Libertarian Rand

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:01:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,

malgeo@... writes:

<< he_Fountainhead_ or seen the

movie, but I have trouble believing Rand published anything

even vaguely Nazi-like. >>

, I can only suggest that you do read and see. Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:30:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< I am not crying about your sob story. Those girls were stupid and should

have known better. You try to pass the buck for them. Try to blame someone

else for their own ineptitude and irresponsibility. Just like you, I

suppose. Why is it my job to make sure someone else isn't a stupid fool?

Its not because everyone knows there is nothing I can do about that. I

can't do anything about that, so why then is it my job to make sure the >>

This is the height and ignorance of ignoring a social context that was

responsible for the murder of innocent people because of out-right greed and

the profit motive unregulated. You have some thinking and reading to dol

Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:30:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< I am not crying about your sob story. Those girls were stupid and should

have known better. You try to pass the buck for them. Try to blame someone

else for their own ineptitude and irresponsibility. Just like you, I

suppose. Why is it my job to make sure someone else isn't a stupid fool?

Its not because everyone knows there is nothing I can do about that. I

can't do anything about that, so why then is it my job to make sure the >>

This is the height and ignorance of ignoring a social context that was

responsible for the murder of innocent people because of out-right greed and

the profit motive unregulated. You have some thinking and reading to dol

Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:30:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< I am not crying about your sob story. Those girls were stupid and should

have known better. You try to pass the buck for them. Try to blame someone

else for their own ineptitude and irresponsibility. Just like you, I

suppose. Why is it my job to make sure someone else isn't a stupid fool?

Its not because everyone knows there is nothing I can do about that. I

can't do anything about that, so why then is it my job to make sure the >>

This is the height and ignorance of ignoring a social context that was

responsible for the murder of innocent people because of out-right greed and

the profit motive unregulated. You have some thinking and reading to dol

Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:53:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,

watts_pete@... writes:

<< I am not crying about your sob story. Those girls were stupid

>and should have known better.

Now this is where it stops being funny. This confirms what I already

suspected, that you arent playing with a full deck. Are you the guy

whose response to my advocacy of gun control was " Anyone wants to take

away my guns, let them just try. " ? If so I am very, very glad I dont

have you a neighbour.

So, this is where it stops being funny and is now very offensive, so I

will be ignoring you from now on. >>

Exactly! This is not a person to be taken seriously or to deal with

genuinely intellectually. Ignore. Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:53:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,

watts_pete@... writes:

<< I am not crying about your sob story. Those girls were stupid

>and should have known better.

Now this is where it stops being funny. This confirms what I already

suspected, that you arent playing with a full deck. Are you the guy

whose response to my advocacy of gun control was " Anyone wants to take

away my guns, let them just try. " ? If so I am very, very glad I dont

have you a neighbour.

So, this is where it stops being funny and is now very offensive, so I

will be ignoring you from now on. >>

Exactly! This is not a person to be taken seriously or to deal with

genuinely intellectually. Ignore. Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 7:53:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,

watts_pete@... writes:

<< I am not crying about your sob story. Those girls were stupid

>and should have known better.

Now this is where it stops being funny. This confirms what I already

suspected, that you arent playing with a full deck. Are you the guy

whose response to my advocacy of gun control was " Anyone wants to take

away my guns, let them just try. " ? If so I am very, very glad I dont

have you a neighbour.

So, this is where it stops being funny and is now very offensive, so I

will be ignoring you from now on. >>

Exactly! This is not a person to be taken seriously or to deal with

genuinely intellectually. Ignore. Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:06:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< distinguishable? Why are you playing this game of bullshit now? You are

right (wow that was quite a deduction Petos) there are so many of you, that

the truth is seldom heard and only the communist bullshit of the folks like

you that permeates, the air, the radio waves, TV and print. Your view is

prevailing of course, this is why I complain because communism is

prevailing. In pure democracy there is no other destiny besides pure

communism, and with that destiny only comes war, when those who support

those who steal become fed up and revolt. That will happen, it always does.

Steal from the rich to feed the poor til there are no rich no more... but

the rich see that coming and do something about it, like kill a bunch of

pests, little leeches, the thieves that steal their money. You just don't

get that. People don't like to be robbed. It is not right to be robbed. I

guess if you'd ever had anything you would know that.

>>

IGNORE

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:06:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< distinguishable? Why are you playing this game of bullshit now? You are

right (wow that was quite a deduction Petos) there are so many of you, that

the truth is seldom heard and only the communist bullshit of the folks like

you that permeates, the air, the radio waves, TV and print. Your view is

prevailing of course, this is why I complain because communism is

prevailing. In pure democracy there is no other destiny besides pure

communism, and with that destiny only comes war, when those who support

those who steal become fed up and revolt. That will happen, it always does.

Steal from the rich to feed the poor til there are no rich no more... but

the rich see that coming and do something about it, like kill a bunch of

pests, little leeches, the thieves that steal their money. You just don't

get that. People don't like to be robbed. It is not right to be robbed. I

guess if you'd ever had anything you would know that.

>>

IGNORE

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:06:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< distinguishable? Why are you playing this game of bullshit now? You are

right (wow that was quite a deduction Petos) there are so many of you, that

the truth is seldom heard and only the communist bullshit of the folks like

you that permeates, the air, the radio waves, TV and print. Your view is

prevailing of course, this is why I complain because communism is

prevailing. In pure democracy there is no other destiny besides pure

communism, and with that destiny only comes war, when those who support

those who steal become fed up and revolt. That will happen, it always does.

Steal from the rich to feed the poor til there are no rich no more... but

the rich see that coming and do something about it, like kill a bunch of

pests, little leeches, the thieves that steal their money. You just don't

get that. People don't like to be robbed. It is not right to be robbed. I

guess if you'd ever had anything you would know that.

>>

IGNORE

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:01:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< Look at the 1960s when the rich did a pretty good number on the poor. It

always happens. Its not the decency of Libertarianism you dolt. Its human

nature, only to take so much then strike against. >>

What kind of logical analysis is this?

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:01:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< Look at the 1960s when the rich did a pretty good number on the poor. It

always happens. Its not the decency of Libertarianism you dolt. Its human

nature, only to take so much then strike against. >>

What kind of logical analysis is this?

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:01:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< Look at the 1960s when the rich did a pretty good number on the poor. It

always happens. Its not the decency of Libertarianism you dolt. Its human

nature, only to take so much then strike against. >>

What kind of logical analysis is this?

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:46:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< I like the way you intellectualize it so that no one is

socialist/communist. Not you, not the Nazis, only the Russkies, right?

>>

ignore drivel

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:46:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< I like the way you intellectualize it so that no one is

socialist/communist. Not you, not the Nazis, only the Russkies, right?

>>

ignore drivel

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 8:46:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,

francisca@... writes:

<< I like the way you intellectualize it so that no one is

socialist/communist. Not you, not the Nazis, only the Russkies, right?

>>

ignore drivel

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 10:57:37 PM Pacific Standard Time,

061450@... writes:

<< Ever hear the term " antisocial personality disorder " ?

--eric >>

while I see you as a fellow colleague and i am in spirit

understanding of the use of antisocial personality disorder here (LOL) I do

have problems with that specific diagnostic category being highly

politicized. I might use the terms selfish and short-sighted? Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 10:57:37 PM Pacific Standard Time,

061450@... writes:

<< Ever hear the term " antisocial personality disorder " ?

--eric >>

while I see you as a fellow colleague and i am in spirit

understanding of the use of antisocial personality disorder here (LOL) I do

have problems with that specific diagnostic category being highly

politicized. I might use the terms selfish and short-sighted? Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/2/01 10:57:37 PM Pacific Standard Time,

061450@... writes:

<< Ever hear the term " antisocial personality disorder " ?

--eric >>

while I see you as a fellow colleague and i am in spirit

understanding of the use of antisocial personality disorder here (LOL) I do

have problems with that specific diagnostic category being highly

politicized. I might use the terms selfish and short-sighted? Piper.

[Guest guest]

At 11:57 AM 2/5/01 -0500, you wrote:

>You have some thinking and reading to dol

How arrogant. Do you really believe that anyone who disagrees

with you is uninformed and unthinking?

[Guest guest]

At 11:57 AM 2/5/01 -0500, you wrote:

>You have some thinking and reading to dol

How arrogant. Do you really believe that anyone who disagrees

with you is uninformed and unthinking?

[Guest guest]

At 11:54 AM 2/5/01 -0500, you wrote:

>In a message dated 2/2/01 7:01:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,

>malgeo@... writes:

>

><< he_Fountainhead_ or seen the

> movie, but I have trouble believing Rand published anything

> even vaguely Nazi-like. >>

> , I can only suggest that you do read and see. Piper.

Yes, I'll probably read it someday. However, my general

familiarity with Rand's work tells me how unlikely it is that

she did a complete 180 in that particular novel.

Silly and childish attempts to smear her as a " Nazi " don't

really mean anything. Many people. apparently including

you, just use that term as a general all-purpose insult.

If you honestly believe that the novel is Nazilike, then produce

a quote from it which favors either socialism or white racial

supremacy.

[Guest guest]

At 11:54 AM 2/5/01 -0500, you wrote:

>In a message dated 2/2/01 7:01:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,

>malgeo@... writes:

>

><< he_Fountainhead_ or seen the

> movie, but I have trouble believing Rand published anything

> even vaguely Nazi-like. >>

> , I can only suggest that you do read and see. Piper.

Yes, I'll probably read it someday. However, my general

familiarity with Rand's work tells me how unlikely it is that

she did a complete 180 in that particular novel.

Silly and childish attempts to smear her as a " Nazi " don't

really mean anything. Many people. apparently including

you, just use that term as a general all-purpose insult.

If you honestly believe that the novel is Nazilike, then produce

a quote from it which favors either socialism or white racial

supremacy.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/5/01 2:48:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, dixie@...

writes:

<< Obviously, this person knows absolutely nothing of history. though he raves

against communism, he does not know the difference between communism and

socialism, and does not realize that some of the world's most democratic

governments are also its most socialistic. Communism is not the opposite of

democracy. It appears this person slept through history and government in

high school and didn't go to college altogether.

Dixie, w ho has a double major in government and history, University of >>

Yes and I have learned from your commentary Dixie. Piper.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/5/01 2:48:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, dixie@...

writes:

<< Obviously, this person knows absolutely nothing of history. though he raves

against communism, he does not know the difference between communism and

socialism, and does not realize that some of the world's most democratic

governments are also its most socialistic. Communism is not the opposite of

democracy. It appears this person slept through history and government in

high school and didn't go to college altogether.

Dixie, w ho has a double major in government and history, University of >>

Yes and I have learned from your commentary Dixie. Piper.