median of 7 months (P=0.06). Despite the high rate of susceptibility in vitro, ciprofloxacin treatment eradicated enteric bacteria in only two out of 12 cases. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infection of the bile ducts with dominant stenosis is a frequent finding and may play a role in the progression of PSC. Short-course antibiotic treatment is not very effective in eradicating acteria from the bile ducts. PMID: 16357622 Best regards, Dave (father of (21); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hi ; I'd tend to agree with Arne that PSC with only small-duct (intrahepatic) involvement seems to have a better prognosis than PSC with large-duct involvement. According to Adolf Stiehl, when the large-ducts get strictured (he calls these large-duct structures 'dominant stenoses') there seeems to be a higher risk of bacterial infections of the bile. This can lead to deterioration of liver function. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jan;18(1):69-74. The role of dominant stenoses in bacterial infections of bile ducts in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Pohl J, Ring A, Stremmel W, Stiehl A. Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ruprechts Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany. OBJECTIVE: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and strictures of the biliary system. We studied the role of dominant stenoses in bacterial biliary infections and the effect of routine antibiotic administration with cholangiography. DESIGN: A prospective clinical trial without blinding or randomization. SETTING: The endoscopy unit in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients with PSC entered and finished the study. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 103 endoscopic retrograde cholangiographies (ERC) was performed in 37 PSC patients with dominant stenosis and 13 controls with PSC but no dominant stenosis. After selective cannulation of the bile duct, bile samples were obtained during each procedure. All patients received systemic antibiotic treatment with ciprofloxacin for one week after ERC. RESULTS: Enteric bacteria were detected in the bile specimens of 15 out of 37 PSC patients (40.5%) with dominant stenosis but never in the absence of dominant stenosis (P=0.004). Positive cultures for enteric bacteria were associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein, high leukocyte counts in bile (P<0.05) and the deterioration of liver function assessed by increasing bilirubin levels during the follow-up period lasting a median of 7 months (P=0.06). Despite the high rate of susceptibility in vitro, ciprofloxacin treatment eradicated enteric bacteria in only two out of 12 cases. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infection of the bile ducts with dominant stenosis is a frequent finding and may play a role in the progression of PSC. Short-course antibiotic treatment is not very effective in eradicating acteria from the bile ducts. PMID: 16357622 Best regards, Dave (father of (21); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hi ; I'd tend to agree with Arne that PSC with only small-duct (intrahepatic) involvement seems to have a better prognosis than PSC with large-duct involvement. According to Adolf Stiehl, when the large-ducts get strictured (he calls these large-duct structures 'dominant stenoses') there seeems to be a higher risk of bacterial infections of the bile. This can lead to deterioration of liver function. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jan;18(1):69-74. The role of dominant stenoses in bacterial infections of bile ducts in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Pohl J, Ring A, Stremmel W, Stiehl A. Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ruprechts Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany. OBJECTIVE: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and strictures of the biliary system. We studied the role of dominant stenoses in bacterial biliary infections and the effect of routine antibiotic administration with cholangiography. DESIGN: A prospective clinical trial without blinding or randomization. SETTING: The endoscopy unit in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients with PSC entered and finished the study. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 103 endoscopic retrograde cholangiographies (ERC) was performed in 37 PSC patients with dominant stenosis and 13 controls with PSC but no dominant stenosis. After selective cannulation of the bile duct, bile samples were obtained during each procedure. All patients received systemic antibiotic treatment with ciprofloxacin for one week after ERC. RESULTS: Enteric bacteria were detected in the bile specimens of 15 out of 37 PSC patients (40.5%) with dominant stenosis but never in the absence of dominant stenosis (P=0.004). Positive cultures for enteric bacteria were associated with elevated serum C-reactive protein, high leukocyte counts in bile (P<0.05) and the deterioration of liver function assessed by increasing bilirubin levels during the follow-up period lasting a median of 7 months (P=0.06). Despite the high rate of susceptibility in vitro, ciprofloxacin treatment eradicated enteric bacteria in only two out of 12 cases. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infection of the bile ducts with dominant stenosis is a frequent finding and may play a role in the progression of PSC. Short-course antibiotic treatment is not very effective in eradicating acteria from the bile ducts. PMID: 16357622 Best regards, Dave (father of (21); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Dear ; PSC can start with damage to the intrahepatic ducts, and then later can affect the larger and extrahepatic ducts. Adolf Stiehl notes that the majority of patients with PSC will eventually develop dominant strictures (stenoses), and when this occurs, he advocates opening then with endoscopic procedures: J Hepatol. 2002 Feb;36(2):151-6. Comment in: J Hepatol. 2002 Feb;36(2):278-9. Development of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid: outcome after endoscopic treatment. Stiehl A, Rudolph G, Kloters-Plachky P, Sauer P, S. Department of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Medizinische Universitatsklinik, Bergheimerstrasse 58, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. adolf_stiehl@... BACKGROUND/AIMS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis is characterized by progressive fibrotic inflammation and obliteration of intra- and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. METHODS: In a prospective study of 106 patients treated for up to 13 years with ursodeoxycholic acid, the development of major bile duct stenoses and the efficacy of endoscopic measures have been evaluated. RESULTS: Of 106 patients ten had major duct stenoses at entry, and during a median follow-up period of 5.0 years another 43 developed a dominant stenosis. Fifty- two patients with dominant stenoses were treated endoscopically by repeated balloon dilatations and five patients were temporarily stented. Complications of endoscopic procedures were pancreatitis (5.2%), bacterial cholangitis (3.3%) and bile duct perforation (0.5%). Five years after the first dilatation of a dominant stenosis the Kaplan-Meier survival rates free of liver transplantation were 100% in stage 2, 72% in stage 3 and 50% in stage 4 disease. The actuarial survival free of liver transplantation of the whole group at 3, 5 and 7 years were 0.987, 0.935 and 0.891 and the corresponding survival rates predicted with the Mayo multicenter survival model were 0.860, 0.775 and 0.737 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced disease, occlusion of major bile ducts with time occurs in the majority of patients. Endoscopic opening of dominant stenoses is effective and appears to be a valuable addition to the medical treatment of such patients. Publication Types: Clinical Trial PMID: 11830325 Intrahepatic bile-duct blockages can produce all of the classic symtoms ... elevated liver function tests, pruritus, fatigue etc. PBC only affects the small-ducts, and PBCers have all of these symptoms! Best regards, Dave (father of (21); PSC 07/03; UC 08/03) > > He only had intrahepatic damage. So that is a GOOD thing right!!! > That would be small duct PSC? The supposed slow-moving train. It will not go back out and cause damage to the extrahepatic ducts will it? Is fatigue worse with intrahepatic or does it just depend on how far you are into the disease? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 These all sound like great questions to me, but I get the impression the state of the art is such that cause and effect relationships on the finer grain points that you suggest is in many cases still unknown. For example why some have debilitating fatigue, itching, etc.etc. years before needing a transplant and others see it late in the progression or not at all. I bet you could come up with enough great research questions to keep Mayo busy in this department for the next 50 years. I too am at times annoyed at the things we don't know (this topic and many others!!) Bestjd, 45 goin to 46UC 1973, Jpouch 2000, Chronic Pouchitis 2001, PSC 2004, Stage 3Southern, IL_ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.